Bombay HC strikes down GST demand on TDR used by real estate developer
NAGPUR
: In an important ruling for
Maharashtra's real estate sector
, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court set aside a GST demand issued to a city-based developer, holding that no taxable transfer of development rights occurred under the agreement in question. The decision offers clarity on the tax implications of development agreements in the real estate sector.
The division bench of justices Avinash Gharote and Abhay Mantri delivered the ruling while allowing a petition filed by Shrinivasa Realcon, which challenged a show-cause notice issued on August 14, 2024, and a consequent GST order dated December 10, 2024. The demand pertained to a development agreement executed on April 7, 2022, for constructing a residential complex on an 8,000 sq ft plot at mouza Lendra. The developer was appointed by the landowner for a consideration of Rs7 crore and two flats.
Senior counsel Akshay Naik, assisted by Abhishek Bhoot, argued that the project did not involve any transfer or purchase of development rights or floor space index (FSI) from external sources. Instead, the construction was based solely on the existing FSI or any statutory increase.
Entry 5B of the GST notification dated June 28, 2017, amended on March 29, 2019, allows taxation of services involving the transfer of TDR or FSI for construction purposes. However, the court noted the GST law does not define a 'transfer of development right'. It referred to Clause 11.2 of the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, which outlines TDR as compensation in FSI granted by a planning authority, not applicable in the present case.
The bench concluded that the development agreement lacked any reference to the transfer of such rights and rejected the department's reliance on Clause 18 of the contract, which merely required compliance under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.
Declaring the transaction outside the purview of Entry 5B, the court quashed both the show-cause notice and the final order. "The transaction contemplated does not fall within Entry 5B of the notification of June 28, 2017, as amended by another notification of March 29, 2019. Neither the show-cause notice nor the consequent order can be sustained," the judges stated in their order, thereby setting them aside.
Key takeaways from HC verdict:
- There was no actual trading of transfer of development rights (TDR) in the agreement
- Entry 5B of GST notification could not be invoked in case
- GST Act does not define 'transfer of development rights'
- Developer used existing FSI or statutory increase, not external TDR
- Clause 18 of agreement was not proof of transfer
- Set aside both show-cause notice and final tax order
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
RBI skips 14-day main liquidity operation for third fortnight in a row
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has opted not to conduct its planned 14-day main liquidity operation on Friday, 13 June 2025, after evaluating the prevailing and anticipated liquidity landscape. 'On a review of the current and evolving liquidity conditions, it has been decided not to conduct the 14-day main operation on Friday, June 13, 2025, for the upcoming fortnight,' the central bank said on Thursday. This is the third fortnight in a row the central bank has skipped the operation. Although the system is bracing for sizable tax-related outflows—around ₹3 trillion–₹3.5 trillion from advance tax payments and GST obligations between 13 and 20 June—this pressure is expected to be offset by incoming liquidity. Market participants said that while short-term money market rates may experience some upward movement, they are unlikely to breach the policy repo rate. 'We have outflows scheduled in the form of tax payments; there will be some upside in overnight rates,' said a market participant. In addition, the RBI has suspended its daily variable-rate repo (VRR) operations as of 11 June, indicating sufficient surplus liquidity, which stood near ₹2.6 trillion as of Wednesday, latest data by the RBI showed.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Haridwar cancels Mansa Devi ropeway tender after court flags safety gaps in tender process
1 2 3 4 Haridwar: The civic body in Haridwar has cancelled the tender for operation and maintenance of the Mansa Devi temple ropeway after Uttarakhand high court flagged serious safety concerns and lack of transparency in the bidding process, which allowed firms without ropeway experience to apply. The court was about to deliver its judgement when the civic body withdrew the process on Tuesday. Usha Breco Ltd, which has managed the ropeway since 1981, challenged the tender in court. The company said allowing firms with experience only in road construction to bid could compromise passenger safety. HC agreed and disapproved of the civic body's move, prompting the withdrawal. The petitioner's counsel, Sandeep Kothari, said, "The court had ordered that Usha Breco, if it applied, could be permitted to run the ropeway on an interim basis until a new tender was floated. The civic body cancelled the tender after the company informed the court about the withdrawal before the final judgement was delivered." Kothari also pointed out that the civic body acted after a five-member committee formed by the govt submitted its report on June 3. The panel had reviewed the tender's terms and raised concerns. Originally, the tender required bidders to have operational experience in ropeway systems. But later, the terms were revised to include firms involved in highways, bridges, tunnels, and hospital construction, said sources. Mayor of Haridwar Municipal Corporation Kiran Jaisal told TOI that while the municipal board gave permission to initiate the tender, the terms were finalised by the municipal corporation. She said she was unaware of the criteria or the changes made to them. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Five-year G-sec yield spikes 22 bps in 3 days on VRRR auction fears
The five-year government bond yield spiked 22 basis points in the last three trading sessions as fears of a potential variable rate reverse repo (VRRR) auction weighed on sentiment, said market participants. It posted its weakest three-day performance in more than two years, with the yield on the short-term benchmark rising by 22 basis points over the last three trading sessions — the highest since 16 September 2022. The yield on the five-year bond settled at 6.05 per cent on Thursday against the previous close of 6.06 per cent. The benchmark 10-year yield settled at 6.34 per cent, against 6.37 per cent on Wednesday. 'There is speculation about RBI conducting a VRRR auction, which is being reflected in the short term,' said a dealer at a primary dealership. 'I see the five-year bond yield moving up by another 10 basis points,' the person added. The weighted average call rate settled at 5.29 per cent on Thursday. The repo rate currently stands at 5.50 per cent. They further said that scheduled outflows like advance tax and GST payments already tighten liquidity, making a VRRR auction unnecessary. 'Why would you want to artificially just push up the overnight rate? Let it find a natural level. If you have done one bit of activity and the market is surplus because there is no credit off-take, let it find its natural level,' said the treasury head at a private bank. 'On one side, the governor wants to infuse liquidity, wants transmission to happen. I am not too sure why they would want to do this suddenly,' he added. The net liquidity in the banking system was in a surplus of ₹2.57 trillion. The RBI has cancelled the planned VRRR auctions, but market panic persisted, leading to broad sell-offs in the shorter segment. 'I am a little surprised about the fact that the differential between the terminal repo rate, which has now become 5.5. Earlier, people were talking about a 60–65 basis point difference between your terminal rate and the 10-year G-sec,' said a market participant. 'It beats logic as of this moment. I think there is a lot of panic and I think people are cutting positions as well,' the person added.
