Zero Tariffs, Infinite Trust: How China's Bold Trade Move Redefines Africa's Future
Discover how China's groundbreaking zero-tariff policy for African nations not only fosters economic growth but also strengthens diplomatic ties, paving the way for a prosperous future. Pictured is South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Image: Presidency
By Michael Andisile Mayalo
In a time when global economic uncertainty and geopolitical friction dominate headlines, China and Africa are offering a refreshing alternative: partnership, solidarity, and shared prosperity. The latest chapter in this evolving friendship came with an announcement that is as historic as it is strategic-China will grant zero-tariff treatment to 100% of taxable products from all 53 African countries with which it maintains diplomatic relations.
This remarkable initiative, announced during the June 2025 Ministerial Meeting of Coordinators on the Implementation of Follow-up Actions of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), is more than just a trade policy—it is a powerful expression of trust, mutual respect, and forward-looking cooperation.
Chinese President Xi Jinping's congratulatory letter to the meeting set the tone for this moment of renewed commitment. In his message, he emphasised that China and Africa are 'good friends, good partners, and good brothers,' bound by shared aspirations and common goals. He praised the success of the ten cooperation actions agreed upon during the 2024 Beijing Summit of FOCAC and reaffirmed China's pledge to accelerate the building of a China-Africa community with a shared future in the new era.
President Denis Sassou Nguesso of the Republic of the Congo echoed these sentiments, affirming that the deep friendship between Africa and China is rooted in solidarity, mutual benefit, and a clear-eyed vision of long-term progress. Their messages were not ceremonial-they were statements of intent backed by concrete action.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
A Win-Win Solution for Africa's Economic Aspirations
The zero-tariff policy is especially significant because it comes at a time when African nations are striving to boost industrial capacity, diversify exports, and secure greater integration into global markets. Removing tariffs on all African exports to China opens an enormous door of opportunity for value-added products, manufactured goods, and agricultural items to reach one of the world's largest and most dynamic consumer bases.
As noted in the recent China Daily piece, African leaders increasingly see China as a preferred and reliable development partner. This policy confirms why: it places no political conditions, imposes no pressure, and offers real, market-driven solutions to real development needs.
China's approach is empowering. Rather than offering short-term aid, it is building sustainable economic linkages. Countries such as Kenya, Nigeria, Ethiopia, South Africa, and Senegal, which are developing robust manufacturing sectors, will now find it easier to export competitively to China. But perhaps even more crucially, least-developed countries across the continent stand to benefit the most, as their exports gain immediate and unrestricted access.
The Changsha Declaration: A Shared Voice for the Global South
This bold trade step was matched diplomatically by the release of the China-Africa Changsha Declaration on Upholding Solidarity and Cooperation of the Global South. Signed by representatives from all 53 African nations, the African Union, and China, the declaration reaffirms the commitment to multilateralism and cooperation in an increasingly fragmented world.
The declaration calls for a stronger collective voice in international affairs, and explicitly states opposition to unilateralism, protectionism, and economic bullying. It aligns perfectly with the zero-tariff decision-not as an isolated gesture, but as part of a broader effort to support inclusive globalization where developing nations play a central role.
By supporting each other's core interests and respecting each other's development paths, China and Africa are demonstrating what modern diplomacy and fair trade can look like when rooted in equality.
A Track Record of Delivery and Trust
This is not the first time China has placed Africa at the centre of its global strategy. For 16 consecutive years, China has been Africa's largest trading partner. From the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to massive infrastructure projects, industrial parks, and clean energy investment, China's presence has been transformative across the continent.
The zero-tariff initiative builds on these foundations. It gives African producers, farmers, and manufacturers the confidence to invest, expand, and compete. It also complements China's long-standing commitment to capacity-building, including thousands of scholarships, technical exchanges, and digital technology partnerships. This is not just trade-it is economic empowerment.
At the June 11, 2025, press conference, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian reaffirmed that China will continue to strengthen economic cooperation with Africa, prioritise the implementation of FOCAC outcomes, and ensure that African voices are heard in global affairs. He stated that China is ready to work with African friends to "deepen practical cooperation and deliver more tangible results to the African people."
That promise is already being kept.
A Friendship That Sets a Global Example
What sets this China-Africa partnership apart is its consistency. It is not driven by short-term headlines or geopolitical competition-it is built on long-term alignment and mutual respect. China sees Africa not just as a market or resource base, but as a strategic partner and friend.
There is an authenticity to the relationship that resonates with African nations. China does not dictate political systems or demand policy changes. Instead, it listens, collaborates, and builds. That is why, time and again, African leaders praise China's development model and diplomatic approach.
And the public feels it too. African perceptions of China remain overwhelmingly positive, driven by real-life impacts-new roads, better hospitals, growing exports, and increased educational access. This kind of people-centered development is where diplomacy meets everyday life.
Looking Ahead: Prosperity Through Partnership
As we look to the future, the zero-tariff initiative is a gateway to deeper economic integration, industrialization, and mutual prosperity. It sends a clear message: China believes in Africa's potential, and is backing that belief with action.
By eliminating barriers and encouraging African exports, China is proving that global trade can be fair, inclusive, and truly win-win.
In an era defined by challenges, the China-Africa relationship is a beacon of what cooperation should look like-visionary, respectful, and full of promise.
* Michael Andisile Mayalo is an independent commentator and writer
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Batohi not worried about Omotoso's deportation as NPA plans to bring Gupta brothers back to SA
She expressed hope that the Nigerian pastor could be returned to South Africa if the NPA's appeal is successful. National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamila Batohi says the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is committed to bringing back Nigerian pastor Timothy Omotoso and the Gupta brothers to face justice. Batohi appeared before Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) on Wednesday, where she faced tough questions about the NPA's performance in handling high-profile corruption and criminal cases. ALSO READ: 'There is no state capture in NPA': Ramaphosa to meet Batohi after infiltration claims The failure of the South African government to secure the extradition of Atul and Rajesh Gupta from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) continues to cast a shadow over the NPA's efforts to prosecute state capture cases. The NPA has also recently come under intense public scrutiny following the acquittal of Omotoso and his two co-accused in a rape trial that spanned eight years. Gupta brothers' extradition During the meeting, Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) head Andrea Johnson rejected any suggestion that the South African government had mishandled previous efforts to bring the Gupta brothers back to the country to face several charges. She explained that the government has yet to receive a response from the UAE clarifying the reasons for the extradition request being denied. 'When the UAE decided not to extradite the Guptas, we wrote to them; 12 note verbales later, we still don't have any response from the UAE about why the extradition failed. Safe to say that they have asked us to resubmit,' Johnson said. READ MORE: A national embarrassment? 'Scorpions 2.0' bill pitched to save failing NPA 'How do you resubmit when you've submitted a full set of papers that have been properly checked, even by themselves?' 'It does put you in somewhat of a predicament – do you send these papers so that they are a so-called 'failed attempt' again?' Johnson confirmed that a new extradition request would be submitted for the Gupta brothers to the UAE. 'We've taken a decision to submit new applications with additional matters. The country also can't wait while the NPA has to follow legal processes.' 'So, having taken that into account, the public interest, and the interest of justice, we'll submit new applications not just on the Estina and Nulane matters. We're going to apply for extraditions in relation to other state capture matters.' Watch the meeting below: The Gupta brothers, who were arrested in Dubai in 2022, stand accused of playing a central role in state capture during former president Jacob Zuma's tenure. One of the key cases in which they are implicated is the Nulane Investment fraud case and Vrede Dairy Farm matter. Batohi explains NPA's appeal on Omotoso Later in the meeting, Batohi told the committee that while the NPA is appealing Omotoso's acquittal, the process could take years. She also downplayed public concern following Omotoso's deportation last month. The NDPP explained that if the televangelist had remained in South Africa as a free man, it could have further distressed his victims, who have already expressed their disappointment with the outcome of the trial. 'The fact that he has had to flee from South Africa means he has not been able to live his life the way that he would like to.' READ MORE: Batohi explains why NPA did not investigate prosecutors in 2021 Omotoso trial Batohi expressed hope that Omotoso could be returned to face justice if the appeal is successful. 'Nigeria is a country that we do have an extradition treaty with, and they are also multi-lateral treaties that we can draw on to hopefully bring him back when we do.' 'We have been successful with many extradition applications across the world. The UAE is the one that sticks out, and we have had challenges with that.' She added that the NPA would await the outcome of the appeal process. Batohi defended the institution, urging the public 'not to lose faith' in the country's prosecutorial system amid growing criticism of the NPA's handling of high-profile cases – the corruption case involving former Cabinet minister Zizi Kodwa.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Xenophobia spits on the freedom of all who live in SA (Part Two)
We need to understand and spread the notion that freedom belongs to all, it is not a freedom where some people are excluded. Part Two of a two-part series on xenophobia and democracy. Most xenophobic conflicts portray sections of the community as being extremely hostile towards foreign nationals. But there is some ambiguity, especially in urban areas where South African traders have tensions with foreign traders. What has happened is that communities form relationships with the traders that are capable of more than one interpretation. On the one hand, they are seen – by many who have testified – as often being beneficial to local communities, offering goods at lower prices than South African traders or providing credit to communities and keeping their shops open for long hours. This creates a bond between them and the foreign traders, who can lower prices through their sharing resources with other traders in bulk buying. However, this bond with communities is not without ambiguity, as there are also instances where the same people who speak highly of foreign traders act opportunistically during attacks against them and join other looters in robbing them. This has been admitted by members of many local communities and is documented in media records. Additionally, when local traders in the Western Cape claimed that foreign traders had an advantage they couldn't compete with, some foreign traders offered to train local traders in what they knew and practised, and in business practices the local traders did not practice or know. This was documented by Professor Heribert Adam of Canada. It is not at all established that foreign traders use unfair methods to succeed in their trade. What is important to note is that the success they have is in an extremely unfair situation where they have a fragile presence in communities. They think it is safe, but time and again, that safety is shattered by incidents, as we have seen in recent months. The truth of the matter is that the relationship between foreign traders and communities does not conform to one narrative. Many of these foreign traders provide services that other trading outlets do not offer. They are willing to give credit in many cases, and if they sell cigarettes or similar small items, they do not necessarily expect patrons to buy a full packet. They may sell one cigarette at a are open for long hours, early in the morning before children go to school, and late at night, and this is the pattern of work which has often integrated the traders into local communities. On the other hand, when there are attacks on such traders and someone has broken the security of their shops, local people – sometimes ones who have formed close relationships with these traders – also engage in the looting that follows. In other words, the same individuals who do not want the traders to leave because of the way they operate, indulge in looting. They do not think it is legitimate to attack the shops, but at the same time, because of their poverty and vulnerability, such people are often willing to engage in the raids. They feel a bit ashamed of or embarrassed by it, but they nevertheless do it. Xenophobia violates foundational humanistic values There are many violations of various kinds that go unpunished in South Africa – notably the Marikana massacre, and killings that demonstrate indifference to human lives. While we must demand the return to foundational humanistic values and abiding by the law, there is no doubt that the impact of repeated violations casts doubt on the current standing of the law. There is not a strong force or understanding of advancing rights and duties for all, and especially for foreign migrants in South Africa today. How we relate to xenophobia cannot simply be individualised as in calling for the removal of specific actors or perpetrators from public positions they may hold. We cannot restrict ourselves to who should be in the Cabinet – while it is desirable to remove such people from public posts, we also need to advance a set of values that explain what is at stake. Spirituality There is sometimes recourse to spiritual underpinnings to advance a non-xenophobic stance. In almost all spiritualities there are notions like 'Jesus was a refugee', 'welcome the stranger', or ubuntu, evoking notions of universalism. The church and other faith-based bodies can have an important impact on this limiting of xenophobia. Both the present pope, Leo XIV, and his immediate predecessor, the late Pope Francis, provided messages calling for respect and compassion. Limited legal basis Acting against these foreign nationals is illegal and reinforces insecurity. Foreign nationals who are legally present should be secure, with their legal rights secured, and those allegedly without papers are also entitled to due process and not subjected to being automatically thrown in prison or deported. When xenophobes want to justify their actions or sentiments, they tend to refer to legal reasons for curbing the presence of foreign nationals, or the porous borders we have. In fact, when foreign traders or workers are attacked, attackers do not follow legal prescripts or try to examine the legal basis for removal of these people, compared with others whose presence is acknowledged to have a legal basis. Most of the time there is not a substantial distinction between those with a legal basis for their presence in South Africa and 'illegals'. Attackers generally do not ask (or have the authority to ask) who among the migrants have a legal basis for being in South Africa, and ignore what qualities create a legal basis. It may be ('may' because there are no statistics) that xenophobia is no longer a phenomenon emanating from individuals – it may be that attacking foreign nationals may now be a phenomenon that enjoys popular support, even in areas with a significant Struggle background like Atteridgeville and parts of the East Rand. This is a dangerous phenomenon, deriving from a politics that is indifferent to ethical questions. The problem of xenophobia and the need for moral clarity in South Africa It is important that we should not restrict our commentary on Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie's outburst, to whether or not he should remain a member of the Cabinet. McKenzie might be removed, although it seems unlikely in the light of the low weight that is placed on xenophobia and the number of Cabinet ministers who have made such statements. The xenophobic threat remains. It remains a problem because there is no clarity as to why or whether xenophobia is wrong, and when we have a discourse in this country that has been more or less condoned, where xenophobic statements are not regarded as wrong. The discourse on 'too many foreigners in the country', porous borders and similar things are not part of people's consciousness of what is considered wrong and is contrary to the freedom provided in 1994 and 1996. It's important that we have people grow up in a country that does not condone certain things. There are certain values, mainly in regard to apartheid manifestations, but it does not seem that there is a moral question in people's minds regarding the wrongness of xenophobia. That must be remedied, because to practise xenophobic behaviour and make xenophobic statements is to spit on the freedom of all who live in South Africa. We need to understand and spread the notion that freedom belongs to all, and it is not freedom where some people are excluded. We must find the modalities for working this out in a way that does not repeatedly create hurtful attacks on foreign nationals, as in the aftermath of recent incidents with poisons allegedly emanating from some of the spaza shops. When one examines the evidence presented in that and many other cases, it's clear that a lower threshold is applied for people who are foreign nationals. That must end. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA's trust deficit has as much to do with enduring whiteness as with colonial legacies
It is one of those unfortunate things, the need to declare one's principles, or starting positions, before presenting any discussion or point of view. I do it often with reminders like 'good people can be bad and bad people can be good' or 'nobody rules without guilt' or 'the country belongs to everyone who lives in it'. Having just written that, I realise that all of the above are what provokes the infectum somnium of the posties. They may ask what you mean by 'good' or 'people' or 'can' or 'be' or 'rules' or 'country' or 'lives'. The wilful obscurantism gets rather tedious. For the record, there is a place for 'complicated' or apparently obscurantist writing when the objective is, in part, to reveal fallacies about 'common sense' claims or 'simplicity' or parsimonious statements. It's the wilfulness (even pretentiousness and performativity) that turns postie discussions farcical. Then there are, of course, calcified positions, which are generally alluded to here. These are the positions where, for instance, even if Cyril Ramaphosa invoked the Second Coming, people would repeat mantric statements like 'what about Phala Phala?' or corruption or a traffic light in the Northern Cape that's not working. These are all valid. The point here is that as soon as Ramaphosa announced the creation of a National Dialogue, it was dismissed as a 'talk-shop' or something unnecessary. It has to do, I think, with trust, or the lack of it – and wilful blindness. The calcified positions would simply have us hand the country to the Democratic Alliance, and when they fail, make the claim that the country was too messed up to begin with (but no, don't refer to how the apartheid era messed things up). Parenthetically (somewhat related), the road to my village has been closed for repairs because of rockfalls, over and again over the past several years, and villagers have been patient, kind and understanding. I often wonder what the response would have been if the road had not been built by the apartheid-era government, which clearly did not envision that floods might destroy parts of the road along False Bay on the edge of cliffs. I have no doubt that if Clarence Drive were built after 1994, there would have been charges of 'incompetence' or 'mismanagement' or a lack of vision… this is, surely, a case of wilful blindness. That's just the way it is; some things will never change, wrote that feller Bruce Hornby in the 1980s… Global white panic The responses of the calcified crowd is not the tedium of wilful obscurantism, it seems to be driven by anger, catastrophism, dissatisfaction, senses of loss (of power) – all of which may best be understood when placed under the rubric of the decline or rapidly disappearing tendency to universalise European values. That's putting it very politely. When I wear my other cap, I look at global historical trends. Cast in the global context, Donald Trump and his followers hate affirmative action as much as some of our compatriots hate affirmative action, and as much as Brexiteers fear the loss of a white Britain, all of which is not dissimilar to Poland or Hungary's boasts about how well they have done by preserving their whiteness… Again, at a macro level, this is about the global rise of opposition to multiculturalism, of diversity, inclusion and equity, which are presented as threats to white hegemony. Have a read, for example, of the study ' Global white nationalism: From apartheid to Trump' edited by Daniel Geary, Camilla Schofield and Jennifer Sutton, and published by the University of Manchester. See, also, the discussion on The global rise of white supremacist terrorism, by the liberal Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. I identify these studies, and the ones below, because the research by white people in the European world will probably be taken more seriously… One study, and subsequent iterations (some of which were written by not-so-progressive scholars) that I have followed for most of the past two decades, pointed to evidence that ethnic diversity, or ethnic change, has caused many (white) people to become less trusting and led – mainly in Europe and North America – to people retreating into the safety of their whiteness. Trump is not the only European leader (I use the late economist Angus Maddison's definition of North America as an outgrowth of the European world) in this spiral of white panic; in Germany, there is a similar sentiment towards mass deportations. In South Africa, there is much reason for distrust. It's not only because of the state of the country and extant conditions… It also has to do with people refusing to accept that 'non-white' people have a history, heritages and landscapes that define a community's culture. I write the above in the wake of some nasty responses directed my way for my concern over the sale of cultural heritage in the Bo-Kaap. One response was that there was 'a market' for the homes in the Bo-Kaap. Well, there is 'a market' for human kidneys, and governments can intervene to prevent 'markets' from spreading. (Don't come at me about 'moral equivalence' – that's just a useful trick to allow people to get away with murder). Anyway, the point about the Western Cape and Cape Town government's permissibility of the sale of homes is that it can be stopped, in the same way that these governments would protect the landscapes and sites that have been most dear to white people and colonial settlers. There is no sign that this will happen… Kirstenbosch Gardens or the Company's Garden in Cape Town's CBD are protected spaces: why, then, not the Bo-Kaap? (This is a topic on which I have done some research). Perhaps because the destruction of Bo-Kaap paves the way for expansive white/foreign settlement, and for removing the Muslim community from the City Bowl – and getting rid of those Palestine solidarity movements… Remember, the European world's great bête noire today is precisely the Muslims! (See here). Muslims in the European world are expected to make themselves ' acceptable ' to Europeans if they wish to be admitted to society, and are expected to blend into the history of their new homes and landscapes. What was it that Amilcar Cabral said? 'They made us leave history – our history – to follow them… to follow the progress of their history.' I should be clear, this is not a cry for the destruction of Kirstenbosch, or the Company's Garden in the City Bowl, although one of the first things that European colonialists have done wherever they settled was to build gardens to provide them places to stroll at ease and remind them of Kew Gardens 'back home', with nary a concern for the natives. The Company's Garden was the first of its kind across all the places where the Dutch and the British held colonies and enslaved people. From a chapter of the book I am working on: 'The Gardens', we called it, was created under the auspices of the Dutch East India Company, shortly after the arrival of Dutch settlers in 1652. While the Dutch first created The Gardens, the British would alter the cultural landscape quite considerably, preserving its 'Englishness,' …. By 1837, there were 22 botanical gardens across the British Empire, and at the end of that century, in 1900, there more than a hundred as continental Europeans, French, Dutch, and Germans spread their colonial wings. The East India Company transformed gardens … (and the Dutch in Java) from food crops to refashioned and curated spaces to reflect colonial preferences and tastes. These curated gardens 'anchored' the European presence and were created to reinforce them as 'spaces of sociability for Europeans that responded to homesickness' … and offered spaces for walks in which ordered paths, benches, and bandstands provided reminders of the parks of Europe. This creation of green spaces is a mark, also, of European settlement in Palestine, which some people have justified or accepted as permissible, and others have described as green colonialism to displace Palestinians. Just by writing that sentence opens one up for much vitriol, criticism, cancellation and – at the extremes (I am always concerned about this) – losing one's income… It's funny (not). I have, in this column, been highly critical (over and again) of Julius Malema, Cyril Ramaphosa, Gayton McKenzie, the ANC, Al Jamaa'ah, of greed, corruption, prebendalism, cronyism, braskap and tall poppy syndrome, parallels between South Africa's politics and organised crime, and not a single person from any of those political parties and not one of those individuals have attacked me (verbally) personally, or suggested that I be cancelled. However, as soon as I write anything about white privilege, about the vertically segmented privileges inherited (explained by Gerald Cohen's development thesis), or about the umbilical ties that bind the intellectual transnational capitalist class, the quite perverse intellectually calcified class exploded, and there are veiled threats about cancellation. The class, here, are those good people among us who are instinctively opposed to, say, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue. The biggest problem, as I see it, is the lack of trust (distrust of black governance), the continuity – at least in Cape Town – of apartheid (how else does one explain the building of the same matchbox-type houses that marked Soweto's early years), where it is now 'the market' that is pushing low-income housing to the far reaches of the Cape Flats and beyond.
