Protests planned as Scottish parliament holds free vote on assisted dying bill
Opponents of proposals to legalise assisted dying in Scotland have warned it is ethically wrong to allow the state to help someone take their own life.
Campaigners against assisted dying, including the Silent Witness actor Liz Carr, are staging demonstrations outside the Scottish parliament on Tuesday, hours before MSPs hold a free vote on new legalisation proposals.
Pam Duncan-Glancy, Scottish Labour education spokesperson and one of Holyrood's few disabled MSPs, said it was a mistake to see this issue as one about choice and personal autonomy. It had far-reaching consequences, she added.
She opposed the bill because 'we are legislating for the state to assist someone to take their own life, and in almost every other circumstance we want the state to legislate for people to live and live well'.
That crossed a very significant ethical line, she added. 'No one wants to be in pain; I have lived with chronic pain for 41 years, but the answer should be to ensure that as much palliative care should be in place as possible.'
Tuesday's stage one vote will allow the bill to be scrutinised in detail and amended by a committee of MSPs, but some prominent politicians have spoken out against it, including all three of Scotland's most recent first ministers – John Swinney, Humza Yousaf and Nicola Sturgeon.
The bill, first proposed by the Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur in 2021, allows someone to request assisted dying if two doctors confirm they have an advanced and progressive terminal illness.
The person must have the mental capacity at the time of death to understand their decision, and the ability to carry out the procedure to end their life without someone's help.
McArthur's bill does not include a time limit; a parallel bill being considered for England and Wales requires doctors to confirm the patient is likely to die in six months or less.
In a post on Instagram on Monday, Sturgeon said she feared the bill's provisions against coercion could not prevent 'internal coercion' where an ill person felt 'others might be better off' if they were not there, she said.
'It would risk a situation in which a right to die might become, in the minds of some people, a perceived duty to die.'
Fraser Sutherland, the chief executive of the Humanist Society of Scotland, who plans to speak in favour of the bill outside Holyrood on Tuesday, said the 'vast majority' of Scottish voters supported its measures and urged MSPs to be 'bold, brave, and compassionate'.
'This bill is about compassion, dignity and the fundamental right to choose,' he said. 'Right now, too many Scots with terminal illnesses are forced to suffer or die abroad simply because the law denies them control over their final moments. That is not humane and it must change.
'Assisted dying is not a fringe idea, it is mainstream.'
McArthur, who also sits as one of Holyrood's deputy presiding officers, said the current system left patients and their families unjustifiably traumatised and meant those suffering 'took matters into their own hands', with the wealthy able to afford assisted dying in Switzerland.
'Scotland cannot put off this conversation. And parliament cannot continue to leave this issue in the 'too difficult' box,' he said. 'It must, at the very least, allow time for amendments to be considered to see if a bill can be agreed that commands majority support and public confidence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour will drop ‘unaffordable' net zero policies, predicts Reform's deputy leader
Labour will back down on its policies aimed at achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions, the deputy leader of the Reform has predicted. Richard Tice, the energy spokesperson for Reform and MP for Boston and Skegness, told the Guardian his party would withdraw from the 2015 Paris agreement that tries to limit global heating to 1.5C. He also said Reform would end a five-year funding plan to help developing countries cope with the impact of climate breakdown. 'The idea that we can afford £10bn for climate aid is ridiculous,' he said. 'We have plenty of problems ourselves that we rely on government to look after.' Tice, who drives an electric car, said he believed Labour had 'a growing anxiety that they have got it wrong on net zero. If energy bills do not come down, they will be in serious electoral trouble.' He accused the government of trying to 'bury' the costs of net zero in the latest spending review, and called the push for renewable energy 'unaffordable' and 'a colossal misjudgement'. He said: 'That's why we will see change, they will back down.' Pointing to a Holyrood byelection last week, in which Labour won the seat with fewer than 1,500 votes more than Reform, he said: 'That sends a very serious message to Labour that even where they used to be dominant in Scotland, there are very many people who will say Reform are the right party.' But he did not expect Keir Starmer, the prime minister, to make a public U-turn on net zero. Rather, Labour would give way gradually, he predicted. 'I think they will delay, they will gradually wind down, they will push back the timing of targets and policies,' he said. 'They will be trying to find clever ways to walk back from their clean power targets [of decarbonising the electricity sector by 2030].' Labour has come under pressure over its net zero plans from the Conservatives, sections of the media and from some unions. In April, former prime minister Tony Blair wrote that any strategy based on phasing out fossil fuels in the short term, or limiting consumption, was 'doomed to fail'. There have also been unfriendly briefings from within government against Ed Miliband, the energy secretary. But Starmer silenced internal critics of his policies with a landmark speech declaring he would go 'all out' on climate action and 'not wait, but accelerate' on net zero. In this week's spending review, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, lavished more than £60bn on green efforts, including £13.2bn for home insulation, about £30bn for nuclear power and £15bn for public transport outside London. Miliband was one of the big winners in the review, as the budget for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero ballooned by 16% a year, or 68% over the period of the review, to 2029. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion A government source said Tice's attacks on net zero would not sway Starmer. 'This is nonsense from Tice. We are doubling down on this agenda because it is the way to take back control of our energy, protect households and create jobs,' said the source. 'As the prime minister recently said, it is in the DNA of this government. We will fight Reform's anti-jobs, anti-growth, anti-energy security, ideological agenda, community by community, as we make the patriotic case for clean energy and climate action.' Reform's vows to move away from renewable energy would mean job losses and raise costs by increasing reliance on expensive fossil fuels, some experts have said. The New Economics Foundation found that 60,000 jobs in wind and solar energy would be lost under the party's policies and the costs to the economy would reach about £92bn by 2030. Energy experts pointed out that renewable power was cheaper than overreliance on fossil fuels. Jess Ralston, analyst at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: 'UK electricity is becoming more British and every bit of renewable power we get from solar reduces the amount of gas we need to import from abroad as the North Sea continues its inevitable decline. Campaigns against [renewables] leave the UK more vulnerable to geopolitical meddling of foreign actors like Putin.' Reform has also pledged to reverse Labour's ban on new drilling licences for oil and gas in the North Sea after Donald Trump, the US president, announced his backing for more North Sea fossil fuel production. Ami McCarthy, the head of politics at Greenpeace UK, said: 'While it might be entertaining to watch Richard Tice's Tiny Trump impression, Reform's energy policy is completely deluded. As we have seen before, Reform has no solution to the energy challenges we face. More drilling for volatile fossil fuels serves no one except the oil and gas bosses that have been profiting exponentially at the expense of bill payers. And putting a windfall tax on wind will only make our bills go up, not down.'
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Confident Kemi says: 'We can beat the SNP in constituencies across the country... anything can happen'
Kemi Badenoch has insisted the Scottish Conservatives could beat the SNP in constituencies up and down the country at the Holyrood election next year. The UK Tory leader suggested the party would take the fight to the Nationalists at the 2026 parliamentary vote, adding: 'Anything can happen.' In an interview with The Mail, Ms Badenoch said the Scottish Conservatives - led by her colleague Russell Findlay - could make gains beyond their traditional supporter base in the North East and in the Scottish Borders. It comes as in a speech to the party's conference at Murrayfield, Edinburgh, on Saturday Mr Findlay laid bare his ambitious plans to oust First Minister John Swinney from his Perthshire North constituency - as well as SNP MSPs in Ayr and Moray. Last night, Ms Badenoch said the party's position on repealing Labour 's 'family farm tax', the energy profits levy and its strong position on the ' gender debate' offered a clear alternative to voters. The UK leader - who replaced Rishi Sunak in November - said: 'I think there's very, very clear blue water between us and the SNP between us and Conservative Party is very clear on what its offer is.' Such optimism was palpable in her Friday speech to conference delegates on Friday, during which she said the party needed to bring about the SNP's 'electoral defeat'. Asked if she truly believed the Scottish Conservatives were able to beat the SNP in the Holyrood election, she said: 'Yes, anything can happen'. She continued: 'People look at what's happening in a particular moment, and assume it's always going to be like that. 'But we're not going to beat them by joining with them. We're going to beat them by having a better offer.' Such fighting talk comes despite a Survation poll in May suggesting the Tories are likely to return fewer MSPs than Nigel Farage's Reform party at the Holyrood vote next year. According to projections from Professor Sir John Curtice the SNP would return 58 seats and the Conservatives fewer than half their current group, returning 13 MSPs compared to its current crop of 30. Reform, meanwhile, would move into second place as the main opposition party on 21 seats. A recent litmus test of Tory support, the Hamilton by-election, saw the party slip into fourth place behind Reform - and was viewed by some pundits as evidence that Mr Farage's party posed an existential threat to the Tories' electoral fortunes. Mr Findlay yesterday dismissed what he labelled as 'pointy head' pollsters, which he said had been proven wrong in the past. And while Ms Badenoch is keenly aware of the rise in popularity of Reform - even warning in her speech to conference at the end of last week that Mr Farage is a threat to the Union because he does not care about more SNP rule - she insisted that 'everybody is a competitor' ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election. She said: 'We live in a multi party era; we're going to be fighting for every single vote; we're not singling any party out.' However, unable to resist being drawn on how she might describe the First Minister John Swinney in three words, the UK Tory leader was characteristically robust. 'Not. An. Option,' she said. Both Ms Badenoch and Mr Findlay hope a display of humility and contrition to voters over mistakes made in government is key to boosting support for the party. Asked how she can prove to Scottish voters who appear to have switched to Reform that they need the Scottish Tories, Ms Badenoch said: 'By winning back their trust, and we will do that by being very honest about where we made mistakes. She said: 'The windfall tax [on oil and gas company profits] was one example. 'I often use immigration as another. We've come up with a whole new set of policies on immigration - which are much tougher - stopping people who have not contributed in our society from getting benefits, which act as a pull factor; not making British citizenship so easy to get, which is another pull factor. 'So we are changing our policy - but we're being very honest, in a way that the other parties simply are not being.' She added: 'The way we win is by rebuilding trust, winning back that trust, but showing who we are, what we stand for, whose side we're on and having an offer that's actually going to work.' On Saturday, in his first major conference speech since becoming Scottish Tory leader, Mr Findlay said he was an 'optimist' and that he was 'not prepared to accept doom and gloom'. Speaking of his party's hopes to win the First Minister's Perthshire North seat, he teased: 'Wouldn't that be some prize? Swinney paying the price for his abysmal record.'
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Now SNP face ANOTHER gender legal fight… this time for failing to give guidance on Supreme Court trans ruling
The SNP Government faces ANOTHER legal challenge after failing to update public sector transgender guidance in the wake of a watershed court ruling. In April, John Swinney 's government was left humiliated when the UK's highest court ruled against it on the legal definition of a woman. It stipulated it was 'biological sex' which determines a person's rights under the 2010 Equality Act, not gender choice or a gender certificate. The ruling meant women-only spaces such as changing rooms are off-limits to biological males who identify as women. Despite the ruling, SNP ministers have so far failed to update guidance on single-sex spaces for the public sector. They have also repeatedly claimed they are waiting to see the final position of the European and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before going ahead with any changes. Now, the group behind the successful Supreme Court challenge, For Women Scotland, have said they are speaking to lawyers about taking the Scottish Government to court AGAIN to force them into action. The organisation's Susan Smith told a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh yesterday: 'We've spoken to the Scottish Government. 'They are still reluctant to withdraw things like the transgender guidance for schools, which was unlawful even before this Supreme Court ruling.' She added: 'There's resistance within organisations, and so we are possibly going to have to go back to court in order to get some of the government policies, especially policies of prisoners and schools, sorted out.' Speaking to reporters later, she said: 'We really do need some action, and they [the Scottish Government] are telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith also said statements by Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC of the EHRC had made the situation clear. She added: 'And in fact, obviously Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC and others have said: 'No, you need to start to act now.' Asked if Ms Smith had a timeline for possible legal action, she said: 'No, we're still talking through things and talking through things with our lawyers as well. We haven't got anything like that but we are exploring options.' Ms Smith suggested the delay could be because Scottish ministers fear if they change the guidance, they face a legal challenge from transgender activists who were unhappy with the clarification over equalities law given by the Supreme Court. At the centre of the successful For Women Scotland challenge against the Scottish Government was the question of whether a 'woman' could include trans women in law. The legal fight was sparked by the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards Act, which aimed to get more women onto public bodies, but could include those who had been born men. Five justices handed down a unanimous verdict against the Scottish Government's position and said sex was 'binary' and a person was 'either a woman or a man'. It sent shockwaves across Scotland's public sector organisations including the prison service. The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) has 16 transgender inmates, according to latest figures, with current rules allowing trans women to be housed in the female estate. Meanwhile The Mail on Sunday has told how a number of councils in Scotland have failed to adapt schools in line with the ruling. That is despite parents winning a separate legal fight over single-sex facilities at the new £16.6 million Earlston Primary School in Berwickshire. Judge Lady Ross, KC, said she would issue a court order to make legal obligations on all Scottish state schools clear. Ms Smith said: 'The Scottish Government tell us that the Scottish Prison Service set their own policy, that they're an arms length organisation, but any case would be taken against the Scottish ministers. 'So I think we need to start to step up and take a bit of responsibility, because these things are under their remit. 'And we've heard that they can't do anything about the NHS guidance, they can't do anything about the prisons…actually, I'm starting to think, well, what is the point of the Scottish government if they have no responsibility for any of these things that actually they do control?' A Scottish Prison Service spokesperson said: 'We have received the Supreme Court's judgement and are considering any potential impact it may have.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'As the judgment relates specifically to the guidance issued under the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards 2018 Act and stated that it was incorrect in relation to the definition referred to of 'woman' under the Equality Act, the guidance has now been removed and will be updated shortly to reflect the judgment. 'The Scottish Government has already begun work on implementation. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency across Government.'
