&w=3840&q=100)
Donald Trump claims India is a ‘tariff king'. What the data reveals
President Donald Trump with Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House. The 25 per cent tariff and Russian penalty on India comes even as officials continue to hammer out a trade deal, which has been ongoing since February. File image/AP
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly slammed India over tariffs.
Trump last week announced he was imposing a 25 per cent tariff on India plus a 'penalty' for buying Russian oil.
He has vowed to raise tariffs 'substantially' over the next 24 hours and accused India of fuelling the war in Ukraine. Trump previously accused India of being a 'tariff king'.
But does the data back Trump up? How does India compare to its Asian rivals and other nations?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Let's take a closer look:
What does data show?
A closer look at the data shows that Trump's claims are false.
India's simple average tariff – which comprises levies on both agriculture and non-agriculture products – is around 16 per cent. This is in the same league as Bangladesh (14.1 per cent), Turkey (16.2 per cent) and Argentina (13.4 per cent).
However India's weighted average tariff is only around 4.6 per cent. When looking at tariffs, it is the weighted average tariff that is deemed more important. This is because simple average tariffs measure the duty on all products, even those that make up a fraction of the goods traded. However, weighted average tariffs quantify the actual levy based on the volume of trade.
India's weighted average compares favourably with Vietnam (5.1 per cent) Indonesia (5.7 per cent) and the European Union (5 per cent).
Of 144 nations, data shows India ranked 64 – lower than competitors such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Brazil.
India has also placed most of its tariffs on agriculture and automobiles – sectors that have low import volumes. India isn't alone in protecting agriculture either. Switzerland (28.5 per cent), Norway (31.1 per cent), and South Korea (57 per cent) have also done so.
When it comes to the US, India in the 2023-24 financial year, imported goods worth $42.2 billion from the US. Almost 75 per cent of this was in 100 key products – most of which have low or negligible tariffs. For example, most of the high-volume US exports to India such as pharmaceuticals, energy products, machinery, and chemicals have tariffs ranging from five to eight per cent.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Most of India's imports are duty free under schemes such as Special Economic Zones (SEZs), Export-Oriented Units (EOUs), and Free Trade Agreements (FTAs).
For example, India has a zero per cent tariff on semiconductors. India's average most-favoured nations (MFN) tariff on electronics is just 10 per cent, which again compares reasonably well with Vietnam's average MFN of 8.5 per cent.
India has also made great strides in cutting tariffs over the years. In 1990, India's average tariff stood at a whopping 80.9 per cent. That rate was slowly brought down post liberalisation to 56 per cent. By 1999, that average tariff was at 33 per cent. By 2023, the simple average tariff had been cut in half at 15.98 per cent. In the last decade alone, India has reduced its weighted average tariff from 7.3 percent to 4.6 percent,
India cut its tariffs by over 80 percent in the period between 2001 and 2022. Conversely, EU tariffs decreased 61 percent, and Thailand reduced its tariffs by 56 percent over the same period.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Many of these cuts have benefitted the US particularly after 2023 when India brought down levies on exports such as apples, walnuts, and almonds after WTO disputes were resolved. India has also reduced its tariffs or brought them to zero on high-tech goods and solar equipment.
The US, meanwhile, continues its own protectionist stance across a number of sectors including autos, textile, agriculture and dairy.
WTO data shows that the US, despite importing just 0.1 per cent of its dairy in 2024, levied a MFN tariff of 17.2 per cent. Its top dairy tariff clocked in at a whopping 200 per cent.
The US has imposed an average tariff of 19.28 per cent on automobiles, a 23.98 per cent on cheese, between 114.8 and 164.8 per cent on peanuts, an average tariff of 114.80 per cent on tobacco and an average tariff of 197.04 per cent on sour cream.
Washington also has imposed a 132 per cent tariff on fruits and vegetables, a 164 per cent tariff on oilseeds, fats and oils, 35 per cent tariff on fish and fish products and a 38 per cent tariff on metals and minerals.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What do experts say?
They say that India, when it comes to tariffs, compares favourably with its rivals and competitors such as Bangladesh and Pakistan. India also does compares reasonably well with upper-middle-income nations with a higher per capita income like Turkey.
They say the data shows India's trade policies have, in the long term, proved to eschew protectionism – even as New Delhi keeps in mind the need to protect its national interest and economically-sensitive sectors such as agriculture.
The data shows that India's tariffs, particularly on agriculture, are perfectly in keeping with what other nations are doing around the world. The US, with its own high tariffs and protectionism, is in no position to lecture India.
India's weighted average tariff is only around 4.6 per cent, which compares favourably with Vietnam (5.1 per cent) Indonesia (5.7 per cent) and the European Union (5 per cent). Reuters
They also say non-tariff barriers, which many view as a means to protect domestic interests, are more difficult to quantify. However, here once again the US argument completely falls apart.
For example, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in 2020 conducted a survey on non-tariff barriers in Asian nations. India on this survey fared better than Japan and South Korea – which the US has treated rather well when it comes to tariffs.
China, which is also in negotiations with the US with the Trump administration making conciliatory noises, had a score nearly twice as high as India. China is said to have more than 2,600 non-tariff measures (NTMs), many of which sources have described as intricate and complicated. They say the US under Trump is pushing a narrative that the facts simply don't bear out and that India is being unfairly targeted.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Troops To Storm U.S. Backyard? War Clouds Loom Over Mexico Cartels; Sheinbaum Says…
/ Aug 09, 2025, 02:46AM IST Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has rejected the idea of a U.S. military invasion, following reports that former President Donald Trump issued a secret directive authorising the Pentagon to target drug cartels in Latin America—some labeled as terrorist organisations. Sheinbaum insisted at a press conference that 'there will be no invasion of Mexico,' affirming that while Mexico cooperates with the U.S., its sovereignty remains inviolable.
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Not really focused...': JD Vance about 2028 election after Trump calls him GOP frontrunner
'Not really focused...': JD Vance about 2028 election after Trump calls him GOP frontrunner 'MAGA heir': Trump touts JD Vance as 'likely' GOP 2028 presidential favourite 'MAGA heir': Trump touts JD Vance as 'likely' GOP 2028 presidential favourite JD Vance confirmed for 2028? Trump sparks frenzy, President names VP as 'most likely' MAGA successor JD Vance confirmed for 2028? Trump sparks frenzy, President names VP as 'most likely' MAGA successor 'Why didn't you answer…': Vance again deflects question on Trump's 2020 presidential election loss 'Our future president': Elon Musk hails JD Vance as 'best Vice President ever'; Social media erupts 'I'll shove it up their a**': Trump blasts rigged 2020 election, reveals fiery 2024 motivation
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Rattles Latin America by Weighing Using Military Force
The US under President Donald Trump is crafting a confrontational approach toward Latin America that signals a willingness to use military force against drug cartels, discarding the Biden administration's preference for carrots over sticks to coax countries into alignment with US interests. The New York Times reported Friday that the president ordered the Defense Department to prepare options to take military action against Latin American drug cartels. A US agreement with Mexico to expand security cooperation, expected to be signed in the coming weeks, would facilitate joint monitoring of criminal organizations by security forces and coordination on the border. But the pending agreement won't provide legal grounds for direct US military action on Mexican territory, officials have said. Any such intervention would risk inflaming anti-US sentiments already whipped up by the Trump administration's wave of tariffs. 'This could call into question the security agreement that was drawn up, which is based on a great deal of trust,' said Victoria Dittmar, a researcher at Insight Crime who specializes in Mexico. Trump, asked about the possibility of using military force Friday at the White House, said he would have 'more to say about that soon.' 'Latin America has got a lot of cartels. They've got a lot of drugs flowing. So, you know, we want to protect our country,' Trump said. A Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment. The emerging plans to deal with cartels build on the Trump administration's already more aggressive presence in a region that is deeply integrated into the US economy, from cross-border gas pipelines to maritime logistics. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Central America on his first overseas trip, pushing for concessions on US military use of the Panama Canal. The administration has engaged in a war of words with Colombia's leftist president Gustavo Petro and may be preparing to decertify that country's efforts against narcotics. Officials have also stepped up allegations against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro as a drug lord, doubling a reward for information leading to his arrest to $50 million this week. The hardening of US policy toward Latin America has been met with varying responses in the region, from open arms to strident opposition. In Ecuador, the pro-US government is preparing a referendum that would allow foreign military installations in national territory, a move seen as clearning the way for the US to reactivate the use of a base in the violence-torn country. But in Mexico, President Claudia Sheinbaum has responded defiantly to any suggestion that American soldiers would take a combat role in her country. Any agreement with the Trump administration must respect the nation's sovereignty, she reiterated Friday at her daily news conference. 'The United States is not going to come to Mexico with the military,' she said Friday. 'We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. That is out of the question, absolutely out of the question. What has been stated in all the calls is that it is not permitted, nor is it part of any agreement, much less.' The security deal in the works rests on the idea that the US won't intervene in Mexico, said Dittmar of Insight Crime. 'If that were to be broken, it would indeed break the relationship of trust and would require a rethinking of joint security strategies,' she said. The Trump administration's approach risks inviting a broader backlash in a region still scarred by decades of Cold War-era intervention from Guatemala to Chile. 'This will strengthen autocratic regimes like the ones in Venezuela or Nicaragua, and the anti-American sentiment in Mexico, Guatemala and even in Colombia,' said Jorge Restrepo, an economics professor who directs CERAC, a Bogota-based research institution that monitors the nation's civil conflict. 'Just the announcement will have the unintended effect of strengthening governments which are not cooperating as much as they could with the United States,' Restrepo said. US interests in the region could become soft targets for criminal organizations, said James Bosworth, founder of political risk firm Hxagon, in a phone interview. The cartels have the ability to take the fight to US territory in a way that al-Qaeda 'could only dream of,' according to Bosworth. While Venezuela, Colombia and Honduras are all potential targets, Mexico is the country that is most vulnerable, especially since Trump officials are much more worried about fentanyl then they are about cocaine, Bosworth said. Trump made a promise to fight trafficking of fentanyl, originating in China and responsible for tens of thousands of US deaths, a key point of his 2024 campaign. Despite stepped-up rhetoric from Washington, Venezuela could be shielded from intervention by US oil interests and concerns about disrupting a steady flow of reverse migration, said Geoff Ramsey, who tracks Venezuela at the Atlantic Council. 'This is an instance in which Trump is seeking to project strength but ultimately understands that any kind of military action in Venezuela would run completely contrary to US interests,' said Ramsey. 'Unfortunately, Maduro knows that this is a bluff. But the opposition doesn't. And I think this is going to fuel a lot of counterproductive daydreaming from the opposition. And my fear is that this is only going to lead them down the path of magical thinking.' The US posturing also risks playing into Venezuela's siege narrative. The country's armed forces on Friday vowed 'to confront, combat, and neutralize any action that threatens the stability and peace of our citizens, as well as the safeguarding of our national territory.' And on state television, Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez reiterated denials that Venezuela hosts organized crime groups. 'There are no criminal gangs operating here, they have taken the story of the Tren de Aragua, they have been completely dismantled, they do not exist, nor do cartels or bosses exist,' Padrino said. Ramsey said US military action in Venezuela 'would risk destabilizing the entire country, and potentially the region itself.' With assistance from Scott Squires. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
