logo
Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky sentenced to 12 years in multi-billion-dollar crypto fraud case

Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky sentenced to 12 years in multi-billion-dollar crypto fraud case

CNBC08-05-2025
Alexander Mashinsky, the former CEO of Celsius Network, was sentenced to 12 years in prison on Thursday after pleading guilty to two counts of fraud, a dramatic fall for the onetime leader of a company once hailed as the "bank" of the crypto industry.
Standing before U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl in Manhattan's Southern District, Mashinsky faced the consequences of what prosecutors described as a sweeping scheme to defraud investors.
In December he pleaded guilty to commodities fraud and a scheme to manipulate the Celsius token.
His sentencing took place in courtroom 14A at 500 Pearl Street — a venue that has seen several crypto executives-turned-felons.
Mashinsky's legal troubles began in 2023 when he was arrested on charges of securities, commodities, and wire fraud, just as Celsius reached a $4.7 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission — one of the largest in the FTC's history.
The settlement, which remains contingent on Celsius returning what remains of customer assets in bankruptcy proceedings, underscored the magnitude of the fraud.
Prosecutors accused Mashinsky of misleading investors about the safety and profitability of Celsius's yield-generating platform while secretly selling off tens of millions of dollars in personal holdings.
Though he initially denied wrongdoing, his guilty plea and Thursday's sentencing mark the final chapter in a years-long case that also drew charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which accused Celsius and Mashinsky of orchestrating a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme.
Mashinsky's downfall mirrors the fate of other once-dominant crypto executives like FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, Binance's Changpeng Zhao and Do Kwon of Terraform Labs.
Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024 for the massive fraud and conspiracy that doomed his cryptocurrency exchange and a related hedge fund, Alameda Research.
Once celebrated as a crypto wunderkind, Bankman-Fried was exposed for misappropriating billions of dollars in customer funds to support his own trading firm, Alameda Research, and for living an extravagant lifestyle in Hong Kong and later the Bahamas.
Caroline Ellison, who led Alameda Research and was romantically involved with Bankman-Fried, received a significantly lighter sentence of two years. Her cooperation with prosecutors proved crucial in unraveling the complex web of fraudulent activities at FTX, allowing authorities to build a strong case against Bankman-Fried and other executives.
Bankman-Fried is in the process of appealing his conviction and sentence.
Ryan Salame, a former top lieutenant of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, was sentenced to 90 months, followed by three years of supervised release.
FTX engineering chief Nishad Singh got no jail time and three years of supervised release for his role in the crypto fraud; and Gary Wang, the co-founder and chief technology officer of FTX, also avoided prison time.
In May 2024, the bankruptcy estate of FTX announced that almost all customers would get their money back — and more.
A judge on Wednesday dismissed most of the claims against celebrities and athletes who were involved in promoting FTX in commercials and on other platforms.
Stars like Tom Brady, Gisele Bündchen, Kevin O'Leary and Stephen Curry were among those facing a suit brought by a group of FTX investors.
In November 2023, Zhao, commonly known as "CZ," struck a deal with the U.S. government to resolve a multiyear investigation into Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.
Zhao stepped down as CEO in 2023 but retained a significant stake in Binance.
In April 2024, Binance's billionaire founder was sentenced to four months in prison after pleading guilty to charges of enabling money laundering at his crypto exchange. He served his sentence at a low-security federal prison in Lompoc, California.
Under new leadership, Binance has undergone a strategic pivot, aligning closely with the Trump administration's pro-crypto stance. CEO Richard Teng described President Donald Trump's second term as a "fantastic reset" for the cryptocurrency industry, noting a dramatically improved regulatory environment for Binance in the U.S.
Months before Bankman-Fried and the FTX fraud was exposed, and years before Binance and its founder would admit fault and settle with the U.S. for several billion dollars, Kwon was widely regarded as crypto's top villain for nearly dismantling the entire sector with his failed U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin.
It was May 2022, and Kwon was riding high. His company, Terraform Labs, was behind one of the most popular U.S.-pegged stablecoins on the planet, the venture funding was rolling in, his coins (dubbed terra and luna) were collectively worth tens of billions of dollars, and like Bankman-Fried, Kwon had landed a spot on the prestigious Forbes 30 under 30 list.
And then it all came crashing down.
Whereas most stablecoins are backed up by a mix of cash and other assets to match the value of tokens in circulation, Kwon's invention was instead backed by a complex set of code. When the algorithm failed in May 2022, it cost investors $40 billion in market value overnight, led to devastating losses to multiple investors, and contributed to the collapse of hedge fund Three Arrows Capital in June 2022, followed by crypto lenders Voyager Digital, then BlockFi, then Genesis — and, in a roundabout way, FTX too.
The stablecoin's implosion also rocked confidence in the sector and accelerated the slide in cryptocurrencies already underway as part of a broader pullback from risk.
Last June, a judge signed off on Do Kwon and his bankrupt Terraform Labs settling with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for $4.5 billion.
Kwon was extradited to the U.S. from Montenegro to face fraud charges in January 2025.
The fall of crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, and lenders Voyager Digital and Celsius, can all be traced to the collapse of Kwon's stablecoin project.
When 3AC's lenders asked for some of their cash back in a flood of margin calls, the money wasn't there. Many of the firm's counterparties were, in turn, unable to meet demands from their investors, including retail holders who had been promised annual returns of 20%.
The three companies all went bankrupt and are currently at various stages of settling their debts, with Celsius having just emerged from bankruptcy in January.
3AC co-founder Kyle Davies said he's not sorry for the collapse of his fund, and has so far managed to avoid jail time by bouncing around the world, unlike his co-founder, Su Zhu, who served time in a Singaporean prison.
This self-driving car technology stock could pop by more than 400%, say three analysts
Looking for alternatives to Nvidia? Futurum CEO names 3 he's bullish on for 2024
Bernstein tech analyst's best idea for 2024 is to short Tesla
Morgan Stanley picks 'alpha' opportunities in China tech - giving one 52% upside
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why insurers worry the world could soon become uninsurable
Why insurers worry the world could soon become uninsurable

CNBC

time5 days ago

  • CNBC

Why insurers worry the world could soon become uninsurable

Top insurers fear the climate crisis could soon outpace industry solutions, effectively threatening to make entire regions around the world uninsurable. Günther Thallinger, a board member at Allianz, one of the world's biggest insurers, recently outlined how the world is fast approaching temperature levels where insurers will no longer be able to offer cover for financial services, such as mortgages and investments. In a LinkedIn post published in late March, Thallinger made the case for rapid decarbonization, pointing out that entire asset classes were "degrading in real time" as extreme weather events take their toll. Perhaps most strikingly of all, he warned the worsening climate crisis appears to be on track to destroy capitalism. Insurance, which is regarded as the invisible lubricant of the global economy, has a unique role to play in addressing climate-related risks. As professional risk managers, insurers routinely allow investors to take on calculated risks, protecting individuals and businesses against financial losses. Thallinger, who is responsible for investment management and sustainability at Allianz, told CNBC that approximately two-thirds of economic losses from natural catastrophes are currently uninsured, indicating a "major societal problem." The so-called protection gap means that the financial burden of these disasters often falls on individuals, businesses and governments, rather than insurance firms. "If this volume just grows even more, we simply have a societal situation that is not bearable anymore because it is just too much risk that is no longer covered," Thallinger told CNBC by video call. "The logic is not ours or mine. No, absolutely not. There are many people who are actually talking about how you cannot insure certain assets. It's very, very difficult to deal with these assets as an investor." The warning comes at a time when the world is on course for a temperature increase of as much as 2.6-3.1 degrees Celsius this century, according to the United Nations, a level that would trigger "catastrophic" consequences for the planet. Scientists have repeatedly warned that global average temperatures must be kept below 1.5 degrees Celsius to avoid the worst of what the climate crisis has in store. This threshold is recognized as a crucial long-term target because so-called tipping points become more likely beyond this level. Tipping points can lead to dramatic shifts or potentially irreversible changes to some of Earth's largest systems. "We can really talk about adaptation. How to build our infrastructure, our houses, our streets, our pipelines, our grids in such a way that they can withstand certain forms of weather phenomena. This is something that we can do with a very, very easy economic case behind it," Thallinger said. Allianz estimates that the cost of economic losses from natural catastrophes is typically around 10 times higher than the cost of adaptation, noting that this provides a clear economic incentive for policymakers to invest in preventative measures. "If we continue, however, with the policies that we have out there, we are clearly on a pathway now of 2.7 degrees or 3 degrees where adaptation is simply not doable anymore. This is just what it is. We cannot protect Amsterdam from sea level rise of three meters. This is just not doable," Thallinger said. It's not just Allianz's Thallinger fearing the worst. Zurich Insurance Group, Europe's fifth-largest insurer, said in April alongside a research paper assessing climate resilience that the outlook looks "alarmingly bleak." The Swiss insurer cited the Los Angeles wildfires at the start of the year as a stark reminder that even the world's wealthiest economies are unprepared for the impact of increasing climate risks. Zurich also found that global insured losses have grown at a much faster rate than the global economy over the past three decades. On an inflation-adjusted basis, Zurich said that average insured losses rose by 5.9% per year between 1994 and 2023, while global gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 2.7% annually over the same period. The findings suggest that insured losses have more than doubled relative to global growth over the past 30 years. "If insured losses continue to grow at this rate, premiums for climate risk coverage will need to increase to reflect the additional risk," Zurich Insurance Group said in the paper. "This in turn, will affect the level of protection that individuals and businesses are willing and able to purchase, with potential consequences for the overall functioning of the market." For insurers and reinsurers, the increase in severity and frequency of extreme weather events has coincided with astronomical growth in the catastrophe bond market. First created in the 1990s, so-called CAT bonds refer to a type of financial instrument designed to raise money for insurers in the event of a natural disaster, such as a hurricane or earthquake. Swiss Re, a leading global reinsurer, said in a recent report that the CAT bond market has expanded by a whopping 75% since the end of 2020, noting that the trend that shows little sign of slowing down. For Allianz's Thallinger, however, the climate crisis threatens to push a long-standing relationship between more risk and more business for insurers to breaking point. At some stage, this could have implications for financial markets, he said. Steve Evans, owner and editor-in-chief at specialist data provider warned the insurance industry won't just keep bearing the brunt of economic losses from natural disasters. "Unless resilience is increased and protection is put in place, then the more disasters impact regions and the more expensive their insurance is going to get. And that could be a terrible spiral to be honest with you," Evans told CNBC by video call. "If the losses keep escalating, it just becomes uneconomic for insurers and reinsurers and even the capital markets. So, something has to be done to really bring together both resilience and protection." Not everyone is convinced the insurance industry will struggle to function amid rising global average temperatures. "Will the world become uninsurable? Well, I'm a bit hesitant on that," said Tobias Grimm, chief climate scientist at German reinsurance giant Munich Re. "It's all about the question of price. We have appetite still to offer — not cut — insurance given that there are healthy market conditions, and we get risk adequate premium on that." Grimm told CNBC that since Munich Re's business offers reinsurance on a one-year basis, rather than a multi-year basis, the question of insurability is not typically something that comes up. "The underlying problem is that we still develop properties in high-risk areas, and we have seen with the example of Californian wildfires where many of these rich villas in the outskirts of the Los Angeles suburbs were hit first," Grimm said. "So, that's the issue. We can counter them by encouraging loss prevention and thinking about land use management schemes, these kinds of things," he added.

Binance teams up with BBVA to let customers keep assets off exchange, FT reports
Binance teams up with BBVA to let customers keep assets off exchange, FT reports

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Binance teams up with BBVA to let customers keep assets off exchange, FT reports

(Reuters) -Binance is working with Spanish bank BBVA to allow customers to hold their assets off the crypto exchange, Financial Times reported on Friday. The Spanish bank is working as one of only a small number of independent custodians for the world's biggest crypto exchange, the report added, citing two people familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. BBVA did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comment while Binance could not immediately be reached. The move comes as Binance faces heightened regulatory scrutiny worldwide and as crypto exchanges seek to reassure investors about fund safety in the wake of FTX's 2022 collapse. Last February, U.S. authorities fined Binance more than $4.3 billion penalty for violating federal anti-money laundering and sanctions laws through lapses in internal controls at the company, while its founder and chief executive Changpeng Zhao was sentenced to four months in prison.

Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao Files Motion to Dismiss $1.8B FTX Lawsuit
Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao Files Motion to Dismiss $1.8B FTX Lawsuit

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao Files Motion to Dismiss $1.8B FTX Lawsuit

The founder and former CEO of crypto exchange Binance, Changpeng Zhao, has filed a motion to dismiss a $1.76 billion lawsuit brought against him, Binance and other Binance executives by the FTX bankruptcy estate. Zhao's lawyers argue that U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over him in the case and that he was improperly served. The motion, submitted Monday to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, contends that the legal complaint fails on multiple technical fronts. Zhao, who lists his residence as the United Arab Emirates, claims the lawsuit violated procedural norms when serving him as a non-U.S. national. The filing also asserts that Delaware courts have no personal jurisdiction over him because he has no meaningful ties to the state. "Mr. Zhao is not amenable to suit in this forum, and the statutes Plaintiffs seek to enforce do not reach the extraterritorial transactions described in the Complaint," the filing stated. "The claims are in any event legally unfounded, and many are outright incoherent. Mr. Zhao joins the motions to dismiss filed by the other Defendants," it added, referring to two similar dismissal attempts filed by other Binance executives in July. The FTX lawsuit Zhao is attempting to fend off a lawsuit originally filed in November 2024 by FTX Digital Markets Ltd. and the FTX Trading estate. The suit seeks to claw back $1.76 billion worth of crypto assets that were transferred to Binance in July 2021 as part of an equity repurchase deal. That deal involved FTX buying back a 20% stake Binance held in the exchange. The relationship between the two began in 2019, back when Binance was one of FTX's earliest backers, but later turned sour. FTX Sues Binance for $1.76 Billion, Accuses CZ of 'Reckless Disregard' for Its Customers According to the suit, Sam Bankman-Fried orchestrated the buyback using a mix of FTX-issued FTT tokens and Binance-branded assets like BUSD, later identified as funds that were allegedly misappropriated from customer deposits. The FTX estate, now managed by a restructuring team, argued the transfer was fraudulent and is seeking to recover the assets to help repay the creditors burned by FTX's 2022 implosion. In the filing, Zhao's legal team also argues that he never directly received the funds in question. 'Plaintiffs in fact show that Mr. Zhao was not a transferee,' the motion stated. 'They allege he was merely a nominal counterparty in the transfer of BUSD from Alameda LTD to Binance.' The document insisted Zhao was just a 'nominal signatory' and not the actual recipient of the assets. FTX and Binance The lawsuit goes beyond the repurchase itself, accusing Zhao of playing a broader role in destabilizing FTX. In particular, it points to a November 2022 tweet from Zhao that triggered a cascade of customer withdrawals from FTX and a run that contributed to the exchange's collapse. Caroline Ellison, former CEO of FTX-affiliated Alameda Research, testified during the Bankman-Fried trial that Alameda had to borrow over $1 billion in customer funds to pay for the Binance buyback. Prosecutors argued FTX and Alameda were likely insolvent even before the repurchase occurred. Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024 for fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. Zhao himself also served a four-month sentence in the U.S. last year after pleading guilty to violating anti-money laundering rules as part of a broader $4.3 billion settlement between Binance and U.S. regulators. He stepped down as Binance CEO as part of that deal. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store