R779 million spent on private security for state-owned properties over last five years
Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers
Taxpayers have paid R779 million over the past five years to provide private security at state-owned properties across the country.
This was disclosed by Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson when he was responding to parliamentary questions posed by DA MP Edwin Bath.
Macpherson said the expenditure on private security contracts was R140.9m in 2020/21, R124.6m the following year, R144.8m in 2022/23, R161.7m two years ago, and R199.9 in 2024/25.
He also said the department has a total of 318 properties that are currently protected by private security companies.
'This is a constantly changing number due to properties that get vacated by tenants and thus require security services to prevent and respond to threats of illegal occupation. This number includes occupied and unoccupied properties located in various regions.'
Macpherson further said there was a total of 248 security contracts in place.
The top 10 costly private security contracts signed by the department are worth R81m and cover periods ranging from 24 to 36 months.
He said none of the listed contracts exceeded the original contract value.
'The department works hard to ensure that security contracts remain within the awarded value.'
Macpherson also said the anticipated implications on the continued protection of state-owned properties currently secured through private security contracts remain uncertain, as the proposed regulations by the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority are yet to be finalised.
'Once these regulations are finalised, the department will align its procurement documentation for private security contracts to ensure compliance with the amended regulatory framework,' he said.
Macpherson said the department has a total of 10,458 unutilised state-owned properties.
'This does not mean that each one can house a government organisation. They could be derelict, condemned, or unfit for human habitation.'
He was responding to ATM leader Vuyo Zungula, who asked the reason for the justification for the government's use of private properties.
Macpherson said the default position was to provide state-owned accommodation, but his department found itself relying more on private-leased accommodation because state-owned assets were not conducive to occupation.
The department has spent R5.5 billion on private leases and R2.8 billion on maintenance during the 2024/25 financial year.
He said the department has adopted asset optimisation strategies that sought to prioritise the development, refurbishment, and repurposing of state-owned properties to reduce the size of private leased properties.
'The minister has tightened controls on how and when leases are required as well as taking action against officials who collude to award leases that are needed,' said Macpherson, adding that he has referred the top 10 leases by value to the Special Investigating Unit for investigation to understand whether they were awarded correctly and if there was value for money.
Asked by EF MP Blose Mazwikayise about unoccupied state properties, Macpherson said there were currently 1,743 that remained unoccupied and considered by his department as being under-utilised.
'Properties have been identified by the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI) and submitted to the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) for analysis, including evaluation to determine suitability for student accommodation as per geographical needs and budget availability.
'This information is being awaited from DHET. On receipt of the above, DPWI will determine the most appropriate implementation model aligned to its asset optimisation strategy to support student accommodation requirements,' he said.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The implications of General Maphwanya's Iran visit on South Africa's foreign policy
An international relations expert warns that the SA National Defence Force chief General Rudzani Maphwanya's recent visit to Iran could deepen tensions between South Africa and the US. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief General Rudzani Maphwanya's recent visit to Iran, where he reportedly pledged military and political support for the country, could deepen tensions between South Africa and the US. This according to international relations expert, Dr Noluthando Phungula, who said South Africa's ties with Iran have been a bone of contention with the US. Maphwanya, who travelled to Iran on Tuesday, held meetings with several high-ranking military officials, including Major General Aziz Nasizadeh, Iran's defence minister, Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, the chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, and General Amir Hatami, the Iranian commander. The trip was aimed at strengthening military cooperation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ According to Iranian newspaper Tehran Times, Maphwanya said that the two countries had common goals, and always stood alongside the oppressed and defenceless people of the world. He also took aim at Israel over the continued war in Gaza as he reiterated support for the Palestinian people and told officials his visit "carries a political message" from Ramaphosa's administration. The meeting in Iran came amid tensions between South Africa and the US after months of worsening diplomatic relations between the two countries. This situation is further complicated by the US having implemented a 30% tariff on South African goods, citing concerns about unfair trade practices. In June, tensions escalated between the US and Iran after the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at Israel's request. Both ministries of International Relations and Cooperation and of Defence have since dissociated the government from Maphwanya's remarks. 'The South African government has distanced itself from the General's comments citing no knowledge of the visit yet he would have required ministerial approval. While the visit may have been mainly on military relations, it however extends to foreign policy. "This speaks to loopholes in SA's international relations and protocol particularly from senior personnel such as the General,'' said Phungula, adding that the timing of this visit and the utterances made set back efforts to mend relations with the US, particularly since there is much misinformation on the side of the US. The sentiments were echoed by Solidarity, which called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to dismiss Maphwanya, warning that the visit places South Africa's relationship with the US at serious risk and threatens the country's broader international credibility and trade interests. 'It is unacceptable that South Africa, at a time when our economy urgently needs access to international markets, chooses to strengthen ties with countries such as Iran, which is internationally isolated due to its policies and actions,' said Jaco Kleynhans, head of international liaison. The DA demanded the immediate court-martial of Maphwanya for misconduct and breach of the defence force Code of Conduct, said this 'forms part of a wider pattern of foreign policy adventurism that is economically destructive, diplomatically reckless, and dangerously misaligned with South Africa's national interest'. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa said he was not aware of Maphwanya's visit to Iran, adding that he would meet him soon to discuss the trip and the consequences for the General. However, the South African Communist Party (SACP) have slammed those opposing Maphwanya's visit, saying it was part of South Africa's long-standing bilateral relations with Iran. 'The SACP rejects the impending acts of isolation and scapegoating of General Maphwanya to appease Western imperialist forces and their domestic agents, compromising South Africa's sovereign right to formulate and implement its own foreign policy, including on defence co-operation. "Any actions by the government towards General Maphwanya as Military Chief must be based on strengthening our military institutions and their capabilities, improving our defence co-operation agreements with other states to which we have full sovereign rights. 'The SACP rejects any attempt at dictating which nations South Africa may have bilateral relations with, including defence, trade and investment,' the party said in a statement.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town's budget battle: Mayor defends fixed charges amid legal challenges
An aerial view of Cape Town's Atlantic seaboard, including Green Point, Green Point stadium, Mouille Point and Table Mountain. Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers The City of Cape Town has defended its amended Hope Budget for 2025/26, after the South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) took legal action over the City's decision to link certain fixed charges to property values. The City's budget has faced considerable criticism over its fixed charges and SAPOA will now be challenging this in court. In their court papers, SAPOA CEO Nilesh 'Neil' Gopal said they are seeking to challenge three items in the Budget, namely the Cleaning Tariff, the Fixed Water Charge, and the Fixed Sanitation Charge. They are hoping to have the budget declared unconstitutional and invalid. SAPOA's membership currently comprises more than 90% of the country's commercial and retail property industry, including some of the largest property-owning companies in South Africa. The City of Cape Town filed its answering affidavit where Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis explained that 'in substance this application questions the role of the City in the determination of a budget at all and whether the City, or any other municipality, can indeed forge ahead on any new or innovative path to ensure not only better service delivery for all now, but also in the future'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He added that City understands the concerns raised about the Budget in the proceedings and in the engagements. He said the City is aware of the relentless increases residents face in administered costs, electricity costs, municipal bills, food, fuel and household necessities, but that this has been 'taken into account by the City at each step of the budget process'. The mayor explained that they received 15,210 comments through both the March and May public participation processes related to the tariffs. 'Residents and organisations opposed the overall increases in rates and tariffs. This is not unusual. Residents from affluent areas and organisations representing property developers argued that the increases were inequitable and amounted to excessive cross-subsidisation of subsidised services.' Hill-Lewis, in his affidavit, said that the City did not lightly decide to impose the three fixed tariffs which are the centre of SAPOA's litigation. 'Neither does the City have ready alternatives simply there for the plucking, to replace the budgetary shortfall that will ensue should they be set aside. This shortfall will be an amount of R4,233,768,467 if all three fixed tariffs are set aside. 'The 'best case scenario' is a shortfall of R1,912,533,115, if fixed tariffs based on property value bands only are set aside. In other words, the non-domestic customers' contribution remains in force, as it is not challenged, the tariffs were decided and calibrated consequently on this intensive process,' he said. The mayor said that the argument goes that, 'because they are linked to property values, the three fixed tariffs constitute rates,' but he highlighted that the tariffs are neither taxes nor rates. Cape Town Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis. Image: File He also explained that property value bands differ from the 'cent amount in the Rand' (being the basis of calculating property rates) as contemplated in the Rates Act. 'Property value bands are not applied or utilised under the Rates Act. The only commonality is that the Municipal Valuation Rolls used by both: (1) for property rates, the Rate-in-Rand (RiR) is applied to the municipal property valuation to compute the property rates payable; whereas (2) the property value band into which a particular property falls is determined by reference to its municipal property valuation. 'This Valuation Roll, however, exists as an independent data source; its use is not solely confined or limited to the determination of property rates in terms of the Rates Act. 'In fact, for example, whenever existing rebates etc. are to be determined or calculated, regard is had to the Valuation Roll to do this. Accordingly, the use thereof for any purpose outside of the Rates Act is not novel, unique or unlawful,' he said. He said that Cape Town's fixed charge serves as a deliberate and rational design intended to secure the revenue necessary to maintain and upgrade infrastructure, improve resilience and ensure reliable service delivery in the face of increasing climate-related uncertainty. 'The City decided that the fixed tariffs, as implemented, were the only rational decision. The only other alternative is to charge the same fixed tariff on everyone regardless of income levels. 'It is the City's view that lower-income and wealthy households should not be making equal contributions to infrastructure and fixed service costs. It is neither fair nor sustainable and, as I have publicly stated, the Budget is asking a little more from those who can afford it to protect essential services, than from those who can't.' The matter is expected to be heard in the Western Cape High Court in September.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
US demands spark growing discontent amid tariff negotiations
The US has reportedly set conditions to restore relations. Ministers belonging to the two largest parties, ANC and DA, in the government of national unity (GNU) are said to be growing frustrated as the United States (US) continue to make more demands during ongoing tariff negotiations. South Africa is in talks with Washington in the hope of securing a deal that would see the steep tariff rate imposed by the US reduced. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump's administration introduced a 30% tariff on all South African exports. ALSO READ: US tariffs: Here's why talks over trade deal have been 'complex' Although Trump had initially delayed implementation for 90 days in April to allow for negotiations, the tariffs officially came into effect last week. The trade standoff comes amid broader tensions between the two countries. These include South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), policies such as broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) and the Expropriation Act, as well as claims of the persecution of Afrikaners. US makes further demands to SA amid tariff talks In June, Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) leader Corne Mulder travelled to the US and later returned claiming that the White House officials his party engaged with had set conditions to restore relations. The conditions allegedly set out by US officials included exempting US companies from B-BBEE, allowing land expropriation with compensation, a public condemnation of the 'Kill the Boer' chant and treating farm murders as a priority crime. According to City Press, the US has further requested that South Africa grant visas to 30 Kenyans linked to Resettlement Support Centre Africa (RSC Africa), an organisation that has worked with the North American giant for over two decades to assist prospective refugees. READ MORE: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking' These individuals would reportedly help facilitate the resettlement of Afrikaners. This latest demand has added to South Africa's frustration, with government reportedly expressing its dissatisfaction informally. Ramaphosa's administration is also displeased with delays in receiving responses to its trade proposals. However, the government has reportedly remained firm in its refusal to get rid of any of its policies. New trade proposal South Africa recently submitted a revised offer to Washington aimed at reducing the 30% tariff. The proposal builds on one put forward in May and specifically addresses issues raised by the US in the 2025 national trade estimates report. Deputy President Paul Mashatile also announced that another delegation will soon be sent to the US to push for better terms. Earlier efforts included a high-profile May visit to the White House led by President Cyril Ramaphosa and joined by Cabinet ministers, Cosatu President Zingiswa Losi, businessman Johann Rupert, and professional golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. Ramaphosa also recently held a phone call with Trump in an attempt to ease tensions. In addition, government has introduced support programmes will help offset the 30% tariff. Thirty-five of South African exports will remain exempt. These include products like copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy-related products. NOW READ: Business confidence increases, but will come under pressure from US tariff
