logo
Could an African cardinal become the next pope? Don't rule it out.

Could an African cardinal become the next pope? Don't rule it out.

Yahoo07-05-2025
As the Catholic Church's College of Cardinals enters the conclave to select the next leader of the church Wednesday, one of the most pressing questions is what part of the world that leader will come from. While Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines is considered to be a front-runner, known for his affable style and karaoke skills, there has been buzz about the possibility of an African pope. The Catholic population has exploded on the continent, and an estimated 20% of the world's Catholics live there.
Gelasius, who reigned from 492-496, was the last pope who hailed from Africa. And there are Africans in today's College of Cardinals who are papabile (pope potentials).
The selection of a new pope is always dramatic, but tensions arose this time even before the conclave began. There were reported leaks of conversations held at General Congregation, a meeting of the cardinals held prior to the conclave. According to unnamed sources to America Magazine, some cardinals complained about Pope Francis' papacy, especially regarding his involvement of the laity in the church. Some cardinals believe that the administration of church affairs should be held only by the ordained. These complaints come from cardinals and conservatives hoping to claw back some of the power to the West — Francis was from Argentina — for which they compiled a profile of cardinals they consider acceptable.
These cardinals may have a hard time electing the kind of pope they want, though, because Francis appointed 108 of the 133 cardinals who'll be involved in selecting the next pope. There may be a lot of chatter about a conservative or liberal pope, but Francis has stacked the deck with cardinals from all over the world.
While an African pope would be a historically stunning development, one of the drawbacks is that no African cardinal holds a major office in the Vatican. That said, Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besengu of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cardinal Robert Sarah from Guinea and Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana are three candidates to watch.
Besengu, the archbishop of Kinshasa, was appointed by Francis in 2019. At 65, he may be considered a bit too young to be pope. (Generally, electors don't like to pick someone that young as it can have a long-term effect on church polity and politics). As bishop in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Besengu stood up against President Joseph Kabila's attempts to push back elections, which bodes well for his willingness to push back against autocratic leaders. He is staunchly against homosexuality. When Francis issued a Fiducia Supplicans that allowed for same-sex blessings, Besengu followed with a statement that was explicitly opposed, stating along with some other cardinals who signed, that there'd be no same-sex blessings in Africa.
Though Cardinal Robert Sarah from Guinea is papabile, his notoriety as a strict conservative make him something of a wedge candidate who'd potentially divide groups. Appointed at age 34 as the bishop of Conakry, the 79-year-old theological hard-liner became embroiled in scandal in January 2020 for a book, 'From the Depths of Our Hearts,' supposedly co-written by Sarah and Pope Benedict XVI. The problem was that the emeritus pope did not agree to co- author that book, and his name was dropped from the publication.
Cardinal Peter Turkson, 76, archbishop of Cape Coast in Ghana, is also papabile. He was appointed as cardinal by Pope John Paul II in 2003, which may make him amenable to those who want a pope who was not appointed by Francis. Turkson is the chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. He defended Francis' same-sex blessings decision and, unlike many clerics in Africa, is against the criminalization of homosexuality, putting him at odds with Ghana's bishops and Ghana's political establishment that has made it illegal to identify as an LGBTQ person. Turkson has also been at the forefront of speaking about climate change and the environment, which puts him in line with Francis on those issues.
Anything is possible when considering who is papabile. But as the saying goes, you go into the conclave a pope, you come out a cardinal. In other words, don't assume anything.
While it would bring great joy to not only the continent of Africa, but also to persons of African descent around the world, it may be difficult in this current conclave to elect a pope from Africa. While Francis shrewdly stacked the College of Cardinals, it may be hard to get consensus around candidates who are so divergent in opinions and skill sets. But for some among the African faithful, even having their cardinals considered is a win.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uganda denies pact with the United States concerning its deportation scheme
Uganda denies pact with the United States concerning its deportation scheme

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Uganda denies pact with the United States concerning its deportation scheme

A top Ugandan official has denied rumors that the nation has agreed to accept illegal immigrants deported from the United States, disputing assertions that Kampala is part of Washington's larger effort to redirect migrants to third countries. Ugandan officials denied approval of an agreement to accept U.S. deportees. Reports suggest that broader U.S. efforts are underway to redirect migrants to third countries. Minister Okello Oryem emphasizes Uganda's infrastructure limitations to accommodate deportees. The statement came on Wednesday, after CBS News reported that Uganda and Honduras had reached deportation agreements with the United States authorities. According to the report, Honduras was slated to receive hundreds of deported individuals from Spanish-speaking nations, while Uganda agreed to accept an unspecified number of African and Asian migrants who had applied for asylum on the US-Mexico border. As per the reported agreement, Uganda agreed to welcome deported migrants as long as they do not have criminal records. The deals were tied to President Donald Trump's immigration policy, which aims to deport millions of illegal immigrants from the United States. However, Uganda has denied the report. "To the best of my knowledge, we have not reached such an agreement," Okello Oryem, state minister for foreign affairs, told Reuters by text message. "We do not have the facilities and infrastructure to accommodate such illegal immigrants in Uganda." The CBS story quoted confidential US government papers indicating that the Trump administration was broadening the scope of deportations, including plans to transfer asylum seekers and convicted criminals to third nations such as South Sudan and Eswatini. Similar incident between America and Eswatini This is hardly the first time an African country has been caught in the crossfire of Washington's deportation campaign. In July, Eswatini denied the United States' claim that deported ex-convicts who could not return to their own countries would be placed in the kingdom. Instead, Eswatini stated that it was collaborating with the United States and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to guarantee that deportees were finally returned to their respective countries. Earlier reports said that a US deportation flight carrying immigrants from Yemen, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, and Jamaica had arrived in Eswatini. The move is part of a policy reintroduced by the US Department of Homeland Security that enables migrants to be deported to third-party nations, even if those countries are not their home countries. The contentious policy gained traction in June when the United States Supreme Court decided in favor of the Trump administration, giving it expanded authority to deport migrants without allowing them to demonstrate that they suffer persecution or danger in their home countries. The United States hailed the judgment as a significant triumph in its fight against illegal immigration. However, critics contend that the approach violates international asylum rules and puts vulnerable migrants at risk by transferring them to nations with no linkages or support systems.

Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe
Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe

As Muslim migration roils Europe, some Catholic bishops are starting to notice. 'For decades, the Islamization of Europe has been progressing through mass immigration,' Polish Bishop Antoni Długosz said July 13, adding that illegal immigrants 'create serious problems in the countries they arrive in.' Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan spoke more bluntly in March: 'We're witnessing an invasion. They are not refugees. This is an invasion, a mass Islamization of Europe.' Advertisement Yet Pope Leo XIV lives in a different dimension. 'In a world darkened by war and injustice . . . migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope,' Leo said July 25. 'Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.' Leo's comments express more than blissful sentimentality. They reveal the Vatican's role in encouraging open borders and exempting migrants from accountability. Advertisement In Europe's case, that involves deliberate blindness to the violent, totalitarian nature of Islam and many of its followers. This Catholic approach toward Islam reflects the ideas of Louis Massignon, a French scholar from the early 20th century. Massignon described Islam as 'the faith of Abraham revived with Muhammad,' and asserted that Muslims 'have the right to equality among the monotheisms descended from Abraham.' French Catholic scholar Alain Besançon described the results. 'An entire literature favorable to Islam has grown up in Europe, much of it the work of Catholic priests under the sway of Massignon's ideas,' he wrote. Advertisement Asylum seekers from Afghanistan set up tents inside of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage in Brussels on Jan. 7, 2014. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir Besançon attributed that posture to 'an underlying dissatisfaction with modernity, and with our liberal, capitalist, individualistic arrangements,' a dissatisfaction that the Vatican embodies. 'Alarmed by the ebbing of religious faith in the Christian West, and particularly in Europe,' Massignon's advocates 'cannot but admire Muslim devoutness,' Besançon wrote. 'Surely, they reason, it is better to believe in something than to believe in nothing, and since these Muslims believe in something, they must believe in the same thing we do.' Advertisement The Catholic Church officially embraced Massignon's ideas at the Second Vatican Council in two documents. One, Nostra Aetate, focused on the church's relationship with Judaism but additionally addressed Islam: 'The Church regards with esteem the Muslims. They adore the one God . . . they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet.' The other, Lumen Gentium, declared that 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God.' That passage made the Catholic catechism. But what Besançon called 'indulgent ecumenicism' toward Islam goes beyond words. During John Paul II's papacy, the church embraced outright appeasement. Catholic bishops sold underutilized churches and schools to Muslim groups; many of the churches became mosques. In October 2006, the Capuchin Franciscan friars agreed to help the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) build a mosque in Genoa next to a monastery. The friars even helped build the mosque's foundation. Advertisement But the UCOII — affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood — advocates 'an extremist version of the Quran, where Christians, Jews and Westerners are criminalized, as well as women and other Muslims who don't submit to their rule,' Magdi Allam, a convert to Catholicism from Islam, reported for Milan's Corriere della Sera. In 2006, the group also demanded Islamic schools, banks and clerical review of textbooks. Its president, Mohamed Nour Dachan, refused to sign a document pledging Muslims to accept Italy's constitution, denounce terrorism and recognize Israel's right to exist. Seven months earlier, a Vatican cardinal even suggested that Muslim students receive Islamic religious instruction in the hour reserved for Catholic instruction in Italian schools. Advertisement 'If there are 100 Muslim children in a school, I don't see why they shouldn't be taught their religion,' said the late Cardinal Renato Martino, then the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 'If we said 'no' until we saw equivalent treatment for the Christian minorities in Muslim countries, I would say that we were placing ourselves on their level.' In 2008, the Catholic bishops of England and Wales asked Catholic schools to reserve prayer rooms for Muslim students and to adapt bathroom facilities for ritual cleansing before prayer. But the worst example of appeasement took place in Belgium. As part of a campaign to force the government to grant amnesty, Belgium's Catholic bishops turned their churches into homes for Muslim migrants, making them squatters. An Afghan refugee seen at the altar of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage on Jan. 30, 2014. REUTERS Advertisement In May 2006, more than 30 Belgian churches served such a purpose. About 300 Africans occupied Antwerp's Magdalena Chapel. Other churches held as many as 700 squatters. At Our Lady of Succor Church in Brussels, squatters lived in small tents donated by Catholic relief agencies, conducted Muslim services, erected computer tables near the pulpit and even set fires on the floor. Friar Herwig Arts described a scene at Antwerp's Jesuit chapel: migrants 'removed the tabernacle [and] installed a television set and radios, depriving us of the opportunity to pray in our own chapel and say Mass.' He went on, 'For me, the place has been desecrated. I feel I cannot enter it anymore.' Advertisement Belgium's bishops were not amused. Arts was chided by Belgium's leading clergy. 'Solidarity cannot be limited to one's own nation, said the late Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then the country's leading prelate. Monsingor Luc van Looy, then the bishop of Ghent, even said 'illegal fugitives' were 'entitled to a good place in our society. Arts has been silent on the topic ever since. But two decades later, Kazakhstan's Bishop Schneider refuses to stay silent: 'This is a global political agenda by the powerful of the world to destroy Europe.' Leo thus faces an existential challenge, one that blissful sentimentality cannot answer: Will he allow a church that played a pivotal role in creating European civilization to perform a more decisive part in destroying it? This article first ran in The Spectator's US edition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store