'I picture the children in your car who didn't survive - your cocky driving killed them'
The mum seriously injured with her children when Edward Spencer caused a head-on crash which also killed his three teen passengers has revealed her endless "nightmares"
A mum who was driving with her two young children when a "cocky" teen driver smashed into her head-on, killing his three young passengers, says she still has nightmares.
Speaking today after 19-year-old Edward Spencer was sentenced to two years' detention on three counts of causing death by careless driving and three counts of causing serious injury by careless driving, the driver of the car he hit said his actions since the crash have been "unforgivable".
Spencer lost control of his Ford Fiesta while on his way home from school just five weeks after passing his test. Harry Purcell, 17, Tilly Seccombe, 16 and Frank Wormald, 16, who were passengers in his car all died as a result of their injuries. In the other car, the mum and her two young children were seriously hurt and continue to receive treatment for their life-changing injuries.
The woman, who cannot be named to protect the identity of her children, spoke directly to the killer driver. She said: "Edward, had you been sorry for your actions, had you said sorry, had you asked for forgiveness, you would have got it. You did not do this.
"You showed yourself to be cocky and indifferent, taking almost two years to take responsibility for your actions. You showed everyone that you do not care about the innocent lives you have taken. You do not care that you nearly killed two innocent children. You have not shown any remorse, any regret, any guilt. That is unforgivable."
She went on to speak about the effect the crash has had on her and her children, adding that they "are still suffering from the consequences of this crash".
She added: "I don't have the words to express how sorry I am that this has happened. If I could have done anything to stop this, I truly would. If I could go back and give my life to save theirs, to save the suffering my children felt, I would, without hesitation.
"Both my children and I are still suffering from the consequences of this crash; there have been countless hospital appointments, operations, therapies. Nothing can undo the trauma that we have all been through; there is still pain, nightmares, flashbacks.
"I wake in the night from nightmares, picturing the poor children in the other car who didn't survive. I have flashbacks to being in the car with my children, the intense fear I felt but had to hide for their sake. I see my own children dead in the back seats of my car.
"This collision has given me permanent scars, both physically and mentally. I should feel lucky for surviving, but I feel the furthest thing from lucky. The lucky ones are the people who go their whole lives without this trauma - this is not lucky; this is the thing of nightmares."
She added: "This crash, like so many others, was wholly preventable. Graduated driving licenses have been proven to reduce incidents of this kind. Every time I see another crash like this in the news, it breaks my heart, yet still nothing is done to prevent these young lives from being lost."
Today at Warwick Crown Court, Judge Andrew Lockhart KC was told social media videos discovered after the crash had exposed a history of Spencer 'showing off, driving too quickly and failing to heed the warnings of those who were in the car with him'.
It also emerged that Tilly had previously sent a Snapchat message to Spencer complaining about his driving but he had responded that she had 'underestimated' him.
Passing sentence, the judge told Spencer his previous and habitual poor driving meant that there was a 'terrible inevitability' about the 'catastrophic' crash between Chipping Campden in Gloucestershire and Shipston-on-Stour, Warwickshire, in April 2023.
The judge said of the social media evidence, including video of Spencer passing a mobility scooter at more than 50mph: 'It is disturbing material and it seriously aggravates the position you find yourself in.
'This is material that is indisputable, largely captured on video. There is here clear and crystal clear evidence of previous poor driving.'
The crash was caused by a 'lethal combination' of grossly excessive speed and a failure to drive to the road conditions, the judge said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
18 hours ago
- Wales Online
M&S issues update on online orders six weeks after cyber-attack
M&S issues update on online orders six weeks after cyber-attack Shoppers are now able to order some of Marks & Spencer's fashion ranges online after a cyber-attack in April forced the retailer to stop online orders The retailer declared an incident on April 22 after the cyber attack Shoppers can now shop online at Marks & Spencer six weeks after it was forced to halt online orders due to a cyber attack which caused huge disruption. It first declared an incident after the cyber attack on April 22 and customers were unable to use contactless payments, gift cards or scan their loyalty card over the Easter weekend. Some M&S stores were also left with empty shelves as the chain grappled with the fallout of the attack. Online orders were paused on April 25 and were resumed on Tuesday (June 10). The retail giant said shoppers are now able to buy a selection of its best-selling fashion ranges and new products for home delivery to England, Scotland and Wales. In a statement published on social media, M&S managing director of clothing, home and beauty John Lyttle said: "More of our fashion, home and beauty products will be added every day, and we will resume deliveries to Northern Ireland and Click and Collect in the coming weeks. "Thank you sincerely for your support and for shopping with us." In May, M&S boss Stuart Machin warned investors that it is facing a £300m hit to trading profits as a result of the cyber attack. Article continues below It is believed that the group fell victim to the same hackers, known as Scattered Spider, who were linked to similar attacks on Co-op and Harrods towards the end of April. M&S confirmed on May 13 that some customer data was stolen in the cyber which could include names, date of birth, phone numbers, home addresses, email addresses, household information and online order histories. It added that any card information taken would not be useable as it does not hold full card payment details on its systems. Chief executive Stuart Machin blamed "human error" for the attack and refused to comment on whether the retailer had paid a ransom to the hackers. It is believed that the hackers managed to gain entry through a third party who had access to its systems. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Mr Machin said at the time: "We didn't leave the door open, this wasn't anything to do with under-investment. Article continues below "Everyone is vulnerable. For us, we were unlucky on this particular day through some human error." Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter here While its 565 stores have been able to remain open and trade throughout, contactless payments were impacted initially while there was also some stock availability issues as it had to temporarily switch to manual processes following the attack.
ITV News
20 hours ago
- ITV News
M&S resumes online orders six weeks after cyber attack
Marks & Spencer has resumed online orders for customers, six weeks after it was forced to halt sales following a cyber attack. Currently, shoppers will only be able to purchase the company's "best-selling fashion ranges" as part of a staggered return to full online operations. On the company's Instagram page, the retailer's managing director of clothing, home and beauty, John Lyttle, wrote: "We are bringing back online shopping this week "A selection of our best-selling fashion ranges will be available for home delivery to England, Scotland and Wales. "More of our fashion, home and beauty products will be added every day and we will resume deliveries to Northern Ireland and Click and Collect in the coming weeks. "Thank you sincerely for your support and for shopping with us." The retailer made the decision to pause online orders over the Easter Weekend after being targeted by hackers. Customer personal data, which could have included names, email addresses, postal addresses and dates of birth, was also taken in the attack. In a statement at the time, the retailer said: "Unfortunately the nature of the incident means some personal customer data has been taken. "Importantly, there is no evidence that this data has been shared and it does not include useable card or payment details, or account passwords, so there is no need for customers to take any action." Customers were prompted to reset their password though the store assured customers this was only for "extra peace of mind." The retail group says 'human error' caused the attack, which is set to cost the firm around £300 million. It is understood that the retailer was targeted by a ransomware called DragonForce, and an employee most likely replied to a phishing email. The National Cyber Security Centre describes ransomware as a type of malicious software that prevents users from accessing their data and systems by encrypting their files. The group deploying the software will then demand a payment or "ransom" in exchange for granting access and unencrypting the data. Attackers can also threaten to leak the data if the ransom is not paid. According to reports, a hacking group known as Scattered Spider is said to be behind the M&S attack, although this has not been confirmed.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Why data breach victims deserve compensation
Amy Haughton is a Partner, Thompsons Solicitors Human error is often a key factor in cyber attacks, writes Amy Haughton Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Ask a lawyer about the data breach cases landing on their desk and the majority will share a common theme. The breaches are rarely deliberate or malicious, at least on the part of the data controller, but that is largely irrelevant to determining liability in a compensation case. Data protection laws are nothing new and seven years after the GDPR took effect in the UK, it is implausible that anyone processing customer information would fail to understand their basic obligation to keep personal data secure. Yet rarely a day goes by without the reporting of some kind of breach, from mis-typed email addresses and documents left on trains, to – as has been especially prominent in recent weeks – cyber attacks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Marks & Spencer, Co-op and Addias are recent targets of what are often framed as highly sophisticated cyber attacks. This type of crime has emerged as an unfortunate feature of a digital society, but are the consequences for consumers inevitable? It remains the case that the majority of cyber attacks, while perpetrated by a third party, involve some element of human error on the part of those responsible for the data. Soon after the attack on Marks & Spencer, it was confirmed that the hackers used social-engineering techniques, relying on human error to gain access to their systems. There is no doubt that organisations targeted by cyber attacks are victims of crime but this does not detract from their responsibilities in terms of data protection. In the UK, a failure to comply with data security obligations can result in regulatory action or a civil compensation claim. The ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) is the regulatory body with the power to investigate data breaches and take action, including the imposition of significant fines. Generally, enforcement action will only follow a high degree of fault or a failure to take responsibilities seriously – it is a penalty and a deterrent to failing to comply. Separately, an individual who has suffered harm, whether financial loss or distress, because of an infringement of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is entitled to compensation. The initial focus is on the infringement, which will often be self-evident, and on how this has affected the individual. The payment of compensation is not intended to punish the organisation and correlates to the harm experienced by the data subject rather than the severity of the failings. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To avoid liability, an organisation must demonstrate that they were not in any way responsible for the event causing harm. This concept will undoubtedly be explored further in time, but it is difficult to see how the defence could apply in situations where a cyber attack only succeeds because of an error made by an organisation or its employees. While the consequences to an organisation may appear harsh, the compensation right reflects the concern which underlies a stringent data protection framework. Without adequate data security, the potential for harm through misuse of data and identity theft is very real. To engage in all areas of life, we trust multiple organisations with our information. Cyber attacks may be inevitable, but it should not be accepted that a breach of personal data will always follow. When an organisation fails, however unintentional their action or inaction may be, it is the individual who is put at risk and requires the law to provide a meaningful remedy.
