
Should you bother about CMEPA's 20% tax on interest earned from savings?
This provision might have caused public confusion, perhaps due to several posts circulating that it imposes a 20% tax on total savings.
The Department of Finance (DOF) has since clarified that only the interest earned from a depositor's savings in a bank is taxed 20%, and not the amount of savings itself.
Under CMEPA, all interest income deposited in banks is charged a 20% withholding tax, which local banks started to implement on July 1, 2025.
'A final tax of 20% is hereby imposed upon the amount of interest yield, or other monetary benefit earned or received from any currency bank deposit, deposit substitute, trust fund, or other similar arrangements,' Section 6 of the measure reads.
Clearly, the law does not slap tax on total savings deposited in a bank, but on the interests it earns.
What is CMEPA?
The Republic Act No. 122141 or CMEPA amended several provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code, namely sections 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 42, 51, 56, 57, 127, 149, 174, 176, 179, 190, 199, and 258, to 'harmonize' and simplify taxation of passive income across financial instruments in a bid to encourage wider public participation in the country's capital markets.
The law defines 'passive income' as any income earned from sources that do not require a taxpayer's active pursuit and performance of trade or business.
CMEPA and the 20% interest tax: What gives?
Prior to CMEPA's enactment into law, all interest earned in a regular savings account is already charged 20%.
Interviewed on Super Radyo dzBB, Finance Secretary Ralph Recto said, '1998 pa may buwis 'yan.'
Recto said 99.6% of depositors or those with regular savings accounts are already being taxed on the interest they earned before the law took effect.
Below is a sample computation from the Asian Consulting Group (ACG), which shows how a 20% tax on interest earned in a year at 0.250% could be reflected in a regular savings account with P100,000:
Before CMEPA After CMEPA Interest earned at 0.250% (1year) P250 P250 Less: 20% final withholding tax P50 P50 Interest income received P200 P200
Prior to the uniform tax rate, taxes on interest earned from savings were tiered and based on the maturity or lock-in periods — 20% for those less than three years; 12% for three years to less than four years; 5% for four years to less than five years; exemptions for more than five years; and 15% for foreign currency deposit units (FCDUs) or dollars.
The Finance chief said that only 0.4% of depositors enjoyed the preferential tax rates.
'Kaya ginawang uniform… kasi 0.4% lang ang may long-term savings,' Recto said.
With the law in effect, those who will open a long-term time deposit account would now bear the 20% tax on the interest they earn, which was previously tax-exempt if the maturity was over five years.
Below is a sample computation from ACG for a seven-year time deposit of P500,000 earning an annual interest rate of 2.50%:
Before CMEPA After CMEPA Interest earned (1 year) P12,500 P12,500 Less: 20% final withholding tax Tax-exempt P2,500 Interest income earned P12,500 P10,000
ACG chief tax advisor Mon Abrea echoed Recto's explanation, saying that the 20% tax on interest earned from savings is 'not a new tax.'
'The recently enacted Capital Market Efficiency and Protection Act (CMEPA) does not introduce a new tax on savings or deposit accounts. Interest income from such deposits has long been subject to a 20% final withholding tax under the Tax Reform Act of 1997,' Abrea said.
'What CMEPA does is standardize the tax treatment by also imposing the same 20% final tax on interest income from long-term time deposits, which were previously exempt if held for more than five years. This reform promotes fairness and consistency in the Philippine tax system and aligns with international best practices, where interest income - regardless of the term - is generally subject to tax,' the tax expert said.
The Finance Department has further clarified that the standardized tax rate of 20% is 'not retroactive,' meaning it does not apply to financial instruments that were issued or transacted prior to July 1, 2025.
'Therefore, existing long-term deposits made prior to the effectivity of the law will continue to enjoy the preferential rate until their maturity,' the DOF said.
Fair or regressive?
The Finance Department has argued that the previous 'special tax treatment' favored depositors who can afford to park their savings in long-term deposits, which made the tax unfair for short-term depositors who face liquidity issues and need immediate access to their funds.
'The CMEPA merely corrects this outdated and inequitable system that has placed a heavier burden on ordinary Filipinos who do not have the extra cash to put in banks for longer periods,' the DOF said.
Non-profit economic research group IBON Foundation's executive director Sonny Africa, however, is not convinced that the law's standardized tax rate is 'equalizing.'
'Standardizing tax rates may sound fair but equalizing tax on interest income at 20% will be regressive in effect because ordinary savers will end up paying the same rate as the ultra-rich. The DOF is being insensitive — equal treatment of unequals is unequal in effect,' Africa said.
'The uniform 20% tax on interest income is regressive because ordinary savers will pay the same rate as the ultra-rich,' he added.
Citing a report from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, IBON's executive director said that 20.1 million or three out of four Filipino families 'didn't have any savings as of the end of 2024.'
'This brute fact should put into context any hype that the new law empowers ordinary Filipinos,' Africa said.
Nevertheless, CMEPA does not impose the unified tax rate to provident savings programs under the Social Security System (SSS) and the Home Development Mutual Fund or Pag-IBIG such as the MP2 and would remain exempt from tax.
'The tax exemptions on SSS, GSIS, Pag-IBIG are welcome because these are public schemes," Africa said.
Capital markets
With the law's aim to encourage wider public participation in the country's capital markets, CMEPA reduced the stock transaction tax (STT) rate from 0.6% to 0.1%, decreasing the documentary stamp taxes (DST) on original issuance of shares from 1% to 0.75%, and removing the DST on collective investment schemes.
It also imposes a uniform 0.75% DST on bonds, debentures, and certificates of stock or indebtedness issued in foreign countries, regardless of jurisdiction, which the government said reinforces neutrality in the tax system.
'These measures are seen to cut transaction costs, encourage market participation and financial planning, boost market liquidity, make the country's equities market regionally competitive, and increase capital market growth,' the DOF said.
Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. Chief Economist Michael Ricafort said the CMEPA would help attract more large foreign and local investors with lower stock transactions tax/costs, vis-a-vis other ASEAN/Asian stock markets, as part of making our markets more cost competitive for transactions.
'More importantly, the CMEPA Law would help structurally attract more large scale foreign fund managers and better compete with other ASEAN/Asian markets in terms of reduced transaction costs/taxes, assuming all other factors are the same. Thus, IPOs (initial public offering) and other share sales would correspondingly increase with more stock market transactions/trading activities as incentivized by CMEPA Law,' Ricafort said.
IBON's Africa, however, said ordinary low-income Filipinos could not be empowered by CMEPA's new tax structure which, he said, 'clearly also wants to drive money, including from ordinary lower-income families into capital markets.'
'Instead of pushing them to be investors in volatile capital markets and shifting risk to individuals, the government should give more attention to securing decent wages and basic incomes, pensions, and social protections,' Africa said.
'Reducing the stock transaction tax and documentary stamp tax will benefit high-volume large investors or brokers, but ordinary savers are not suddenly empowered by this. They are still burdened by unaffordable risk, lack of disposable income, and poor financial literacy. The DOF should stop thinking that Filipinos are all rich and that financial markets are somehow substitutes for social security systems,' he added.
The DOF estimates CMEPA to generate P9.0-billion worth of revenues from 2025 to 2028, the end of the term of the current administration. It is expected to raise P500 million this year; P1.6 billion in 2026; P2.8 billion in 2027; and P4.1 billion in 2028.
The government is looking to generate P4.520 trillion in 2025 and P4.983 trillion in 2026 based on the latest report of the Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC). — BAP, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
19 hours ago
- GMA Network
Alleged 'ghost' flood control projects being validated — DPWH's Bonoan
Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Secretary Manuel Bonoan assured the public Wednesday that the supposed ''ghost'' flood control projects would be validated and investigated. ''This is something that we have to validate po kung mayroong ghost project na sinasabi kasi one to one 'to eh. Kung halimbawa, nirereport namin at hindi ho makita 'yung project na 'yan then that's the only time we can see na mayroong ghost project,'' Bonoan said in a Super Radyo dzBB interview. (This is something that we have to validate if there are ghost projects. For example, if we report then we don't see that project, then that's the only time we can see if there's indeed a ghost project.) His statement was in response to Senator Panfilo Lacson's remarks, pushing for the punishment against contractors and government accomplices who are involved in failed and ''ghost'' flood control projects. "The most effective mechanism is the certainty of punishment. Someone must be held accountable. Because if not, the flood control mess will continue, with the culprits lying low and then going back to business. So that is the most effective mechanism - to see the culprits actually getting punished,'' Lacson said in an earlier interview. President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. earlier vowed that his allies would not be spared if found to be involved in corruption on flood control projects. Marcos in his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA 2025) warned government personnel who steal public funds, such as those for flood control projects, that they will be dealt with under the law. The DPWH earlier admitted that it has no monitoring system in place for some flood control projects—specifically those inserted by lawmakers into the national budget without undergoing technical vetting. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
21 hours ago
- GMA Network
PNR clarifies: Laguna-Bicol route not yet operational
The Philippine National Railways (PNR) clarified that the route from Laguna to Bicol is not yet operational. 'Hindi totoo ang kumakalat na impormasyon sa social media na operasyunal na ang PNR Bicol Express kung saan inaasahang tatlong oras na lamang ang magiging byahe mula Laguna hanggang Bicol,' the PNR said on Tuesday. (The information circulating on social media that the PNR Bicol Express is now operational and that the travel time from Laguna to Bicol is expected to be only three hours is not true.) President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. has ordered the immediate rehabilitation of the Calamba-Legazpi route and it will be operational by 2026. According to the PNR, the railway firm is also fast-tracking addressing the right-of-way issue of the PNR-South Long Haul Project, which connects Manila to Bicol. The PNR said the following are the operational PNR routes: ???????????????????????????? - ???????????????????????? (???? hours and ???????? ????????????????????es) ???????????????????????????? - ???????????????? (???? hour and ???????? ????????????????tes) ???????????????? - ???????????????????????????? (???? hours and ???????? ????????????????????es) The public is advised to monitor the social media pages of PNR for official information and trips of the train system. –VAL, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
Rice inflation to remain negative in next four months —PSA
The retail price of rice, the country's staple food, is expected to continue its contraction in the next four months due to base effects and continuous arrival of imported grain, the Philippine Statistics Authority said Tuesday. At a press conference, National Statistician and PSA chief Claire Dennis Mapa said rice saw a sharper year-on-year deflation or 'negative inflation' at -15.9% in July from -14.3% in June. Mapa said the -15.9% rice inflation was the lowest for the staple since January 1995. 'In the next four months we will still be seeing negative inflation for rice,' the PSA chief said. The trend of easing inflation for rice seen since August 2024 was consistent with the PSA's expectation that it will begin easing towards the second half of 2024 due to base effects, particularly when it began its uptrend in August 2023, as well as the impact of lower rice import tariff which took effect early July last year. To illustrate the contraction in rice inflation seen last month, Mapa bared the year-on-year national average prices of regular, well-milled, and special rice varieties during the period. In particular, the following are the average prices of rice at the national level in July 2025: Regular milled: P41.31 per kilo from P50.90 per kilo in July 2024 Well-milled: P47.60 per kilo from P55.85 per kilo Special: P56.83 per kilo from P64.42 per kilo year-on-year Proposed rice import tariff hike On the Department of Agriculture's recommendation to increase the tariffs on imported rice from 15% to 25%, Mapa said any increase in tariff would result in 'an increase in the retail price.' However, he clarified that the PSA is still monitoring the developing situation but said any effect on prices would depend on its timing. Nevertheless, the PSA chief said the expectation for rice is it would remain at a negative inflation rate for the entire year. In a separate statement, Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. said that increasing the rice import tariff could help curb excessive imports while generating much-needed revenue to support programs that boost local farmers' productivity and competitiveness. 'This is a delicate balancing act between our duty to protect rice farmers from those who undervalue their produce and ensuring consumers have access to affordable rice,' said Tiu Laurel. The DA also recommended a temporary halt in rice importation. Enacted in 2018 to liberalize rice importation, the Rice Tarrification Law (RTL) empowers the President to halt imports under specific conditions. Specifically, Section 3, as amended by Republic Act No. 12078 last December, allows the President to suspend or prohibit further importation 'when there is an excessive supply of imported or locally produced rice resulting in an extraordinary decrease in local prices.' The suspension may apply for a specific period or volume until supply and prices stabilize. In July 2024, Marcos reduced rice tariffs to 15% to provide relief to consumers amid soaring world prices at that time. That move, along with other DA initiatives—including the implementation of a maximum suggested retail price for imported 5% broken DT8 rice starting January—helped bring down prices of imported rice from over P60 per kilo to around P43 per kilo. Globally, bumper harvests—as well as lifting of India's rice export ban, a record-breaking 9.08 million metric tons of palay produced by the Philippines in the first half of the year—have put downward pressure on prices, particularly from exporting countries. From over $700 per metric ton, Vietnamese rice DT8 variety which is the main type that is now widely favored by the Philippine market now sells for $470 per ton, freight-on-board as of last week, according to the DA. With cheaper imports flooding the market, Tiu Laurel said reports indicate that some private traders are now buying palay for as low as P8 to P10 per kilo—well below the production cost of P12 to P14 per kilo. Farmers have attributed this sharp decline to the influx of cheaper imported rice. Currently, the landed cost of 5% broken imported rice has dropped to about P35 per kilo—or even lower in some cases. Tiu Laurel said that even if the President adopts the DA's recommendations, the relief would be temporary. He stressed the need to amend the RTL to give the NFA greater flexibility in releasing its rice stocks and influencing both palay and rice prices. 'When its regulatory powers are restored, the NFA could provide the DA with more precise industry data, including consumption patterns and price trends as well as supply levels per region and province, which are invaluable in crafting more responsive policies,' said Tiu Laurel. Allowing the NFA to resume selling stocks purchased from local farmers would also free up warehouse space, enabling the agency to procure more palay. According to the secretary, by rule of thumb, producing one sack of rice requires the NFA to procure approximately two sacks of palay. 'Now that we've helped lower inflation, the DA's next challenge is to tackle rice and pork issues to keep food inflation in check,' said Tiu Laurel. —AOL, GMA Integrated News