US carbon removal hub funding may face Energy Department cuts, sources say
By Valerie Volcovici
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Energy is weighing cuts of hundreds of millions of dollars in grants to two projects in Texas and Louisiana aimed at demonstrating technology to capture carbon from the atmosphere at commercial scale, three sources familiar with the matter said.
The Direct Air Capture hubs, part of former President Joe Biden's effort to slash U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, were launched by the DOE's Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations to help commercialize the expensive and nascent carbon removal technology. At full operation, the two hubs could remove more than 2 million metric tons of carbon emissions per year, far more than the world's biggest operating DAC plant in Iceland.
The two largest U.S. hubs are Louisiana's Project Cypress, run by research and development firm Battelle, Climeworks Corporation and Heirloom Carbon Technologies, and the South Texas DAC Hub, proposed by Occidental Petroleum subsidiary 1PointFive, Carbon Engineering and engineering firm Worley.
The projects are on a list of Biden-era programs targeted to be eliminated to fund tax cuts in Congress's budget reconciliation bill, which is being reviewed by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the sources said. They requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly.
The two hubs were awarded $550 million and $500 million respectively under Biden, but have so far only received their first tranche of $50 million each.
An Energy Department spokesperson said it was conducting a department-wide review to ensure programs align with the Trump administration's priorities.
'This review is ongoing, and speculation by anonymous sources about the results of the review are just that – speculation," the spokesperson said.
The roughly 20 smaller DAC research projects identified by Biden's administration for grants were not on the list, and their status was unclear, the sources said.
The capital-intensive demonstration projects cannot continue without receiving the rest of their grants and cannot survive even two more months of uncertainty as Wright makes his final funding decisions, said a source involved in one of the projects.
Louisiana state officials turned up the pressure on Wright and the state's congressional delegation this week to save funding for its DAC hub.
"I urge you to contact DOE Secretary Chris Wright and ask him to take every necessary step to advance this critically needed federal grant," Louisiana's Secretary for Economic Development Susan Bonnett Bourgeois wrote in a letter on Thursday to the state's U.S. senators and representatives, which was seen by Reuters.
Occidental did not respond to a request for comment on the potential DAC hub cuts but said on the company's February investor call that it has had several conversations with President Donald Trump about the need for DAC technology and for subsidies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
38 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Everyone Is Saying The Same Thing About This Video Of Donald Trump Tripping
A video of Donald Trump stumbling up stairs into Air Force One went mega viral on Sunday. This picture is also everywhere: And the zoom in: Naturally and expectedly, people had a lot to say about this one! This person wrote, "My friend said, 'So, there was sleepy Joe, now we have Trippy Trump." Another person said, "Slipping on all them lies he's saying about Los Angeles." And this person joked: "Walking in heels is tough." But the most common comment was something like this: "Wasn't he laughing at Biden for the same thing??" "Where are all the people who said Biden tripping meant he was in mental decline? Bueller?" one person asked. "Life has a funny way of showing you different prospectives after one has harshly judged another," another person commented. And a bunch of people said something like: "Please ask Fox News to show this." Needless to say, I can't wait to see how he blames Biden for this one.
Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russia Won't End Ukraine War Until NATO 'Pulls Out' of Baltics: Moscow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Ukraine war won't end until NATO withdraws troops from the Baltics, a top Russian official has warned. Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister responsible for U.S. relations, nonproliferation and arms control, made the remarks in an interview with state-run news agency Tass. Newsweek has reached out to the Kremlin and NATO for comment by email. Why It Matters Ryabkov's comments mark a shift in the Kremlin's position. He suggested that the conflict's roots lie not only in Ukraine itself but in NATO's eastward expansion. According to Ryabkov, the withdrawal of NATO forces from the Baltics would help bring an end to the war. What To Know NATO maintains a strong military presence in the Baltic States, with multinational battle groups and brigades stationed in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. The military alliance bolstered its presence in the region in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It said in an update on June 6 that the eight battle groups "demonstrate the strength of the trans-Atlantic bond and the Alliance's solidarity, determination and ability to respond to any aggression." Also, Sweden and Finland have switched from being neutral to joining NATO since the invasion. The Kremlin had said Ukraine must abandon its ambitions to join NATO as a condition for ending the war, but Ryabkov appeared to signal to Tass that the alliance must withdraw completely from the Baltics as well. In the article titled "Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov: It is impossible to resolve the conflict until NATO pulls out," the official argued that resolving the conflict in Ukraine requires addressing what he described as the root causes. "The American side requires practical steps aimed at eliminating the root causes of the fundamental contradictions between us in the area of security. "Among these causes, NATO expansion is in the foreground. Without resolving this fundamental and most acute problem for us, it is simply impossible to resolve the current conflict in the Euro-Atlantic region." Ryabkov suggested NATO's eastward expansion was central to the war. "Given the nature and genesis of the Ukrainian crisis, provoked by the previous U.S. authorities and the West as a whole, this conflict naturally acts, well, if you like, as a test, a trial, which checks the seriousness of Washington's intentions to straighten out our relations," he said. Last month, three Russian sources with knowledge of Washington-led negotiations told Reuters that Putin's conditions for ending the Ukraine war include a written pledge from Western leaders to halt NATO's eastward expansion. What People Are Saying A senior Russian source with knowledge of top-level Kremlin thinking told Reuters in an article published on May 28: "Putin is ready to make peace but not at any price." A second source told Reuters: "Putin has toughened his position." Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister, told Tass: "Trump's return to the White House, declaring his commitment to a political and diplomatic settlement of the Ukrainian crisis, has become a reason for cautious optimism in terms of a potential normalization of relations with the United States, but also in a broader sense. "It was in this vein that the presidents of Russia and the United States held four telephone conversations. Our side expressed gratitude for the United States' support in resuming direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, interrupted by the Ukrainian side in 2022. "But Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin also confirmed the basic principle of the need to eliminate the root causes of the conflict within the framework of political and diplomatic efforts. Otherwise, long-term peace cannot be ensured, and in concrete terms, it is necessary to exclude any opportunity for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to take advantage of the pause for a respite and regroup their forces." What Happens Next Moscow and Kyiv will continue to launch strikes on each other's territory, with the war in Ukraine showing few signs of a peace deal in the near future.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Seems Terrified These Messages About Its Robotaxi Rollout Will Be Released
We're less than a week away from Tesla's launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. The company's long-awaited ride-hailing service is set to kick off on June 12, albeit with some significant limitations. A mere "ten or 20 vehicles," which will rely on human safety drivers, will ferry passengers on "day one," CEO Elon Musk revealed during the company's disastrous earnings call in April. Tellingly, the carmaker is already desperately trying to steer the conversation, closely barring the public from accessing information about the robotaxi service pilot. As Reuters reports, Tesla is trying to prevent the city from releasing public records related to the project, raising urgent questions surrounding Tesla's long-awaited foray into the autonomous ride-hailing space. As Tesla reels from Musk's incredibly damaging leadership — or lack thereof — the stakes are incredibly high. Making matters even worse, the company's shares tanked on Thursday, following the mercurial CEO's ugly spat with the president breaking out into the public, wiping out a record $152 billion in market value. Vehicle sales have also fallen off a cliff, compounding a growing crisis. In other words, an extraordinary amount is riding on Tesla's Hail Mary robotaxi launch. To learn more, Reuters requested communications records between Tesla and Austin officials spanning the last two years. But as one public information officer from the city told the agency, "third parties" intervened, preventing them from releasing these cords to protect their "privacy or property interests." A Tesla lawyer told Reuters that the EV maker was simply protecting "confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information" and that releasing these records would "irreparably harm Tesla." That degree of secrecy is certainly suspicious. Apart from protecting its IP, it feels plausible that Tesla is trying to prevent the public from exposing the EV maker's foray into the autonomous ride-hailing industry as half-baked and woefully behind the competition. Literal insiders certainly seem to feel that way. In a podcast interview last month, Tesla's head of Autopilot and AI software, Ashok Elluswamy, admitted that "technically Waymo is already performing." "We are lagging by maybe a couple of years," he added. Musk has bet the company's entire fate on a future in which "hundreds of thousands, if not over a million, Teslas" are "doing self-driving in the US" in a matter of years. But glaring shortcomings with the firm's driver assistance software remain. Federal regulators are still investigating fatal crashes involving the carmaker's misleadingly-named "Full Self-Driving" feature, casting its future as a fully autonomous taxi company in doubt. Unperturbed, Musk has remained characteristically optimistic, tweeting late last month that "Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents." "A month ahead of schedule," he added. "Next month, first self-delivery from factory to customer." More on the robotaxi launch: Tesla's Robotaxi Launch Is Already an Enormous Mess
