Nigerian communities set to have oil pollution High Court claims tried in 2027
Members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta, which have a combined population of around 50,000, are suing Shell plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, which is now the Renaissance Africa Energy Company.
The two communities began legal action in 2015, claiming they have suffered systemic and ongoing oil pollution for years due to the companies' operations in the African country, including pollution of drinking water.
They are seeking compensation and asking for the companies to clean up the damage caused by the spills.
The companies are defending the claims, saying that the majority of spills are caused by criminal acts of third parties or illegal oil refining, for which they are not liable.
On Friday, Mrs Justice May ruled on more than 20 preliminary issues in the claims, following a hearing held in London over four weeks in February and March.
She said that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified', but added that the case was 'still at a very early stage'.
Her findings included that Shell could be sued for damage from pipeline spills caused by third parties, such as vandals, in efforts to steal oil, a process known as bunkering.
She also said that while there was a five-year limitation period on bringing legal claims, a 'new cause of action will arise each day that oil remains' on land affected by the spills.
The cases are due to be tried over four months, starting in March 2027.
Reacting to the ruling, the leader of the Ogale community, King Bebe Okpabi, said: 'It has been 10 years now since we started this case, we hope that now Shell will stop these shenanigans and sit down with us to sort this out.
' People in Ogale are dying; Shell need to bring a remedy.
'We thank the judicial system of the UK for this judgment.'
Matthew Renishaw, international development partner at law firm Leigh Day, which represents the claimants, said: 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining.'
He continued: 'Our clients reiterate, as they have repeatedly for 10 years, that they simply want Shell to clean up their pollution and compensate them for their loss of livelihood.
'It is high time that Shell stop their legal filibuster and do the right thing.'
A Shell spokesperson said that the company welcomed the judgment.
They said: 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs.
'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining.
'These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up.
'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities.
'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA.'
The High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled in 2017 and 2018, respectively, that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care, but the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that there was a 'real issue to be tried'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
US approves potential $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to bolster security
The U.S. State Department approved a possible $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to help improve security in the sub-Saharan country, the Pentagon said Wednesday. Congress was notified and would need to approve the sale, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement. The agency is a division of the Department of Defense body that provides technical assistance and oversees transfers of defense equipment. The weapons requested by Nigeria include munitions, bombs and rockets. A resurgence of attacks by Boko Haram, Nigeria's homegrown jihadist group, has shaken Nigeria's northeast. The group took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose its radical version of Islamic law. In recent months, Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities, raising fears of a possible return to the peak insecurity of the Boko Haram era despite the military's claims of success against them. The conflict, which has spread into Nigeria's northern neighbors, has claimed about 35,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 2 million people in the country's northeastern region, according to the U.N. Apart from the insurgency in the northeast, Africa's most populous country also faces serious security challenges in the north-central and northwest regions, where hundreds have been killed and injured in recent months. 'The proposed sale will improve Nigeria's capability to meet current and future threats through operations against terrorist organizations and to counter illicit trafficking in Nigeria and the Gulf of Guinea,' the Pentagon said Wednesday. 'There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.' In the past 10 years, Nigeria has bought military equipment from the U.S. on several occasions. Most recently, the U.S. approved a $997-million weapons sale in 2022.
Finextra
4 hours ago
- Finextra
Africa's cross-border payments boom: Why stablecoins and AI are key to the next financial leap
1 This content is contributed or sourced from third parties but has been subject to Finextra editorial review. Remittances to Africa have hit record highs, but sky-high fees and inefficiencies in Africa's payments landscape still hold back economic potential. This article explains why stablecoins and AI could reshape cross-border payments and inclusion across the continent. Africa is experiencing a cross-border payments boom, with data from the World Bank showing that remittance inflows into Africa soared to USD 95.3 billion in 2024, despite a rocky global economic environment. Countries like Egypt, Nigeria, and Morocco continue to receive billions annually from their diasporas. The individual transactions may be small – a few hundred grand sent to a parent in Johannesburg, with a few more sent to relatives elsewhere – but these small sums add up to billions across the continent, underpinning sectors like education and healthcare. However, this lifeline is still marred by high transaction costs and settlement delays. Sending money into Africa has historically been expensive and slow. In 2023, the average cost of sending $200 into sub-Saharan Africa was 7.9% of the amount being sent – significantly higher than other regions like South Asia (5.8%) and Latin America and the Caribbean (5.9%). This is putting the brakes on economic development in the region, impacting both families dependent on remittances and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which suffer from delayed access to working capital. But there is a new era of payments dawning. There are now big players entering the market to modernise the continent's financial infrastructure and transform the way that money moves across borders – both within Africa, and overseas. For instance, the new partnership between Yellow Card and Visa is a key example of where stablecoins are being used to radically improve the speed, cost, and security of cross-border transactions. This is critical in markets like Africa, where legacy systems continue to weigh down on the financial ecosystem. Stablecoins – a financial transformation? Stablecoins can be a reliable alternative to traditional remittance corridors, as they are linked to fiat currencies or to a commodity like gold. For instance, USDT and USDC are pegged to the US dollar, allowing users to transfer digital dollars quickly and with minimal volatility. Stablecoins can thus eliminate the need for complex foreign exchange conversions and costly intermediaries; instead of sourcing FX liquidity or relying on multiple correspondent banks, remitters can send funds in a stablecoin directly to recipients. This minimises both settlement risk and delays, so, a payment that once took two or three days to process, can now be completed in minutes. What's more, as central banks continue to explore their own digital currencies, this innovation could become even more integrated into formal financial systems. AI is key for Africa's payments future Coupled with stablecoins, AI has the potential to unlock huge value and reshape Africa's payments landscape, notably by improving credit scoring, streamlining regulatory compliance, and generating behavioural insights. While financial inclusion across the continent has been steadily rising for years, a significant proportion of the population is still underbanked. In an environment where many Africans operate outside the traditional banking sector, mobile wallets and digital payment platforms can plug this gap and unlock a treasure trove of untapped data. AI tools can analyse this information to assess spending habits, repayment patterns, and risk profiles far more accurately than outdated, document-heavy processes reliant on payslips or formal credit histories. For instance, imagine a user who receives their salary into a digital wallet, pays their utilities on time, and regularly shops locally using tap-to-pay. AI can interpret these behaviours as signs and evidence of financial reliability, which paves the way for micro-lending, insurance, or savings products tailored to their needs. AI can enable remittance providers to also track spending patterns more accurately, helping them to understand demand and design services that respond to real customer behaviour. Plugging the infrastructure gap That said, Africa's readiness to support this shift is mixed. While countries like Kenya and Nigeria have made strides with mobile money and fintech innovation, infrastructure and regulation remain major hurdles. Many African markets remain deeply reliant on cash, with limited access to point-of-sale terminals and mobile data. As the saying goes, 'cash is still king' – and that's a heavy barrier to progress. To bring more users into digital ecosystems, the continent needs widespread infrastructure investment. This means improving mobile and internet access, especially in rural areas, and expanding access to smartphones. Other opportunities are in building digital identity systems that allow users to open wallets, verify transactions, and access formal banking services securely. At the same time, governments and regulators must step up. In the UK and Europe, governments are proactively exploring digital currencies and setting out clear regulatory roadmaps. In Africa, however, regulators have generally adopted a wait-and-see approach, making movement in this space slow. To truly benefit from the promise of stablecoins and AI, governments and financial regulators across the continent should engage more closely with fintechs and central banks operating in the region. Policy harmonisation and cross-border regulatory alignment will be key to moving the needle in this area. Accelerating inclusion and innovation If these pieces come together, the benefits on Africa's payments ecosystem could be transformative. – bringing millions of unbanked individuals into formal finance. Ultimately, the biggest winners will be end-users. Consumers who previously waited days for cross-border transfers, paid excessive fees, or were denied access to credit will benefit from a faster, fairer, and more intelligent system that understands their needs and works in their favour.
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
British Gas owner takes stake in Europe's biggest LNG terminal in £1.5bn deal
The two firms will be acquiring the Isle of Grain terminal in Kent. Grain imports and stores gas from around the world, and connects it to the European energy market. Its customers include Centrica, Shell, and Qatar Energy. It supplied some 15% of the UK's gas demand last year, but this is forecast to swell to about 60% by 2050. After taking into account some £1.1 billion worth of project finance debts on Grain's balance sheet, Centrica's equity investment totals about £200 million, it said. National Grid, which runs much of Britain's electricity grid, had been looking to sell the asset as part of broader efforts to offload parts of its portfolio to help fund investment plans. Centrica chief executive Chris O'Shea said: 'The Isle of Grain terminal is a strategic asset that will support the UK's energy security for many decades to come, keeping energy flowing reliably and affordably to households and businesses across the country as we transition to net zero.' The acquisition comes soon after Centrica announced it was investing £1.3 billion for a 15% stake in the new Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk. Mr O'Shea said that, combined with the Grain acquisition, 'demonstrates the attractiveness of the UK as an investment location underpinned by supportive government investment policies'. The acquisition is expected to complete during the final three months of 2025, subject to it being approved by regulators.
