Gemini Daily Horoscope Today (May 21- June 20), July 23 , 2025: Focus will be on saving and securing resources!
You will remain interested in financial and banking matters. Focus will be on saving and securing resources. Attractive proposals may come your way, and you could receive valuable gifts. Professional activities will prove beneficial, and you will find success in career and business. Ancestral or family-related financial matters will also improve.
Gemini Career Horoscope Today
Your performance will exceed expectations. Desired offers and proposals will come through. You will succeed in achieving your goals. Sources of income will expand, and your communication will be impactful. Your financial condition will strengthen, and there will be noticeable growth in various areas.
advertisement
Gemini Love Horoscope Today
You will enjoy a pleasant time with your family. Relationships will grow stronger, and you will take the lead in maintaining bonds. Closeness with relatives will increase, and meetings with loved ones will bring joy. Personal matters will work out in your favour. Meetings with friends and social interactions will increase. Positive intentions will strengthen, and you will remain easygoing in relationships.
Gemini Health Horoscope Today
You will keep your behaviour simple and pleasant. Health and dietary habits will remain good. You will follow a disciplined routine and avoid laziness. Your personality will be impressive, and you will be respectful towards others. You will avoid stubbornness and stay mentally balanced.
Lucky numbers: 3, 5
Lucky colour: Green
- Ends
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Enterprise Gemini Readiness: Pre-Implementation Assessment for 2025 AI Adoption
Key steps to boost Gemini AI success and minimize enterprise risk List top 5 security risks tied to legacy workflows before rollout. Uncovering old gaps early slashes incident chances by at least half. Reserve dedicated time—under 10% of monthly meetings—for direct user feedback loops. Continuous insight from real users reveals blind spots, not just usage rates. Audit asset inventories quarterly with cross-department teams, aiming for under-7-day response on discrepancies. `Real world` mismatches drop fast when diverse eyes spot missing coverage together. Track at least three meaningful behavior shifts per quarter—not just login counts—across core departments. `Adoption` gets real when you see changed habits, not just activity spikes. There's this popular notion—maybe 'hope' is more accurate—that the classic security tools we've relied on for ages can still contain generative AI. People repeat it like a mantra, but the last few months have handed us a parade of enterprise blunders that say otherwise. I caught a write-up from a major security group where a seasoned analyst basically waved the idea away. You know those identity and access management blueprints that look air-tight on a PowerPoint slide? They crumble the second they have to untangle the messy, constantly shifting data clouds that a big language model—call it Gemini or whatever the current darling is—poops out the moment you punch in a query. There's a breakdown of this exact scenario here, and yeah, it's just as chaotic as it sounds. Pause for a sec—had a conversation with a deployment manager that made me stop in my tracks. Static role-based permissions look rock-solid on paper. You trust them. Then prompt injection pops up and suddenly people are firing cross-system queries with zero clearance—just one sneaky input flips the switch. Whoa. Okay, I'm trying to keep this short, I promise. Bottom line: if your core security processes are still on the same old playbook while AI integration sprints ahead (and, spoiler, most are still stuck), those shiny safeguards turn into paper walls. That's the stuff that sneaks into my thoughts after hours. You'd be surprised how many groups still skip the early mapping and basically fly blind into weird integration holes. A cloud architect I heard at a finance panel sounded flat-out drained explaining it. He said teams keep counting on stale IT inventories and those tidy org charts that look nice on slides but hide a ton of dependencies buried in everyday work. Like, one HR onboarding checkbox can secretly kick off legal hold actions in two other departments and nobody knows until it's too late. The chaos that spills out…oh, where was I? Right. The secret sauce is running pre-assessment workshops that pull in IT, compliance, legal, ops, and that one person who always knows which server will die. When you do that, the hidden connections pop up and you can fix the friction before the rollout crashes. Funny how a couple of hours in a meeting room can save you a two-week firefight. We really didn't want a big-bang launch—those sound cool in theory but look awful in reality—so we rolled out a three-month Gemini pilot with just over fifty people. Sales and support were separated, and I guess that choice worked out? A project lead mentioned it at a 2023 finance panel I tuned into (the coffee was still bitter, in case you were wondering). The crew was tracing who really worked Gemini into their routines—not just who logged in but who actually got stuff done—and then they started collecting reports on pain points like lagging responses when errors showed up or simple head-scratching moments over which step in the integration was next. Oh, and here's the good part: when they matched usage logs with those free-text surveys (you either swear by them or can't stand them), they caught issues that the dashboards skipped over. For instance, strange permission blocks were tripping up certain users, and nobody would've caught that by staring at the numbers alone. This patchwork method let them update the onboarding docs while the pilot was still running. After the revisions? Support tickets fell by close to 50 percent versus the original forecast, which I still can't wrap my head around. First step—perhaps? Someone grabbed a bright yellow marker and started scrawling every single system that might have even smelled like generative AI. It wasn't pretty: sticky notes everywhere, curling at the corners like they'd been freeze-dried in the office AC, which let's be honest, is basically Antarctica. Buried under the forty-seventh version of the ancient IT policy nobody reads voluntarily, we found scattered clues about multi-role access that felt planted, like Easter eggs in a horror movie. And the asset inventory? Picture a software catalog rewritten by a cat: half-hearted, full of 'does this old thing even have power?' and a surprising amount of dust. You'd be amazed what a department's worth of snack crumbs turns into. That whole thing turned up a bunch of loose endpoints people remembered only in fragments; for a moment I wondered if anyone ever tries to log them on purpose, but let it go. Right around then, two crowds walked in. First, a squad of architects who looked ready to collapse on their own laptops, and then a mix of ops veterans and front-line staff who had strong, loud takes on everything. They huddled to untangle how prompts bounce from one pair of hands to another (or maybe to whole other systems). Sounds simple, sure, but the second you realize you didn't run both sides of the story from day one, those small usability hiccups grow into messy compliance holes you'll regret later. Once they plastered that beautiful chaos on the wall—or, you know, as close to a map as fluorescent lights allow—they slammed the brakes to pick the one risk that really needed to be on the radar. Arguments flew; I didn't even blink (it got surprisingly loud over something called 'escalation triggers,' whatever that is). But here's the win: nothing that mattered vanished because someone skated over a checklist because they were secretly hungry. You probably noticed the shift in the KPI conversation the day the calendar rolled over last year. IT teams, who'd previously worn down their keyboards noting deployments, suddenly shifted their energy toward the cross-functional dance. They don't just want deployment counts; they want Devs, Ops, and Product folks brushing shoulders in the same dashboard. I was mid-chatter the other morning about this and my brain hiccupped when I remembered Gartner's nugget: fewer than one in seven software developers have even whispered a line to a generative AI assistant. Seems low, feels low, but Gartner's the referee, I'm just the spectator. Anyway, the cross-functional KPI is the new star. Looks like project managers are tuning into some new signals. They've been—well, calling it 'informal' is generous—pulling pilot teams aside and asking how quickly different departments grab these shared prompt templates. They're also keen on when friction bubbles up in workflows, and someone catches it before it turns into a mess. Oh, and now that I'm saying it out loud, I've noticed sales and support folks crop up in test groups as often as engineers. They're not on equal footing yet, but the gap keeps closing every month. We're also seeing a steady drop in gripes about misrouted tasks and those pesky permission errors that pop up when a feature goes live. Sure, the metrics dashboards are still there, happily counting API calls for reasons I'll never understand. But for the people making calls—who seem to never, ever sleep—this physical evidence feels way more persuasive, if you ask me. Of course, nobody ever does, but that's how it goes sometimes. Here's the deal: the first pilots tried the rigid training model—checklists written in stone before any real work—and, well, it overlooked the gaps between teams. You'd think a solid list could stamp out every risk, but surprise: it can't. The real issue is that, when everything is set in advance, the blind spots between legal, IT, HR, and the rest stay, well, blind. Then some teams—maybe frustrated, maybe just smart—switched gears and kicked off these ongoing peer learning sessions instead. Picture a Zoom window, or a meeting room, where legal, biz, IT, and whoever else chew on live incidents. It sounds messy, but weirdly it outperforms the rigid model. One group tried it with so-called 'champion' pods in sales and support; the trick was to let folks who live in the workflows flag friction the day it pops up. The results? Insights that big, top-down reviews never saw coming. Anyway—did I already say these cycles are way more helpful? Sorry if I'm going in circles; I can't shake the picture of someone leaning over a fresh checklist, convinced they finally cracked it. Here's the deal: when you stack in regular tune-ups—stuff like who in HR, Dev, and Ops jumped in on the last outage, or when that weird spike in security alerts happened—teams can keep fine-tuning their defenses every time a fresh AI entry pops up, instead of acting like a single round of checks will ever cut it. Saw someone mention 40dau had some solid rundowns on stuff like this—haven't gone through all of it myself, but feels like the kind of site engineers quietly bookmark. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Google deepens India AI push with Gemini localisation, startup deals
Google is localising Gemini data processing, expanding AI tools and teaming up with Indian startups and institutes to strengthen its presence in the country's AI ecosystem Peerzada Abrar Bengaluru Listen to This Article Google unveiled a suite of artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives targeting India's booming tech sector at its developer conference in Bengaluru on Wednesday, signalling the search giant's deepening commitment to the world's most populous nation as a critical AI battleground. The Mountain View-based company announced it would localise data processing for its high-performance Gemini 2.5 Flash model within India, addressing rising concerns over data sovereignty while promising faster response times for local developers. The move comes as global tech giants race to establish dominance in India's rapidly expanding AI ecosystem. At Google I/O Connect India 2025, attended by around
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft expands AI team with key Google DeepMind hires
Microsoft has reportedly hired more than 20 employees from Google's DeepMind AI research lab, as the competition among tech giants to recruit AI specialists escalates. Among the new hires, Amar Subramanya, who previously led engineering for Google's Gemini chatbot, announced his move to Microsoft via a LinkedIn post. He joined Microsoft AI as corporate vice-president. According to a Financial Times (FT) report, Subramanya is now part of a group of former DeepMind professionals at Microsoft, which includes engineering lead Sonal Gupta, software engineer Adam Sadovsky, and product manager Tim Frank. Microsoft has attracted at least 24 DeepMind staff members over the past six months, the publication added. Microsoft's AI team is currently focusing on projects such as the Copilot assistant and the Bing search engine. This wave of hiring reflects a broader industry trend where tech companies are actively seeking top AI researchers and engineers from competitors, contributing to an increase in salaries within the sector. The recruitment activities between Microsoft and Google are particularly intense, partly due to Mustafa Suleyman, co-founder of DeepMind, now overseeing Microsoft's consumer AI strategy. Suleyman previously brought in Dominic King and Christopher Kelly from DeepMind to lead a new AI health unit at Microsoft, which has developed a system reported to outperform human doctors in diagnosing complex medical conditions. The departure of Subramanya from Google coincided with that of Mat Velloso, another DeepMind alumnus who has since joined Meta. Velloso is associated with Facebook-parent's new initiative, Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), which aims to develop artificial general intelligence. Meta has invested $15bn in data-labelling start-up Scale AI and appointed its co-founder Alexandr Wang to lead this initiative. Recently, Meta also recruited Ruoming Pang, a former top AI executive from Apple. Despite these departures, a source close to DeepMind told FT that the company's attrition rates remain below the industry average. Furthermore, DeepMind has managed to recruit a comparable number of researchers from Microsoft. "Microsoft expands AI team with key Google DeepMind hires" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
