All of Brigitte Macron's most awkward moments from THAT face grab to encounter with Donald Trump and breaking royal protocol
Mrs Macron, now 72, was a drama teacher and the President, now 47, was a pupil when they met at a private Catholic school in their hometown of Amiens.
A mother of three children, she divorced her husband and began a relationship with Mr Macron while he was in his late teens – before they tied the knot in 2007.
Now, interest in their marriage has intensified in recent weeks following an incident in Vietnam where Mrs Macron appeared to shove her husband in the face.
Brigitte ignores helping hand from her husband
Emmanuel Macron was ignored by his wife Brigitte while he offered her a hand off a plane yesterday as they arrived in Britain for their three-day state visit.
The visiting leader was being welcomed by the Prince and Princess of Wales after disembarking his jet before the first lady at RAF Northolt in West London.
As his wife walked down the steps towards the waiting royals, who were greeting the couple on behalf of King Charles III, President Macron held out a helping hand.
But Mrs Macron appeared to ignore it, instead holding the handrail as she walked down - leaving him to awkwardly drop his hand, before giving Kate's hand an air kiss.
Minutes later, the Macrons were seen in a car waiting to leave the base - and relations appeared frosty, with Mrs Macron looking at her phone after getting it out of her bag.
Pushing her husband's face on a plane
Brigitte Macron sparked a storm in May when she was seen pushing her husband's face away with both hands before they disembarked a plane in Vietnam.
The president dismissed the gesture - caught on camera - as horseplay, but it caused a huge stir in France, with daily Le Parisien newspaper asking: 'Slap or 'squabble'?'
Mrs Macron seemed to stick out both her hands and give her husband's face a shove, leaving him startled before he recovered and turned to wave through the open door.
The couple proceeded down the staircase for the official welcome by Vietnamese officials, though Mrs Macron did not take her husband's arm when he offered it.
'My wife and I were squabbling, we were rather joking, and I was taken by surprise,' Mr Macron later said, adding that it had 'become a kind of planetary catastrophe'.
His office said in a statmeent: 'The president and his wife were decompressing one last time before the start of the trip by horsing around. It's a moment of complicity. It was all that was needed to give ammunition to the conspiracy theorists.'
Breaking royal protocol at Normandy memorial
Brigitte Macron committed of a faux pas in June 2024 when she tried to hold hands with a rather reluctant Queen Camilla at the British Normandy Memorial in France.
Camilla and Mrs Macron, both dressed in white, laid wreaths at the memorial at Ver-sur-Mer, before stepping back to take a moment of reflection.
The First Lady then reached out to the Queen, but Camilla seemed somewhat reluctant to proffer her gloved hand.
After appearing to give the royal's hand a slight squeeze, Mrs Macron dropped it and the two stood side by side in front of the memorial.
Emmanuel Macron also kept the King and Queen waiting when he was 20 minutes late for a showpiece D-Day memorial ceremony during the same visit.
The Royals were already sitting waiting when France's head of state finally arrived at the 80th anniversary event at the memorial.
Donald Trump telling her she is 'good shape'
Donald Trump made his admiration for Brigitte Macron clear back in July 2017 in Paris when he told France's first lady: 'You know, you're in such good shape.'
The compliment to Mrs Macron, then 64, was made in front of her husband - and Mr Trump repeated it to him before turning back to her and saying: 'Beautiful.'
During the exchange, which was captured on a French official livestream, the reaction of Mr Trump's wife Melania was not seen, because her back was to the camera.
However the American first lady seemed to move closer to Mrs Macron and put her hand around her protectively as President Trump spoke to her.
The awkward exchange came after an also-awkward lingering embrace with Mrs Macron as she and her husband welcomed the Trumps on the eve of Bastille Day.
Mr Trump kissed Mrs Macron Parisian-style, once on each cheek, before taking both her hands for a prolonged grip, in which he appeared to jerk her left arm towards him as she appeared to be struggling to get him to let go.
Melania Trump put her hand around Mrs Macron protectively as President Trump spoke to her
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
10 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Starmer hails Zelenskiy's desire for ‘just peace' amid fears of Russian land grab
Keir Starmer has hailed Volodymyr Zelenskiy's desire for a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine, amid worries a Russian land grab could result from negotiations to end the war. The British Prime Minister and French President Emmanuel Macron chaired a meeting of the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon, where allied leaders prepared for a meeting with US President Donald Trump alongside Mr Zelenskiy in Washington on Monday. Advertisement European leaders appear poised to join Mr Zelenskiy in a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian president, after his last encounter with his American counterpart in the Oval Office resulted in a diplomatic crisis. Giving a readout of the video call between coalition allies, a Downing Street spokesman said: 'The leaders reaffirmed their continued support to Ukraine, and praised President Zelenskiy's desire for a just and lasting peace as he prepares for further consultations with President Trump in Washington DC. 'The leaders also commended President Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to Ukraine, in which the coalition of the willing will play a vital role through the Multinational Force Ukraine, among other measures. 'They re-emphasised the readiness to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased, and to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces.' Advertisement The call followed fears that Mr Trump may have been swayed by Vladimir Putin's demands for ending the war when the pair met in Alaska on Friday. News reports suggested Mr Putin wants full control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two occupied Ukrainian regions, in exchange for withdrawing troops from other areas. Mr Trump is inclined to press the Ukrainian president to accept the demands at their meeting on Monday, the reports added. President Donald Trump listens as Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a news conference (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) The US leader also appeared to change his mind about the need for a ceasefire following his meeting with Mr Putin, who has refused to lay down arms ahead of a sustained peace deal. Advertisement US secretary of state Marco Rubio has since insisted Russia will face 'additional consequences' if no peace deal is reached. Fresh sanctions are not off the table, Mr Rubio told American broadcasters, though he claimed they would not lead Russia to accept a ceasefire. European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said it did not matter that Mr Trump was no longer aiming for a ceasefire before brokering a wider peace, as either would 'stop the killing'. Appearing alongside her at a press conference before the coalition of the willing call, Mr Zelensky agreed, but insisted negotiations needed to result in the 'correct steps to have lasting peace, to stop Putin' rather than simply a pause in the war. Advertisement Earlier, Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Mr Putin had agreed to Nato-like protection for Ukraine for the first time at the Alaska summit, as a concession to western allies. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' he told CNN. European leaders on Saturday suggested Mr Trump had indicated he is now willing to provide American air support for the alliance, a 'security guarantee' said to be vital to its operation. Those travelling to Washington on Monday alongside Mr Starmer includes Mr Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Finland's Alexander Stubb, EU Commission president Ms von der Leyen and Nato chief Mark Rutte. Advertisement Ahead of the Oval Office encounter, the allies are likely to be mindful of the previous time Mr Zelenskiy appeared in the room – February's bust-up, which resulted in American aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Don't cave to Putin, Europe urges Trump
Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders will urge Donald Trump not to submit to Vladimir Putin's demands for more Ukrainian concessions. In a show of unity in the wake of Russia's success at last week's Alaska summit, the group will fly to Washington on Monday and attempt to stiffen US resolve in the peace talks. Alongside Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, Sir Keir will seek to minimise the risk of Volodymyr Zelensky being humiliated in the Oval Office again – as happened when he last visited in February. The European delegation – which includes Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister; Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president; and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general – will also push back on Putin's demand for Mr Zelensky to surrender the whole of the Donbas region, which is made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in eastern Ukraine. But the Trump administration said a discussion about the future of the mineral-rich region was needed and insisted 'both sides' will need to make concessions. On Sunday, Mr Macron said the delegation's will was to ' present a united front between Europeans and Ukrainians ', warning Mr Trump: 'There is only one state that proposes a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' He added: 'If we are weak with Moscow, we are preparing for tomorrow's conflicts.' European leaders have not explicitly called for all of Donetsk to remain Ukrainian, instead saying it was up for Mr Zelensky to decide what to agree to on territory. Mr Zelensky pushed back on suggestions that he should be made to give up the entirety of the Donbas region, including land that Ukraine still holds. However, he opened the door to negotiations with Putin directly, saying any territorial changes should be discussed in a three-way meeting with the US. 'We need real negotiations which means they can start where the frontline is now,' Mr Zelensky said. 'The contact line is the best line for talking and the Europeans support this.' The Ukrainian president noted that the Russians were 'still unsuccessful' in Donetsk, where Ukraine holds 30 per cent of the land, and had failed to take the area in the 12 years that Putin had tried to seize control. The request for face-to-face talks with Putin, which Moscow has consistently rejected , appears to be part of a wider European strategy to show Russia as the obstacle to peace. In a joint press conference in Brussels on Sunday, Mr Zelensky and Ms Von der Leyen said Russia must stop attacking Ukraine before proper negotiations can progress, whether that is called a ceasefire or not. The message represented an attempt to counter Mr Trump's public declaration that all sides should end the focus on a temporary ceasefire and move straight to establishing a permanent peace deal. European leaders are wary of this position because it would allow Putin's forces to seize more Ukrainian land while talks were ongoing. However, senior figures in the Trump administration reinforced the president's desire for talks over territory on Sunday. Steve Witkoff, the US peace envoy who joined Mr Trump and Putin for talks in Alaska, told CNN: 'There is an important discussion to be had with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.' Marco Rubio, who was also in Anchorage, told CBS News: 'To reach the end of this conflict, both sides are going to have to make concessions. That's just a fact.' The US secretary of state also backed away from previous US threats to sanction Putin if he failed to agree to a ceasefire, suggesting such a move would not keep him at the negotiating table. European leaders praised the Trump administration after the president promised security guarantees to a Western-backed peacekeeping force in Ukraine once the fighting has ended. Sir Keir and Mr Macron are leading a group of 30 nations dubbed the ' Coalition of the Willing ' offering to help protect Ukrainian freedom if a peace deal is struck. Under the plans, British military trainers and engineers would be sent into Ukraine alongside contributions from other nations after a ceasefire to rebuild the Ukrainian armed forces. European planes, including Royal Air Force fighter jets, would also police the skies to deter any invasion. Leaders have argued for months that the US would have to provide some form of security 'backstop' to make sure that in reality Russia would be deterred from attacking again. Some went public over the weekend thanking Mr Trump for supposedly offering 'Nato Article 5-like' guarantees in a call briefing them on the Putin summit. Article 5 is a clause that agrees an attack on one Nato member is considered an attack on all. Downing Street wants the White House to clarify what security guarantees it is offering, while Mr Macron said he would ask the US 'to what extent' it is ready to contribute. However, Sir Keir did not issue personal comments on Sunday, reflecting Downing Street's strategy of trying to influence Mr Trump behind closed doors rather than via megaphone diplomacy. Senior figures in Downing Street have expressed regret over what they consider to have been their failure to help Mr Zelensky prepare for February's ill-fated meeting with Mr Trump in Washington. Mr Zelensky arrived at the White House hoping to announce Ukraine had reached a minerals deal with the US. But his Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump descended into a shouting match after JD Vance, the vice-president, demanded that he show more gratitude after years of American support.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it
FOR those enraged at growing evidence of 'two-tier' Britain, the acquittal of Ricky Jones last week was just the latest depressing example. Here was a Labour councillor being cleared of encouraging violent disorder despite calling for far-right protesters to have their throats slit. 3 3 Reform and the Tories seized on the case as yet another blinding display of courtroom double standards. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp wasted no time laying the travesty squarely at the feet of Sir Keir Starmer. In a tweet viewed more than two million times, he said 'as far as I can see, this Labour Government seems to be quite happy with two-tier justice'. Cue howls of anger from online liberals, who breathlessly crowed that not only was he disrespecting the decision of a jury, he was unfairly meting out blame to ministers. 'You ought to know this has nothing to do with them', retorted the arch-Conservative wet Dominic Grieve. 'That is the hallmark of a rabble rouser.' Rank unfairness But people are roused. In fact, they are bloody furious about what they perceive to be rampant 'two-tierism'. The refrain thundered into the political lexicon like a bullet train in the tinderbox aftermath of last year's Southport riots. In that sticky, angry summer, there was a feeling the clunking fist of the British state was being disproportionately brought down upon a certain kind of protester. For a public that routinely watches paedophiles walk free, the case of Lucy Connolly — slung in the slammer for a disgraceful but quite clearly stupid tweet — became a lightning rod. Even now, her 31-month jail sentence is the yardstick held up against some of the more mind-boggling outcomes from our judiciary. 'Two-tier' justice savaged by Kemi Badenoch who blasts 'extraordinary' decision to spare Huw Edwards You can argue the toss over how much blame ministers should shoulder for policing and court decisions. We have an independent judiciary but it is of course Parliament that makes our laws and ministers who make the political weather. Rightly or wrongly, Starmer is the man at the sharp end of the criticism. And much more dangerously for him, allegations of two-tier standards have now stretched well beyond the orbit of crime and seeped into every cranny of public life. It has become a byword for the rank unfairness voters see in modern day Britain. Charges of two-tierism are so common I'd eat my notebook if it is not the 2025 Oxford word of the year. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look Of all the unfortunate nicknames bestowed upon our Prime Minister, none has stuck quite so solidly as Two Tier Keir. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look. Ordinary British families struggling to pay the rent watch in fury as undocumented illegal migrants waltz into hotels for free bed and board. Law-abiding citizens paying full whack for council services and leisure activities read revelations in The Sun about small-boat migrants getting discounts. Millions of workers setting their alarm clocks for crack of dawn see an ever-growing number of their countrymen and women signing on for welfare with zero requirements to look for work. Taxpayers squeezed more than ever wonder where the improvement in public services is to show for it. Passengers paying hefty Tube fares rattle with rage as guards turn a blind eye to entitled oiks bumping the barriers. And just last week, we saw Birmingham council tear down St George flags from lamp-posts while turning a blind eye to Palestinian ones. Two-tierism is more than just a buzzword — it captures the mood of a nation fed up with a system they increasingly feel is not on their side. The PM's political enemies are alive to just how damaging the Two Tier Keir narrative has become. Consider how just last year those who brandished allegations of two-tierism were dismissed as cranks and nutjobs, whereas now these are mainstream complaints. Even when Starmer was shoving Netflix show Adolescence down our throats, but neglected to watch a documentary about grooming gangs, he was accused of 'two-tier telly'. How does Sir Keir neutralise these attacks and restore the faith of a nation that loves rules and loathes unfairness? Winning the trust of voters always starts by showing them you get it. Starmer will never himself use the T-word — a refrain adopted mainly by the political Right. And it is unlikely this former lawyer will start openly criticising his old profession, although it is a good first step that he has pledged new legislation to stop dinghy-chasing lawyers weaponising European human-rights laws. Kick up backside Expect him to start wrapping himself up in the language of 'fairness' over the next few months, though, as he tries to show he does in fact get it. He tweeted yesterday: 'I will do what it takes to uphold the law and ensure fairness for the British people. 'If someone doesn't have the right to be in this country, we won't allow them to stay.' Which is all well and good, but the rhetoric has to be matched by results. Whitehall departments have been given a kick up the backside to deliver positive stories about this Government to sell. At a recent summer bash, No10 chiefs told Cabinet aides that the Health, Treasury and Environment departments had churned out the most 'top of the grid' stories — a pointed reminder to slackers to up their game. Stopping the boats, closing hotels, driving living standards, going after genuine criminals and getting more people into work — voters don't ask the world of their politicians, they just want the basics done right so they can get on in life. Sir Keir needs to restore that uniquely British sense of fairness — or it could all end in tiers. NEVER wrestle with a pig – you both get dirty but the pig likes it. I fear Sir Keir Starmer's latest mud-slinging campaign against Nigel Farage could see him end up on the wrong end of that old political slogan. 3 New Labour attack ads claim the Reform leader 'wants to make it easier to share revenge porn online' and would 'put women and girls at risk'. Another one attempts to portray him as best mates with social media misogynist Andrew Tate. It all comes shortly after ministers lampooned Farage, right, as 'on the side' of modern day Jimmy Saviles. Politics can be a dirty business and sometimes it pays dividends to go below the belt. But if the gloves are off, the PM should not be surprised if he now gets hit back twice as hard. And Reform are hardly the sort who will pull their punches. I suspect the real reason Labour has ratcheted up the criticism is that nothing else is sticking to Teflon Nige, or knocking him off his perch atop the polls. A No10 insider recently told me their attempts to undermine the costs of Farage's policies were futile. They said: 'We are so far out from a general election that nobody cares about whether the sums add up. It's all vibes.'
