'Breakthrough' for hay fever sufferers through new NHS drug
You cannot cure it, but there are things you can do to help your symptoms, or medicines you can take to help.
But if you've clicked on this article, you probably didn't need us to tell you that.
I'm not being dramatic but i might be the first person to die from hayfever. — Sheena (@sarky_sheena) July 20, 2025
The new under-the-tongue immunotherapy tablet works by training the immune system to tolerate tree pollen over three years of daily use.
The drug, called Betula verrusca and sold under the brand name Itulazax 12 SQ-Bet, has been recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as a hay fever treatment on the NHS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
5 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Airdrie & Shotts MSP Neil Gray welcomes new Scottish Government funding for independent hospices
The Scottish Government has confirmed that £5 million is being distributed to ensure pay parity with NHS staff. Airdrie & Shotts MSP Neil Gray has welcomed new Scottish Government funding for independent hospices to ensure their "fantastic" clinical staff get pay parity with those in the NHS. The Scottish Government has recognised the 'enormous value' of clinical staff in independent hospices in North Lanarkshire - and confirmed that £5 million is being distributed to ensure pay parity with NHS staff. The funding was announced in the Scottish Budget, with hospices now having their funding allocations confirmed so that staff providing essential palliative and end-of-life care in independent hospices are fairly paid in line with NHS pay scales. This will help hospices like Airdrie's St Andrew's Hospice recruit and retain skilled healthcare professionals during a time of rising workforce pressures and increasing demand for palliative care services. Mr Gray MSP said: "The independent hospices like St Andrew's provide vital support to countless families at the most difficult times in their lives. "That's why this SNP Government is supporting hospices across North Lanarkshire in paying the staff who are so integral to providing this care. "Hospice staff deliver incredibly skilled, compassionate care every day, and now their pay will reflect the immense value of their work."
Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
What is Botox and the symptoms of botulism after warning issued
It can take up to four weeks for the symptoms of botulism to develop 🏥 Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There have been 38 cases of iatrogenic botulism detected in the North East of England. The botulism cases happened after patients underwent cosmetic procedures involving botulinum toxin. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) are warning people to be aware of the signs and symptoms of botulism. People who have had cosmetic procedures involving botulinum toxin are being warned by the UKHSA to look out for the symptoms of botulism after a series of cases have been reported. Detected in the North East, they relate to procedures carried out in the East of England and East Midlands. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There have been 38 cases of iatrogenic botulism between June 4 and July 14. As yet there are no known links between the newly diagnosed cases and those in the North East. Investigations behind the infections are being carried out, with evidence suggesting they have been caused by the use of an unlicensed Botox-like product. Professor Meghana Pandit, Co-National Medical Director secondary care at NHS England, said: 'When these procedures go wrong, there is a risk of serious infections and permanent scarring, which is why only registered professionals like a doctor, a nurse or pharmacy prescriber should be prescribing these treatments. 'If you decide to undergo a cosmetic procedure like Botox or lip fillers, there is advice on the NHS website on the questions to ask, including making sure that the person administering it is trained to do it.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A number of cases of botulism have occurred after people had cosmetic procedures involving botulinum toxin. |What is botulism? Botulism is a rare but life-threatening condition that is caused by toxins produced by Clostridium botulinum bacteria. The NHS explain that these toxins attack the nervous system and cause paralysis. What are the symptoms of botulism? Dr Gauri Godbole, Consultant Medical Microbiologist at UKHSA, explained it can take up to four weeks for the symptoms of botulism to develop. Dr Godbole said: 'If you have had a recent botulinum toxin (Botox-like) treatment and are having symptoms such as difficulty swallowing or breathing, contact NHS 111 for further advice and seek treatment.' How do you know if someone is qualified to do Botox? Botox injections are prescription-only medications that can only be prescribed after a consultation with a healthcare professional, such as a doctor or a nurse. The person who prescribes the Botox must make sure that the person giving you the injections is trained and safe to do so. Questions you can ask include: Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad who the prescriber is who'll be giving the actual treatment what training and experience they have what the insurance arrangements are The NHS have outlined more information on what steps you can take when finding a practitioner for a cosmetic procedure. You can also check if those who are offering the cosmetic procedures are on a voluntary register accredited by the Professional Standards Authority (PSA).
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Resident doctors' focus on pay is doing untold damage to the NHS
As a retired doctor, now 80, I feel sad as I watch our resident doctors struggle to exert pressure on the government to increase their pay packet (Wes Streeting 'thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors', 27 July). This behaviour will have far-reaching consequences, which are unlikely to be beneficial either to the doctors or the country. Clearly, the action will cause delays in treatment and probably unnecessary morbidity and mortality. This will make the NHS vulnerable to pressure from those who favour its abolition. Already, it has alienated large sections of the population whose support the doctors have always been able to count on previously. But the British Medical Association has assured resident doctors that it is necessary for them to put their livelihood ahead of the wellbeing of the public, to ensure that the NHS survives into the future. This is a false promise. The commitment of resident doctors and nurses has always been integral to the success of the NHS, and there is no doubt that this has been central to the incredible efficiency it has demonstrated since its inception. It was conceived as a non-commercial organisation. There have always been areas of the globe where doctors could earn more than at home. But for most, the attractions of the NHS outweighed pecuniary advantages available elsewhere. I fear that in setting their sights purely on increased remuneration, today's resident doctors are leading the NHS towards a change in its entire ethos, the ethos that made it a success. The BMA should concentrate on improving doctors' working conditions, as Wes Streeting has offered BehrmanCookham Dean, Berkshire On Sunday I cancelled my subscription to the British Medical Association after being a member for 39 years, in disgust at its insistence on going ahead with the strike of resident doctors in pursuit of a 29% pay rise, despite having had a 22% rise over the previous two years. It is hard to know what is the correct rate of pay for resident doctors, but no other group in the health service is seeking such a rise in pay, and the decision to strike seems to ignore patients, as well as all the other staff alongside whom they work. I believe that improvement in the working conditions of doctors and all other groups should be sought through discussions, as the government has offered, not strikes. Whatever the appropriate pay should be for resident doctors, they should be glad that they don't get the equivalent of the £2 per hour we were paid in the 1980s for each of the 60 hours a week we had to be in the hospital over and above our basic 40-hour David CameronBelhaven, East Lothian I do have a lot of sympathy for our resident doctors, even though I was on call on Sunday as a consultant. It is not just that pay has been eroded, but also that the cost of becoming a doctor has gone up, as has the cost of living in general. Unlike in most other higher-paid professions, half of doctors are women. The cost of childcare has gone up significantly since my day. There is no more cheap hospital accommodation. And the student loan system is misogynistic in principle, the interest accumulating during maternity leave. Women earn less during their careers but end up paying back a lot more for their student loans as a group. And because of the forced itinerant lifestyle, most doctors get their foot on the housing ladder quite late, having to pay increasingly unaffordable GemmekeEastleigh, Hampshire Wes Streeting rightly points out that 90% of resident doctors voted for strike action, with a 55% turnout (Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, says Wes Streeting, 25 July). That means just under 50% of all resident doctors voted in favour. He fails to point out that Labour is in power on the votes of 34% of the 60% who turned out – about 20% of the electorate. The doctors' result looks more convincing as a test of opinion, whatever you think of the pay WestLondon Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
