Bombay HC strikes down GST demand on TDR used by real estate developer
: In an important ruling for
Maharashtra's real estate sector
, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court set aside a GST demand issued to a city-based developer, holding that no taxable transfer of development rights occurred under the agreement in question. The decision offers clarity on the tax implications of development agreements in the real estate sector.
The division bench of justices Avinash Gharote and Abhay Mantri delivered the ruling while allowing a petition filed by Shrinivasa Realcon, which challenged a show-cause notice issued on August 14, 2024, and a consequent GST order dated December 10, 2024. The demand pertained to a development agreement executed on April 7, 2022, for constructing a residential complex on an 8,000 sq ft plot at mouza Lendra. The developer was appointed by the landowner for a consideration of Rs7 crore and two flats.
Senior counsel Akshay Naik, assisted by Abhishek Bhoot, argued that the project did not involve any transfer or purchase of development rights or floor space index (FSI) from external sources. Instead, the construction was based solely on the existing FSI or any statutory increase.
Entry 5B of the GST notification dated June 28, 2017, amended on March 29, 2019, allows taxation of services involving the transfer of TDR or FSI for construction purposes. However, the court noted the GST law does not define a 'transfer of development right'. It referred to Clause 11.2 of the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, which outlines TDR as compensation in FSI granted by a planning authority, not applicable in the present case.
The bench concluded that the development agreement lacked any reference to the transfer of such rights and rejected the department's reliance on Clause 18 of the contract, which merely required compliance under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.
Declaring the transaction outside the purview of Entry 5B, the court quashed both the show-cause notice and the final order. "The transaction contemplated does not fall within Entry 5B of the notification of June 28, 2017, as amended by another notification of March 29, 2019. Neither the show-cause notice nor the consequent order can be sustained," the judges stated in their order, thereby setting them aside.
Key takeaways from HC verdict:
- There was no actual trading of transfer of development rights (TDR) in the agreement
- Entry 5B of GST notification could not be invoked in case
- GST Act does not define 'transfer of development rights'
- Developer used existing FSI or statutory increase, not external TDR
- Clause 18 of agreement was not proof of transfer
- Set aside both show-cause notice and final tax order
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Raids conducted on over a dozen high-end salons for GST evasion
The Excise Department and Central GST teams Friday carried out joint raids on over a dozen high-end salons in the city. The action followed a series of complaints alleging that these salons were evading GST despite charging hefty amounts for their services. According to sources, many salons were providing premium services such as haircuts, hair colouring, makeup, spa treatments, and wedding packages — often charging large sums — but were not depositing the mandatory 18 per cent GST with the government. Also, customers were allegedly asked to pay in cash, and no invoices were issued. Records reflected only the sale and purchase of beauty products, while actual earnings from services were being concealed. The Excise Department seized records from prominent salons in sectors 8, 9, 26, 35, and other key locations. The excise teams have begun examining the last three years' returns and transaction details. Investigations have also revealed that some salons lured customers with 'discount' offers and then provided services without bills, making tax evasion easier, said sources. Meanwhile, the officials have urged citizens to always insist on a bill for any service to help curb tax evasion as paying GST not only strengthens government revenue but also safeguards consumer rights. The Excise Department has hinted at further inspections of salons and beauty parlours in the coming days. The seized records are currently under scrutiny, and cases of GST evasion will attract heavy penalties along with interest.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
HC: Land pooling policy may hit fertile land & social milieu, notified in haste
1 2 Chandigarh: While staying Punjab's Land Pooling Policy 2025, the Punjab and Haryana high court has held that the land sought to be acquired is among the most fertile in the state, and it is possible that "it may impact the social milieu. " In its order released on Saturday, the HC stated that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, bars the acquisition of multi-cropped land, and such acquisition is permissible only in exceptional circumstances. The court was also of the view that no timelines have been prescribed, nor has any mechanism been provided to address the grievances of the affected persons. "We are prima facie also of the view that the policy appears to have been notified in haste and all concerns, including social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, timelines, and redressal grievance mechanism, should have been addressed at the very outset in the policy, before its notification," the HC observed while staying the policy until Sep 10. A division bench comprising Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal and Justice Deepak Manchanda passed these orders while hearing a petition filed by Gurdeep Singh, 72, a resident of Ludhiana district. He sought directions to quash the notification dated June 4, 2025, along with the Land Pooling Policy 2025, being ultra vires and an act of colourable legislation, violating fundamental rights. Speaking for the bench, Justice Grewal observed that the state proposes to take over tens of thousands of acres of fertile land in the entire Punjab for carrying out its proposed development work, without conducting any Social Impact Assessment or Environmental Impact Assessment study. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Best-Paying Degrees of 2025 Are Not What You Think Best Paying Degrees | Search Ads Learn More Undo Although a stand is taken that the assessment would be carried out later when they have definite information about the number of landowners who have opted for the scheme, it has been held by the Supreme Court in several cases that before permitting urban development, the state ought to carry out an environmental impact assessment. The judge also observed that payment of subsistence allowance has been provided to the landowners, but there is no provision for the rehabilitation of those landless labourers, artisans, and others who are dependent on the land. "It has also been submitted before this Court that the state's statutory bodies shall themselves develop the land, but no budgetary provisions appear to have been made, nor has anything been put forth before this Court to indicate that the state has adequate resources to finance the development project under the policy," the HC observed. In its nine-page order, the bench also mentioned that the court has come across several instances wherein the owners surrendered their land to the state development authority under the earlier land pooling policy, but the developed plots have not been allotted even after 10 years. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Hindustan Foods posts 17% YoY rise in Q1 PAT; clocks EBITDA of Rs 83.5 crore
Hindustan Foods has recorded 17% increase in consolidated net profit to Rs 31.7 crore in Q1 FY26 from Rs 27.2 crore in Q1 FY25. For the quarter, the company declared revenue of Rs 998.1 crore, a growth of 15% over the corresponding quarter of the previous year. EBITDA improved by 10% to Rs 83.5 crore in Q1 FY26 from Rs 75.5 crore in Q1 FY25. Profit before tax (PBT) in Q1 FY26 was at Rs 42.1 crore, up by 16% from Rs 36.2 crore posted in Q1 FY25. Sameer R. Kothari, managing director, said: HFL was able to achieve its highest ever quarterly profit despite the unseasonal rains that affected the off take of our seasonal offerings like ice creams and beverages. The ramp-up in our new plant in Nashik and the stabilization of the shoe business led to a satisfactory performance in this quarter. The last year was the year of Audacious, Agile and Ambitious bets, this year is going to be all about scaling with intent and executing with discipline. We will continue to focus on acquisitions which are value accretive in an external environment that continues to be challenging and more so with the Tariff War. Our diversified product mix and differentiated business model gives us confidence of being able to successfully maneuver the turbulent times and we remain confident of being able to achieve the targets that we have set for ourselves." Hindustan Foods (HFL) offers dedicated and shared manufacturing services to FMCG corporates who are looking to minimize costs while maximizing product quality in the post-GST environment. In 2013, Vanity Case India bought a controlling stake in HFL and since then, the company has diversified across various FMCG categories with manufacturing competencies in food & beverages, home care, fabric care, beauty & personal care, wellness & OTC pharma, leather & sports footwear, and household insecticides, amongst others. The scrip had shed 0.82% to end at Rs 535.00 on the BSE on Friday.
