logo
SD's 100th legislative session is in the books. Here's what bills lived and died in 2025

SD's 100th legislative session is in the books. Here's what bills lived and died in 2025

Yahoo14-03-2025
PIERRE — The 100th annual convention of lawmakers, which concluded Thursday, was laden with political and historical subtext.
A Republican supermajority, emboldened by President Donald Trump and led by a lieutenant governor who took over the state's highest office for former Gov. Kristi Noem early in the session, pushed a gamut of conservative legislation.
That included bills affecting gun rights, voting, education, property rights and policies involving transgender people. Democrats brought proposals aimed at child care, deepfake technology and repealing capital punishment.
Meanwhile, South Dakota Gov. Larry Rhoden had his own wins and losses, with a temporary property tax fix earning legislative support and a property rights-focused Republican body shooting down a proposed prison project.
The South Dakota Legislature processed 489 bills, 44 commemorations and 38 various resolutions during its 38-day run.
Here's a look at some of the major bills that made it to the governor's desk — and those that didn't — this year.
Lawmakers passed House Bill 1052, a bill prohibiting companies from using eminent domain to acquire land for the construction of pipelines carrying "carbon oxide."
This restriction prevents Summit Carbon Solutions, an Ames, Iowa-based developer with plans to build an $8.9 billion liquid carbon dioxide pipeline, from using eminent domain — the right to take private property for public uses, with compensation — in South Dakota.
Rhoden signed the bill March 6.
More: Rhoden sides with landowners, signs bill blocking CO2 developers from using eminent domain
The bill's success is a reversal of the Legislature's attitude toward carbon dioxide pipeline projects from just one year ago. State lawmakers had passed Senate Bill 201, legislation that would have eased the way for Summit Carbon's plans in South Dakota. But the law was challenged through the state's referral process, and voters overturned the bill during the 2024 general election.
A number of South Dakotans launched and won political campaigns, while ousting several incumbents, on a property rights platform. This grew the support for an eminent domain reform bill in the Legislature.
Lawmakers found themselves divided on a years-long plan to build a $825 million modern prison facility on Lincoln County farmland.
The bill would have moved about $182 million from the state's general fund to an incarceration construction fund, an appropriation meant to fill a funding gap for the state Department of Corrections project.
After the bill died on a 34-35 vote, there was an attempt to shuffle $148 million to the prison fund for future use, but that also was narrowly rejected.
Rhoden later created a prison project task force to reassess the state's plans and possibly consider new locations for the facility.
The task force meets April 2 and has until July 15 to make its recommendations.
South Dakota's property tax payments have climbed by hundreds of millions of dollars over the last decade, according to state Department of Revenue data, and homeowners are taking the brunt.
In response, Rhoden pushed Senate Bill 216, which aimed to cap individual taxing districts and school capital aid budgets from increasing property taxes due to capital growth or construction by more than 2% through 2031. It also would have limited cities' and counties' yearly property tax increases at 3% even if assessments rise above that level.
An iteration of Rhoden's bill passed the Senate but died in the House after needing just one vote to clear the chamber. An amended version later raised the property tax growth in the state to 3% across the board over the next five years, which Rhoden signed Thursday.
Lawmakers brought more than 20 bills on property tax this session, with Rhoden's the only one to be made law.
Rhoden vetoed an amended House Bill 1132, a proposed child care law that would have raised the federal poverty line for child care eligibility from 209% to 300% explicitly for people who work at least 30 hours per week at a licensed school daycare program, center or family home providing child care.
The South Dakota governor wrote in a Wednesday statement that his reasoning for blocking the legislation was because it would "shift South Dakota's child care assistance program away from its core mission." He also explained he killed the bill over its fiscal aspects, since it lacked an appropriation to cover the cost of the program's expansion.
This was the first bill Rhoden vetoed as governor of South Dakota.
Erin Healy, House Minority Leader, called Rhoden's argument that the state would have to increase its budget "premature," as the state does not have a waiting list for child care assistance.
Several bills pitched by Attorney General Marty Jackley that centered on whistleblowing, government corruption and certain crimes were mostly well-received by the Legislature and passed with few changes.
Some of the legislation was drafted as a response to alleged embezzlement and corruption crimes committed by former state employees, including one case where an employee purportedly circumvented her workplace's oversight measures to defraud the state's Child Protective Services program for $1.8 million.
More: Attorney General Jackley submits seven bills for 2025 legislative session: What are they?
Here's a list of those bills:
SB 58 revises provisions related to human trafficking, prohibits the obstruction of human trafficking enforcement.
SB 59 revises provisions relating to the delivery, possession with intent to deliver, and possession of unauthorized articles in a state correctional facility.
SB 60 expands the access and investigatory authority of the state auditor.
SB 61 modifies the authority of the Board of Internal Control.
SB 62 establishes mandatory reporting requirements related to improper governmental conduct and crime.
SB 63 establishes protections for state employees who report improper governmental conduct and crime.
The nine state House and Senate Democrats found a number of their bills jettisoned by the state's Republican supermajority, and there were several bills related to social issues that proved a thorn for the party, particularly in comparison to previous years.
Senate Minority Leader Liz Larson of Sioux Falls managed to steer a bill on deepfakes, or AI-manipulated media that can be used to generate edited and false images of real people, to Rhoden's desk.
The bill makes it a class 1 misdemeanor to disseminate a deepfake to influence an election in the state.
Rhoden had yet to sign it as of Thursday.
Here are some other Democrat-led bills that passed the Legislature and were signed by the governor or still await his signature.
HB 1072 modernizes provisions relating to water development districts.
HB 1074 modifies the individuals eligible to sign an affidavit of homelessness for purposes of obtaining a free copy of a birth certificate.
HB 1075 modifies the persons eligible to sign an affidavit for proof of homelessness for purposes of waiving the fee for a non-driver identification card.
HB 1099 modifies the community paramedic endorsement.
HB 1196 updates the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act to include provisions related to virtual currency and notice requirements.
SB 170 authorizes the South Dakota State Brand Board to enter a memorandum of understanding with any Indian tribe for the investigation of cattle theft.
SB 193 allows an applicant to have an interpreter present during the driving portion of a driver license exam.
The 100th legislative session was one that saw a few bills targeted at policies affecting transgender South Dakotans.
This included a "bathroom bill" that prohibits transgender people from using a bathroom that does not match their biological sex, which Rhoden signed into law.
More: SD lawmaker has 'no regrets' over demotion for bill targeting Huron schools, trans youth
A similar but unsuccessful bill that would have required that birth certificates and certain official documents reflect biological sex was short a single vote of securing a majority.
Rep. Phil Jensen, R-Rapid City, also introduced a bill to defund the Huron School District over a transgender bathroom policy, but he pulled the bill after backlash within the state and Legislature.
This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakota Legislature: Bills that passed, failed during 2025 session
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Republicans set to approve Trump-backed new congressional map after lengthy fight
Texas Republicans set to approve Trump-backed new congressional map after lengthy fight

USA Today

time2 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Texas Republicans set to approve Trump-backed new congressional map after lengthy fight

Aug 20 (Reuters) - Texas Republicans on Wednesday will take up a new state congressional map intended to flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, after dozens of Democratic lawmakers ended a two-week walkout that had temporarily blocked its passage. Republican state legislators have undertaken a rare mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump, who is seeking to improve his party's odds of preserving its narrow U.S. House of Representatives majority despite political headwinds. The gambit has triggered a national redistricting war, with governors of both parties threatening to initiate similar efforts in other states. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom is advancing an effort to neutralize Texas' move by redrawing his state's map to flip five Republican seats, pitting the nation's most populous Democratic state against Texas, its most populous Republican one. The Texas map aims to flip five Democratic seats. Other Republican states including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic states such as Maryland and Illinois. Redistricting typically occurs every 10 years after the U.S. Census to account for population changes, and mid-decade redistricting has historically been unusual. In many states, lawmakers manipulate the lines to favor their party over the opposition, a practice known as gerrymandering. Texas' new map was listed on Wednesday's schedule for the state House, though it was not clear how quickly Republicans could move to approve it. The bill is still subject to debate on the floor, and Democrats can also introduce amendments to be voted upon. Democrats fled the state earlier this month to deny the Texas House a quorum. In response, Republicans undertook extraordinary measures to try to force them home, including filing lawsuits to remove them from office and issuing arrest warrants. The walkout ended when Democrats voluntarily returned on Monday, saying they had accomplished their goals of blocking a vote during a first special legislative session and persuading Democrats in other states to take retaliatory steps. Republican House leadership assigned state law enforcement officers to monitor Democrats to ensure they would not leave the state again. One Democratic representative, Nicole Collier, slept in the Capitol building on Monday night rather than accept a police escort. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged that the new map is aimed at increasing their political power. The party currently controls 25 of the state's 38 districts under a Republican-drawn map that was passed four years ago. Democrats and civil rights groups have said the new map dilutes the voting power of racial minorities in violation of federal law and have vowed to sue. Nationally, Republicans captured the 435-seat House in 2024 by only three seats. The party of the president historically loses House seats in the first midterm election, and Trump's approval ratings have sagged since he took office in January. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Daniel Wallis)

Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'
Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'

The Hill

time2 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'

Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) criticized President Trump for claiming to be a war hero in the wake of the Iran strikes, arguing it is offensive to those who have served in combat. 'Yeah. I mean, look, this is just nuts. This is nuts. And they're going to find — his people are going to find a way to justify this,' Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic, told CNN's Erin Burnett on Tuesday. 'Listen, when they were putting out something honoring the Army's 250th anniversary, they put out a picture of Donald Trump in his military academy uniform, which has nothing to do with the military except they drill you.' Kinzinger, who retired from Congress in 2021 and is now a senior contributor on CNN, was asked to weigh in on Trump's recent remarks on 'The Mark Levin Show.' 'He's a war hero because we work together. He's a war hero,' Trump told conservative radio host Mark Levin, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'I guess I am too.' 'Nobody cares, but I am too. I mean, I sent those planes,' he added, just months after the U.S. bombed three nuclear facilities near Tehran in defense of Israel. Kinzinger, who served in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, pressed back against the rhetoric but added that he hopes the president is able to facilitate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. 'You can like what he's done. That's fine. I hope he gets a resolution in Ukraine,' he said. 'But to put himself on the same level of people that have actually gone out and served this country, not claimed bone spurs, is an offense to anybody who served.' 'And frankly, you just take somebody that served, calling themselves a war hero, even that would be inappropriate,' the former GOP lawmaker, who said recently that he feels closer to a Democrat nowadays, told CNN. 'For a guy that never served to say it, it's nuts.' Kinzinger added, 'But somebody, they'll defend it, they'll find a way.' The comments come as Trump is looking to facilitate a Russia-Ukraine peace deal after meeting with both leaders and seeking another ceasefire in the Middle East between Isreal and Hamas.

Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs
Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs

About 360,000 Illinois residents risk losing SNAP benefits under provisions of the " big, beautiful bill," which could also saddle the state with $700 million in additional SNAP costs previously covered by the feds, according to Gov. JB Pritzker's office. Why it matters: The cuts could have far-reaching effects on hunger as well as spending in the local economy. This year, Pritzker's office says, the new provisions could cost Illinois an additional $80 million just to meet administrative requirements at a time when the state is under intense pressure to bail out basic services. Zoom in: About 15% of state residents, or 1.9 million people, receive SNAP benefits in Illinois. The new rules require Illinois to expand work requirements (proof of 80 hours of work a month) to SNAP recipients who are: Able-bodied adults ages 55-64 Adults with dependents who are over 13 years old Adults who had been exempt under Illinois' 4.8% unemployment rate. New rules restrict the exemption to counties with unemployment of 10% or higher. Between the lines: Illinois can avoid the additional $700 million in SNAP payment responsibility if it reduces its "payment error rate" (PER) from 11% to under 6%. The PER measures underpayment or overpayment usually driven by administrative or applicant mistakes. It does not include fraud. Illinois has the 10th worst error rate in the nation, but is on par with most big states. The intrigue: Alaska has an error rate of 20% but Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski worked out a deal to exempt her state from the requirement to reduce it. What they're saying: "While the state government will be doing everything in its power to lower the so-called error rate, we cannot gloss over the fact that this provision was intentionally designed as a craven mechanism to deny states funding and feed fewer people in need," Pritzker spokesperson Matt Hill said in a statement. The other side: " We are incentivizing states to administer the SNAP program more efficiently and effectively, protecting taxpayers and prioritizing limited resources for those who truly need the benefit," Republican Rep. Darin LaHood tells Axios.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store