logo
What To Expect From Trump-Putin Alaska Summit: Goals, Stakes, And Possible Outcomes

What To Expect From Trump-Putin Alaska Summit: Goals, Stakes, And Possible Outcomes

News183 days ago
Talks between Trump and Putin will test if a 'feel-out' meeting can pave the way for peace in Ukraine. With Kyiv absent and Moscow eyeing recognition, here's what's on the table
When US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska on Friday, it will be their first face-to-face encounter since Trump's return to the White House and their first meeting in more than seven years. It also marks one of the most significant moments in US–Russia relations since the war in Ukraine began in 2022.
The summit was finalised in barely a week, a sharp departure from Washington's policy of isolating Putin after the invasion that has killed hundreds of thousands and devastated both countries. For the Kremlin, the very fact of the meeting is already a diplomatic win; for Trump, it is an opportunity to see if his self-proclaimed deal-making skills can yield even the beginnings of a ceasefire.
The talks will take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. According to the Kremlin, the leaders will begin with a one-on-one discussion with interpreters, followed by delegation-level talks over a working breakfast, and conclude with a joint press conference. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has described the encounter as a 'listening exercise" for Trump.
Possible Outcomes From The Alaska Talks
outcomes could still be significant. The talks might produce symbolic measures, such as a commitment to continue negotiations, the announcement of a follow-up meeting involving Ukraine, or limited humanitarian steps like prisoner exchanges and pledges to protect civilian infrastructure.
Another scenario is a loosely worded framework for a potential ceasefire, possibly involving a monitored pause in hostilities. However, anything seen as legitimising Russia's territorial gains would draw strong opposition from Kyiv and European capitals.
It is also possible the meeting ends without substantive agreements, with Putin gaining the optics of being treated as a global player and Trump portraying the summit as a valuable 'testing of the waters" while keeping the door open for future talks.
Why Is The Alaska Summit Happening Now?
According to The New York Times, both sides had discussed a possible summit since January but saw no clear path forward. Putin, confident of Russia's battlefield position, felt no urgency to negotiate. Trump, initially supportive of Moscow's position and critical of US military aid to Kyiv, also held off while a resolution seemed unlikely.
That changed last week when Trump advanced a deadline for imposing new sanctions and tariffs unless Russia took steps toward ending the war. He also raised tariffs on Indian imports to 50 per cent to penalise New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. Days later, the Kremlin requested the meeting.
The timing also reflects political calculations. For Putin, it is a chance to reassert Russia on the world stage. For Trump, it is an opportunity to show progress toward his campaign pledge to end the war, and, as he has often hinted, to bolster his case for a Nobel Peace Prize.
What Does Putin Want From The Summit?
Putin's first gain is recognition. By meeting the US president on American soil and holding a joint press conference, the Kremlin can claim that Western isolation has failed. 'So much for being isolated," crowed the Russian tabloid Moskovsky Komsomolets earlier this week.
Alaska offers both practical and symbolic advantages. At its closest point, mainland Alaska is only 90km across the Bering Strait from Russia's Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, a remote, sparsely populated region in the Far East that Putin has visited multiple times to underline its strategic value. This proximity allows him to travel to the summit without overflying 'hostile" nations — Kremlin shorthand for countries that have closed their airspace to Russian aircraft since 2022, including most of Europe, Canada, and the US itself outside of special arrangements.
The location also keeps the meeting far from Ukraine and the European Union, consistent with Moscow's strategy of sidelining Kyiv and EU leaders in favour of direct talks with Washington. It carries historical symbolism too: Russia sold Alaska to the US in 1867, and Russian state media cite the sale as proof that borders can change, a narrative the Kremlin uses to justify its actions in Ukraine.
On substance, Putin's demands remain maximalist. As per NYT, he wants Russia to keep all territory seized in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, bar Ukraine from NATO membership, limit its armed forces, and ensure a pro-Moscow government in Kyiv. Ukraine has rejected these outright, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy declaring, 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier."
Putin may also broaden the agenda to include economic cooperation, the Arctic, and other US–Russia issues, or simply use the meeting to buy time while consolidating battlefield gains.
What Does Trump Hope To Achieve?
Trump entered office promising to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. More than six months into his presidency, that goal remains unfulfilled, but it continues to shape his approach.
His stance toward Russia has swung between conciliation and confrontation. Early this year, he suspended military aid to Ukraine and publicly berated Zelenskyy in a dramatic Oval Office meeting. More recently, he has condemned Russia's attacks on civilians as 'disgraceful" and 'disgusting", and warned of 'very severe consequences" if Putin refuses to halt the war.
This week, Trump called the Alaska meeting a 'feel-out" session, saying he might know within 'the first two minutes" if a deal is possible. While lowering expectations by describing it as a listening exercise, he also suggested that both Putin and Zelenskyy want peace. Even modest progress, such as agreeing to further talks or limited humanitarian steps, could be cast as a political win and evidence of his peacemaker credentials.
Why Ukraine And Europe Are Wary
Kyiv's absence from the Anchorage talks is a major concern for Ukraine and its allies. On Wednesday, Zelenskyy joined a call with Trump and European leaders to outline five principles for negotiations, according to NYT. Chief among them was that a ceasefire must come first.
European governments fear bilateral US–Russia talks could lead to proposals, such as a 'land swap", that Ukraine cannot accept. They also worry that if Kyiv rejects such terms, Trump could scale back US support. For Ukraine, any deal that legitimises Russian territorial gains is unacceptable.
Trump–Putin Relationship
The Trump–Putin relationship has been closely watched since their first meeting at the 2017 G20 summit in Hamburg, where they exchanged warm words and a businesslike handshake. Ukraine was on the agenda even then, with Trump raising concerns about Russia's destabilisation efforts, a reference to Moscow's 2014 annexation of Crimea and its backing of separatists in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions, which kept the conflict simmering well before the 2022 full-scale invasion.
They have met at multiple forums since. The 2018 Helsinki summit was especially controversial, with Trump siding with Putin over US intelligence agencies on Russian election interference, a stance that drew bipartisan criticism at home.
Former officials told the BBC that Putin tends to dominate conversations with long, rapid monologues, controlling the agenda and leaving little space for responses. Fiona Hill, a former Trump adviser, has said Putin sometimes uses sarcasm in Russian that is 'totally lost in translation" and has mocked Trump.
John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, described Putin as methodical and always prepared, traits he attributes to the Russian leader's KGB training, while Trump prefers an unstructured, freewheeling style. This, Bolton argues, can give Putin an advantage in one-on-one talks.
The Bottom Line
top videos
View all
The Trump–Putin Alaska summit is as much about optics and positioning as it is about the war in Ukraine. For Putin, it is a platform to show that Russia is not isolated and to press his demands directly to Washington. For Trump, it is a chance to project statesmanship and lay even a thin foundation for a legacy as a peacemaker.
Without Ukraine at the table, any agreement will be hard to implement. But in a war now in its fourth year, even symbolic gestures toward dialogue will be scrutinised, and heavily spun, by both sides.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Alaska Donald Trump - Vladimir Putin Russia Ukraine War
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 15, 2025, 13:54 IST
News explainers What To Expect From Trump-Putin Alaska Summit: Goals, Stakes, And Possible Outcomes
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘You sold out America': Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger lambasts Donald Trump's 'embarrassing' presser with Putin
‘You sold out America': Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger lambasts Donald Trump's 'embarrassing' presser with Putin

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

‘You sold out America': Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger lambasts Donald Trump's 'embarrassing' presser with Putin

Actor and former Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger lambasted US President Donald Trump, calling his joint press conference with Russian President Vladmir Putin "embarrassing". In a video on YouTube, Schwarzenegger said Trump "stood there like a little wet noodle, like a little fanboy." "I mean, I was asking myself, when you gonna ask him for an autograph or for a selfie or something like that?," Schwarzenegger said. He went on with his scathing attack on Trump, saying, "You've literally sold out at this press conference, our intelligence community, our justice system, and worst of all, our country." "You're the president of the United States. You shouldn't do that. And what's the matter with you?," he asked. "I mean, whatever happened to the strong words or to the strength of Ronald Reagan when he stood there at the Berlin Wall and he said, Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall. What happened? All that?," Arnold Schwarzenegger said as he ended his video message with a sigh. Schwarzenegger's criticism came after Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin held a joint press conference in Alaska on Friday at their high-stakes summit, but took no questions from journalists. The press conference followed some three hours of talks between the two leaders and senior aides on the brutal war in Ukraine, which Moscow invaded in 2022. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin on Friday made no apparent breakthrough on Ukraine in a high-stakes summit, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire. "We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said. "There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant," Trump said without elaborating. "But we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there." Putin also spoke in general terms of cooperation in a joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes. "We hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine," Putin said. Putin told Trump he agreed with him that the Ukraine war, which Putin ordered, would not have happened if Trump were president instead of Joe Biden.

JP Morgan, Commerzbank and ING to Back European Defense Bank
JP Morgan, Commerzbank and ING to Back European Defense Bank

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

JP Morgan, Commerzbank and ING to Back European Defense Bank

(Bloomberg) -- JP Morgan Chase & Co, Commerzbank AG and ING Group NV are among the banks to give their backing to a new Europe-wide bank designed to boost security spending across the region, according to the development group guiding its creation. The banking heavyweights, which also include RBC Capital Markets and Landesbank Baden-Württemberg, are endorsing the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB), which is hoping to raise £100 billion ($132.9 billion) to turbocharge rearmament and counter threats, development group chief executive Rob Murray said Thursday. The idea is to allow European nations to rapidly invest in defense procurement without causing soaring government debt, at a time when US President Donald Trump has threatened to curtail military support to the continent. The bank will also support allies in North America and the Indo-Pacific region. The bank hopes to address systemic problems in defense financing, particularly among smaller companies, which struggle to secure the credit needed to produce critical components. The DSRB would provide guarantees for commercial banks to unlock credit for suppliers. It would also issue bonds backed by an AAA rating, which would lower state borrowing costs. 'We're trying to get armaments into our nations' inventories as quickly as possible, such that we can deter, at least from a European perspective, Russia, and from an Indo-Pacific perspective, China,' Murray, the former head of innovation at NATO, said in an interview. 'It's about making sure that allied nations are not susceptible to being unable to manufacture the elements they require to be able to defend themselves.' Other advisers to the DSRB development group, which will be internationally governed, include Stuart Peach, former chairman of the NATO Military Committee, and John Cummins, former chief executive officer of Aviva Capital Partners. The bank will be another tool for nations to leverage, Murray said. If each country in NATO follows through with spending 5% of their GDP on defense, it would result in an extra $1.9 trillion in spending, he said. 'The question is, how do we finance that?' An example of a project that could benefit from the bank is the Global Combat Air Programme, a tie-up between the UK, Italy and Japan that aims to produce a next-generation stealth aircraft by 2035. If those countries were shareholders in the bank, they could secure multiyear financing without being tied to the funding cycle of government defense departments. 'The companies can do their capex and actually get on and start building,' Murray said. The bank in September will launch working groups with the finance firms, who are operating on a no-fee basis, Murray said. Their main focus will be areas including designing the bank's capital structure, advising on investor engagement and ratings advisory. (Updates with comment from Murray) More stories like this are available on

'Since opposition isn't...': Shashi Tharoor's shoutout for Shubhanshu Shukla
'Since opposition isn't...': Shashi Tharoor's shoutout for Shubhanshu Shukla

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Since opposition isn't...': Shashi Tharoor's shoutout for Shubhanshu Shukla

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Monday lauded astronaut Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla's historic mission to the International Space Station (ISS), calling it a 'powerful symbol' of India's human spaceflight ambitions and a crucial precursor to the upcoming Gaganyaan programme. Shashi Tharoor lauded Shubhanshu Shukla for the feats he achieved in space. 'Since the Opposition are not participating in the special discussion, let me say how proud all Indians are of the recent mission of Commander Shubhanshu Shukla to the ISS. It served as a stepping stone to our nation's own human spaceflight program, Gaganyaan,' Tharoor said in a post on X (formerly Twitter). Earlier in the day, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had urged opposition parties to join a special Lok Sabha discussion on Shukla's mission and India's space programme. Tharoor's message seemed to be a jibe at the other Opposition leaders choosing to stay away from the discussion to celebrate Shukla's achievement. The senior Congress leader noted that Shukla's flight gave the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) 'invaluable hands-on experience and data that cannot be replicated in simulations,' including first-hand insights into spacecraft systems, launch procedures, and the psychological and physiological effects of microgravity. These, he said, would be crucial in 'de-risking and refining' Gaganyaan. Tharoor highlighted that the mission tested Indian systems and protocols in a live space environment and generated scientific findings - from human health studies to plant growth experiments - that would directly shape life-support and medical systems for future Indian spaceflights. Beyond its technical gains, he stressed the diplomatic significance of the mission, describing it as a milestone in 'global space diplomacy' that demonstrated India's readiness for multilateral cooperation and opened new avenues for joint research and investment. 'Commander Shukla's historic flight serves as a powerful symbol of India's ambitions in human spaceflight. It has captured the nation's imagination, inspiring a new generation to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, maths & space studies — all essential for sustaining India's long-term space goals. Well done,' Tharoor said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store