Charu Asopa slams ex-husband Rajeev Sen's accusations of talking to his bestfriend; says 'Kis dost se baat kar rahi thi mai aapke?'
A few days after
Rajeev Sen
stirred controversy by suggesting that his fallout with ex-wife, TV actress
Charu Asopa
, was triggered by her alleged closeness with his best friend, Charu has come forward to firmly deny the claims.
In a candid response, she challenged Rajeev to back up his accusations with proof.
"If you're going to make such serious allegations, at least name the friend and share what exactly was said," she urged. Rajeev, who is the brother of Bollywood star Sushmita Sen, has yet to respond with specifics.
Charu Asopa addressed the allegations head-on, calling out the bizarre nature of the claim made against her. She said, 'Ek comment mere baare mein aaya tha ki mujhe apne kisi dost se baat karte hue range haath pakda.
Toh pehle toh mujhe yeh comment hi bada ajeeb laga ki 'dost se baat karte hue range haath pakda'. Jab aapne range haath pakda toh aapko pata hoga ki maine kya baat ki,' (There was a comment made about me saying I was caught red-handed talking to one of your friends.
First of all, I found that very strange—'caught red-handed just for talking to a friend'? If you caught me 'red-handed', then surely you know what I said, right?) She made it clear that simply speaking to someone doesn't equate to betrayal and urged for clarity rather than vague accusations.
Charu didn't hold back as she called out the lack of clarity in the accusations. She firmly stated, 'Toh batao, maine kya baat ki, kyunki mujhe bhi pata chale. Jab aapne 'range haath pakda' toh mai aapke dost se kya baat kar rahi thi? Aur jis dost se baat kar rahi thi, uska naam toh batao mujhe. Kis dost se baat kar rahi thi mai aapke? Toh hawa mein nahi baat karni chahiye; sab hawa mein baat karte hain,' (So tell me what I said; I'd like to know too.
If you 'caught me red-handed', what exactly was I saying to your friend? And tell me the name of the friend I was talking to. Who is this 'friend'? One shouldn't make baseless statements; everyone just speaks without facts.)
Earlier, while talking to Times Of India TV, Rajeev Sen revealed that he had caught Charu talking to his bestfriend, he said, "I saw Charu talking to my best friend of 20 years behind my back. She even started following him on Instagram… she just kept numb when confronted. She has many male friends of hers yet she crossed her line by being secretly friends with my best friend, from then on things took a ugly turn between Charu and me.
I will not tolerate this."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
JK Rowling's magic brought them together; now her views have left them divided: Where do Harry Potter stars stand amid the controversy?
When the Chosen One Chooses a Side — PopCrave (@PopCrave) Emma Watson: A Feminist Witch for All Emma Watson's Instagram post. (Images: Agencies, Instagram) Rupert Grint: The Diplomatic Gryffindor The Silence Breakers: Felton, Fiennes, and Bonham Carter — Variety (@Variety) Jason Isaacs and Evanna Lynch: The Middle Path A World Torn Between Wand and Word In the universe of Harry Potter , lines between good and evil were once clearly drawn. But outside the pages, the reality has become far murkier. At the heart of this divide stands the author of the spellbinding world herself—J.K. Rowling. Once revered as the literary magician behind a generation's childhood, Rowling has since drawn intense criticism for her public stance on transgender issues . And while her pen gave life to Hogwarts, her real-life opinions have stirred the kind of debate no spell could controversy has left the Harry Potter fandom—and its beloved stars—divided. As Rowling's stance grows firmer, so do the varied responses of the actors she once helped catapult into global fame. Their statements reveal a complex dance of gratitude, discomfort, conviction, and conflict. Because while movies may bring books to life, the actors and authors behind them don't always see the world through the same lens. Daniel Radcliffe , forever known as "The Boy Who Lived," has not held back. In 2020, he penned a heartfelt op-ed distancing himself from Rowling's views and affirming, "Transgender women are women." He called out the pain her comments caused, emphasizing the need to listen to medical experts and the lived realities of trans people. In later interview with The Atlantic, he doubled down on his sadness over the divide: "Nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it did without that person... But that doesn't mean you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life."Emma Watson, never one to stay silent, used her platform to amplify trans voices. Her 2020 statement stood in direct contrast to Rowling's, expressing love and respect for the trans community. Later, at the BAFTAs, she quipped, 'I'm here for all the witches,' a line many took as a clear dig at Rowling. Watson's activism continues to blur the boundary between performer and advocate, as she chooses solidarity over also expressing firm support for trans rights, Rupert Grint has tried to strike a more personal chord. In interviews, he referred to Rowling as an "auntie"—someone he disagrees with, but still holds a complex relationship with. In an interview with The Times, he said, "I liken JK Rowling to an auntie. I don't necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she's still my auntie. It's a tricky one."His stance reflects the internal conflict many feel: can you love the art while questioning the artist?Tom Felton, who played the antagonistic Draco Malfoy, was more muted in his response, saying he's not deeply affected by the controversy and choosing to focus on the unifying power of Potter. But Ralph Fiennes, who portrayed Lord Voldemort, came to Rowling's defense with characteristic intensity. According to New York Times, he called the abuse Rowling faced 'disgusting' and insisted that her perspective was not extreme but Bonham Carter, the formidable Bellatrix Lestrange, echoed similar sentiments. As per a report from The Times, she condemned the backlash as 'a load of b***ocks,' suggesting Rowling was a victim of overzealous cancel culture and hinting that envy might be fueling the vitriol. 'She's allowed her opinion,' Bonham Carter said, urging respect for trauma-informed Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy) offered a cautious but thoughtful take—acknowledging differences in views but emphasizing Rowling's extensive charitable work. While talking with Telegraph, he refused to 'stab her in the front or the back' without a personal conversation. Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood), who once stood against Rowling, has since revisited her opinion. She now urges compassion on all sides, admitting she was 'naive' in earlier responses and praising Rowling's support for detransitioners—a controversial but honest Harry Melling, who played the unlikable cousin Dudley Dursley, offered a clear and succinct opinion while talking to the Independent: "Transgender women are women and transgender men are men." A simple statement, delivered without fanfare, but loaded with Harry Potter franchise , once a global beacon of fantasy, is now entangled in a very real-world dilemma—can the creation be separated from the creator? Can childhood heroes still stand tall if they clash with the values of their literary parent?What is unmistakably clear is that movies are not books, and actors are not authors. Each individual carries their own worldview, their own politics, their own truth. And just as Rowling once taught the world to question what lies beneath a surface, this controversy now compels fans and stars alike to reckon with the complex, often uncomfortable intersection of art, identity, and belief.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
JK Rowling's magic brought them together; now her views have left them divided: Where do Harry Potter stars stand amid the controversy?
When the Chosen One Chooses a Side — PopCrave (@PopCrave) Emma Watson: A Feminist Witch for All Emma Watson's Instagram post. (Images: Agencies, Instagram) Rupert Grint: The Diplomatic Gryffindor The Silence Breakers: Felton, Fiennes, and Bonham Carter — Variety (@Variety) Jason Isaacs and Evanna Lynch: The Middle Path A World Torn Between Wand and Word In the universe of Harry Potter , lines between good and evil were once clearly drawn. But outside the pages, the reality has become far murkier. At the heart of this divide stands the author of the spellbinding world herself—J.K. Rowling. Once revered as the literary magician behind a generation's childhood, Rowling has since drawn intense criticism for her public stance on transgender issues . And while her pen gave life to Hogwarts, her real-life opinions have stirred the kind of debate no spell could controversy has left the Harry Potter fandom—and its beloved stars—divided. As Rowling's stance grows firmer, so do the varied responses of the actors she once helped catapult into global fame. Their statements reveal a complex dance of gratitude, discomfort, conviction, and conflict. Because while movies may bring books to life, the actors and authors behind them don't always see the world through the same lens. Daniel Radcliffe , forever known as "The Boy Who Lived," has not held back. In 2020, he penned a heartfelt op-ed distancing himself from Rowling's views and affirming, "Transgender women are women." He called out the pain her comments caused, emphasizing the need to listen to medical experts and the lived realities of trans people. In later interview with The Atlantic, he doubled down on his sadness over the divide: "Nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it did without that person... But that doesn't mean you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life."Emma Watson, never one to stay silent, used her platform to amplify trans voices. Her 2020 statement stood in direct contrast to Rowling's, expressing love and respect for the trans community. Later, at the BAFTAs, she quipped, 'I'm here for all the witches,' a line many took as a clear dig at Rowling. Watson's activism continues to blur the boundary between performer and advocate, as she chooses solidarity over also expressing firm support for trans rights, Rupert Grint has tried to strike a more personal chord. In interviews, he referred to Rowling as an "auntie"—someone he disagrees with, but still holds a complex relationship with. In an interview with The Times, he said, "I liken JK Rowling to an auntie. I don't necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she's still my auntie. It's a tricky one."His stance reflects the internal conflict many feel: can you love the art while questioning the artist?Tom Felton, who played the antagonistic Draco Malfoy, was more muted in his response, saying he's not deeply affected by the controversy and choosing to focus on the unifying power of Potter. But Ralph Fiennes, who portrayed Lord Voldemort, came to Rowling's defense with characteristic intensity. According to New York Times, he called the abuse Rowling faced 'disgusting' and insisted that her perspective was not extreme but Bonham Carter, the formidable Bellatrix Lestrange, echoed similar sentiments. As per a report from The Times, she condemned the backlash as 'a load of b***ocks,' suggesting Rowling was a victim of overzealous cancel culture and hinting that envy might be fueling the vitriol. 'She's allowed her opinion,' Bonham Carter said, urging respect for trauma-informed Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy) offered a cautious but thoughtful take—acknowledging differences in views but emphasizing Rowling's extensive charitable work. While talking with Telegraph, he refused to 'stab her in the front or the back' without a personal conversation. Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood), who once stood against Rowling, has since revisited her opinion. She now urges compassion on all sides, admitting she was 'naive' in earlier responses and praising Rowling's support for detransitioners—a controversial but honest Harry Melling, who played the unlikable cousin Dudley Dursley, offered a clear and succinct opinion while talking to the Independent: "Transgender women are women and transgender men are men." A simple statement, delivered without fanfare, but loaded with Harry Potter franchise , once a global beacon of fantasy, is now entangled in a very real-world dilemma—can the creation be separated from the creator? Can childhood heroes still stand tall if they clash with the values of their literary parent?What is unmistakably clear is that movies are not books, and actors are not authors. Each individual carries their own worldview, their own politics, their own truth. And just as Rowling once taught the world to question what lies beneath a surface, this controversy now compels fans and stars alike to reckon with the complex, often uncomfortable intersection of art, identity, and belief.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Diet Cherry Coke likely to make comeback in US market after 4 years: Report
After a gap of four years, international beverage firm Cola Cola is most likely to bring back its classic Diet Cherry Coke in the US market, reported Economic Times. Diet Cherry Coke was launched in 1985 but discontinued in 2020. Citing a January report by the digital media outlet Parade, ET mentioned that the Diet Cherry Coke may make a comeback to the shelves with retro packaging during the summer season. Claiming a comeback of the classic drink, popular social media creator Snack-O-Lator later shared the news on its Instagram channel. It added that Diet Cherry Coke is making a comeback better than ever. 'Diet Cherry Coke is returning for a limited time with retro packaging!,' the post read. 'It's been years since the OG Diet Cherry Coke has been out, so I'm really looking forward to getting it again,' the post further stated, adding, 'This does not appear to be an exclusive release, but I'll update as it arrives on store shelves. Are you excited for some Diet Cherry Coca-Cola goodness?' Diet Coke is reportedly popular among consumers as it is a classic soda fountain beverage with flavours, including Diet Cherry Coke. Meanwhile, there are also calls for the return of Diet Coke with Lime. The popular beverage-making firm's website has mentioned that Diet Coke Cherry targeted adult consumers, and it contained no sugar and no calories. Also, the Diet Coke Cherry does not have any bubbles or effervescence, but the drink has an adult cola taste with a hint of cherry. Following the news was spread, netizens were quick to react. one wrote, 'Where can I find! This is an emergency! 😂' Another said, "Bring back the Diet Coke with lime and the one with Splenda" A third wrote, "Did Cherry Cole Zero go away? I haven't got any in a while but I thought it was still around. Huh." 'Oh yay! Im super picky about my diet soda and the Splenda Sweetened stuff just didn't hit right, I need the old school carcinogenic aspartame to get my fix 😂,' commented a fourth.
