Junta-led Mali begins construction of gold refinery in partnership with Russia
Mali is constructing a new gold refinery supported by Russian investment to enhance control over its natural resources.
The refinery will be majority owned by the Malian government with a 38% stake held by Russian firm Yadran.
This initiative aligns with regional efforts to mandate domestic processing of gold for economic benefits.
Mali has begun building a new gold refinery backed by Russia, a move its military-led government says will help the country gain greater control over its natural resources.
The newly formed refinery will be 62% owned by the Malian government, with Russian firm Yadran holding the remaining 38% stake.
Speaking at the groundbreaking ceremony, interim President Colonel Assimi Goïta said the facility is part of broader efforts to require all mining companies to refine gold domestically under a revised mining code, though no timeline has been set for enforcement, according to Reuters.
The refinery marks a shift across the Sahel region, where countries like Guinea, Niger, and Burkina Faso have also updated mining laws to mandate local processing, aiming to add value to exports and retain more revenue.
Upgrade to global standard
Since 1980, Mali's gold has been exported unprocessed to countries like the UAE, South Africa, and Switzerland, costing the country valuable income that could support economic development, according to Goïta.
Despite the country's status as Africa's second-largest gold producer, it lacks an internationally certified refinery. The country's two existing facilities have been unable to meet the standards required by global bodies like the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), forcing miners to refine their gold abroad.
The new refinery will produce gold with a purity of 99.5%, adhering to international certification standards.
Constructed on a five-hectare site near Bamako's international airport, the refinery will have the capacity to process up to 200 metric tons of gold annually, a significant leap from Mali's current processing capacity of about 50 tons.
The refinery is part of Goïta's broader mining reforms since coming to power in 2021 and distancing Mali from Western allies.
Goïta added that the refinery will improve gold traceability and help curb the billions lost to smuggling, a challenge many African nations face in the absence of certified refineries and tracking systems.
Since seizing power in 2020, Mali's military government has vowed to overhaul the mining sector to ensure the state captures a larger share of gold revenues. These reforms are projected to boost annual government income by about $950 million, representing nearly 20% of the national budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
24 minutes ago
- UPI
India responds to U.S. penalty over Russia oil
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Indian officials confirmed Saturday the country is not altering policy and will continue buying oil from Russia, despite threats of a financial "penalty" from U.S. President Donald Trump. India's government has not given any directive to the country's oil refiners to stop or reduce the amount of Russian crude oil, the New York Times reported, citing two senior Indian officials. Trump earlier this week said he would impose a financial "penalty" on the South Asian country if it did not cut back on its reliance on Russian oil. The sanction would be in addition to a 25% American tariff on Indian goods. The president did not elaborate on the extent of the additional financial "penalty." "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country, " Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." Trump on Friday said it was his understanding "that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens." Indian officials told the New York Times the country has "not given any direction to oil companies" to change direction. Publicly, Indian officials said they are considering options without confirming or denying the Times report. "We have taken note of the sanctions, and we are looking into it," Ministry of External Affairs of India spokesman Shri Randhir Jaiswal said during a news conference Friday in New Delhi. "On the other question about proposed oil sale, I would say that I have no comments to offer in this particular matter. As far as sourcing our energy requirements is concerned, you are well aware of our broad approach, meaning our overall approach and stance. We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics." Jaiswal also attempted to avoid further escalating the situation. "I would also like to underline this particular point that this is a sensitive and complex case and therefore, I would urge all to be mindful that media reports based on speculation and misinformation are not helpful at all," he told reporters. "In so far as the reports claiming that there has been certain developments etc., such reports are incorrect. Please wait for an update from us, this is a sensitive matter, and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation."
CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
How this week's avalanche of news from Washington to Wall Street kept investors guessing
It was a dizzying week on Wall Street. The S & P 500 closed this past Monday at a record high and then went on a four-session losing streak. Friday was particularly unsettling as terrible jobs data slammed the market and triggered President Donald Trump . Trump started the day by slamming Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates on Wednesday. He accused the Fed of cutting rates at the end of last year to help elect Kamala Harris. Later in the day , the president used similar reasoning when firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which puts out the employment report. Trump accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, a Biden appointee, of negatively manipulating the numbers during his presidency and inflating them before Election Day to help Harris. Also on Friday afternoon, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler resigned . The Biden appointee didn't give a reason. As if all that were not enough, just before his self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline, Trump set new "reciprocal" tariff rates to go into effect on Aug. 7. The president also on Friday ordered two nuclear submarines "to be positioned in the appropriate regions" after a warning to the U.S. from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. On Monday, Medvedev said that "each new ultimatum" about the Ukraine conflict is a "threat and a step towards war" between Russia and the U.S. .SPX .IXIC 5D mountain S & P 500 and Nasdaq performance this week It was no wonder the S & P 500 lost more than 1.5% on Friday, in a session even further pressured by a drop in tech stocks following Amazon 's post-earnings stock decline of more than 8%. For the week, the broad market index lost nearly 1%, ending a two-week win streak. The tech-heavy Nasdaq was the big loser Friday, dropping more than 2.2% on the session and more than 2% for the week. It, too, snapped two straight weekly gains. As bad as the calendar page turn to August was on Friday, the S & P 500 and the Nasdaq wrapped July on Thursday with gains of 2.2% and 3.7%, respectively. The S & P 500 completed a three-month winning streak, while the Nasdaq extended its monthly run to four straight. It was certainly a busy week, jam-packed with macroeconomic updates, trade negotiations, a Fed rate decision — and, of course, an earnings onslaught, with four of the Magnificent Seven reporting. Trump trade The week started out with the U.S. on Sunday striking a trade deal with the European Union. South Korea slipped in under the wire before the president's Friday deadline. Both trade partners are now subject to a 15% tariff on exports to the U.S., down from the respective 30% and 25% rates in place prior to the agreements. The deal with the EU will also see the trading bloc purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy, while investing an additional $600 billion into the U.S. The deal with South Korea included an agreement for $350 billion in U.S. investments. Negotiations with China remain ongoing, with the tariff deadline being pushed to Aug. 12. Mexico was granted a 90-day extension of current 25% rates following a discussion with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Canada, however, was slapped with a 35% tariff rate . As for the trade partners that have yet to strike a deal, new rates were announced last Thursday evening and are set to take effect this coming Thursday. Weak jobs Just hours after the new tariff rates were announced, the Friday jobs report was released. The July nonfarm payroll growth of 73,000 positions fell way short of the 100,000 additions economists had expected. Worse yet, the June and May readings were both revised significantly lower for a combined 258,000 less jobs than originally reported for those two months. All of that, besides setting Trump off, put a September rate cut back on the table, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The market odds of a cut flipped from about 38% on Thursday to nearly 83% on Friday. Shortly after the weak jobs report, Jim Cramer said that while he has been a big backer of Powell, this number says: "You didn't need to wait" to cut rates. Warmer inflation The day after the Fed held rates steady, the central bank's preferred measure of inflation — the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index — was released Thursday morning. Both the headline PCE reading, as well as the core rate excluding food and energy prices, came in one-tenth hotter than expected on a year over year basis, seemingly supportive of the Fed's decision to leave rates unchanged. However, the negative jobs data clouds the picture a bit and will force the Fed to weigh the importance of both parts of its dual mandate — maintaining price stability, around their target 2% inflation rate, and fostering maximum employment. The former currently requires more restrictive or higher rates, given that inflation remains above target, while the latter points to less restrictive or lower rates, because central bankers don't want to see any material increases in joblessness. Economic growth Part of the rationale for holding rates steady came from a strong advance second quarter reading on the economy, which was released Wednesday morning just hours before the Fed's July meeting wrapped up. The seasonally adjusted annual GDP growth rate of 3% was much better than the 2.3% advance that was expected. While the economy managed to chug along during the April to June period, despite all the fear and uncertainty caused by trade disputes, it's already August. The GDP is a backwards looking data set. That's why more weight is put on the monthly updates noted above, relating to inflation and the labor market — and of course, the most real-time source of data we can get, earnings. Club earnings So, with that, let's take a look at how earnings went this week for the Club. We heard from Starbucks on Tuesday evening, Meta Platforms and Microsoft on Wednesday evening, Bristol Myers Squibb on Thursday morning, Amazon and Apple on Thursday evening, and Linde on Friday morning. Starbucks : Though the coffee giant reported mixed quarterly results, we heard enough positives to confirm that CEO Brian Niccol's turnaround remains firmly on track. Meta Platforms : The social media powerhouse delivered an absolute blow out quarter, with the only thing better than the results being the guidance. Bristol Myers : The drugmaker delivered a solid quarterly beat and outlook raise. However, with the Cobenfy narrative — at the core of our investment thesis— going from being pretty straightforward to a show-me story, investors aren't giving the company the benefit of the doubt. We trimmed our price target following the release. There are also the added questions marks around Trump push this week for lower prescription prices from Bristol and 16 other major drugmakers, including Club name Eli Lilly, which reports earnings next week. The threat of sector-specific pharma tariffs remains in play. Amazon : Overall the tech giant reported a solid quarter. However, shares sold off as investors took issue with Amazon Web Services (AWS) failing to deliver the same type of cloud revenue upside as rivals Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. Operating income guidance for the current quarter was also a bit lower than expected, though that has historically proven conservative. Ultimately, we think the concerns are overblown and think the pullback represents a buying opportunity . Apple : The iPhone maker reported a very respectable quarter. However, when taking into account the price action of the stock this year alongside the reaction to the results, it's clear that investors are not ready to give management much credit until they deliver more clarity about the company's AI strategy. It was encouraging to hear CEO Tim Cook say he's open to M & A to help with that. Linde : The industrial gas stalwart delivered solid quarterly results in a difficult operating environment, demonstrating the company's resiliency no matter the backdrop. Moreover, management raised the low end of its full-year earnings guidance, despite noting that the high end of the range already assumes an economic contraction. It's another important week of corporate earnings ahead, with about a quarter of S & P 500 companies set to report. Six companies in the Club portfolio are on the docket: Coterra Energy , DuPont , Eaton , Disney , Eli Lilly , and Texas Roadhouse . Week in trades It was also a busy week of trades for the portfolio. Kicking off the week, we added to our positions in Cisco Systems and Honeywell . That was followed up by a small trim of Eaton as the stock hit new high. On Tuesday, we locked in a nice profit on Eli Lilly following disappointing news from Novo Nordisk , its main competitor in the GLP-1 market. We also trimmed our position in Wells Fargo as shares finally recovered from their post-earnings decline. On Wednesday, we added to our position in Dover and called out that we would also be adding to our stakes in Starbucks and Palo Alto Networks , we were not restricted. We'll be keeping a close eye on both in the week to come for an opportunity to step in. Palo Alto finished the week down nearly 15% on a four-session losing streak after reports of talks and its confirmation of a $25 billion deal to buy CyberArk were not well received by investors. We, however, feel that bundling CybarArk's identity security platform will accelerate Palo Alto's platformization strategy. Rounding out the week , on Thursday, we cut our position in Abbott , in line with prior commentary in which we highlighted our concerns about the company's exposure to China. We took the raised capital and redeployed it in Capital One Financial as the move we were seeing in the stock didn't reflect the fundamentals we saw when it reported second quarter earnings. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump hits Brazilian products with 50% tariffs over Bolsonaro
WASHINGTON — Products imported to the U.S. from Brazil — including almost a third of the supply relied on every day by America's coffee drinkers — are subject to a 50% tariff beginning Friday, not because of Brazil's trade policies, but because of President Donald Trump's relationship with the country's former strongman president Jair Bolsonaro, and because of the actions of one of the justices of Brazil's supreme court. Trump typically justifies his tariffs by pointing to the U.S. trade deficit and saying that other nations are taking advantage of the United States. Many economists disagree with his view, but it doesn't matter in this instance: The U.S. actually has a trade surplus with Brazil of hundreds of billions of dollars over more than a decade, not a deficit. Still, on Friday, Trump imposed a total 50% tariff on certain products imported from Brazil, the highest rate of any country in the world. Earlier this week, the Trump administration also slapped the supreme court justice, Alexandre de Moraes, with tough sanctions under the Magnitsky Act, a law originally passed by Congress with the intent of punishing Russian President Vladimir Putin and his allies after the death in prison of Sergei Magnitsky, who had been investigating corruption in Russia. In a post on X, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions had been imposed 'for serious human rights abuses.' What are the alleged human rights abuses? De Moraes has been overseeing the case against Bolsonaro, who is charged along with some 30 others — including the former commander of Brazil's navy, the former defense minister and the former intelligence chief — with trying to stage a coup to prevent the current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, from taking office after he defeated Bolsonaro in a 2022 election. Brazil's Supreme Federal Court has ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle monitor and not go on social media, call foreign leaders or leave the country pending his trial. Three Brazilian officials noted to NBC News that the penalty was imposed after one of his sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman visiting the U.S., worked to enlist Steve Bannon and other MAGA allies to get Trump's attention and advocate to put pressure on Brazil over his father's case. De Moraes also ordered a ban in Brazil of the social media platform X, which is owned by sometime Trump ally Elon Musk, that lasted for more than a month last year after Musk and X refused to appoint a legal representative for their business in the country or to comply with court orders and requests to remove certain accounts and posts associated with election misinformation. And Trump's own social media company, Trump Media, has sued de Moraes over a suspension order he issued to the video hosting company Rumble, which Trump Media uses for its Truth Social platform. 'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. This Trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' Trump said in a letter that he sent to Brazil's president, who is widely known as Lula, and posted to Truth Social on July 9. Trump's letter went on to tie Bolsonaro's prosecution and de Moraes' social media rulings to the tariffs he'd later impose: 'Due in part to Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans (as lately illustrated by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which has issued hundreds of SECRET and UNLAWFUL Censorship Orders to U.S. Social Media platforms, threatening them with Millions of Dollars in Fines and Eviction from the Brazilian Social Media market), starting on August 1, 2025, we will charge Brazil a Tariff of 50% on any and all Brazilian products sent into the United States.' Brazil, the world's fourth largest democracy, exports popular commodities like coffee, beef, oranges, aircraft, oil, iron and steel to the U.S. Trump's executive order excluded some products, including oranges, oil and fertilizers, but not coffee or beef. Trump's actions against Brazil have brought the country's opposing political sides together to some extent. A delegation including Bolsonaro supporters and a former opposition Cabinet member from Brazil's foreign relations and defense committee met in Washington this week with Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Republican Sen. Thom Tillis to try to iron out the dispute. Brazil's foreign minister also flew to Washington to meet with Rubio on Wednesday. And U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick talked by phone with his Brazilian counterpart, two of the Brazilian officials told NBC News. They also said the call did not go well. Lula has not yet announced whether or how Brazil will retaliate against the U.S. tariffs. On Thursday, a U.S. appeals court panel heard arguments on a challenge to Trump's authority to impose tariffs by executive order brought by businesses and a coalition of state attorneys general. Tariff opponents argue the White House has not established that a national emergency exists to justify Trump's circumventing what is, with some emergency exceptions, supposed to be congressional authority over tariffs. Several of the judges on the panel pressed the Justice Department lawyer representing the government on the president's right to impose steep duties using an economic emergency law that does not specifically mention tariffs. No other president has ever tried to impose tariffs under the 1977 law the Trump administration is citing. The case is expected to eventually end up at the Supreme Court.
