logo
Dating Fatigue Is Real, But Is Going Back To An Ex Okay?

Dating Fatigue Is Real, But Is Going Back To An Ex Okay?

NDTV6 hours ago

Charlotte York, the ever-prim and proper fictional character from Sex and the City, is relatable for many reasons. She's poised, smart, beautiful, and chasing her prince charming in the chaos of a metro city like New York. And while New Delhi is no New York, dating in any city is tough-no matter how different the dating scene might be.
So, after multiple failed first dates, when she had a mental breakdown and said, "I've been dating since I was fifteen. I am exhausted, where is he?", many people related to the character.
In today's world, where finding a match is just a swipe away, dating can be tiring. You can get multiple matches, talking stages, and hundreds of "what's your favourite colour?" questions later, if you're still not able to find the person you want to spend the rest of your life with, it can get exhausting. We can all have breakdowns like Charlotte.
Gen Z Too
A 2024 data set shows that 79% of Gen Z faces dating app burnout.
But if that's the case, should you take your phone out and dial that person from the trash can? I mean, your block list? Tempting, isn't it? If you're here, chances are that you might be thinking about it too.
We all might have different answers to it. Some might say that the person is your ex for a reason, while others might not agree that much. So, if you too watched Materialists, and right before the ending you wondered if you should also call up your ex or hope to 'accidentally' bump into them (hopefully not Joe Goldberg from You style), you're not alone.
Spoilers Ahead: When Lucy (played by Dakota Johnson) picked John (Chris Evans) in the end, many of us couldn't help but wonder - in a world where dating is becoming so hard and settling down seems to be what most people are doing, is it really time to consider whether you still have some leftover flames with your ex? Is there a right time to revisit old love? Or, more importantly, should you?
'The Microwave Love'
Getting back with an ex isn't as rare as we'd like to think. Love, after all, has a strange pull-memories, comfort, familiarity. Sometimes, the past feels easier than the uncertain present.
A four-year-old Reddit thread asked, "Has anyone gotten back with an ex-and how's it going?"
The replies were a mix of happily-ever-afters and cautionary tales. Some rekindled romances ended in weddings, while others proved that not all stories deserve sequels. Let's have a look at some of them:
Radhika Mohta, a matchmaker and relationship coach from Indore, Madhya Pradesh, says it is pretty human for people to want to go back to their ex.
"This happens for various reasons, especially when people are on the verge of finding someone new, and they feel vulnerable-they end up running back to their exes," she adds. She also says that during events of happiness or sadness, like a birthday or New Year's, she has seen couples getting back together.
Getting back with the ex is a phenomenon that's fairly common across all generations, but it is more often observed in younger generations in India-like Gen Z and millennials, especially Gen Z-who have a tendency to fall into microwave love: a reference to romantic relationships that heat up quickly and cool down just as fast.
Unlike traditional relationships, these breakups aren't seen as a definitive ending but rather as part of a continuous cycle.
Even though we don't have specific data for India, a study published in Medical News Today in 2023 shows that 60% of young adults in the US admitted to having at least one on-off relationship.
When Can You Get Back With Your Ex?
"The ex is the ex for a reason," Radhika says. According to her, getting back with an ex is usually a bad idea. However, one can consider it seriously if they believe that the person has truly changed and evolved for the better-and that the problems that caused the breakup are actually resolvable.
She does believe that such changes are very rare, and humans, generally, don't change their nature drastically.
"There's a very little chance that people change so much that the root cause of their breakups is resolved. However, there are chances that people might actually evolve-then you can think of getting back with your ex," she adds.
Experts also suggest that if one of the main reasons for the breakup was timing or life circumstances-like getting a big promotion and not having time to dedicate to a relationship, or having to move far for work or study-and you're both now in a better position to prioritise your relationship, then it's okay to give your relationship another chance.
Sometimes you meet the right person at the wrong time. And if both of you are now ready to work it through, seriously and honestly, there's a good chance it might work this time.
On the flip side, if the breakup involved cheating, emotional abuse, or persistent disrespect, it's a major red flag. In such cases, you might want to reconsider your reconsideration. And, the best way to cut off a relationship? Actually cut it off. Block, delete, mute, disappear.
Radhika says people often make timelines in their heads for relationships, like, "If he doesn't call me till my birthday, I'll move on." But when breakups happen, the only real way to move on is to cut people completely out of your life, as much as possible-otherwise, there's a strong chance you'll end up right back with your ex, according to Radhika.
But Can We Just Be Friends?
Well, we get it. Dating your ex again can be complicated, and in some cases, it's a road to a dead end. But is becoming friends a better idea? As self-destructive as it might sound, sometimes you have to be friends with your ex-maybe because you share a close friend group, have co-parenting responsibilities, or something else entirely.
Whether that's a healthy idea or not depends on the situation, says Mumbai-based counselling psychologist Absy Sam.
"As a psychologist, I believe it's possible, but only under specific conditions. Both parties must be free of romantic or sexual tension and have no lingering hope of rekindling the relationship. Mutual respect for each other's boundaries is essential," she says.
However, she adds that maintaining a friendship can be problematic if it's just a facade to hold on to the past or avoid grieving the end of the relationship. In collectivistic societies, she says, such friendships may also invite societal judgement or gossip, adding further complications.
How To Be Friends With An Ex
According to experts, like Absy, if both parties genuinely want to maintain a friendship, here's how to try it:
Examine your motives: Reflect on why you want to stay friends. Is it a genuine friendship, or are you avoiding letting go? Avoid "friends with benefits" or vague emotional attachments with unspoken expectations.
Set clear boundarie s: Define what is and isn't acceptable in the friendship. Respect each other's space and autonomy to keep it healthy.
Accept that it may not work: Not every ex is meant to stay in your life as a friend-and that's okay. Some relationships are better left in the past. Grieving and moving on may be more healing than forcing a friendship.
So, the next time you think about texting your ex at 1 am while three glasses of wine down - maybe just write it in Notes instead. Or better yet, rewatch Sex and the City and let Charlotte and her friends speak your truth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dating Fatigue Is Real, But Is Going Back To An Ex Okay?
Dating Fatigue Is Real, But Is Going Back To An Ex Okay?

NDTV

time6 hours ago

  • NDTV

Dating Fatigue Is Real, But Is Going Back To An Ex Okay?

Charlotte York, the ever-prim and proper fictional character from Sex and the City, is relatable for many reasons. She's poised, smart, beautiful, and chasing her prince charming in the chaos of a metro city like New York. And while New Delhi is no New York, dating in any city is tough-no matter how different the dating scene might be. So, after multiple failed first dates, when she had a mental breakdown and said, "I've been dating since I was fifteen. I am exhausted, where is he?", many people related to the character. In today's world, where finding a match is just a swipe away, dating can be tiring. You can get multiple matches, talking stages, and hundreds of "what's your favourite colour?" questions later, if you're still not able to find the person you want to spend the rest of your life with, it can get exhausting. We can all have breakdowns like Charlotte. Gen Z Too A 2024 data set shows that 79% of Gen Z faces dating app burnout. But if that's the case, should you take your phone out and dial that person from the trash can? I mean, your block list? Tempting, isn't it? If you're here, chances are that you might be thinking about it too. We all might have different answers to it. Some might say that the person is your ex for a reason, while others might not agree that much. So, if you too watched Materialists, and right before the ending you wondered if you should also call up your ex or hope to 'accidentally' bump into them (hopefully not Joe Goldberg from You style), you're not alone. Spoilers Ahead: When Lucy (played by Dakota Johnson) picked John (Chris Evans) in the end, many of us couldn't help but wonder - in a world where dating is becoming so hard and settling down seems to be what most people are doing, is it really time to consider whether you still have some leftover flames with your ex? Is there a right time to revisit old love? Or, more importantly, should you? 'The Microwave Love' Getting back with an ex isn't as rare as we'd like to think. Love, after all, has a strange pull-memories, comfort, familiarity. Sometimes, the past feels easier than the uncertain present. A four-year-old Reddit thread asked, "Has anyone gotten back with an ex-and how's it going?" The replies were a mix of happily-ever-afters and cautionary tales. Some rekindled romances ended in weddings, while others proved that not all stories deserve sequels. Let's have a look at some of them: Radhika Mohta, a matchmaker and relationship coach from Indore, Madhya Pradesh, says it is pretty human for people to want to go back to their ex. "This happens for various reasons, especially when people are on the verge of finding someone new, and they feel vulnerable-they end up running back to their exes," she adds. She also says that during events of happiness or sadness, like a birthday or New Year's, she has seen couples getting back together. Getting back with the ex is a phenomenon that's fairly common across all generations, but it is more often observed in younger generations in India-like Gen Z and millennials, especially Gen Z-who have a tendency to fall into microwave love: a reference to romantic relationships that heat up quickly and cool down just as fast. Unlike traditional relationships, these breakups aren't seen as a definitive ending but rather as part of a continuous cycle. Even though we don't have specific data for India, a study published in Medical News Today in 2023 shows that 60% of young adults in the US admitted to having at least one on-off relationship. When Can You Get Back With Your Ex? "The ex is the ex for a reason," Radhika says. According to her, getting back with an ex is usually a bad idea. However, one can consider it seriously if they believe that the person has truly changed and evolved for the better-and that the problems that caused the breakup are actually resolvable. She does believe that such changes are very rare, and humans, generally, don't change their nature drastically. "There's a very little chance that people change so much that the root cause of their breakups is resolved. However, there are chances that people might actually evolve-then you can think of getting back with your ex," she adds. Experts also suggest that if one of the main reasons for the breakup was timing or life circumstances-like getting a big promotion and not having time to dedicate to a relationship, or having to move far for work or study-and you're both now in a better position to prioritise your relationship, then it's okay to give your relationship another chance. Sometimes you meet the right person at the wrong time. And if both of you are now ready to work it through, seriously and honestly, there's a good chance it might work this time. On the flip side, if the breakup involved cheating, emotional abuse, or persistent disrespect, it's a major red flag. In such cases, you might want to reconsider your reconsideration. And, the best way to cut off a relationship? Actually cut it off. Block, delete, mute, disappear. Radhika says people often make timelines in their heads for relationships, like, "If he doesn't call me till my birthday, I'll move on." But when breakups happen, the only real way to move on is to cut people completely out of your life, as much as possible-otherwise, there's a strong chance you'll end up right back with your ex, according to Radhika. But Can We Just Be Friends? Well, we get it. Dating your ex again can be complicated, and in some cases, it's a road to a dead end. But is becoming friends a better idea? As self-destructive as it might sound, sometimes you have to be friends with your ex-maybe because you share a close friend group, have co-parenting responsibilities, or something else entirely. Whether that's a healthy idea or not depends on the situation, says Mumbai-based counselling psychologist Absy Sam. "As a psychologist, I believe it's possible, but only under specific conditions. Both parties must be free of romantic or sexual tension and have no lingering hope of rekindling the relationship. Mutual respect for each other's boundaries is essential," she says. However, she adds that maintaining a friendship can be problematic if it's just a facade to hold on to the past or avoid grieving the end of the relationship. In collectivistic societies, she says, such friendships may also invite societal judgement or gossip, adding further complications. How To Be Friends With An Ex According to experts, like Absy, if both parties genuinely want to maintain a friendship, here's how to try it: Examine your motives: Reflect on why you want to stay friends. Is it a genuine friendship, or are you avoiding letting go? Avoid "friends with benefits" or vague emotional attachments with unspoken expectations. Set clear boundarie s: Define what is and isn't acceptable in the friendship. Respect each other's space and autonomy to keep it healthy. Accept that it may not work: Not every ex is meant to stay in your life as a friend-and that's okay. Some relationships are better left in the past. Grieving and moving on may be more healing than forcing a friendship. So, the next time you think about texting your ex at 1 am while three glasses of wine down - maybe just write it in Notes instead. Or better yet, rewatch Sex and the City and let Charlotte and her friends speak your truth.

'Materialists' review: Love and other banalities
'Materialists' review: Love and other banalities

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

'Materialists' review: Love and other banalities

'Are we in the right film?' a girl in the row behind me asked her friend. You could see why she'd be confused. They'd turned up for a New York romance with Pedro Pascal and here was an unkempt man wearing animal hide handing a bouquet to a woman in front of a cave. He puts a ring fashioned out of single flower on her finger. The title drops and then we're in New York, watching Lucy (Dakota Johnson) get ready for another day as an in-demand matchmaker. The opening of Materialists yearns to be the deer in the snow in Ildikó Enyedi's On Body and Soul (2017). But this is an American film, so poetic animal metaphors are out. The question remains: why does Celine Song's film—which insists throughout that marriage is a business deal—begin with an Edenic scene of a man and woman in love? We have to wait till the last five minutes to learn they're a dream Lucy had of the first people who decided to marry. It's funny enough with Johnson's uninflected voiceover, even better that the film's idea of cave people is 'average Middle Eastern farmer'. After they meet at a client's wedding, Lucy is steadily pursued by the groom's brother, financier Harry (Pedro Pascal), even as her actor ex-boyfriend John (Chris Evans) shuffles unhappily in the background. The romance with Harry peaks over dinner at a swanky restaurant. If you played the scene on mute, you'd think Pascal and Johnson were trading Casablanca-level lines, such is the smug look on their faces. There's some banter about the romance of a date depending on its lavishness (both seem to agree it does). He asks her to rate him as a corpse, since she'd said her job makes her think like a mortician ('A good corpse,' she says). She calls him a unicorn (matchmaker term for an unbelievably eligible single man). She goes on about his wealth, how he's meant for someone younger and posher. "I don't want to date you for your material assets,' he replies. 'I want to be with you for your intangible assets." This is so far from good writing, and yet I can understand people defending it. The scene has the aura of witty, romantic things being said—chic two-shot in profile with her leaning forward and him back, soft, sexy lighting, ersatz jazz changing to something soft and ambiguous to signal that the important part of the conversation has arrived. It also makes some logical sense: she's a matchmaker, he's in private equity, of course they'll talk numbers. The problem is, logic isn't romantic. Inventory isn't poetry. This is the moment she's supposedly swept off her feet and they're talking like they've swallowed a balance sheet. The best screwball comedies do their sexiest work with characters who can't switch off their non-romantic selves. Bringing Up Baby (1938) has Cary Grant's nerdy paleontologist moaning about misplacing his bone and Katharine Hepburn helping him find it. His Girl Friday (1940) is a romance conducted entirely in rapid-fire newsroom talk. In Materialists, though, all anyone talks about is love, and everyone's insufferable ('Love is the last country, the last ideology… when you're lost, the answer is simple, just go where love is'). Pascal looks great, but Harry is an empty dream—too beautiful, too rich, too respectful. John is a sad sack, but at least there's some life there; the cliché of a broke actor saying 'I'm a beggar for you' has an emotional directness missing in the other romantic declarations. His pathetic earnestness pushes Lucy towards cruelty; she confirms every low opinion he has about his own prospects. For a short spell, Lucy becomes something like the complex, self-doubting Julie in Joachim Trier's The Worst Person in the World (2021)—though it's one thing to try on someone's shoes, another to walk a mile in them. Song is in such a hurry to redeem Lucy that she interrupts the scene with a mercy mission, by the end of which this thread is entirely lost. It's been clear for some time that Hollywood has lost its feel for writing romance. The genre has been one of the biggest victims of the shrinking space for mid-budget, non-IP films. When I was growing up, big stars would frequently turn up in romcoms; this has become exceedingly rare now. As the films have become less frequent, writers and directors have become less sure-footed. Song's first film, Past Lives (2023), with its loose, loping narrative and sophisticated visual aesthetic, felt like a possible revival. Materialists is a step back, a return to safer narrative structures with the added pressures of working within the machine (there's a design-by-committee blandness to the wedding dance scene, carefully curated across racial and sexual demographics). 'You don't want to marry me,' Lucy tells Harry. 'You just want to do business with me.' 'Isn't marriage a business deal?' he asks. 'Yes, but love has to be on the table,' Lucy insists. Materialists acts like it's cynical, but this isn't an anti-romance. It has the bright, expensive look of a studio romcom, and shares the genre's inherent hopefulness. One suitor is let down easy, the other promises to change . Even the client whose terrible experience with a match sends Lucy into a spiral has to hear a sanctimonious 'I promise you, you're going to marry the love of your life' after it's over. Cave people are having a baby. Lucy gets a flower ring. Love was never off the table.

Panda Connect Launches to Fix a 'Broken' System, Proving a Chair Has Better Odds Than a Bollywood Star on Mainstream Apps
Panda Connect Launches to Fix a 'Broken' System, Proving a Chair Has Better Odds Than a Bollywood Star on Mainstream Apps

Business Standard

time7 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Panda Connect Launches to Fix a 'Broken' System, Proving a Chair Has Better Odds Than a Bollywood Star on Mainstream Apps

HT Syndication New Delhi [India], June 17: A new connections app, Panda, launched this month to fundamentally challenge today's broken and exploitative online platforms. The app introduces industry-first features like a strictly maintained 50/50 male-to-female ratio and "Panda Duos" for group connections, directly addressing the skewed and isolating environment found elsewhere. Panda was born from the realisation that the current system is "completely off its hinges". This was famously demonstrated by an experiment where a chair given a female profile attracted over 100 likes on a major app, while a male friend--now a Bollywood star--received zero in the same period. The app is built on the principle of fostering genuine, conversation-based relationships and aims to "harken back to the days when relationships weren't a game of super likes and premium accounts, but good conversation". "It turns out that in today's connections world, an inanimate object with a female profile has roughly 500 times better odds than a literal Bollywood-bound model," said founder Zoraver Mehta, a lawyer and classical jazz musician. "That's not just a bad date; that's a system completely off its hinges. We figured it was time to build something that actually works". Panda has already attracted over 10,000 members, 95% of whom are Gen Z , and is the fastest-growing app in its active regions. A New Philosophy for Connection * No Paid Features, No Games: Panda rejects the "pay to win" model. The platform does not commoditise connections and has no super-likes or premium gold and platinum memberships. * A Balanced and Safe Community: Beyond being the only app to maintain a 50/50 gender ratio, it is also the only Aadhar-verified application, using government ID to create the safest possible online experience for its members. * No Secret Algorithms: The app does not use secret "desirability scores" to rank users and incentivize payment. The PANDA Smart AI recommends connections based on a user's application, ideas, and ambitions, not their reception by others. Features for Genuine Connection * Panda Duos: An industry-first feature where the "PANDA Smart AI" helps two sets of best friends match with each other to make for a "fun dinner party". * AI-Powered Compatibility: The app integrates Myer-Briggs personality tests, powered by its Smart AI, to help nurture compatibility among its members. * Authenticity First: Panda is designed for "passionate, motivated, ambitious" people who don't want to waste their time. On Panda, no user--male or female--uses AI to generate their first move, a feature that is intentionally blocked to encourage real, original conversation. Panda was created for a discerning user who seeks to connect with like-minded partners, friends, and gym buddies based on shared tastes and intentions. By focusing on user well-being, security, and trust, Panda is building a community where members can be appreciated for their originality.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store