
Ranveer Allahbadia, aka BeerBiceps, confirms breakup after India's Got Latent controversy: ‘I just wanted a wife so bad'
In the new episode, he spoke to Tara about finding love, and the regrets that he feels about how he behaved in his 20s. He said, 'I think I chased love too hard… I think if one has a burning desire to find deep romance in life, they're meant to find it. That burning desire is still there in me now, but it burnt me so much on the inside… I just wanted a wife so bad. But something switches after you're 30. But it's not in my hands. My chart says it has to be a delayed marriage, because there's work to be done. And that's probably my only way of self-actualising this issue. As a guy, I've just buried that want… There's so much pain I've buried so deep, and a lot of it is from broken romance. I don't have any expectations from a partner to come and heal my pain, because that's unfair… The women in my life; my mom, my sister, my niece, my girl, who is yet to come, I want them to have a soft experience of life…'
Also read – After Aadar Jain's 'time-pass' comment, ex-girlfriend Tara Sutaria says she's great at 'letting things go' as she opens up about 'painful lows' in the last year
Following the India's Got Latent controversy, Ranveer's rumoured girlfriend, Nikki Sharma, had shared a series of cryptic posts on social media. 'There will come a time when you will lose everything, including your mind. Once you've lost your mind, you'll be left with nothing but your soul – this is when you'll know you're invincible,' she shared. The post was originally shared by the Spiritual League. Before that, she'd written in another post, 'Your body doesn't just reject food; it also rejects energy. If your body starts rejecting certain places, people, or things, trust it and listen.'
Ranveer was targeted online and in real life when, appearing on India's Got Latent, he asked a contestant, 'Would you rather watch your parents have sex every day or join them to finish it once and for all?' After being barred from producing new content, he was given relief by the Supreme Court when he alleged that his freedom of speech and expression was being curtailed. He returned to podcasting not long afterwards.
In December, Ranveer opened up in a post about having escaped a near-death experience with his girlfriend while holidaying in Goa. 'We're perfectly fine and well now. But yesterday at 6:00 pm or so, my girlfriend and I had to be rescued from a bit of a situation,' he wrote. He mentioned that he has always loved swimming in the open sea, and has been doing so since he was a child, but isn't accustomed to having others with him. Nikki Sharma is a television actor who has appeared in shows such as Pyaar Ka Pehla Adhyaya Shiv Shakti, Mind the Malhotras, and Dehleez.
In a previous episode of his podcast, Ranveer had opened up about realising that not every person in his life during the controversy was 'real'. ''Haan, unn rishtedaaro ka character dikh gaya jo log fake friends the unka character dikh gaya. Par iske saath saath bohot logo ke acche characters bhi dikh jaate hain. Jo actual kareebi dost hain voh saare mere liye the. They were all present. Bohot saare mentors aaye. Kuch kuch aise log hain jinse main kabhi zindagi main mila bhi nahi hoon, baat bhi nahi hui hai. Unn logo ne saamne se call karke madad kari (The friends who are truly close to me were all there for me. They were all present. Many mentors came too. There were even some people whom I've never met in my life, never even spoken to — and they reached out on their own and offered help). I'm just treating this phase as an opportunity to grow.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Actor Darshan, Pavithra ask SC not to cancel bail in murder case
Bengaluru: Actor Darshan and co-accused Pavithra Gowda urged Supreme Court to uphold the bail granted to them by Karnataka high court in the sensational Renukaswamy murder case. The apex court had reserved its verdict after a lengthy hearing on Karnataka govt's plea seeking to cancel their bail. In his written submission, Darshan (accused no. 2 in the case) argued that bail should only be revoked in cases of serious violations, none of which apply to him. "Cancellation of bail is a harsh step that curtails personal liberty and shouldn't be taken lightly," his plea stated. The actor said he hadn't breached any bail conditions and there was no evidence against him when he was arrested in Mysuru for a crime that allegedly occurred in Bengaluru. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Darshan claimed his arrest was based on inadmissible late-night disclosures by other accused, who went to the police station on June 10, 2024, and allegedly named him during interrogation. He insisted the crime scene narrative was constructed using handpicked witnesses while key individuals present at the shed on the day of the murder — such as Vijay, Basavaraj and others — were curiously left out by the prosecution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Accounting Help Made Simple legal directorate Learn More Undo He also highlighted procedural delays, including a three-day gap before the inquest and postmortem were conducted, allegedly due to identity issues. In her written submissions, Pavithra Gowda, accused no. 1, said no exceptional circumstances exist to cancel the bail granted to her. Countering their arguments, the govt pointed to Darshan's post-bail behaviour: He was seen socialising with Chikkanna, a witness, after being granted bail. Further, although he received exemption from court appearance on medical grounds in April (citing back pain), he was spotted at a film screening the very next day. 5th suspect held in Ramya case Cybercrime police arrested 23-year-old Manjunath from Koppal in north Karnataka on charges of sending abusive messages to actor Ramya. Police said Manjunath, a daily- wage labourer, sent her the message from his Instagram account, forever_crickte_lover. This is the fifth suspected to be arrested in the case.


NDTV
8 hours ago
- NDTV
Actor Vijay Deverakonda Questioned, Says Even ED Officials Did Not Why
Hyderabad: After four hours of questioning by the Enforcement Directorate in Hyderabad in the online betting case today, Tollywood actor Vijay Deverakonda said that even those who had questioned him did not know why his name had come up in the case. He is among 29 people being questioned by the ED, that has filed ECIRs based on FIRs filed by the Telangana police. The actor sought to make a distinction between illegal betting apps that was being investigated and gaming apps that are legal. "The gaming apps are legal, they have a GST, TDS, licence and permissions, " he said, adding, "They sought to know the company name, financial transactions, bank account numbers, all of which I have shared." The actor pointed out that gaming apps are legal and in fact support many like Indian cricket team, women's cricket, kabaddi, volleyball and so on. "The A23 app that I promoted is skill-based, that the Supreme Court has also said is legal. If you open app in Telangana, it will deny access," he explained, adding that he had only promoted it only in regions where it was legal and allowed. While the Telangana police is looking at cheating because of celebrity endorsement, the ED is looking at violations of PMLA, evasion of tax in promotion and sponsorship deals, digital ad revenue from online promotions and so on. The ED's probe is based on an Enforcement Case Information Report or ECIR filed against 29 celebrities, including actors, TV personalities, and social media influencers. The case stems from multiple First Information Reports filed by the Telangana Police, which allege that these public figures promoted betting apps in violation of the law. The ED suspects that these endorsements were part of a scheme to launder large sums of money generated through illegal gambling. Vijay Deverakonda's team had earlier issued a clarification after his name surfaced in the case. They clarified that Vijay Deverakonda's association was strictly limited to endorsing a "skill-based gaming platform" and was not for any illegal betting or gambling apps.


Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
Vijay Deverakonda breaks silence on betting apps case after appearing before ED: 'As my name appeared...'
Actor Vijay Devarakonda appeared before the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday in connection with allegedly betting app case. After his arrival at the investigating agency's office, the actor clarified about the summons and said that the matter is being probed. Not just Vijay, but 25 celebrities, including Rana Daggubati, Prakash Raj, and Manchu Lakshmi came under the scanner for allegedly promoting illegal betting and gambling apps. Vijay said, as per ANI, 'I want you all to change the headline saying Vijay Deverakonda appeared for gaming apps clarification. An investigation into betting apps is definitely underway, and they're also unsure why my name appeared. As my name appeared, they are doing the verification and taking details.' Kingdom star added that while he has done "endorsements for Gaming apps, and there is no relation between gaming apps and betting apps." 'I have done endorsements for Gaming apps. There is no relation between a gaming app and a betting app. Gaming apps are completely legal, recognised by the government, and licensed as a business. They have GST, TDS, companies fully registered and recognised by the Supreme Court and various state governments. A23 is the same,' he said. He further explained, "If you Google top gaming apps... these are registered gaming apps. They also sponsor the Indian Cricket team, the Olympics, the Indian Women's cricket team, IPL, and various others because these are completely legal entities. So, firstly, gaming apps and illegal betting apps should be separated." Vijay said he has submitted all the necessary details for the investigation. "As my name came, they asked me for a few clarifications. They asked me for account details, transaction details and about the company. We have shown that." "There is the Supreme Court and state governments to decide what is right or wrong. If they are okay, there should be no discussion," he said. Previously, actor Prakash Raj appeared before the ED in an alleged betting app case. Addressing media, he said, "This was a case of money laundering of betting apps, and it was something I did in 2016. On moral grounds, I did not pursue it, and I gave them information that I did not receive any money because I did not want to make money from that. They have taken all the details and have finished the enquiry... Officers are doing their job, and as a citizen, I am supposed to cooperate and answer their questions. There is no witch-hunting or political motivation in this..." The FIR was filed at the Miyapur police station in Hyderabad after Phanindra Sarma, a 32-year-old businessman, lodged a complaint on March 19. The complainant alleged that celebrities and influencers were promoting illegal gambling apps in violation of the Public Gambling Act of 1867, reported ANI.