Is it a snub? Tom Cruise rejects Trump's 2025 Kennedy Center honors, cites this as the reason
According to The Washington Post , Cruise declined the recognition due to 'scheduling conflicts,' though the actor has not publicly remarked on the stance. The Kennedy Center Honors, traditionally organized by the institution's board, are now widely influenced by Trump after his recent appointment as its chairman earlier this year.
In his latest announcement, Trump revealed the 2025 recipients: country music great George Strait, rock band KISS, Broadway veteran Michael Crawford, disco queen Gloria Gaynor, and action icon Sylvester Stallone. Notably missing from the lineup was Tom Cruise, as his participation would have arguably delivered the ceremony its biggest mainstream draw.
Trump has stated openly that he played an active role in curating the list, even admitting that he personally excluded certain names he deemed 'too woke.' His remarks have further fueled debates about political influence in a ceremony historically intended to honor artistic achievement beyond partisan boundaries. Although Cruise's representatives attribute his decision to prior commitments, industry insiders point out that the actor's calendar is indeed filled. He is actively promoting Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning and is speculated to be developing Top Gun 3 . However, observers claim the political scenario surrounding this year's event could have influenced his decision.
Throughout his career, Cruise has long maintained a careful public image that avoids explicit political association. Participating in a Trump-led cultural event could have ignited speculation about his political opinions, an outcome the actor may have been keen to ignore. By citing scheduling conflicts, Cruise maintains a neutral stance for avoiding the controversy.High-profile figures have turned down Kennedy Center Honors and similar awards before when the events have political interventions. In earlier years, stars like Mel Brooks and other entertainers have quietly declined invitations when ceremonies were hosted under politically charged scenarios.Q1. Who is Tom Cruise?
A1. Tom Cruise is an American actor and producer known for blockbuster films like Top Gun and the Mission: Impossible series. He is considered one of Hollywood's most successful and highest-paid stars.Q2. What are the Kennedy Center Honors?
A2. The Kennedy Center Honors recognize individuals for lifetime contributions to American culture through the performing arts. They are awarded annually by the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian man reveals why he married his American wife, internet moved by his heartfelt answer
A video shared on Instagram by a cross-cultural couple has struck a chord with viewers, as an Indian man candidly explained why he married his American wife. The post, uploaded on their joint account @thekarnes, features Candace Karne and her husband Aniket, and has already garnered over 45k views. A candid video of an Indian man explaining why he married an American woman went viral.(Instagram/thekarnes) (Also read: Watch: Indian husband's adorable reaction as American wife greets him in Marathi) A simple question sparks a sweet conversation The clip begins with a follower's question appearing on screen: 'Why you married her'. Candace turns to her husband and asks, 'Why did my husband marry me? Aniket, why did you marry me?' Aniket responds with a heartfelt explanation. 'I married you because when I first met you or when I first saw you, I was really impressed with everything you said you were doing. I especially liked the fact that you are a teacher. Everything you said that night made me feel welcome. As an international student, your hospitality was so nice. You have always been nice to me. I felt like the time spent with you would be nice and fun, and you like to work on things. I also like your family.' The importance of family Candace interjects, asking, 'Yeah, who, dad?' to which Aniket laughs and continues, 'Yes, I was really happy when I talked to them and got to know them. I got a really friendly vibe and thought this is a really good family, and I want to be with a good family. So maybe that is why.' Candace ends the exchange with a smile, saying, 'Oh, that's sweet, honey. I think he married because of my dad.' Watch the clip here: A caption full of gratitude In the post's caption, the couple noted, 'Obviously we know the comment was meant to say 'why did you marry her'. Although the tone may not have been positive, we are so thankful for this sincere moment. We do not have these types of conversations often where we reminisce about how or why we chose each other.' Internet reacts The video has prompted affectionate reactions from users. One viewer described it as 'so simple and wholesome but profound at the same time,' while another commented that Candace is 'stunning, both inside and outside.' Some noted the couple's shared positivity, with one remarking, 'Both are happy, positive and growing together.' Another user interpreted Aniket's words as meaning 'She is very kind and beautiful, and he loves her.'
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What might a Russia-Ukraine ‘land swap' entail?
The American and Russian Presidents will meet in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday (early hours of Saturday in India) to discuss, possibly decide, the future of the war in Ukraine. Ahead of the meeting, US President Donald Trump has repeatedly spoken about a 'land swap' which, he says, will help end the fighting. 'There'll be some land swapping going on,' Trump told reporters earlier this week. Russia currently occupies around a fifth of Ukrainian territory. Ukraine holds next to no Russian land. So what might a potential land swap entail? Status of war Three and a half years into the war, Ukraine is well and truly on the defensive. According to Reuters, Russia currently controls 114,500 square km (more than 19%) of Ukraine, including Crimea and a major chunk of territory in eastern and southeastern Ukraine. Some estimates peg this number to be even higher. Ukraine, on the other hand, controls next to no Russian territory. After making significant gains in Kursk last August-September, Ukrainian forces were pushed out of Russian soil by March this year. As things stand, Russia holds all of the initiative in the war: with Ukraine running out of men to send to the frontlines, Russian forces continue to make steady progress. If the fighting were to continue in its current tempo, experts suggest Russia would occupy all of the four eastern and southeastern Ukrainian provinces of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. At the moment, Russia holds almost all of Luhansk, and about three-quarters of Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Reuters reported. Putin officially incorporated all four provinces as Russian territory in 2022, shortly after the war began. Russia also controls small pockets of land in the northern Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine. Russia has said it is carving out a buffer zone in Sumy to protect Kursk from a future Ukrainian attack. Russia has held Crimea since 2014. While Kyiv publicly maintains that the peninsula is Ukrainian territory, in private, officials have long admitted that getting Crimea back by force would be next to impossible at this point of time. Swap or surrender? Earlier this week, Trump had said that Russia had occupied some 'very prime territory', and he would 'try to get some of that territory back'. But since Ukraine currently holds no Russian land that can be leveraged in a negotiation, many have wondered what Trump's land swap would entail. Moscow wants Ukraine to unilaterally withdraw from all of the strategically and economically vital Donbas region, comprising provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, multiple media reports from this week have suggested. If Kyiv were to agree — and that is unlikely — this would entail pulling Ukrainian troops back and ceding some 6,600 sq km it still holds onto in this region. In return, Moscow would be willing to freeze the frontier in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, return the small pockets of land it holds in northern Ukraine, and possibly concede the even smaller pockets of land Ukraine still holds in Kursk. Ukraine Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrsky in June had said that despite Russian claims to the contrary, Ukrainian forces still held some 90 sq km of Russian territory in Kursk. Even if this were to be true, whatever Russian land Ukraine holds is incomparable in size and strategic importance to the Ukrainian land held by Russia. This is why the talk of swapping land has been perceived more as a surrender in Ukraine. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot,' Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine told local media this week. No good options Given it has no leverage on the battlefield, Kyiv will be hoping that Western sanctions are hurting Moscow enough to force Putin to make some concessions. Such hope is not altogether unjustified: the latest secondary sanctions will potentially leave a massive hole in Moscow's budget, and Trump has promised to further squeeze Putin if Russia does not agree to make peace. That said, the Russian economy has thus far been remarkably resilient against Western pressure. Even if the economy were to be in terrible shape, that alone is no guarantee of a Russian capitulation in what Moscow views as a fight against an existential threat. In this context, experts suggest that the best-case scenario for Ukraine at the moment would be for the conflict and battlelines to be frozen. In theory, this would buy Ukraine some much needed time to rebuild its manpower base and economy, both of which lie in tatters at the moment. At the same time it would also give Russia time to recoup, and potentially prepare for another future invasion — something that Kyiv believes is an inevitability. As Al Jazeera defence editor Alex Gatapoulos puts it: 'This is a really dangerous time for Ukraine.'
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Contacts with the U.S. did not cease even during Biden's presidency: Senior Russian interlocutor on Russia-U.S. talks
Russia's back channel links intensified under President Donald Trump, but Russian representatives had maintained contacts even with the previous administration under President Joe Biden, said a senior interlocutor who has been part of the back channel negotiations that helped in maintaining dialogue tracks between Russia and the United States in the last three and half years since the Ukraine crisis began. Trump-Putin Alaska Summit LIVE In a written interview to The Hindu, Nikolai Plotnikov, Head of the Center for Scientific and Analytical Information of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said the summit in Alaska is not just about Ukraine and that there is a sense of panic in Europe as Russia and the U.S. have made a fresh beginning. 'Contacts with the U.S. did not cease even during Biden's presidency. With the start of Trump's second term, the situation began to change dramatically. Contacts resumed through the foreign policy departments, special services, and the military. Special representatives have been actively at work: Kirill Dmitriev on the Russian side and Steve Witkoff on the American side. One should also mention contacts at the expert and academic levels,' said Mr. Plotnikov. The summit in Alaska is the first in recent years when the top leaderships of Russia and the United States are meeting seven months after the return of President Donald Trump as the U.S. President. Formal communication between the two sides had broken down after the Biden administration imposed a slew of sanctions on Russia after President Putin ordered a 'special military campaign' against neighbouring Ukraine on 24 February 2022. The Alaska summit has been opposed by the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy who has demanded that a discussion on the future of Ukraine must include Ukraine's leadership. That however did not prevent a number of countries, India included from welcoming the summit. Mr. Plotnikov said that Ukraine was not included in the summit as Mr. Zelenskyy has 'no legal rights'. 'They voluntarily gave up their independence in favor of Washington, London, Paris, Brussels, Berlin, and other Western capitals,' said Mr. Plotnikov marking 2014 as the year when Ukraine according to him ceased to be independent after the removal of President Viktor Yanukovych in the so called 'Revolution of Dignity'. He further said that European Union's strategy on Russia has failed and that the European states had miscalculated their strategy of using a 'blitzkrieg' of sanctions against Russia. 'Judging by the plentiful statements coming out of various European capitals (except perhaps for Hungary and Slovakia), Europe is panicking. With his decision to meet President Putin, Donald Trump revealed who is really in charge,' said Mr. Plotnikov. He further said that discussion between President Trump and President Putin would also make a difference in enduring conflict zones of the world including in Armenia-Azerbaijan and India-Pakistan. 'If the two world powers and leading members of the nuclear club find common ground in resolving existing issues, everyone will benefit,' said Mr. Plotnikov.
