
As student loan interest restart for millions under SAVE plan, leaving some borrowers ‘crushed'
Household debt
Personal financeFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Andrea Murzello has a doctorate in pharmacy and a stable job at a nonprofit. But she says she can't afford to grow her family — not under the Trump administration's latest student loan policy shift.
She's one of nearly 8 million borrowers who will see their loan balances start increasing again on August 1.
Earlier this month, the Department of Education announced it would resume applying interest to loans held by borrowers enrolled in the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, an income-driven repayment plan introduced under the Biden administration that had helped borrowers struggling to keep up with high interest loans.
Murzello, 34, graduated from pharmacy school in 2016 with over $200,000 in student loan debt. She initially enrolled in a student loan repayment program for public servants, making monthly payments of around $1,000.
In 2023, she switched to SAVE because it cut her monthly payments to about $400. She was even able to stop these payments without adverse consequences last year, when a court injunction put a temporary pause on the SAVE plan.
Before SAVE, Murzello couldn't make a dent in her balance despite making monthly payments because of the rising interest, she said.
'Instead of having any debt going downwards, I was seeing the opposite occur, because I just wasn't able to pay enough to make any impact,' she said. 'Entering the SAVE program was very beneficial for me and my family.'
She had hoped SAVE would offer long-term stability. But now, she and her husband are postponing plans for a second child.
'I think the frustration comes from the massive amount of changes that are occurring,' she said.
The SAVE plan launched in August 2023. It aimed to reduce monthly payments based on income and family size, prevent interest from ballooning, and accelerate loan forgiveness for some low-income borrowers.
'These are people or individual families that have low income that were really relying on that that zero dollar for payment, that no longer are going to have that option,' said Roxanne Garza, director of higher education at EdTrust, a left-leaning education advocacy group.
But SAVE faced legal challenges from the start.
Last year, two federal judges in Kansas and Missouri blocked key parts of the program, arguing that the Biden administration overstepped its authority by enacting debt relief without Congressional approval.
Following the court decision, SAVE borrowers were placed in no-interest forbearance, with payments paused and balances frozen since last summer.
But starting August 1st, interest will start to accrue again.
Borrowers will still be able to be granted forbearance — meaning putting a delay on their monthly payments — but interest will now be applied each month.
The Department of Education hasn't said when this will end. Calling SAVE an 'illegal' plan in a press release, Education Secretary Linda McMahon urged borrowers to switch to a 'legally compliant repayment plan' instead.
Student loan experts say this move causes more confusion for borrowers who are already bogged down in trying to navigate the rapidly changing landscape of student loans. Besides the change to SAVE, more extensive shifts to student loans were passed in the Trump administration's domestic policy bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill.
'Even diligent people grow weary of understanding what their situation is and their options,' said Ken Ruggiero, founder and CEO of private loan provider Ascent.
And Garza, of EdTrust, warned that it could be a long wait before getting clarity from the Department of Education. 'I'm not sure how easy it will be to get your questions answered or how long it will take to actually have your application process to switch into a different plan, especially now that you will likely see like a surge of people acting because of the interest accrual coming back online,' Garza adds.
The Department already has a backlog of roughly 1.5 million applications from borrowers seeking to switch into different income-driven repayment plans, CNN has previously reported.
Experts encourage borrowers who are on the SAVE plan to be as proactive as possible to understand their options and figure if another plan may be better.
The confusion over student loans is creating broader societal issues. Nearly three quarters (71%) of borrowers surveyed in a national poll have said that student loan debt has delayed a major life event, such as buying a home, having children, or getting married, according to the Gallup-Lumina Foundation's Cost of College report released last spring.
And in some important sectors, such as medicine, it is contributing to a looming crisis. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the US is expected to face a deficit of up to 40,400 primary care physicians by 2036 — an expected shortfall the group has attributed in part to the steep cost of medical education.
Bronte Remsik, a 31-year-old medical resident, graduated from Campbell University in May 2024 with close to $300,000 in student loans. She had worked with financial counselors and immediately applied for the SAVE plan.
But her application was never processed. Her loan servicer advised her to 'wait it out.' She couldn't apply for a different repayment plan, as it would cancel out her SAVE application. With a growing federal backlog and no clear guidance, she feels stuck in limbo.
'All of the people that I'm reaching out to who are supposed to help me also don't know what to do,' she said. 'And now I'm being told that the interest is going to start accruing on my loans when I'm not even able to enroll in a payment program.'
'The financial walls just feel like they're crushing down around me when I thought graduating from medical school was the big win,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Skift
a minute ago
- Skift
Travel Deal Activity Drops 8% in First Half of 2025
The DJIA fell 542 points on Friday, while the Nasdaq was down 472, the S&P 500fell 101 points, and the 10-year treasury yield was down .14 to 4.22%. It was a rough last two days of the week in the market, meaning the earnings reports, good or bad, did not really matter. BHR reported results, and they were down -5%, the only mover of note in the group. Park Hotels and Xenia Hotels had opposite type 2Q25 reports. PK beat estimates but tightened guidance, and not in a good way. They are now expecting flat to down -2% RevPAR in 2025. PK also said they are permanently closing the Embassy Suites Kansas City Plaza in this current quarter. They did not repurchase any shares in 2Q25. XHR, on the other hand, reported a 2Q that was very much ahead of expectations but did not change their 2025 outlook, guidance raised to reflect 2Q's results, clearly deemed to be a conservative stance. They bought back $35.7 million worth of stock in the quarter, 2.8% of the shares


Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
A Banker's Guide To Trump's Digital Finance Innovation Agenda
OBSERVATIONS FROM THE FINTECH SNARK TANK In 2022, President Biden signed an executive order directing the government to develop a framework for digital assets and financial technologies. In July, the US Treasury released Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology, a policy roadmap for federal agencies with innovation implications for banks. For too long, innovation in US financial services has proceeded without a cohesive national strategy. As a result, regulation has lagged behind market developments, and public infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the needs of a digital economy. Meanwhile, other nations—notably China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union—have made significant investments in their digital finance capabilities, coordinated regulatory reforms, and launched government-backed initiatives to modernize payments, identity, and data frameworks. The Treasury's report is a wake-up call: if the US is to remain a global financial leader, the public and private sectors must align around a shared vision for modernization. From Fragmentation to Coordination US innovation in financial technology has been fragmented across state lines, regulatory jurisdictions, and technological platforms. This fragmentation has led to inefficiencies, confusion, and lost opportunities. Banks face a regulatory patchwork that stifles experimentation while allowing unregulated fintechs to exploit gaps. Meanwhile, consumers encounter inconsistent standards for data privacy, interoperability, and identity verification. The Treasury says this is no longer tenable and calls for a national strategy that unifies public and private sector innovation. The bank connection: The message for banks is clear: future success will depend not just on internal innovation, but on strategic alignment with public policy goals and infrastructure initiatives. Faster Payments as the Linchpin The Treasury views instant payments as a building block for a digital financial system. In addition to recommending that government payments move to instant rails, it encourages government assistance to financial institutions to upgrade legacy systems, and provide technical assistance to smaller institutions that struggle with the transition. While the private sector has made strides in faster payments—through The Clearing House's RTP network and FedNow—adoption has been uneven, especially among smaller institutions. According to Cornerstone Advisors, heading into 2025, just 45% of banks and 38% of credit unions offered real-time (or faster) payments. Among them, however, roughly 80% only receive instant payments. While there are plenty of use cases for faster payments, banks are lacking business models for faster payments. The bank connection: These aren't just recommendations--they're signals. Banks that fail to adopt or integrate with real-time payment networks will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage—not only in terms of customer experience, but also in areas such as cash management, fraud mitigation, and liquidity optimization. The Missing Layer: Digital Identity An often overlooked barrier to financial innovation in the US is the lack of a trusted, interoperable digital identity system. Without secure digital identity credentials, banks rely on inefficient, error-prone, and--worse--fraud-prone methods for onboarding, authentication, and compliance. This imposes high costs, increases friction, and limits the potential for automation and innovation. The Treasury's report calls for investment in digital public infrastructure, with digital identity as a core component. While the private sector has offered various proprietary solutions, none have reached scale, in part because no actor can mandate adoption. The bank connection: Banks need to solve this problem—not just to reduce fraud losses, but to unlock the next generation of digital experiences. Bankers should advocate for public-private collaboration on digital identity standards, support pilot programs, and explore partnerships with providers working toward scalable solutions. Data and the (Possibly) Coming Open Banking Era To date, the US has taken a market-led approach to data access--relying on aggregators to bridge the gap between consumers and third-party applications--which has led to tensions over data security, user control, and liability. Poorly crafted rules from the CFPB--and two subsequent flip-flops--have caused more problems than they've solved. Other countries, however, have implemented formal open banking regulations with mandatory APIs, standardized data formats, and consent frameworks. The Treasury report calls for the development of a national strategy for data access. This includes support for secure, standardized APIs and policies that protect consumers while fostering competition. The bank connection: Instead of viewing open banking as a regulatory burden, bankers should see it as an opportunity to differentiate on trust, transparency, and user experience. Safely sharing data and integrating with external ecosystems are already key competitive differentiators. Global Competition and the Risk of Falling Behind The Treasury warns that the US is losing ground in the global race for digital financial leadership. China has deployed digital currencies at scale while the European Union has launched frameworks for instant payments, digital identity, and data portability. Even smaller jurisdictions like Singapore, Hong Kong, and New Zealand are punching above their weight by creating fintech sandboxes, government-backed infrastructure, and progressive regulatory environments. The Treasury is urging greater US engagement in international standard-setting bodies and greater coordination across agencies. The bank connection: Domestic policy, infrastructure investments, and international alignment are all part of the same strategic picture. Banks with international exposure should assess how shifts in regulatory and infrastructure alignment will affect their business models. Those without global operations should still recognize that domestic innovation will increasingly be influenced by international trends. What Banks Should Do About Digital Finance The Treasury's report isn't a roadmap for banks, but it is a clear signal of where federal policy is heading—and what will soon be expected of financial institutions. Waiting for regulatory mandates is a losing strategy. Banks that want to remain relevant must take proactive steps to align with the emerging digital finance agenda: 1) Accelerate adoption of real-time payments. Whether through FedNow, RTP, or both, institutions must modernize their payment infrastructure, align internal systems, and educate their customers and staff on the benefits and use cases. 2) Increase investment in--and deployment of--secure API frameworks. Update consent management systems and build partnerships with fintechs and aggregators. This is not just about compliance, but about creating new value propositions and customer experiences. 3) Support the development of a digital identity infrastructure. This includes participating in pilots, contributing to standards efforts, and aligning internal authentication and KYC processes with best practices in identity verification. 4) Reevaluate their data governance policies and practices. As data becomes the currency of digital finance, banks must ensure that their data is secure, accurate, and accessible—both to internal systems and authorized external partners. Digital Finance Isn't a Technology Initiative Digital finance isn't simply a technology initiative—it's a business imperative. Boards should ask tough questions about how the bank is preparing for a digital-first future, and how it's competing--and partnering--with fintechs, big techs, and global players. The Treasury report marks the beginning of a more coordinated, intentional strategy to modernize the financial system, protect consumers, and promote American leadership in an revolving global landscape. For banks, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge lies in adapting legacy systems, aligning with new expectations, and navigating a regulatory environment that is still taking shape. But the opportunity is far greater. Banks have the customer relationships, the trust, and the infrastructure to lead the next chapter of financial innovation—but must take advantage of these assets.


Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
Schumer accused of 'political extortion' as Trump nominees await confirmation
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., joins 'Fox News Live' to discuss Senate Republicans pushing to confirm President Donald Trump's nominees as they accuse Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of trying to slow the process.