Madison Booker named finalist for for national award
On Wednesday, Longhorns star Madison Booker continued to earn national recognition for her play. The talented sophomore was named one of five finalists for the 2025 John R. Wooden Award. Her latest recognition comes following another season of excellence in Austin.
As the Longhorns have been one of the best teams in the country, Booker has been at the center of their success. She has scored 20 or more points in 14 games this season. While the Germantown High School product has made headlines with her scoring, she has also made an impact on the boards. Booker has a team-leading eight games with at least ten rebounds.
Whenever Booker has had the ball in her hands, she has been hard to stop. The Longhorns star is shooting 46.5 percent from the field this season. She has also been effective from three-point range, shooting 41 percent. Against top-ten teams, she has taken her game to another level, averaging 20.5 points per game.
That success has translated to the NCAA tournament where Booker has shined. In four games, the Mississippi native is averaging 18.8 points and eight rebounds per game. With her leading the way, Texas is two wins away from ending their title drought.
While Booker's focus is on winning a national championship, adding the Wooden Award to her resume would not be a bad way to end the season. Since starting her Longhorns career, Booker has been one of the best teams in the country due to her all-around game, and as a result, the awards have been rolling in.
Booker won't have to wait long to find out her fate regarding the Wooden Award. The winner will be announced on April 11th at the Los Angeles Athletic Club John R. Wooden Award Show.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NCAA releases statement criticizing West Virginia players' eligibility ruling
In light of a judge's ruling to grant four football players eligibility in 2025, the NCAA released a statement. The organization criticized the ruling and the impact it could have on 'academic standards. Judge John Preston Bailey in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Virginia issued a temporary restraining order Wednesday, paving the way for the four players to suit up this year. , , and were all waiting on answers about whether they could play for WVU in NCAA further called for Congressional action to settle the landscape and provide clarity on eligibility rules. It also cited the impact on academic standards, alluding to the fact Robinson was deemed academically ineligible, an NCAA attorney said during a hearing. 'This ruling will lead to high school students losing opportunities to compete in college athletics and it erodes the academic standards that have for decades ensured student-athletes have obtained an education,' the statement read. 'The NCAA and its member schools are making changes to deliver more benefits to student-athletes, but the patchwork of state laws and differing court opinions are why partnering with Congress is essential to provide stability for all college athletes.' This story will be updated.
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge allows 4 West Virginia football players fighting NCAA eligibility rules to compete
A federal judge on Wednesday allowed four football players to compete at West Virginia this season, the latest ruling in one of a long line of cases challenging the NCAA's eligibility rules. U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey issued a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed by defensive lineman Jimmori Robinson, running back Tye Edwards, safety Justin Harrington and wide receiver Jeff Weimer. They were previously denied appeals to play, then challenged the NCAA's rule that sets a five-year limit for players to compete over four seasons. Each of the players attended junior colleges that weren't members of any NCAA divisions. They contended those years shouldn't have counted against the five-year limit. Eligibility cases involving more than two dozen college football players are playing out in courts nationwide. Wednesday's ruling comes two days after a federal court in California denied efforts to play this season by Southern Cal offensive lineman DJ Wingfield and UCLA wide receiver Kaedin Robinson. 'The nationwide case law reveals a clear split,' Bailey wrote. In acknowledging a lack of guidance from higher courts on the subject, Bailey said he aligned his ruling with those made in favor of separate appeals by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia, Rutgers safety Jett Elad and former Nevada wide receiver Cortez Braham Jr., now at Memphis. Bailey agreed with the rulings in each of those cases that determined the NCAA's eligibility rules were commercial in nature and therefore subject to antitrust scrutiny under the Sherman Act. Bailey made a similar ruling in late 2023 in favor of college basketball players who previously were denied the chance to play immediately after transferring a second time. That lawsuit had alleged the NCAA transfer rule's waiver process violated federal antitrust law. In some cases involving college football players where NCAA eligibility rules were upheld, 'it is apparent, however, that those decisions were grounded in a pre-NIL world,' Bailey wrote, citing name, image and likeness compensation deals that commenced in July 2021. 'In the current era of NIL compensation, eligibility rules are commercial in nature,' Bailey wrote. He added that athlete eligibility 'is even more commercial now' following the so-called House settlement earlier this year that cleared the way for schools to start paying millions to their athletes. In a statement, NCAA spokeswoman Saquandra Heath said the ruling 'erodes the academic standards that have for decades ensured student-athletes obtained an education.' Heath also said that while the NCAA and its member schools are making changes to deliver more benefits to student-athletes, 'the patchwork of state laws and differing court opinions are why partnering with Congress is essential to provide stability for all college athletes.' At West Virginia, the four players have not participated in fall practices. Weimer is the only one not currently listed on the roster. Jimmori Robinson is the most accomplished. Last season at UTSA, he amassed 10 1/2 sacks and 17 tackles for loss as a linebacker and was named the American Athletic Conference's defensive player of the year. He would provide immediate help at a hybrid-linebacker position on a West Virginia defense that is undergoing a complete makeover under new coach Rich Rodriguez. There are still unanswered questions about Robinson's status. During arguments in court in Wheeling on Tuesday, an NCAA lawyer contended that Robinson had academic issues at UTSA, according to multiple reports. An attorney for Robinson said the defense team was aware of the academic situation but declined to be more specific in court. ___
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Judge allows 4 West Virginia football players fighting NCAA eligibility rules to compete
A federal judge on Wednesday allowed four football players to compete at West Virginia this season, the latest ruling in one of a long line of cases challenging the NCAA's eligibility rules. U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey issued a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed by defensive lineman Jimmori Robinson, running back Tye Edwards, safety Justin Harrington and wide receiver Jeff Weimer. They were previously denied appeals to play, then challenged the NCAA's rule that sets a five-year limit for players to compete over four seasons.
