
India's strategic trade reset with the US: Beyond tariff to critical technology
Manish Kumar Jha is a defence editor and security expert. He is the Sr. Visiting Fellow & Editorial Adviser at the United Services Institution of India. He is a fellow of Oxford University/KPF. He writes on national security, military technology, strategic affairs & policies. LESS ... MORE
The talk over the new trade deal between India and the US must be seen beyond the trade and tariffs. The reduced tariffs, lesser barriers and regulations could be a potential for economies like India to leverage advanced tech, materials, and machines for a greater global supply chain resilience.
In a pivotal move that could redefine India's position in the global economic and technological landscape, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump are negotiating a new trade agreement. The agreement has a key element of a technology partnership. Despite the calls for a tariff, which is more in line with a reciprocal tariff, as the Trump administration calls it, it is based on the trade deficit that the US has with many countries, including India.
However, the tariff reduction also means greater trade and technology, as both are trying to raise the bilateral trade from the existing (2024) $129.2 billion to $500 billion by 2030. Will it be a positive mark on the bilateral trade or a drag while it aims to bolster bilateral ties, enhance economic resilience, and supply chain alternatives? For India, it is more about breaking into some real investment in advanced technology, easing the higher investment in R&D and technology transfer, especially in defence.
The recent deal with the UK has given enough indication to gauge some direction on how Trump's administration will deal with India. Recently, the US announced its first 'breakthrough deal' with Britain. It lowers average British tariffs on US goods. Still, it keeps in place the 10% base tariff on British goods, levied by Trump's administration, which hints at the major policy approach under negotiations with other major economies and trading partners.
In February, India and the United States announced plans to complete the initial phase of a trade agreement by autumn 2025, to achieve bilateral trade of $500 billion by 2030. In June, Trump announced a 90-day pause on his long-planned reciprocal tariffs on global trading partners, including a 26% tariff on India, while his administration negotiates trade deals. Even after the pause, on such a pattern, a 10% base tariff remained for India and other major trading partners.
Tariff Reduction: Expanding trade & Tech
Worth noting that India was amongst the earliest nations to initiate a trade deal with Trump's Administration.
India has proposed a significant reduction in its average tariff gap with the United States, from nearly 13% to under 4%. India's average tariff rate is 17% compared with 3.3% by the US.
Agriculture, being the mainstay of India, has a tariff of around 39% on Agri imports. In electronics, US products face a 7.64 % tariff while Indian electronics get a 0.41 % tariff.
This ambitious move, one of India's most extensive tariff reforms, is designed to prevent potential U.S. tariff hikes and stimulate trade. In exchange, India seeks preferential market access for key export sectors such as gems and jewellery, textiles, chemicals, and agricultural produce, along with full tariff exemptions on its exports.
In the first phase, the Indian government announced to reduce duties to zero on 60% of the tariff lines, a comprehensive scale of trade, covering almost 90% of the goods from the US.
What is the tariff story which also connects to the aspiration of the domestic market? The notion that high tariffs work is factually incorrect, especially in the case of developing nations. In many cases, it is only about protecting the few for the fear of competition, which only limits the growth in the long run.
For example, the US has had the lowest trade tariff barriers, even if it's on a 10% basis, it will be among the lowest. The lower tariff in all economic possibilities will work for developing countries, and the next phase of the growth story must hinge on a greater global supply chain by embracing competition and technologies in all possible ways.
Additionally, India has also shown its intent and greater flexibility by offering to ease/simplify export regulations for high-value U.S. goods, including aircraft, medical equipment, and cars. Further, India is also reportedly easing export regulations on several high-value US exports, including electric vehicles, hydrocarbon, devices (telecom), beverages (whiskey and wines), and chemicals (specific).
However, for India, the point of leverage is far beyond the commodity export or import, but strategic areas of critical technologies such as AI, telecoms, biotech, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors.
It is about tech, talent, and innovation bases.
TRUST & iCET Initiative: Technological beyond tariff
The trade negotiations are largely seen from the point of goods and tariffs for market access, and removing barriers. However, such a binding agreement opens strategic areas of cooperation, accessing advanced technology for both commercial and defence.
Underlining this, the White House recently announced: Central to this partnership is the launch of the U.S.-India TRUST ('Transforming the Relationship Utilising Strategic Technology') initiative. This initiative aims to catalyse government-to-government, academia, and private sector collaboration to promote the application of critical and emerging technologies in areas like defence, artificial intelligence, semiconductors, quantum computing, biotechnology, energy, and space.
Drawing on PM Modi's policy roadmap on critical tech like Artificial Intelligence (AI), Advanced Computing, and Quantum, the TRUST initiative focuses on the development of a U.S.-India Roadmap on Accelerating AI Infrastructure. The TRUST framework is designed to address and enhance AI capabilities across the key sectors of the economy, including military applications in both nations.
Further, Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET), launched in 2022, is opening collaboration in key sectors – from space to semiconductors, biotechnology, cybersecurity, advanced telecommunications, and clean energy. The reduced barriers will potentially advance the ongoing strategic semiconductor partnership between the US Space Force and 3rdiTech to establish a compound semiconductor fabrication plant in India to manufacture infrared, gallium nitride, and silicon carbide semiconductors that will be used in national security-relevant platforms.
In another area is Advanced Materials R&D, where such trade deals can free metal and materials from high-tariff barriers, which is vital for critical military platforms from aerospace (jet engines) to marine propulsion systems to commercial sectors, healthcare, electronics, energy, and transportation.
Moreover, the very quest for self-reliance in defence technologies warrants a greater flow of tech, talent, and trade. India's acquisition of the MQ-9B platforms, the possible co-production of land warfare systems, and progress on other co-production initiatives outlined in the US-India Roadmap for Defence Industrial Cooperation will further broaden industrial bases in India.
The formation of the Bio-5 Biopharmaceutical Supply Chain Consortium, the US-India-ROK Technology Trilateral, is are building block for cooperation with Australia and Japan through the Quad.
Aligning with Global Allies
India has expressed its desire to be treated on par with top U.S. allies like Britain and Japan in sectors such as AI, biotech, and semiconductors. This alignment is crucial as both nations seek to counter common challenges, including unfair practices in export controls and overconcentration of critical supply chains. By fostering deeper ties in these strategic sectors, India aims to enhance its technological capabilities and ensure its position as a key player in the global innovation ecosystem.
A Calculated Leap Forward
This strategic partnership between India and the United States is not merely a trade agreement but a calculated leap toward global leadership. By reducing trade barriers, enhancing technological collaboration, and aligning with global allies, both nations are positioning themselves to address the complex challenges of the 21st century. The tariff reduction or elimination of trade barriers will deepen collaboration across key sectors – from space to semiconductors, biotechnology, cybersecurity, advanced telecommunications, and clean energy.
As the world watches, India's proactive approach could serve as a model for emerging economies seeking to navigate the intricacies of global trade and technology diplomacy.
On India's part, the expectation of full exemptions from tariffs on exports will be a herculean task under Trump's administration, as it came up during the early phase of negotiations between the US and the UK.
However, in areas like the agriculture sector, where nearly half of India's population is dependent on farming or agriculture needs a different approach is needed. India's high tariffs are to safeguard its farmers from imports and the undue disadvantage they might face from the large subsidies in the US. The trade deal and tariff negotiation must take into account such fundamentals of the Indian economy.
The India-US trade and technology partnership does represent a significant step toward building greater trade, technology, and supply chain resilience in the global economy. The trade reset, as it sounds, an alarm bell is rather an opportunity to not only strengthen its ties with the United States but also assert its role as a pivotal force in shaping the future of global trade and technological innovation.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
AI-native startups edge out SaaS in investor playbooks as tech shift accelerates
India's venture capital ecosystem is undergoing a pivotal shift in 2025, with investors increasingly backing artificial intelligence (AI)-native startups over traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) players. Between January and 4 June, AI-focused startups raised $454 million across 65 deals, slightly surpassing SaaS firms, which drew $432 million over 52 deals, according to data from Venture Intelligence. While some overlap exists as SaaS companies adopt AI features, the trend points to a deeper reset in investor priorities. 'AI-led startups are commanding 3–4x valuation premiums over traditional SaaS businesses, thanks to their potential for faster scalability and deeper, more transformative use cases," said Abhinav Chaturvedi, partner at Accel. Also read: 10 Indian AI startups and products to watch out for Blurring boundaries However, to stay competitive with pure-play AI startups, many SaaS companies are now streamlining operations and aggressively investing in artificial intelligence, according to multiple industry executives. This trend is pushing established SaaS companies to retool quickly. 'If SaaS companies don't integrate AI, they are unlikely to survive the next 2–3 years," said Nitin Bhatia, managing director at DC Advisory. 'We're seeing the switch happen where pure-play SaaS startups don't exist anymore. AI is becoming a fundamental part of what they offer—whether it's to enhance customer experience or product capabilities." This transition is also shaping the investment strategies of venture capital firms such as Stellaris Venture Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Accel, who see the convergence of AI and SaaS playing out across their portfolios. Accel's Chaturvedi pointed to SaaS portfolio companies like Chargebee, which is exploring newer monetisation models like usage-based pricing, and BrowserStack and Testsigma, which are embedding AI to automate testing—showing how legacy players are not just adapting but helping shape this transformation. Some of the largest AI-linked fundraises this year include Netradyne's $90 million, SpotDraft's $54 million, and Infinite Uptime's $35 million rounds, according to Venture Intelligence data. The narrowing gap between AI and SaaS deal volumes underscores growing investor appetite for pure-play AI models. Deal data reflects this shift: in 2024, there were 193 SaaS deals versus 145 AI deals. A year earlier, SaaS saw 159 deals compared to just 96 in AI. While SaaS still leads in terms of overall capital raised, AI startups are quickly gaining ground with more focused, domain-specific solutions. Also read: Meta in talks to invest nearly $10 billion in artificial intelligence startup Scale AI Even within traditional SaaS portfolios, companies are recalibrating. 'Our existing SaaS portfolio companies are investing aggressively in AI capabilities. From Whatfix in the digital adoption space to Factors in marketing automation, most of our portfolio companies are already using AI to add features, increase convenience and reduce cost for their customers," said Ritesh Banglani, founding partner at Stellaris Venture Partners. According to Banglani, more than 80% of Stellaris' B2B SaaS deal flow is now led by AI-centric solutions. 'This shift will transform every process within an enterprise from marketing and sales to accounting and finance," he added. A generational shift Industry veterans believe the shift marks a generational reset for Indian software startups. SaaS inflows have dried up, Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu said last week, attributing it to rising investor appetite for AI and growing profitability pressure on SaaS firms. He noted that artificial intelligence is now superseding traditional SaaS models in funding priority. Still, the broader outlook for SaaS remains strong—with a caveat. In August, Bessemer Venture Partners projected that the Indian SaaS market could generate three times more revenue by 2030 compared to today, driven in large part by the infusion of AI. In 2025, Indian SaaS is expected to clock $25 billion in annual recurring revenue. Bessemer also expects India to see a similar shift as the global SaaS wave of the late 2010s—with AI software exports playing a bigger role in the $400 billion global services market. As the Indian startup ecosystem matures, the once-clear boundaries between SaaS and AI are dissolving—with capital, innovation and talent increasingly flowing toward platforms that can do both. Also read: Boom in AI fuels a flurry of startups


News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
'Israel Has Enough Problems Without Kidnapping Her': Trump On Greta Thunberg's 'Abduction' Claim
Donald Trump called Greta Thunberg a 'young, angry person' and recommended she take an anger management class, after she claimed she was kidnapped by Israel. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg is a 'young, angry" person, and that she should be taking an 'anger management class". Trump also joked that Israel already has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg. Trump's remark came while he was addressing the media on Thunberg's claims of being kidnapped 'She's a strange person, she's a young angry person," Trump said, on being asked if he had a message for her. 'I don't know if this is real anger, it's hard to believe, actually, but I saw what happened. She's certainly different. I think she has to go to an anger management class, that's my recommendation for her," Trump said. On being asked if Greta was kidnapped by Israel, as she claimed, Trump said, 'I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg." On Monday, the activist arrived at a port in Israel, hours after Israeli forces boarded the Gaza-bound aid boat that she was travelling on with other activists and detained them. Israel was enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory that had been tightened during the Israel-Hamas war. The boat, accompanied by the Israeli navy, arrived in the Israeli port of Ashdod on Monday evening, according to Israel's Foreign Ministry. The ministry published a photo of Thunberg on social media after disembarking from the boat. The 12 activists are undergoing medical checks to ensure that they are in good health, the ministry said. They were expected to be held at a detention facility in the Israeli city of Ramle before being deported, according to Adalah, a legal rights group representing the activists. The activists had set out to protest Israel's ongoing military campaign in the Gaza Strip, which is among the deadliest and most destructive since World War II, and its restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid, both of which have put the territory of around 2 million Palestinians at risk of famine. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!


The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. Defence Secretary Hegseth faces Congress for first time since Signal leaks, Marine deployment to Los Angeles
U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is expected to field sharp questions from members of Congress about his tumultuous start as Pentagon chief, including his sharing of sensitive military details over a Signal chat, in three separate Capitol Hill hearings beginning Tuesday (June 10, 2025). Lawmakers also have made it clear they are unhappy that Mr. Hegseth has not provided details on the administration's first proposed defence budget, which President Donald Trump has said would total $1 trillion, a significant increase over the current spending level of more than $800 billion. It will be lawmakers' first chance to ask Mr. Hegseth about a myriad of other controversial spending by the Pentagon, including plans to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on security upgrades to turn a Qatari jet into Air Force One and to pour as much as $45 million into a parade recently added to the Army's 250th birthday bash, which happens to coincide with Mr. Trump's birthday on Saturday. Lawmakers may quiz Mr. Hegseth on the latest searing images coming out of the immigration raid protests in Los Angeles. Mr. Hegseth has deployed about 700 active-duty Marines to assist more than 4,100 National Guard troops in protecting federal buildings and personnel. But there are questions about what the troops will have to do and how much it will all cost. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, troops are prohibited from policing U.S. citizens on American soil. Invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to do that, is incredibly rare, and it's not clear if Mr. Trump plans to do it. The commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. Eric Smith, will be on Capitol Hill testifying at a separate budget hearing at the same time as Mr. Hegseth and is likely to face similar questions. What Hegseth has focused on so far Mr. Hegseth has spent vast amounts of time during his first five months in office promoting the social changes he's making at the Pentagon. He's been far less visible in the administration's more critical international security crises and negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Iran. Most recently, Mr. Hegseth directed the renaming of a Navy ship that had honoured Harvey Milk, a slain gay rights activist who served as a sailor during the Korean War. His spokesman, Sean Parnell, said the renaming was needed to ensure "the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the commander-in-chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' Mr. Hegseth has posted numerous videos of his morning workouts with troops or of himself signing directives to purge diversity and equity programs and online content from the military. He has boasted of removing transgender service members from the force and firing so-called woke generals, many of whom were women. He was on the international stage about a week ago, addressing an annual national security conference in Asia about threats from China. But a trip to NATO headquarters last week was quick and quiet, and he deliberately skipped a gathering of about 50 allies and partners where they discussed ongoing support for Ukraine. Use of Signal messaging app Mr. Hegseth's hearing Tuesday before the House Appropriations Defence Subcommittee will be his first public appearance on Capitol Hill since he squeaked through his Senate confirmation with a tie-breaking vote. It was the closest vote of any Cabinet member. While he has talked a lot about making the military more lethal, it was his use of the unclassified, unsecured Signal messaging app that quickly caught public attention. Set up by then-national security adviser Mike Waltz, a group chat included Mr. Hegseth and other senior administration leaders and was used to share information about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. The chat became a public embarrassment because the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, was inadvertently added to it. Mr. Waltz took responsibility for the gaffe, but Mr. Hegseth was roundly criticised for sharing details about the military strikes in this chat and in another one that included his wife and brother. Multiple investigations are looking into his use of Signal. The Defence Department's acting inspector general has been looking into the initial chat at the request of the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee. The Pentagon's watchdog is also reviewing whether any of Mr. Hegseth's aides were asked to delete any Signal messages. Controversial Pentagon spending While any number of those issues could come up at the House Armed Services Committee hearing Thursday, money issues are more likely to be the focus of the hearings Tuesday in the House and Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. Already defence leaders have been grilled in other hearings on the plans to retrofit the Qatari jet and the costs of the military parade. Mr. Trump has long wanted a parade, and Army leaders defended it as a good way to attract new recruits. Other questions may involve the costs of expanding the use of military forces to secure the southern border, the plans for the Golden Dome missile defence program, and how the department intends to fund modernisation programmes for drones and other critical weapons systems.