PM Modi Visits the Maldives: Time to Reset the Clock
Since then, Maldives has fallen into a debt trap due to having borrowed massively from China. Currently, that seems to be a daunting financial challenge. Maldives needs to service external debt worth approximately $600 million USD in 2025, which is projected to rise to a staggering $1 billion in 2026.
In addition, the Maldivian leadership has realized that burning bridges with India can be costly in the long term. All this has led to a rethinking in the Maldivian leadership. And this seems to have led to the invitation to Indian Prime Minister Modi as the Chief Guest for the 60th Maldivian Independence Day celebrations. Maldives President Muizzu welcomes Indian Prime Minister Modi on July 25. (©Public Relations Office of the President of the Maldives)
In the run-up to the Maldivian presidential elections, back in November 2023, the then-presidential hopeful, Mohamed Muizzu, had run on an "India Out" campaign. Following his victory, he led a call for India to withdraw its military personnel from the Maldives with immediate effect.
Initially, these personnel were deployed to operate and maintain two helicopters and an aircraft donated by India, which were used mainly for humanitarian assistance and rescue missions. Later on, New Delhi replaced them with civilian staff.
Ties further nosedived when several junior ministers in the Maldivian youth ministry posted derogatory comments about Indian PM Modi on social media. That led to a row between the two countries. Those officials were suspended after a strong diplomatic response from New Delhi.
It is also worth noting that the number of tourists from India has come down drastically. In the past, Indian travel agencies ran a boycott campaign against tourism to Maldives, in light of the derogatory posts made by the Maldivian ministers against India's prime minister.
While he was in Maldives, PM Modi signed several important agreements. These included an Extension of Line of Credit (LoC) to Maldives of INR 4,850 crores (approximately $565 million). New Delhi also announced the reduction of Maldives' annual debt repayment obligations by 40%, from $51 million to $29 million.
The two countries also agreed to launch talks on a free trade agreement. They further jointly issued a stamp to commemorate the 60th anniversary of India-Maldives diplomatic relations. PM Modi meets with members of the different political parties of Maldives in Male on July 26. (©Indian Prime Minister's Office)
PM Modi noted in his Joint Press Statement with the Maldivian President that: "India is the closest neighbor of the Maldives. The Maldives holds a key place in both India's 'Neighborhood First' policy and our Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions (MAHASAGAR) vision. India also takes pride in being the Maldives's most trusted friend. Be it natural disasters or pandemics, India has always stood by the Maldives as the 'First Responder.' Whether it was ensuring the supply of essential commodities or supporting economic recovery post-COVID, India has always worked hand-in-hand with the Maldives."
For India, the turnaround in bilateral ties is important. It clearly shows China and other countries that, in the short term, they may be able to dent India's influence in the region to some extent, but that won't last for long.
Yet, for India, other challenges in the neighborhood remain, particularly in countries like Bangladesh. However, it is best that knee-jerk reactions are avoided, as seen in the case of renewed India-Maldives ties.
India has followed a "Neighborhood First" policy ever since PM Modi came to power for the first time in 2014. Maldives is also an important part of India's MAHASAGAR vision, which gels well with Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific vision.
For Japan, it means that China's influence is decreasing once again in India's immediate neighborhood. This is certainly good news for Japan in the short and the long term.
It is worth noting here that India and Japan are already collaborating on the building of infrastructure in Sri Lanka. This improvement in India's ties with Maldives means that India and Japan could collaborate there, too.
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force operates a base in Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa. And the sea lanes of communication in the region are key for Japan, both in a strategic and economic sense. Maldives lies along those key sea lanes, which bring oil to energy-deficient Japan. Prime Minister Modi receives a warm welcome from Maldives President Dr Mohamed Muizzi upon his arrival in Male on July 25. (©Indian Prime Minister's Office)
The wheel indeed seems to have turned a full circle now. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that, after coming to power, President Muizzu broke tradition by choosing to travel to China before visiting India.
The joint statement released during President Muizzu's visit to China in Jan 2024, soon after taking office, declares: "China firmly supports the Maldives in upholding its national sovereignty, independence and national dignity, respects and supports the Maldives' exploration of a development path that suits its national conditions, and firmly opposes external interference in the internal affairs of the Maldives." It can be seen as a statement directed at India.
However, in the long-term scheme of things, India and Maldives are very important for each other. And this is why they are coming closer. In this also lies a message for other countries, which are coming closer to China.
Author: Dr Rupakjyoti Borah
Dr Rupakjyoti Borah is a Senior Research Fellow with the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies, Tokyo. The views expressed here are personal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
44 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Analysts criticize U.S. tariff hikes for undermining global trade order
Many political leaders and analysts believe that the United States, to maximize unilateral interests, is using tariffs to pressure other economies into making concessions in trade agreements. BEIJING, Aug. 7 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. modified tariffs with dozens of its trading partners are set to take effect on Thursday, amid widespread concern across the globe that the new rates of levies, ranging from 10 percent to 40 percent, will harm the global trade order. Many political leaders and analysts believe that the United States, to maximize unilateral interests, is using tariffs to pressure other economies into making concessions in trade agreements. Under the new tariff measures, the basic tariff for goods entering the United States will remain at 10 percent. However, the 10 percent rate will only apply to countries with which the United States has a trade surplus. For countries with which the United States has a trade deficit, a 15 percent rate will serve as the new tariff floor. Still, for more than a dozen other countries, the tariff rates are higher than 15 percent. Last month, Trump imposed unilateral tariffs on imports from Brazil, Canada and India, with rates up to 50 percent. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on imports from India in response to the country's purchases of Russian oil, according to a White House statement. The order, effective 21 days after the announcement, will bring the combined tariffs imposed by the United States on Indian goods to 50 percent. Similarly, Trump has increased the tariff on Canada from 25 percent to 35 percent and imposed an additional 40 percent tariff on Brazilian goods, bringing the total tariff to 50 percent. For those that have struck a trade deal with the United States, the clauses are far from being fair. On July 30, Trump announced a "full and complete" trade deal with South Korea, setting 15 percent tariffs on imports from the country. South Korea also agreed to invest 350 billion U.S. dollars in U.S.-owned projects and purchase 100 billion dollars of U.S. energy. On July 27, Trump announced a deal with the EU imposing a 15 percent tariff on EU goods, while U.S. strategic exports enjoy zero-tariff access. The EU pledged to buy 750 billion dollars in U.S. energy and invest an additional 600 billion dollars in the United States. On July 22, Trump said the United States had reached a deal with Japan, imposing a 15 percent tariff on Japanese goods. Japan will invest 550 billion dollars in the United States, which will receive 90 percent of the profits. Trump's handling of such trade deals and his use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on trading partners have sparked extensive criticism. U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that the tariffs are a "trade war on the American people," and that there has been "chaos and uncertainty" and "no one knows what's coming when Donald Trump has no plan, no strategy, and he's not honest about what he presents." "Our businesses ... need some degree of certainty, and all they're getting is chaos and inflation. So the Trump tariff trade war is a trade war on the American people. We've seen this week the chaos and uncertainty," he said. In response to the EU's deal with the United States, German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil criticized the bloc's negotiating stance, saying it was "too weak" in talks over new tariffs. "I think we were too weak. We can't be satisfied with the result that was achieved," Klingbeil said on Monday. Meanwhile, India reacted sharply to the U.S. announcement of an additional 25 percent tariff on its imports, calling the move "unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable," and declaring that New Delhi would take all actions necessary to protect its national interests. "The U.S. has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India," said Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal in an official statement. By erecting these extremely high tariff barriers and undermining and weakening the WTO, the Trump administration has seriously damaged the world trading system, said Time Magazine, adding that consequently, it might end up pushing the rest of the world away and sowing the seeds of America's own isolation and irrelevance.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Indian authorities in Kashmir ban books by eminent writers and scholars
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — Indian authorities have banned 25 books in Kashmir that they say propagate 'false narratives' and 'secessionism' in the disputed region, where strict controls on the press have escalated in recent years. The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Indian authorities in Kashmir ban books by eminent writers and scholars
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — Indian authorities have banned 25 books in Kashmir that they say propagate 'false narratives' and 'secessionism' in the disputed region, where strict controls on the press have escalated in recent years. The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield. Booksellers and owners could face prison The order was issued on Tuesday by the region's Home Department, which is under the direct control of Lt. Gov. Manoj Sinha, New Delhi's top administrator in Kashmir. Sinha wields substantial power in the region as the national government's representative, while elected officials run a largely powerless government that came to power last year after the first local election since India stripped the disputed region of its special status in 2019. The order declared the 25 books 'forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region. Various elements of the code threaten prison terms of three years, seven years or even life for offenses related to forfeit media, although no one has yet been jailed under them. 'The identified 25 books have been found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India,' the Home Department said in its notice. It said such books played 'a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against Indian State.' The action was taken following 'investigations and credible intelligence' about 'systemic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature' that was 'often disguised as historical or political commentary,' it said. India is cracking down on dissent in Kashmir Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict. Since 2019, authorities have increasingly criminalized dissent and shown no tolerance for any narrative that questions India's sovereignty over Kashmir. In February, police raided bookstores and seized hundreds of books linked to a major Islamic organization in the region. In 2011, police filed charges against Kashmir education officials over a textbook for first graders that illustrated the word 'tyrant' with a sketch resembling a police official. A year earlier to that, police arrested a college lecturer on charges he gave his students an English exam filled with questions attacking a crackdown on demonstrations challenging Indian rule in the region. In some cases, the accused were freed after police questioning but most of these cases have lingered on in India's notoriously slow judicial system. Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, a key resistance leader in Kashmir, condemned the book ban. 'Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the repertoire of lived memories of people of Kashmir,' Mirwaiz said in a statement. He questioned authorities for organizing an ongoing book festival to showcase its literary commitment but on ground banning some books. 'It only exposes the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such authoritarian actions, and the contradiction in proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival.' India rarely bans books, but has tightened grip on media Banning books is not common in India, but authorities under Prime Minister Narendra Modi have increasingly raided independent media houses, jailed journalists and sought to re-write history in school and university textbooks to promote the Hindu nationalist vision of his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Meanwhile, curriculums related to Muslim Mughal rulers who ruled much of India between sixteenth and nineteenth centuries have been altered or removed. Last year, An Indian court ended decades-old ban on Salman Rushdie's 'The Satanic Verses' owing to absence of any official order that had banned the book in 1988.
