South Korea: Google may launch YouTube Premium sans music amid antitrust probe
The self-proposed measure is part of negotiations between the U.S. tech giant and the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), which has been investigating Google over suspicions that it violated fair trade rules by bundling YouTube Music to its premium subscription service.
In July last year, the FTC issued a report equivalent to a formal prosecution complaint, accusing Google Korea of unfairly bundling YouTube Music with YouTube Premium, thereby restricting consumer choice and abusing its market dominance, reports Yonhap news agency.
The regulator claims Google's practice effectively forced consumers to subscribe to both services, limiting options for those who may have only wanted access to ad-free video streaming.
Rather than pursuing a prolonged legal battle, Google has submitted a corrective action plan under the FTC's procedure known as a "consent decision." The mechanism allows the FTC to suspend its investigation if the company voluntarily proposes measures that address the alleged consumer harm.
"The FTC will review the validity and appropriateness of Google's proposed corrective actions and will draw up a final consent decision plan," the FTC said Thursday, without disclosing when a final decision would be made.
In South Korea, YouTube Premium currently costs 14,900 won (US$10.79) per month, while YouTube Music is offered separately for 11,990 won ($8.38) per month.
In the United States, YouTube recently announced it is expanding its Premium Lite pilot program to local users. The Premium Lite plan costs $7.99 per month, significantly lower than the full YouTube Premium subscription at $13.99.
In July last year, the US tech giant was accused of providing the YouTube Music streaming service to users of the ad-free YouTube premium program without additional charges in violation of the fair transaction law, and the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has carried out an on-site probe since February last year.
Officials have said the probe was focused on whether Google has abused its market dominance for implementing such a practice and that it has restricted fair competition in the industry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Losing India would be a strategic disaster in face of China: Nikki Haley to Trump
Former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, warned that US-India relations are at a breaking point and must be repaired quickly if Washington hopes to contain China's global a Newsweek op-ed published Wednesday, Haley said the Trump administration cannot afford to let tariffs and disputes over Russian oil drive a wedge between the world's two largest United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals," she wrote. "To face China, the United States must have a friend in India."WASHINGTON, NEW DELHI AT ODDS OVER RUSSIA OIL Tensions escalated after President Donald Trump imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs and an additional 25 per cent levy on New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. The move followed months of friction, including claims over America's role in India-Pakistan ceasefire backed Trump's pressure campaign, saying India's energy purchases "are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine."But she cautioned against treating India like an adversary. "Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster," she argued that India is essential to Washington's economic and security goals. As the United States seeks to shift supply chains away from China, India offers manufacturing capacity "at China-like scale" for industries like textiles, phones and solar pointed at India's increasing defence ties with the United States and allies like Israel make it a "crucial asset to the free world's security."INDIA'S RISE COULD SURPASS CHINA'S IMPACTIn the long run, she added, India's rise may be the most significant geopolitical development since China's economic ascent. "Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows," Haley former South Carolina governor urged direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to end what she called a "downward spiral."Without action, she warned, Beijing would exploit the rift. "It would be a massive -- and preventable -- mistake to balloon a trade spat into an enduring rupture."Haley concluded by echoing Ronald Reagan's words to Indira Gandhi at the White House in 1982: although Washington and New Delhi may at times "travel separate paths," their destination should remain the same."The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India," she wrote.- EndsWith inputs from agenciesMust Watch
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'As Crack Barrel's ex-designer...': NC man says new logo, makeover is 'brand suicide'
Cracker Barrel, the US-based food and gift store, announced on Wednesday they are changing their iconic logo, which has been a face of the brand the last 47 years. The change, which was part of the brand's makeover, received massive backlash on social media. Cracker Barrel's old logo.(X) Cracker Barrel has had the golden-colored image of a man resting against an oak barrel as its logo since 1977. Announcing the change, the brand's CEO said that it is "now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape." However, a large number of people opposed the move, including a designer from North Carolina, who worked with Cracker Barrel for a year. Erik Russel, a Greenville-based designer, wrote on is X account that the logo change would be "suicidal" for the brand. "As a brand designer that worked at @CrackerBarrel for almost 9 years, watching them commit brand suicide is... something," Russel wrote on X. Cracker Barrel Defends Decision Despite the backlash, Cracker Barrel has defended the decision to change to logo. In an interview with Good Morning America, Julie Felss Masino, the CEO of Cracker Barrel, called the logo change the brand's attempt to adapt to the changing times. Also read: Cracker Barrel new logo row: Why Lebanon-based chain is facing backlash; CEO responds 'People like what we're doing. Cracker Barrel needs to feel like the Cracker Barrel for today and for tomorrow -- the things that you love are still there. We need people to choose us, and we want people to choose us,' Masino said. 'We believe in the goodness of country hospitality, a spirit that has always defined us. Our story hasn't changed. Our values haven't changed," Cracker Barrel's Chief Marketing Officer, Sarah Moore, said in a statement.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US policy on India is confusing; Trump an aberrational president: Ex-NSA John Bolton
Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton criticised Washington's 'confused' policy on India, questioning the 25% penalty on India for purchasing Russian energy while China faces no sanctions. In an interview with HT, Bolton acknowledged that the India-US relationship is for the time being in 'a very bad place' and believes Trump is an 'aberrational president' as he stressed on the need for efforts to limit damage to bilateral ties for the US President's remaining term. Former US national security adviser John Bolton speaks at a panel hosted by the National Council of Resistance of Iran – US Representative Office (NCRI-US) at the Willard InterContinental Hotel in Washington, DC, on August 17, 2022. (Getty Images) Q. Former ambassador Bolton, just a couple of months ago, India was a close strategic ally of the United States. Now things seem to have changed entirely—a 180-degree turn. As President Trump's former National Security Advisor, can you channel some of his thinking on India? A. Well, I think it's unfortunately very confused. The first level of concern is the tariffs that emerged out of the so-called Liberation Day tariffs in April, where Indian negotiators were working to try and get a mutually satisfactory arrangement, and Trump kind of pulled the plug without warning and said the tariffs would be at 25%. The second matter is the 25% addition to that tariff because of purchases of Russian oil and gas. It turns out that Russia has not faced any new sanctions. China has not faced any new sanctions, notwithstanding the fact that they were the major purchasers of Russian oil and gas. India has been singled out. I wish India didn't buy oil and gas from Russia, because I think it's in the interest of India as well as the United States to recognise the threat posed by China, the growing axis between China and Russia, and the threat that poses globally. Leaving India hanging out to dry as the only country to which punitive action has been taken obviously leads a lot of people to conclude that the United States has given up on India, and I do worry that India is being driven closer to Russia and China. It's just part of the aberrational Trump presidency. But it's a very bad place for the relationship at the moment. Q. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent has come down hard on India for buying Russian energy. India has pushed back defending its position. Can you speak to that criticism? A. Secretary Bessent isn't very experienced in international affairs, and I don't think he sees the growing axis between China and Russia. The complaint is that India took some of the gasoline it was buying from Russia, perhaps refined it and sold it internationally. That's a complaint worth discussing. But the sanctions as written do not preclude anyone, including India, from buying Russian oil at the capped price, or below $60/barrel, and then selling it elsewhere. If that's the complaint, the complaint lies with the sanctions, not so much with India's behaviour. What India did isn't prohibited. Q. There are many in India questioning whether trust in the US has been strained beyond repair after the last few months. What would you say to them? A. Unfortunately, what Trump has done on tariffs is destroying decades of effort with India and many others to build up good faith and reliance, and it will take time to repair that. But here's what's important: Trump is aberrational. I don't know any other Republican or Democrat who ran for president who if elected would behave anything like this. Trump doesn't have a philosophy, so there's no legacy for his successors. Our objective should be to keep the damage to the relationship at a minimum, and then think about how to repair it quickly thereafter. When Trump leaves, he'll take almost the bulk of this history with him. Q. Regarding China, we've seen President Trump and his team push for a deal with the Chinese, but policy seems confused at times. What is Trump's China policy? A. It's confused. In the first term, Trump wanted the biggest trade deal in history with China. Deadlines for tariffs on China have already been extended 180 days. China hasn't faced secondary sanctions on its purchase of Russian oil and gas. If you want a trade war, we should have teamed up and had a trade war with China, because they're the worst actor in international economics. They steal intellectual property, subsidise companies, don't open their market even when they claim to. It's hard to explain why he gives China this much leeway. Q. Lastly, what do you see happening going forward? Are you optimistic that India and the US could return to normalcy? A. I think a couple things will need to happen. We need continued conversations between non-governmental Indians and Americans, so people see that what's happening at the top isn't reflective of what the whole country thinks. Modi should wait for the right moment, perhaps at the UN General Assembly in New York in September, to meet Trump one-on-one and clear the air. Before the tariff problem, Trump and Modi had a good personal relationship, which is central to Trump's view of state-to-state relations. That asset remains, and if deployed effectively, could be a step toward recovery.
