logo
SD's 100th legislative session is in the books. Here's what bills lived and died in 2025

SD's 100th legislative session is in the books. Here's what bills lived and died in 2025

Yahoo14-03-2025

PIERRE — The 100th annual convention of lawmakers, which concluded Thursday, was laden with political and historical subtext.
A Republican supermajority, emboldened by President Donald Trump and led by a lieutenant governor who took over the state's highest office for former Gov. Kristi Noem early in the session, pushed a gamut of conservative legislation.
That included bills affecting gun rights, voting, education, property rights and policies involving transgender people. Democrats brought proposals aimed at child care, deepfake technology and repealing capital punishment.
Meanwhile, South Dakota Gov. Larry Rhoden had his own wins and losses, with a temporary property tax fix earning legislative support and a property rights-focused Republican body shooting down a proposed prison project.
The South Dakota Legislature processed 489 bills, 44 commemorations and 38 various resolutions during its 38-day run.
Here's a look at some of the major bills that made it to the governor's desk — and those that didn't — this year.
Lawmakers passed House Bill 1052, a bill prohibiting companies from using eminent domain to acquire land for the construction of pipelines carrying "carbon oxide."
This restriction prevents Summit Carbon Solutions, an Ames, Iowa-based developer with plans to build an $8.9 billion liquid carbon dioxide pipeline, from using eminent domain — the right to take private property for public uses, with compensation — in South Dakota.
Rhoden signed the bill March 6.
More: Rhoden sides with landowners, signs bill blocking CO2 developers from using eminent domain
The bill's success is a reversal of the Legislature's attitude toward carbon dioxide pipeline projects from just one year ago. State lawmakers had passed Senate Bill 201, legislation that would have eased the way for Summit Carbon's plans in South Dakota. But the law was challenged through the state's referral process, and voters overturned the bill during the 2024 general election.
A number of South Dakotans launched and won political campaigns, while ousting several incumbents, on a property rights platform. This grew the support for an eminent domain reform bill in the Legislature.
Lawmakers found themselves divided on a years-long plan to build a $825 million modern prison facility on Lincoln County farmland.
The bill would have moved about $182 million from the state's general fund to an incarceration construction fund, an appropriation meant to fill a funding gap for the state Department of Corrections project.
After the bill died on a 34-35 vote, there was an attempt to shuffle $148 million to the prison fund for future use, but that also was narrowly rejected.
Rhoden later created a prison project task force to reassess the state's plans and possibly consider new locations for the facility.
The task force meets April 2 and has until July 15 to make its recommendations.
South Dakota's property tax payments have climbed by hundreds of millions of dollars over the last decade, according to state Department of Revenue data, and homeowners are taking the brunt.
In response, Rhoden pushed Senate Bill 216, which aimed to cap individual taxing districts and school capital aid budgets from increasing property taxes due to capital growth or construction by more than 2% through 2031. It also would have limited cities' and counties' yearly property tax increases at 3% even if assessments rise above that level.
An iteration of Rhoden's bill passed the Senate but died in the House after needing just one vote to clear the chamber. An amended version later raised the property tax growth in the state to 3% across the board over the next five years, which Rhoden signed Thursday.
Lawmakers brought more than 20 bills on property tax this session, with Rhoden's the only one to be made law.
Rhoden vetoed an amended House Bill 1132, a proposed child care law that would have raised the federal poverty line for child care eligibility from 209% to 300% explicitly for people who work at least 30 hours per week at a licensed school daycare program, center or family home providing child care.
The South Dakota governor wrote in a Wednesday statement that his reasoning for blocking the legislation was because it would "shift South Dakota's child care assistance program away from its core mission." He also explained he killed the bill over its fiscal aspects, since it lacked an appropriation to cover the cost of the program's expansion.
This was the first bill Rhoden vetoed as governor of South Dakota.
Erin Healy, House Minority Leader, called Rhoden's argument that the state would have to increase its budget "premature," as the state does not have a waiting list for child care assistance.
Several bills pitched by Attorney General Marty Jackley that centered on whistleblowing, government corruption and certain crimes were mostly well-received by the Legislature and passed with few changes.
Some of the legislation was drafted as a response to alleged embezzlement and corruption crimes committed by former state employees, including one case where an employee purportedly circumvented her workplace's oversight measures to defraud the state's Child Protective Services program for $1.8 million.
More: Attorney General Jackley submits seven bills for 2025 legislative session: What are they?
Here's a list of those bills:
SB 58 revises provisions related to human trafficking, prohibits the obstruction of human trafficking enforcement.
SB 59 revises provisions relating to the delivery, possession with intent to deliver, and possession of unauthorized articles in a state correctional facility.
SB 60 expands the access and investigatory authority of the state auditor.
SB 61 modifies the authority of the Board of Internal Control.
SB 62 establishes mandatory reporting requirements related to improper governmental conduct and crime.
SB 63 establishes protections for state employees who report improper governmental conduct and crime.
The nine state House and Senate Democrats found a number of their bills jettisoned by the state's Republican supermajority, and there were several bills related to social issues that proved a thorn for the party, particularly in comparison to previous years.
Senate Minority Leader Liz Larson of Sioux Falls managed to steer a bill on deepfakes, or AI-manipulated media that can be used to generate edited and false images of real people, to Rhoden's desk.
The bill makes it a class 1 misdemeanor to disseminate a deepfake to influence an election in the state.
Rhoden had yet to sign it as of Thursday.
Here are some other Democrat-led bills that passed the Legislature and were signed by the governor or still await his signature.
HB 1072 modernizes provisions relating to water development districts.
HB 1074 modifies the individuals eligible to sign an affidavit of homelessness for purposes of obtaining a free copy of a birth certificate.
HB 1075 modifies the persons eligible to sign an affidavit for proof of homelessness for purposes of waiving the fee for a non-driver identification card.
HB 1099 modifies the community paramedic endorsement.
HB 1196 updates the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act to include provisions related to virtual currency and notice requirements.
SB 170 authorizes the South Dakota State Brand Board to enter a memorandum of understanding with any Indian tribe for the investigation of cattle theft.
SB 193 allows an applicant to have an interpreter present during the driving portion of a driver license exam.
The 100th legislative session was one that saw a few bills targeted at policies affecting transgender South Dakotans.
This included a "bathroom bill" that prohibits transgender people from using a bathroom that does not match their biological sex, which Rhoden signed into law.
More: SD lawmaker has 'no regrets' over demotion for bill targeting Huron schools, trans youth
A similar but unsuccessful bill that would have required that birth certificates and certain official documents reflect biological sex was short a single vote of securing a majority.
Rep. Phil Jensen, R-Rapid City, also introduced a bill to defund the Huron School District over a transgender bathroom policy, but he pulled the bill after backlash within the state and Legislature.
This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakota Legislature: Bills that passed, failed during 2025 session

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LA-based Jimmy Kimmel claims ‘there's no riot outside' as he blasts ‘mentally ill' Trump
LA-based Jimmy Kimmel claims ‘there's no riot outside' as he blasts ‘mentally ill' Trump

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

LA-based Jimmy Kimmel claims ‘there's no riot outside' as he blasts ‘mentally ill' Trump

Los Angeles-based comedian Jimmy Kimmel told his audience on Tuesday that 'there's no riots outside' and slammed 'mentally ill' President Donald Trump for deploying troops to quell what he claims is exaggerated unrest in the city. Trump sent over 700 Marines to Los Angeles in an effort to quash anti-ICE protests that have ravaged parts of the city on Tuesday. Images from L.A. showcase masked protesters blocking roads, destroying vehicles and engaging with police, while Mayor Karen Bass issued a curfew for a portion of the city's downtown area. Advertisement Kimmel mocked the media for portraying the anti-ICE protests as 'some kind of totalitarian hellscape' and condemned the Trump administration for deporting 'people who have lived here their whole lives.' 'You won't see this elsewhere on television. Not only is it not an apocalypse, they're having a Disney/Pixar movie premiere for 'Elio,' a movie about aliens. Don't tell Trump — he'll send in the Green Berets, too,' Kimmel ribbed. 'But I just want to say, thank God for President Trump and the heroes at ICE for protecting us from these bloodthirsty fruit stand vendors spreading their dangerous pineapple chunks and mangos with a squirt of lime all over the city.' 4 Kimmel mocked the media for portraying the anti-ICE protests as 'some kind of totalitarian hellscape.' ABC 4 Cars burn during a protest against federal immigration sweeps in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 8, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement The late-night host vented his anger towards the ICE raids in the city, claiming that the 'vast majority' of those being deported have 'never done anything wrong.' 'People who have lived here their whole lives, people who have been in this city longer than I have, the vast majority of whom have never done anything wrong, are being abducted, which is the correct word to use, by agents in masks, hiding their identities, grabbing people off the street and at work, sending people to detention centers,' he claimed. Kimmel asserted that it's not only Los Angelenos' right to protest the deportations, but it's their 'responsibility.' 4 U.S. President Donald Trump walks away after speaking to the media upon arrival at Joint Base Andrews following a visit to North Carolina, in Maryland, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement 'Los Angelenos gathered to demonstrate and, with very few exceptions, peacefully demonstrate to voice their opposition to this disgusting and unnecessary abuse of power instigated by our mentally ill president, who is dead-set on exacerbating this, who actually wants conflict, who is intentionally inflaming and lying to make it seem like there's a war going on,' he charged. Kimmel continued his criticism of the president and claimed that 'he wants there to be a war going on' in L.A. and doesn't care who gets hurt in the process. 'There's no riot outside,' Kimmel declared. 'We have more so-called 'unrest' here when one of our teams wins a championship.' 4 A protestor is detained in downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. AP Advertisement The host maintained that the media is exaggerating the violence taking place at the anti-ICE protests and argued that Trump exacerbated the unrest by sending in troops. 'Someone sets a fire in a garbage can, 12 camera crews go running toward it,' he asserted. 'Trump wants it to seem like anarchy, so he goes around our governor and calls in 4,000 troops from the National Guard and 700 active-duty Marines. When we had the wildfires that devastated big chunks of our city, he did absolutely nothing. Now that we're in the middle of a non-emergency, send in the National Guard!'

Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says
Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says

The White House said Wednesday President Donald Trump would not allow "mob rule" after protests against his immigration policies spread across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also attacked the Democratic governor of California and mayor of Los Angeles, claiming they had "fanned the flames" of the clashes. "President Trump will never allow mob rule to prevail in America," Leavitt told a briefing at the White House, backed by television screens showing images of burning vehicles and masked rioters. "The most basic duty of government is to preserve law and order, and this administration embraces that sacred responsibility." Leavitt's comments echoed Trump's in a speech at the Fort Bragg military base on Tuesday, in which he vowed to "liberate" Los Angeles and branded the protesters "animals." Trump is in conflict with California authorities who have accused the Republican president of being "dictatorial" and seeking political gain by sending in thousands of troops to break up the protests, which have largely been peaceful. Pockets of violence -- including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling of stones at police -- have triggered a massive response from authorities, who have used tear gas and other less-lethal weapons. "Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass shamefully failed to meet their sworn obligations to their citizens," Leavitt responded, accusing Newsom of having "fanned the flames and demonized our brave ICE officers." The protests erupted last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers carried out a series of raids in Los Angeles to back up Trump's hardline immigration policies. Trump has also called the protesters "paid insurrectionists" -- alleging that some of them had professional anti-riot equipment -- but the White House did not say who it believed was paying them. "It's a good question the president is raising, and one we are looking into, about who is funding these insurrectionists," Leavitt said when asked by AFP about the president's comments. dk/aha

Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site
Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site

A judge this week ruled in favor of the city of Austin in a case involving the former American-Statesman site just south of downtown along Lady Bird Lake. The ruling denied a motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by the Save Our Springs Alliance, an environmental watchdog group. The lawsuit alleged that the Austin City Council violated key provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act in 2022 when it approved a special type of zoning known as a planned unit development, or PUD, for the former Statesman site. The lawsuit sought to void the council's Dec. 2, 2022 vote to approve the PUD, based on the alleged open meetings violations. The Statesman moved several years ago from the site at 305 S. Congress Ave. to a new location near the airport. In arguing their case before District Judge Jan Soifer on May 15, Save Our Springs attorneys Bobby Levinski and Bill Bunch contended that the council granted the PUD zoning in violation of two key mandates of the Texas Open Meetings Act: proper public notice, and a reasonable opportunity for the public to speak before the vote was taken. Levinski said today that the Save Our Springs Alliance might appeal the ruling. "Given the importance of this case for governmental transparency and proper enforcement of the Texas Open Meetings Act, we'll be evaluating our options for appeal," Levinski said. "This case ultimately impacts the ability of residents to weigh in on important matters that affect their community, including the relocation of the Hike and Bike Trail and removal of the natural, tree-lined aesthetic of the Lady Bird Lake shoreline. Every case has its challenges, and we may need to work on it a little longer to ultimately prevail." More: Lawsuit seeks to halt planned redevelopment of former Statesman site on Lady Bird Lake Casey Dobson and Sara Wilder Clark represented the landowner, the Cox family of Atlanta, along with Austin-based Endeavor Real Estate Group. The Cox family hired Endeavor several years ago to create plans to redevelop the prime waterfront site. The site formerly housed the newspaper offices and printing plant. Cox sold the Statesman but retained ownership of the 18.9-acre site, a property many developers had long coveted and said was ripe for new development. Dobson did not immediately respond to an email for comment about the ruling and what it means for future plans to transform the property into a mixed-use project with high-rise buildings and other uses, which could include housing, office and retail development. Richard Suttle Jr., an Austin attorney and the spokesperson for the planned redevelopment, said he hasn't seen a final judgment yet in the case, so couldn't comment on what it might mean for the future planned redevelopment. Dan Richards represented the city in the lawsuit. Richards said Soifer's ruling, signed Monday, means "the trial court case is basically over." At last month's hearing, Richards told Soifer that voiding the PUD could jeopardize the developer's ability, in the current economic climate, to secure a new amendment offering the same level of community benefits — such as 6.5 acres of green space — at the site. At the same hearing, Dobson and Wilder Clark said the PUD zoning change was properly noticed, and the public was given sufficient opportunity to speak at nine different meetings. However, Levinski said that, while the PUD was listed on the council agenda as a zoning item, that posting was misleading because it failed to provide "full disclosure of the subjects to be discussed." The proposed PUD ordinance encompassed "numerous provisions that extend well beyond traditional zoning regulations," Levinski told Soifer. Those included "sweeping changes" to environmental protections and other city land-use codes, including a failure to disclose height limits, setbacks and the elimination of two restrictive covenants. "There are so many different parts of this (PUD) ordinance that are not zoning, yet it was sold to public as a rezoning," Levinski said. The zoning changes included modifications to the Lady Bird Lake shoreline; the relocation of the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail inland away from the lake; the removal of more than 90 mature trees; code waivers; and "amendments to almost every chapter of Austin's land development code," Levinski told Soifer. In arguing their case before Soifer, Leviniski and Bunch said that the Texas Open Meetings Act requires a public notice identifying these major changes to city standards and a public 'right to speak' on them before council granted the approvals. The Cox owners and Endeavor have the right to build high-rises — up to 725 feet tall — within 140 feet of Lady Bird Lake. The development would be "forever exempt from a plethora of water quality, parkland and lakeshore rules and regulations," according to the Save Our Springs Alliance. "The key here is the Statesman PUD went beyond zoning," Levinski said. "This didn't give sufficient notice to the public to say what is occurring with this zoning." Among other issues, he said the PUD included "non-zoning provisions, including items the council doesn't have authority over." There was a way the city could have described with greater detail what was occurring with the zoning case, "but they chose not to, and it's deceptive that they chose not to," Levinski said. The level of specificity "gets enhanced" when the issue involves matters of "significant public interest," Levinski said. "It's not enough to rely on the assumption that the general public may have knowledge of the subject matter." Dobson and Wilder Clark, however, told Soifer that the public notices complied with the Texas Open Meetings Act. The notices properly and adequately disclosed the subject of the PUD at various meetings on the council's printed public agenda, Dobson and Wilder Clark said. Moreover, all the details that Save Our Springs claims were lacking from the notice were available at "the click of a link" in backup materials on the council's online agenda, Wilder Clark said. "Not only did (the public) get to talk in meetings, but they got to submit written testimony," Wilder Clark said. She also noted that the council postponed meetings on the case. Showing slides of newspaper articles, Dobson said the proposed redevelopment of the Statesman site was front-page news. He said the case was "noticed out of the wazoo." "(Opponents) think this was done in the dark of night, with adequate notice to nobody," Dobson said. "In fact, the polar opposite happened." Dobson said no special notice was required, and opponents "didn't need it. They wrote letters, they spoke at length to (the city) Planning Commission and City Council. This did not take place under the shroud of secrecy," Dobson said. Countering the city's arguments, Bunch said the city "invented out of whole cloth" its position that it upheld the open meetings act, saying "there's no support for that in the entire body of open meetings cases." Early in the hearing, Dobson showed a photo of the current Statesman site "in all its glory," showing a low-slung building surrounded by a near vacant parking lot with lots of asphalt and concrete. Attorneys for the city and the developer stated that "virtually no one" opposes the proposed development, which may include condominiums, apartments, a hotel, office space and retail areas. Noting the site's popularity as a prime location for viewing the famed bat colony under the Ann Richards Congress Avenue Bridge, they emphasized the new development will enhance the bat viewing area. Additionally, they said the project has the support of bat conservation groups. Last year, the Save Our Springs Alliance won a lawsuit contesting the city's creation of a special financing district, a so-called tax increment reinvestment zone, to fund infrastructure improvements within the proposed Statesman redevelopment project. A judge ruled that financing method unlawful. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Judge rules for city in case involving former Statesman site

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store