Nvidia CEO warns that Chinese AI rivals are now ‘formidable'
US restrictions on exports to China have effectively locked Nvidia out of the country. PHOTO: REUTERS
WASHINGTON – Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said that Chinese AI rivals are filling the void left by the departure of US companies from that market, and their technology is becoming more powerful.
'The Chinese competitors have evolved,' he said on May 28 in an interview with Bloomberg Television. Huawei Technologies Co., a Chinese tech company blacklisted by the US government, has become 'quite formidable,' he said.
US restrictions on exports to China have effectively locked Nvidia out of the country, the largest market for chips, and as a result the company expects to lose out on US$8 billion (S$10.3 billion) in sales this quarter alone.
During a quarterly earnings call on May 28 , Mr Huang spent much of the time arguing that the American government should ease the curbs.
Rather than keeping AI technology out of Chinese hands - the intended purpose - local companies are just finding alternatives, he said. Tencent Holdings Ltd. and other major purchasers of his products can't be blamed for turning to Huawei because they can no longer depend on US suppliers, he said.
'Like everybody else, they are doubling, quadrupling capabilities every year,' Mr Huang said. 'And the volume is increasing substantially.'
Mr Huang cautioned that the gap between US products and Chinese alternatives is decreasing. Huawei's latest AI chip is similar to the performance of Nvidia's own H200 – a component that was state-of-the-art until its replacement in recent months.
Under new rules, Nvidia isn't able to even ship its H20 chip to China. That component is a downgraded version of the H200.
It's not possible to degrade the product's capabilities further, he told Bloomberg Technology.
Nvidia is considering potential alternatives to the H20, but has no current chip planned, Mr Huang said. When it does, the company will have to seek permission from Washington.
'You cannot underestimate the importance of the China market,' Mr Huang said. 'This is the home of the world's largest population of AI researchers.'
Mr Huang said he wants all the world's AI researchers and developers to be using American technology.
'Irrespective of the near-term revenue success we have had, we can't ignore the fact that the Chinese market is very important,' he said.
In the interview, Mr Huang was also asked about the US revoking some Chinese student visas and how that might affect Nvidia.
'I believe the administration still feels very strongly about the incredible importance of immigration,' said Mr Huang, who was born in Taiwan.
'Look, I'm an immigrant. I know many immigrants that came to the US to build a great life, and many of us have contributed greatly to the technology industry in the US.'
Mr Huang said he believed that will continue. 'We would like the brightest to come here,' he said. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Business Times
US consumer spending growth slows while inflation remains soft
[WASHINGTON] US consumers hit the brakes in April after the strongest month of spending since early 2023 while inflation remained tame, consistent with a slowing economy. Inflation-adjusted personal spending rose 0.1 per cent after rising 0.7 per cent a month earlier, Bureau of Economic Analysis data showed Friday. The personal consumption expenditures price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.1 per cent from a month earlier. Compared with a year earlier, the so-called core inflation gauge rose 2.5 per cent from April 2024 – the smallest annual advance in more than four years. The figures illustrate an undercurrent of anxiety among many American consumers about the economy after the weakest quarter for spending in nearly two years. While higher duties on imports have yet to show up more broadly in higher goods prices, sentiment has slumped and the outlook for personal finances stands at a record low. The modest rise in spending reflected an increase in services that more than offset a decline in durable goods outlays. At the same time, the Trump administration has walked back or paused some tariffs as negotiators work toward trade deals with key partners including China and the European Union. On Wednesday, a US court issued a ruling that blocks many of the import taxes. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Separate data out Friday showed a massive narrowing of the US merchandise-trade deficit in April on the largest-ever decrease in imports. The constant state of flux in trade policy has nonetheless fuelled uncertainty, with consumers' spending attitudes hanging in the balance. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve policymakers will likely keep interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future until they get more clarity on the impact of tariffs not only on prices but also on other pillars of the economy like the labour market and consumer spending. Economists are paying close attention to the degree to which companies are passing through higher import duties to consumers. A measure of goods inflation that excludes food and energy climbed 0.3 per cent. While many companies have so far been absorbing or offsetting much of the hit from tariffs, retailers including Walmart and Macy's Inc have indicated Americans will start seeing price hikes soon. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
There's a ticking time bomb in Trump's ‘big, beautiful Bill'
THIRTY years ago, when I was a rookie reporter, a veteran writer offered me sage advice: whenever presented with a government or corporate document that is more than 100 pages long, hunt for hidden bombs. Donald Trump's thousand-page (plus) 'big, beautiful Bill' is a case in point. Since the House of Representatives passed it last week, this fiscal act has been (rightly) lambasted for many reasons: it favours the rich over the poor; cruelly cuts social safety nets; and recklessly expands the debt. Even Elon Musk is upset. But what investors should also fret about, if they care about the state of Treasuries or are a non-American entity holding US assets, is a clause buried in the bowels of this behemoth called section 899. This would enable the US Treasury to impose penalties on 'applicable persons' from 'discriminatory foreign countries' by increasing US federal income tax and withholding rates by up to 20 percentage points on their US investments, on a variable scale. It might thus be viewed as a novel 'revenge tax' (as some lawyers call it) that Trump could use to bully friends and foes alike in trade negotiations. So, at best, all this undermines prior efforts to build a collaborative global tax system via groups such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, with its undertaxed profits rules. At worst, it makes Trump look like a feudal European king intent on using tax as a capricious tool to extract foreign tribute. Either way, it undermines the idea that America is a place of consistent investment laws – and has shocked lawyers in countries such as Canada. 'Section 899 is toxic (and) a potential game-changer for foreign investment,' Larson Gross, a tax advisory group, told clients this week. Or as Neil Bass, a Canadian lawyer wrote in his own missive: 'The US just declared a tax war and it's targeting allies.' George Saravelos, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, writes in a client note: 'Section 899 challenges the open nature of US capital markets by explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up So will this actually become law? The only honest answer (as with so much of Trump policy-making) is 'no one knows'. Trump's bark, after all, is often worse than his bite, and the courts sometimes rein him in, as seen with tariffs this week. Known unknowns In any case, there are a host of known unknowns around section 899. The Senate might insist that this clause is watered down or removed. Or if the surcharge stays intact, there may be provisions to let affected non-American investors and companies offset this against domestic tax bills. No one exactly knows how a 'discriminatory foreign country' will be defined (although the Treasury is supposed to regularly report on that). Nor is it entirely clear what investors and companies might be hit. At first glance, the Bill only affects non-US investors and companies already subject to US tax. But, as I recently noted, the White House recently warned in an executive order that it might overturn a crucial 1984 ruling that exempted Chinese investors, among others, from a prior 30 per cent withholding tax on assets such as US Treasuries. If so, those flows might be hit by section 899 too, as analysts such as Michael McNair suggest. Another reason for uncertainty is splits among Trump's own advisers. I am told that some love the idea of imposing revenge taxes on foreigners, since it will play well with the Maga base – and a think-tank allied with vice-president JD Vance reckons that such taxes could raise US$2 trillion revenue in the next decade. And figures such as Howard Lutnick, commerce secretary, are keen to find new weapons to wield in their trade negotiations with the EU and Canada. As the law firm Davis Polk points out, the fact that those two regions – along with the UK – impose digital services taxes could make them easy targets for section 899 measures. But Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, is likely to be wary of invoking section 899 since he does not want to scare global investors away from Treasuries. After all, he needs to sell oodles of US government bonds to fund the ever-expanding debt – and there are already hints of some capital flight. Undermining global trust Either way, the key point is that the mere presence of section 899 in this Bill – whatever ultimately happens – is likely to further undermine global trust, given that it shows that the Trump team is at least entertaining the idea of turning trade wars into capital wars, in the future. No wonder investment groups ranging from Canadian pension funds to mighty Asian institutions tell me that they are stealthily diversifying away from US assets. Or that Federal Reserve officials recently fretted about the likely damage to America's economy if its 'safe haven' investment status is undermined. As legislative bombs go, this is self-defeating. The Senate should kick it away. FINANCIAL TIMES
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
US: Wall St opens lower as Trump says China violated tariff terms
[NEW YORK] Wall Street's main indexes opened lower on Friday (May 30) as trade worries deepened after US President Donald Trump accused China of violating a tariff agreement, while investors assessed the latest inflation data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 23.4 points, or 0.06 per cent, at the open to 42,192.35. The S&P 500 fell 8.5 points, or 0.14 per cent, at the open to 5,903.67, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 44.7 points, or 0.23 per cent, to 19,131.219 at the opening bell. REUTERS
