North Korea's Kim vows to win anti-US battle marking Korean War anniversary
SEOUL - North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said the country would achieve victory in "anti-imperalist, anti-US" battles, as the country marked the anniversary of the Korean War armistice, state media reported on Sunday.
Kim "affirmed that our state and its people would surely achieve the great cause of building a rich country with a strong army and become honorable victors in the anti-imperialist, anti-US showdown," KCNA state news agency said, referring to his visit to a war museum on a previous day.
North Korea signed an armistice agreement with the United States and China on July 27, 1953, ending the fighting in the three-year war. US generals signed the agreement representing the United Nations forces that backed South Korea.
North Korea calls July 27 "Victory Day" even though the armistice drew a border dividing the Korean peninsula roughly equally in area and restoring balance after the two sides had made major advances back and forth during the war.
South Korea does not mark the day with any major events.
North Korea is now fighting alongside Russia in the war in Ukraine. Thousands of North Korean troops were deployed to Russia's Kursk region, while Pyongyang has also supplied Russia with munitions. It may deploy more troops in July or August, South Korea has said.
Kim also visited memorials honoring the veterans of the 1950-53 war including the Tower of Friendship remembering the Chinese People's Liberation Army soldiers who fought with the North Koreans, and met soldiers in an artillery regiment to celebrate the day, state media KCNA said. —Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Ex-Palawan gov Reyes guilty of Malampaya fund mess —Sandiganbayan
The Sandiganbayan has found former Palawan governor Mario Joel Reyes and his provincial planning and development coordinator Samuel Madamba II guilty of 11 counts of graft in connection with misuse of some P1.53 billion in royalties from the Malampaya gas field in 2009. In a 625-page decision, the anti-graft court sentenced Reyes and Madamba to six to 10 years in prison per graft conviction or a total of at least 66 years of jail time. The P1.53 billion worth of Malampaya gas field royalties were allegedly spent on school buildings, the San Vicente Airport Development Project, road projects, solar home system, and a day care center. "There is manifest partiality when accused Reyes, as HoPE (Head of Procuring Entity), improperly evaluated the bid proposals, leading to the award of numerous or overlapping contracts to a single contractor with one set of key personnel," the anti-graft court said. "Accused Reyes approved contracts that awarded multiple projects to a single contractor while being fully aware that these projects required the contractor's presence at specific times that conflicted with other projects. This act indicates a clear, notorious, or plain inclination or predilection to favor one side or one person rather than another, which the Anti-Graft Law categorizes and punishes as manifest partiality," it added. Based on documentary evidence presented before them, including the contracts awarded to the same contractor for overlapping projects and the Commission on Audit report, the Sandiganbayan ruled that there was "a clear violation of contractual obligations." "For one, it is logically impossible for the same key personnel to be involved in all these projects at once, given their different locations which are far apart from each other. Although the towns and areas belong to only one province (Palawan), the Court takes judicial notice that these towns are not really geographically located in one single island," it said. "Additionally, the contractors failed to update or submit revised lists of key personnel for the overlapping projects," the anti-graft court said. The Sandiganbayan also said that Reyes and Madamba, who was then BAC secretary, failed to publicly post the bidding for the subject government contracts due to "neglect and utter lack of effort." While Reyes posted bail in these cases, the court said the ex-Palawan governor failed to appear or present any evidence to dispute the evidence presented by the prosecution. "His (Reyes) failure to be present and adduce evidence could indeed be considered as a waiver of his constitutional right to defend himself and confront the witnesses against him," the Sandiganbayan said. Madamba, for his part, defended himself by arguing that he only failed to properly register the invitation to bid on the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS) because of a former contractual employee's failure to provide a password and to the poor internet connection in Palawan before 2010. The Sandiganbayan, however, says this defense rings hollow absent evidence. "Not a shred of evidence was offered to prove these allegations. Thus, the basic rule applies that, a mere allegation is not evidence and is not equivalent to proof," it said. "Besides, there were available alternative options provided by the Government Procurement Policy Board to ensure mandatory posting, such as contacting the PhilGEPS division for assistance, fax the documents for posting, or utilizing internet cafes. This noncompliance with these posting requirements led to limited participation in the bidding process, as evidenced by the COA Audit Report which showed only one bidder for 65 projects and two bidders for 139 projects," it added. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
Chiz: Minority senators will have committee chairmanships
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Esucero said Wednesday that all the four other members of the Senate minority bloc, except Senate Minority Leader Senator Vicente 'Tito' Sotto III, will be given respective committees to lead in the 20th Congress. Escudero explained that usually, only the Senate President, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, and Senate President Pro Tempore do not have committee chairmanships because they are officers of the Senate. This means that all the 41 permanent committees of the upper chamber will be distributed to the 20 other senators, including those from the minority bloc. 'Lahat sila magkakaroon ng komite… Inuuna lamang mag-organize ang majority, kapag natapos mag-organize ang majority, ang minority naman ang io-organize,' Escudero said in a Balitanghali interview. (All of them will be given a committee. The majority just has to organize first, and then the minority will organize after.) 'Itong Senadong 'to, nagdaang Senado man, merong komite 'yung mga miyembro ng minority except for the minority leader dahil by tradition, 'yung apat na officers ng Senado us usually walang komite, maliban na lamang kung may gusto sila,' he added. (In this Senate, even the previous one, the members of the minority were given a committee except for the minority leader because by tradition, the four officers of the Senate usually do not have a committee, unless they want something to lead.) The five-man Senate minority bloc is composed of Senators Risa Hontiveros, Juan Miguel 'Migz' Zubiri, Loren Legarda, Panfilo "Ping" Lacson. The group is led by Sotto. On Tuesday's Senate plenary session, 32 of the 41 committee chairmanships were filled, including the significant ones like the blue ribbon committee that will be led by first-termer Senator Rodante Marcoleta; Committee on Finance by Senator Sherwin Gatchalian; and Committee on Constitutional Amendments and Revision of Codes by Senator Robin Padilla. Other senators were also given two or more committees to chair this 20th Congress, such as Senators Alan Peter Cayetano (Accounts; Science and Technology; Higher, Technical and Vocational Education; and Justice and Human Rights), Imee Marcos (Labor, Employment & Human Resource Development; Cooperatives; and Foreign Relations); Pia Cayetano (Energy; Sustainable Development Goals, Innovation and Futures Thinking; and Ways and Means); and Bong Go (Health and Demography; Sports; and Youth). Lacson committee Meanwhile, Lacson said that the chairmanship of the Senate Committee on Electoral Reforms and People's Participation had been offered to him. In a statement, Lacson said he accepted the chairmanship, stressing that he will push for the passage of the Anti-Political Dynasty Act which is included in his priority bills in the 20th Congress. 'I will schedule as soon as possible my Anti-Political Dynasty bill and another bill also referred to that committee,' Lacson said. Escudero pointed out that the distribution of committee chairmanships does not depend on the seniority or length of service of a senator. 'Walang kinalaman 'yan. Lahat kami ay pare-parehong senador—matanda man o bata, matagal nang nanilbihan o bago lang. Hindi sinusukat ang kakayahan ng isang senador base sa haba ng oras o ikli ng oras ng kanyang paninilbihan dahil pare-pareho lamang naman kaming binoto ng sambayanan at pare-pareho kaming tigi-tigisa lamang ang boto sa Senado,' the Senate president said. (That has nothing to do with the chairmanship. We are all senators—old or young, whether serving for long or not. The ability of a senator is not measured based on the length of his/her service because we were all voted by the people and each of us has a vote in the Senate.) — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 days ago
- GMA Network
US to allow federal workers to promote religion in workplaces
WASHINGTON - Federal employees may discuss and promote their religious beliefs in the workplace, the Trump administration said on Monday, citing religious freedoms protected by the U.S. Constitution. Agency employees may seek to "persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views" in the office, wrote Scott Kupor, director of the Office of Personnel Management, the U.S. government's human resources agency. Supervisors can attempt to recruit their employees to their religion, so long as the efforts aren't 'harassing in nature,' according to Kupor's statement. Agencies can't discipline their employees for declining to talk to their coworkers about their religious views. The statement represents the latest effort of the six-month-old Republican Trump administration to expand the role of religion in the federal workplace. Courts have long held that employers cannot suppress all religious expression in the workplace, but can lawfully curb conduct that is disruptive or imposes an undue hardship as long as it applies equally to members of any religion. The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protects individuals' rights to practice their religion while preventing the government from favoring one religion or another or religion in general. OPM in mid-July said agency workers can get permission to work from home or adjust their hours to accommodate religious prayers, after previously demanding that workers report to offices fulltime. The new statement cites President Donald Trump's February executive order calling on agencies to eliminate the "anti-Christian weaponization of government." That order directs cabinet secretaries to identify federal actions hostile to Christians. Trump has embraced the conservative Christian world view and promoted policies that speak to concerns that their religious liberty is under attack. Federal employees can also set up prayer groups in the workplace, so long as they don't meet during work hours, Kupor's statement said. The memo references Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a law that prohibits workplace discrimination based on a person's religion or religious practices. Kupor in the memo said that means the law requires employers to allow workers to proselytize, organize prayer groups on non-working time, and display religious icons. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces Title VII, has said that proselytizing in the workplace can amount to unlawful religious harassment if it is unwelcome and is so severe or pervasive that it creates a hostile or abusive work environment. "A consensual conversation about religious views, even if quite spirited, does not constitute harassment if it is not unwelcome," the agency said in a 2008 guidance document. Kupor's memo is not legally binding, and any court that reviews it could disagree about the scope of Title VII's protections. But the memo could be difficult to challenge directly in court, as judges in many past cases have said they lack the power to review internal agency documents. — Reuters
