logo
Mississippi lawmakers approve $7 billion budget in special session marred by political fighting

Mississippi lawmakers approve $7 billion budget in special session marred by political fighting

Mississippi lawmakers on Thursday finally passed a $7.1 billion state budget to fund government agencies, but it wasn't a master class in legislative statesmanship.
Senators complained about their House counterparts, House members fought bitterly among themselves about budget details and lawmakers knowingly passed a bill that conflicts with federal Medicaid regulations.
The public display of bickering took place during a special legislative session because lawmakers couldn't agree on a budget during their regular session earlier this year, which was also mired in Republican infighting. Gov. Tate Reeves called them back to Jackson this week to pass a budget before the new fiscal year begins July 1.
'Yes — this should have been completed in regular session,' Reeves wrote on social media. 'But once clear that was no longer an option, the two sides worked diligently to find an agreement that met my specific criteria and passed it while minimizing costs of a Special Session.'
The Senate wrapped up its work Thursday evening, after debating whether it should approve the state Department of Health's budget, after lawmakers realized it contained a provision that could jeopardize $1.2 billion in federal Medicaid money for Mississippi.
The 52-member chamber approved the budget and said they had a guarantee that Reeves would veto the provision out of the agency's budget.
Republican Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann thanked the senators for their work, but he accused House leaders of working in bad faith by renegging on some prior budget agreements and by filing bills that were outside Reeves' parameters for the special session.
'There were three more significant bills that came from the House, which were not on the governor's call and did not reflect the agreement of the House, the governor and the Senate,' Hosemann said.
Senate Democrats opposed almost all of the budget bills in the special session because they complained they did not receive any advance drafts of the bills ahead of the session.
Hosemann told Mississippi Today that he shared a budget summary with all senators on Sunday and encouraged them to ask questions about the budget to Senate leaders ahead of the special session.
Senate Minority Leader Derrick Simmons, a Democrat from Greenville, attempted to replace agency funds frozen by the federal government with state funds, but Republican senators used procedural tactics to defeat the measures.
The House finished its work on the budget in the early hours of Thursday morning after working all Wednesday night to approve, debate, and question the spending bills.
House leaders struck a more conciliatory tone with Democratic members late Wednesday, after the two factions, earlier in the day, butted heads over the budget process and House Speaker Jason White threatening to remove a member from the chamber.
Like their Senate colleagues, House Democrats grew frustrated that they were largely kept in the dark about the specifics of the budget and used a constitutional provision to force the reading aloud of lengthy budget bills.
Irate at the filibuster tactic, White, a Republican from West, and his leadership team refused to answer any questions from Democrats if they continued to request that bills be read.
White posted on social media that he shared a digital copy of a budget summary with House members on Tuesday and placed a physical copy of the summary on their desks on Wednesday.
'When I was elected Speaker, I stated my goal was to bring more order and timeliness to the budget chaos while allowing all House members time to read and review the spending bills before they are asked to vote on them,' White said. 'While we may not have perfected that process yet, as Speaker, I will maintain the goal of transparency and working in an orderly fashion.'
It appeared the House would continue to bicker over the budget after Republicans refused to allow members from both parties to ask questions in a House Appropriations Committee meeting, prompting further outrage from Democrats.
'So, we're not allowed to debate any piece of legislation in this process, is that correct?' Democratic Rep. John Hines of Greenville asked.
'That's correct,' House Appropriations Committee Chairman John Read, R-Gautier, responded.
Read and other appropriations leaders cited the Democrats' earlier filibuster tactics as the reason for not allowing them to ask questions.
But even some Republicans complained that the committee moved too fast for them to understand what was being proposed.
Rep. Becky Currie, a Republican from Brookhaven, during the committee meeting, said she didn't understand an explanation of an amendment to the budget for the State Auditor's Office.
Rep. Sam Mims V, a Republican from McComb, declined to repeat his explanation of the amendment and continued to speed through the budget.
The committee meeting showcased how, in recent years, rank-and-file lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, have complained they aren't provided budget details in time to vet and debate the bills and how individual members have virtually no input in the budget process.
But longtime lawmakers said the special session this week was one of the worst budget-making cycles they've seen in roughly a decade.
'I understand that we're in the minority, and Republicans are in a supermajority, but there's just no dialogue taking place,' Rep. Bryant Clark, a Democrat from Pickens, said. 'This is the straw that broke the camel's back.'
Despite the chaos from the committee meeting, Democrats on the House floor stopped asking for bills to be read Wednesday night into Thursday morning, and Republicans chose to answer their questions.
The most substantive debate on the House floor occurred over the Mississippi Development Authority's budget, the agency responsible for economic development.
Rep. Robert Johnson III, the Democratic leader, offered four amendments to the agency's budget, but the GOP majority voted against them mostly along partisan lines.
Johnson, a Democrat from Natchez, tried to amend the legislation to reduce the amount of money counties are required to contribute to economic development projects in areas with extremely high poverty rates or failing school districts.
Rep. Karl Oliver, a Republican from Winona who leads an appropriations committee, opposed the amendments because he said he did not want the new proposals to jeopardize earlier agreements he reached with Senate leaders.
Most agencies in the proposed budget will see flat funding with no major increases or decreases. But many agencies will see a drop-off starting July of millions of dollars in 'one-time' money, either federal pandemic funds that are drying up or state cash for projects that lawmakers are withholding this year.
Under the budget agreement, lawmakers are planning to leave about $1 billion unencumbered. Some legislative leaders say this is prudent, given federal cuts and uncertainty in Washington. Others question whether state agencies will suffer, and contractors go unpaid on already started projects, from not having capital expense money allocated in the coming year.
___
This story was originally published by Mississippi Today and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk
Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk

Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk President Trump has pulled his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Elon Musk, as NASA administrator. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump calls Elon Musk a 'fantastic guy' amid drug use allegations President Trump said he didn't know about Elon Musk's alleged drug use and backed the billionaire's cost-cutting. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump has pulled his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Elon Musk, as his nominee to serve as administrator of NASA. The White House confirmed the withdrawal on May 31 and said Trump will soon announce a new nominee to lead NASA. No reason was provided for parting ways with Isaacman, who led and financed private astronaut missions Polaris Dawn and Inspiration4, which was carried out by Musk's SpaceX. The withdrawal, first reported by the news website Semafor, comes after the 42-year-old Isaacman already cleared the Senate Commerce Committee in April and appeared on track for a full Senate vote. 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars," White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston said in a statement. "It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda, and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon." More: Elon Musk's rise and fall: From Trump's chainsaw-wielding sidekick to a swift exit The move comes a day after Musk, a business partner and friend of Isaacman, left the White House after spending four months as a senior White House adviser overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk joined Trump for an Oval Office news conference to mark the end of the billionaire Tesla and SpaceX CEO's tenure in the White House. Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who has proven influential in many Trump decisions, raised alarm about the status of Isaacman's nomination in an X post, hours before the White House confirmed it was being withdrawn, writing, "There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with Musk." More: Trump's pick to head NASA has been to space twice: Recapping billionaire's missions Isaacman, founder and CEO of the payment processing company Shift4 Payments, undertook his first private space venture in 2021, when he was commander and financier of the world's first all-civilian extended mission to space. In 2024, he returned to space with an all-civilian crew of amateur spacefarers with the Polaris Dawn missions, which he jointly funded with SpaceX. The Polaris Dawn mission got off the ground on Sept. 10 with the help of a Falcon 9 rocket, which propelled the crew to orbit on a SpaceX Dragon capsule from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The crew also included pilot Scott 'Kidd' Poteet and mission specialists Sarah Gillis and Anna Menon. NASA has lacked a full-time administrator since Bill Nelson, NASA administrator in the Biden administration, stepped down on Jan. 20 when Trump was inaugurated. Contributing: Eric Lagatta of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison @joeygarrison.

CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability
CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability

After years of work, state legislators voted Saturday evening to approve landmark legislation to fund an endowment account to create more affordable child care in Connecticut by 2032. Lawmakers agreed with Gov. Ned Lamont to set aside as much as $300 million per year from the state's future budget surpluses in order to create a large endowment fund that would be invested by the state treasurer and could grow in future years. This year's allocation is expected to be $200 million, based on the size of the surplus. The debate started at noon in a rare Saturday session, which essentially happens one day each year at the end of the legislative session. The bill passed on strict party lines, by 101 to 45, at 5:30 p.m. after five hours of debate. The measure had been approved the previous day on a bipartisan basis in the state Senate by 32 – 4. Democrats hailed the plan for 'affordable and accessible' child care, but Republicans questioned the use of large amounts of money for an off-budget account instead of allocating more money for the state's unfunded liabilities like pensions for state employees and public school teachers. Under the plan, families earning $100,000 or less would pay nothing for child care starting in 2028, as it would be paid by the endowment, lawmakers said. 'I think it's the most important initiative we have in this budget,' Lamont said Saturday at the state Capitol in Hartford. 'If I can get universal early childhood free of charge for every family under $100,000, it's great for the kids. It helps mom and dad get back to work. It helps with affordability.' State Rep. Jennifer Leeper, a Fairfield Democrat who co-chairs the education committee, said the legislature would be 'achieving something many people thought would never be possible.' The legislation is known as Senate Bill 1 to show that it is the highest priority for Senate Democrats, who control the numbers of the bills. A key feature is that the measure establishes an early childhood endowment fund with a national model in a move to bring down the cost of early childhood for families. But House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said creating an off-budget endowment fund was a mistake that lawmakers would see in future years. 'It really is the beginning of the end of good fiscal practices,' Candelora told reporters before the debate. 'They are turning the faucet off on Connecticut paying down its unfunded liabilities. The glory days are over of paying down unfunded liabilities. … This legislation right now is doing away with surpluses as we know it.' Candelora, who said he was surprised that there was not more Republican opposition in the Senate, said many members of the House caucus were opposed to the bill. The debate was delayed Saturday afternoon when Rep. Tina Courpas, a freshman Greenwich Republican who graduated from Columbia University Law School, asserted on the House floor that the bill required a three-fifths vote to pass because uses of the state's surplus funds are heavily restricted unless there is a 60% vote. The Democrats initially told Courpas twice on the floor that she was wrong, but then House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford consulted with colleagues before ruling that Courpas was, in fact, correct. 'I have grave concerns about this bill,' Courpas said on the House floor. 'More importantly, the financial aspects of this bill concern me greatly. … The very things that put our state on a better fiscal path are on the table in this bill. … This is a bill which takes a very radical step, hence the three-fifths vote. … I ask the chamber really to consider what is at stake here.' The goal by lawmakers is that the endowment would help pay the costs to create 16,000 spaces for preschool, infants, and toddlers by 2030. While those under $100,000 would be free, those earning more than $100,000 would not pay more than 7% of their household income, lawmakers said. 'Our kids are our most important gifts,' Rep. Lezlye Zupkus, the ranking House Republican on the education committee, said during Saturday's debate. 'They are our leaders of tomorrow.' Zupkus gave examples on the House floor of students who need assistance. During a tour at a public school in New Haven, Zupkus said that she asked about a 5-year-old girl who was a student in the school. 'She saw her father murder her mother,' Zupkus said she was told. 'That's heavy. … I always keep that little girl in the back of my mind.' The multi-faceted bill calls for pay increases for child care workers, who historically make low salaries. This year, an estimated $200 million is expected to be placed into the endowment fund, lawmakers said. The maximum under the bill is $300 million, but that will depend on the size of the state surplus each year. In the first two years, officials could spend a maximum of 12% of the fund. 'We do view this as a sustainable source of funds,' said Rep. Kate Farrar, a West Hartford Democrat who outlined the bill on the House floor. The omnibus bill also includes sections on special education, which are combined with additional provisions in House Bill 5001, which is another high-priority bill. 'I struggle with our state because we want to fund everything,' Zupkus said of the costs. 'We have to pick and choose. … I do struggle with all of this funding and ensuring it is put to the best use.' With costs reaching more than $100,000 per year for some students, Lamont called this year for an additional $54 million for special education to help Connecticut communities shoulder the cost. Lamont and the state legislature both earmarked special education this year as a high priority and a renewed area of interest, noting that expenses have been rising for services. Part of the focus is to keep students in their own district, rather than sending them by bus as much as an hour away for specialized programs for which tuition and transportation costs can reach as high as $200,000 per student, officials said. The plan calls for $14 million in competitive grants for in-district programs, plus $40 million in the second year of the two-year budget for 'excess costs' for the most expensive cases. Out of 512,652 students in the public schools statewide, more than 92,000 students, or 18%, are in special education classes. The state and federal governments are spending a combined $324 million annually for the 92,000 students, officials said. Some communities, such as Hartford, have more students in special education and subsequently costs that are higher than the state average. About 80% of all transportation costs in the Hartford schools are for out-of-district trips. While about 20% of Hartford students are in special education classes, the high costs mean that 31.6% of the overall school budget is for special education, according to Mayor Arunan Arulampalam. On Friday night, senators passed the same measure after a long debate. 'Parents have been telling us that child care is unaffordable, and municipalities have been clear they need help with special education. Senate Bill 1 tackles both,' said Senate majority leader Bob Duff, a Norwalk Democrat. 'We're taking sustainable steps toward universal child care so parents can stay in the workforce without breaking the bank. And we're overhauling special education to bring more oversight, more efficiency, and a system that actually works for families and educators.' During the debate, Sen. Ryan Fazio, a Greenwich Republican who voted against the overall bill, offered an amendment that would have created a scholarship fund to help low-income students to attend either public or private schools. Test scores, he said, have dropped 'over the last 10 years or so,' particularly in lower-income areas. 'This is a simple and straightforward amendment,' said Fazio, who also represents parts of Stamford and New Canaan. 'It creates more options and more hope for families and students who need it the most.' The amendment failed along strict party lines at 7:45 p.m. Friday with Republicans in favor and Democrats against. Sen. Doug McCrory of Hartford, a longtime educator, said the overall bill will help students, particularly in lower-income areas. 'Right now, families in underserved communities have fewer child care options and face higher barriers to access. Senate Bill 1 is designed with equity in mind,' said McCrory, who co-chairs the education committee. 'It ensures that funding doesn't just flow to the communities that can afford to pay more, but reaches the families who need it most. Every child deserves the same strong start, no matter where they live.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@

Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'
Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) doubled down on a recent quip about Medicaid in a Saturday post on her Instagram story. 'Hello, everyone. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall,' Ernst said in the clip, with a sarcastic tone. On Friday, the Iowa Republican was jeered after brushing aside life or death concerns about cuts to Medicaid, a public health insurance program for low income families and individuals with disabilities. 'See I was in the process of answering a question that had been asked by an audience member, when a woman who was extremely distraught, screamed out from the back corner of the auditorium, people are going to die,' Ernst said Saturday. 'And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth. So I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well,' she continued. The Iowa lawmaker then encouraged viewers who want to see 'eternal and everlasting life' to 'embrace' Jesus Christ. During her Friday event in Butler, Iowa, Ernst promised that Republicans would 'protect' social services for the most vulnerable. She suggested that those who work and have opportunity for benefits elsewhere 'receive those benefits elsewhere' and leave taxpayer dollars for those eligible for Medicaid. Under the current GOP-House passed spending bill, millions would lose access to healthcare if passed by the Senate. 'Children will get hurt. Women will get hurt. Older Americans who rely on Medicaid for nursing home care and for home care will get hurt. People with disabilities who rely on Medicaid to survive will get hurt,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said during the debate on the bill, according to Politico. 'Hospitals in your districts will close. Nursing homes will shut down. And people will die. That's not hype. That's not hyperbole. That's not a hypothetical,' he added. Every Democrat who voted in the House, voted against the bill. Some Senate Republicans have pledged to make some edits to the legislation, objecting to changes to Medicaid, the proposed phaseout of clean energy incentives and an increase in the federal debt. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store