
I had to cancel my £21k wedding but I don't know what to do with the dress
Inside, the dress hangs, ghostly and still, suspended in time, the opposite of Miss Havisham's. The beads, intricately sewn onto the delicate fabric, catch my eye as I reach inside to touch the gown I chose back in December 2018, freshly engaged and drunk on the prospect of the white wedding we'd planned for summer 2020.
The bag falls away, landing in a soft heap on the floor, and the dress, perfectly preserved, is revealed in all its glittering glory, for the first time in half a decade.
While most wedding dresses, five years on from their big days, divulge telltale signs of a party well partied – a rip, a stain, a train trampled with mud – mine has none of that. It appears to be as it always was: untouched, unseen, unworn.
The perfect dress for my dream wedding
Stuart and I met in 2016 at a housewarming party and, a year and half later, I moved from London to live with him in his house in Cambridge. We got engaged later that year.
Life – or, more accurately, a global pandemic – got in the way of our wedding. I last tried on my dress – a £1,300 gown bought from a small bridal shop in Cambridge the day after we got engaged (I was overexcited) – in February 2020.
I had planned to collect it from the dress shop that May to take it to a seamstress for alterations: it needed taking up, delicate work that the shop itself couldn't do. That never happened.
Instead, in March 2020, we were forced to postpone the wedding – a £21,000 DIY affair with a marquee in a field, a barbecue, and a band – until the following summer.
Then, nearly a year later, we cancelled it altogether when life really did get in the way and I fell pregnant with our first child: nothing sharpens the mind or the available budget quite like an impending baby.
But, while my life moved on – we bought a house together in a village just outside Cambridge; had a baby, Fabian, in November 2021; and then a second, Inigo, in May 2024 – my dress didn't.
It stayed secreted away in its bag like an unkissed bride behind a veil at the dress shop – scene of its giddy purchase – for two years and then in a wardrobe at my sister's house for a further three after the boutique owner begged me to collect it.
I felt unable to have it – this pretty, precious thing – in my house, a home now full of dirty nappies and smears of crusted Weetabix. The two chapters of my life – the wedding that wasn't and the motherhood that is now viscerally real – felt so profoundly at odds that it was hard to compute they both belonged to me.
Sometimes, deep in the trenches of mothering, I longed to be a bride again: carefree, romantic, naive. And then my son would slip his tiny, sticky hand into mine and I'd pity the girl who thought her wedding dress had to be perfect.
The woman I am, five years on
Inevitably, the half-decade in storage has imbued the dress with a weighty significance: it's a shimmering embodiment of the person I used to be; an almost mystical artefact from a life I no longer lead.
The person who bought this dress still lived in her partner's house; had left journalism behind – she thought forever – to pursue a teaching career; could go out dancing on a whim (and tolerate the hangover that followed); and had never, ever changed a nappy.
While I have largely ignored the dress for five years, the memory of it – almost ethereal – has burrowed its way into my subconscious mind, its beauty jarring with the chaos of my life five years on.
I don't know what made me want to look at it again; when curiosity finally trumped the fear I might burst into tears upon seeing it, the physical release of emotions that have been in storage for as long as the dress. Perhaps it was the birth of my second baby a year ago, a further stretching of the now taut line between my former and current selves. Perhaps it was the growing sense of guilt about the dress taking up space in my sister's wardrobe, a maid of honour duty she performed gladly but didn't sign up for. Perhaps it was simply because wedding season was coming down the aisle.
We choose a Monday, when the children are in childcare, and my sister treats the moment with the reverence it deserves, hanging the dress, cloaked in its covering, on the back of her wardrobe.
She speaks in hushed tones, like a doctor breaking bad news. I'm grateful she's taking it seriously, this slightly frivolous reopening of the past. Taking the dress out of its bag, I note, with surprise, the emotional paralysis I feel upon seeing it: not sad, not happy, just nothingness.
The dress feels both familiar and foreign, like an ex-partner I once loved but haven't seen for years. It is, objectively, beautiful; its intricate beading, the cut of its bodice, the buttons that snake sensuously down its back. As I trace a finger down these buttons, the numbness begins to dissipate and I observe the tangle of emotions – joy, anger, excitement, grief – now woven into the gown. It's both special and not; both my wedding dress and not.
My first dress – and my second
Because we did have a wedding, in the end: a simple ceremony 16 months after the birth of our first son with close friends only and a party at a pub. It cost us just £850 all in. And I chose another dress to wear for that day, deeming my original too bridal for the occasion.
My first dress was – still is, of course – traditional: the colour of champagne with a demure neckline, delicate embellishments and a train that puddled prettily on the floor. It was also a tiny size six.
My second dress, meanwhile, was crimson, low-cut and aggressively sequinned with a slit from floor to upper-thigh. It – a size 12, incidentally – was vibrant and bold and, I think, spoke of the life lived in the years since choosing the first gown.
If my first dress was virginal, my second screamed the opposite: it was the colour of life, of longing and of a mother newly blooded. It was also rented: with one dress already in storage, I chose an outfit I could send back. It cost me £85.
Back in the room, my sister – doing a job she's waited more than half a decade to do – helps me into the dress. Only half the buttons do up. As I gaze at my reflection in the mirror, I realise the dress is ill-fitting in more ways than one. It doesn't fit my body any more but nor, I see, does it fit me. The me that prefers secondhand to brand new, favours an oversized silhouette to a figure-hugging one, and is too time-poor, exhausted and overstimulated to faff around with that many tiny buttons. I have changed, forever altered by the last five years, while the dress, which never made it to its alterations, has not.
I take the dress off, place it back on its hanger. As I do so, I notice a seam at one shoulder has come apart, a small rip in the tulle that frays at the edges. Was it always like this? Is this one of the alterations I was hoping the seamstress might fix? I reach into the dark recesses of my brain but I can't remember: that information has been wiped and replaced with the correct Calpol dosage for a one-year-old. Maybe, I ponder, it's a new tear, evidence that, in fact, my dress was not frozen in time but aged with me inside the closet. Either way, I rather like this flaw. Marriage, after all, isn't about one perfect day in one perfect dress. Like delicate fabric, it can snag when put under pressure and be repaired with love and attention. And mending, of course, is how you make things stronger.
What to do: sell, donate or keep?
I take the dress home: it's time. What comes next, I don't know. Beautiful as it is, the frock rubs up awkwardly against my new life – my now life – a reality made flesh when, in order to get it home, I have to drape it across two children's car seats, both of them infested with toy cars, dried orange peel and breadstick crumbs. I have three options: sell, donate or keep. A scan of resale sites tells me wedding dresses, like cars, depreciate in value as soon as they're taken off the bridal forecourt: even ones that are only test driven, it seems, don't sell for anywhere near retail value. Meanwhile, the allure of donating the dress is appealing, in line as it is with the sustainable values that have sprouted in me over the last five years; a way of offsetting, perhaps, the fact I didn't choose a preloved dress in the first place.
Keeping it would be a ludicrous choice, of course. The dress is awkward to store and of little – nay, no – use to me: I have sons and, if I did have a daughter, I'd never expect her to wear a dress even I didn't don. But, when I finally get it home, I spot an inscription written in cursive on the garment bag: ' When I fall in love it will be forever... ' A cloying epigraph designed to woo brides-to-be, sure. But I did fall in love, in a bridal boutique days before Christmas 2018, and, well, till death do us part.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
REVEALED: Lindsay Lohan just wore this £35 foundation - and beauty fans say it's like an 'Insta-filter in a bottle'
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Makeup wearers are getting 'constant compliments' on their skin thanks to one £35 peptide foundation tint. And it's the secret behind Lindsey Lohan's latest red-carpet look. The cult-favourite sunscreen-meets-primer hybrid, the Naked Sundays BeautyScreen SPF50 Tinted Peptide Foundation, has got the internet talking thanks to its airbrushed effect on the skin. Equal parts sunscreen, foundation, and serum, it's the three-in-one hybrid that will protect your complexion from the sun as well as blur imperfections. Naked Sundays BeautyScreen SPF50 Tinted Peptide Foundation, 30ml If you're after a flawless, your-skin-but-better foundation this summer, then the Naked Sundays BeautyScreen SPF50 Tinted Peptide Foundation is the one that has had everyone talking. Lightweight yet with buildable coverage, it comes in 15 flexible shades and has the addition of SPF50 so your complexion stays protected. £35 Shop With so many foundations on the market, it takes a lot for one to go viral and reach 'cult status', but that is exactly what the Naked Sundays BeautyScreen SPF50 Tinted Peptide Foundation has achieved. The internet-loved foundation has become the go-to for celebrities looking for flawless, radiant skin, that stands up to the harsh red carpet lights and world photographers. A backstage beauty secret on red carpets and beaches alike, the BeautyScreen is the lightweight yet 'great coverage' foundation that could be well worth adding to your summer makeup routine. Standing up to the scrutiny of the red carpet, the new Naked Sundays BeautyScreen™ SPF50 Peptide Foundation Tint could leave you with your most flawless-looking skin yet. The foundation with SPF50 and blue-light protection has had users 'obsessing' over the skin-blurring finish. Praised for its beautifully sheer pigmentation that looks like your skin-but-better, the buildable, hydrating formula feels comfortable on the skin and can be layered and concentrated in areas to build up the coverage. 'This sunscreen/foundation tint is incredible!' raved one impressed user. 'It literally melts onto your skin and blends so amazingly. I highly recommend!'. Another agreed, adding: 'This is one of the first cream foundations I truly enjoy wearing. It looks so natural and you can't beat the mineral spf aspect of this product. I definitely recommend it. I like that it doesn't feel heavy, matches my complexion, and feels good on my skin.' And makeup lovers aren't the only ones to be wowed by the Naked Sunday Peptide Tint. Celebrity makeup artist Ash K Holm, who was responsible for Lindsay Lohan's red carpet look, and who counts the Kardashians among her other A-list clients, says it's her non-negotiable pre-makeup step. 'For the most camera-ready, natural skin, I love using Naked Sundays BeautyScreen - it gives a flawless, radiant finish while protecting the skin,' says Holm. Available in 15 shades, the breathable SPF skin tint is loaded with skincare benefits too. Each shade is infused with broad-spectrum SPF50, blue light defense and hydrating botanicals to give you a natural looking glow whilst protecting the skin. The added Polyglutamic Acid ensures skin is kept hydrated not cakey, while the peptides are a great anti-ageing ingredient, helping to boost moisture whilst the added niacinamide boosts skin barrier health.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Patrick Kielty admits he 'didn't feel like an equal partner' in 12-year marriage to Cat Deeley and couple had 'rough patches' before announcing their split
Patrick Kielty admitted he 'didn't feel like an equal partner' in his marriage to Cat Deeley and they had 'rough patches' before announcing their split. In a joint statement, the pair, aged 54 and 48 respectively, confirmed: 'We have taken the decision to end our marriage and are now separated. There is no other party involved. 'We will continue to be united as loving parents to our children and would therefore kindly ask for our family privacy to be respected. There will be no further comment.' Speaking on The Mid-Point podcast in July 2023, Patrick told how he thought he was in a '50/50 partnership' but then later felt more like a 'junior shareholder'. Asked how he and Cat made decisions in their marriage, he said: 'For a long time I genuinely thought I was in a 50/50 partnership [laughs]. 'Then you realise you're actually a junior shareholder in a 50/50 partnership. 'You go, 'I thought we were 50/50? Why do you seem to have more shares?' 'I think with big decisions you kind of have to float stuff and see how that's going to go. You know, drop that into conversation.' Patrick also discussed the couple's decision to leave Los Angeles and move back to London in 2020 after a decade living in California. 'What was weird about it was it was Cat who more wanted to do that. It was more so her decision,' Patrick said. 'I think being a new mum and not having the family around and not having the network of cousins and brothers, and so I think, for me, London is not home. It will never really be home for me. 'In my head, I still live in a little village in County Down, even though I haven't lived there full time for 30 years. These are the tricks you play on yourself. 'Living in London, my family was always a flight away anyway, so that idea of being a longer flight away from LA wasn't as much of a problem for me as someone who had to get a flight to go to see them anyway. 'I also think because Cat was the one with a successful career out there, she was the one who chose to leave that at the right time, and that's a decision that she made and only she can make.' Patrick was also asked if, at the time, he and Cat were the happiest they'd ever been. 'Yeah, look, you know 10 years into marriage, it is something you work at,' he said. 'It's that idea that what attracts you is not going to keep you together. 'It's that idea of how you work together whenever the rough and the smooth and all those things … it's a journey. 'You put those kids into the mix and suddenly those priorities change, and all of those things. 'I think anybody who feels they can put their feet up and go, 'Yeah, that's marriage cracked,' you're kind of going, 'Really?!' ' Cat notably did not attend Patrick's mother Mary's funeral back in March. It was reported that she stayed home in order to support their two young children, Milo, nine, and James, seven, who were suffering the loss of their grandmother. Patrick, 54, looked bereft as he carried Mary's coffin through his home village, where he was joined by close family and friends at the Church of the Sacred Heart. A spokesperson for Cat told Daily Mail at the time: 'Cat remained at home to be there for her two young children before and after school on this very sad day.' Cat and Patrick first met in 2002 while they hosted BBC talent show Fame Academy, however sparks didn't fly between the couple until 10 years later. After being friends for years, their friendship turned to romance thanks to his major gesture when he flew all the way from Belfast to Los Angeles for brunch with Cat. Previously talking about how they got together he told the Daily Mail: 'Well there had always been a spark between us, but either she was with someone or I was, and then she moved to LA, so opportunities for something to develop were limited. 'Unless someone was stupid enough to get on a plane, nothing would have happened. 'Cat was in LA and I was in Northern Ireland, so I texted her to wish her a happy birthday. 'When she said she was having a birthday lunch at the Beverly Hills Hotel, I said I'd be there. She told me to go to sleep as I was drunk. 'That was 2am. I got up at 5am, went to Belfast airport for 6am, got the 7.15am flight to Heathrow, landed at 8.30am, took off again at 9.40am and arrived in LA at 1.15pm. 'I was at the Beverly Hills Hotel by 2.15pm. When I walked in, Cat looked at me and said: "Oh, you're good!"" They married in a secret, intimate ceremony in Rome in 2012 with their close family and friends present. A wedding photo showed the pair looking blissfully happy as they enjoy a celebratory drink at their wedding reception. The couple lived in California for over 14 years as she presented So You Think You Can Dance but they put their Beverly Hills mansion on the market for $4.9 million (£3.8 million). They moved back to North London in 2020 after buying a £4.9 million property in Hampstead. The pair have been renovating the fixer-upper since moving in, with the couple's architect telling Daily Mail: 'The proposed external appearance builds on the inherent character of the existing house but updates it into a contemporary dwelling both in use and character. 'It is inspired by mid-twentieth design ranging from the designs of Alvar Aalto to houses of the west coast of America which are familiar to the clients who spent many years living there. 'Materials have also been introduced that connect the clients to their previous home in LA and to places that have significant memories for them.' The move came prior to Cat securing her job at This Morning amid fears of gun violence following an incident in which Patrick had to hide from a gunman in a Los Angeles mall. The star recalled: 'They shut down the centre. I got a call from Paddy, saying, "They're taking us out through the fire exits but nobody can get to their car. If we walk to a junction, can you come and get us?" 'He wanted to keep Milo calm, so I didn't understand the enormity of what was happening. 'As I was driving I began to see helicopters, news vans, firemen and SWAT squads. It makes me go funny now. It was terrifying.' The couple started their family while living in the US and explained that she found moving back to the UK 'really hard', even though she felt it was necessary with LA becoming increasingly unsafe in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. She added: 'It doesn't feel as safe as it used to be. There's an edge, which wasn't there before. The health system is failing miserably. 'After the pandemic there are lots of vulnerable people with severe mental health issues that have just fallen through the net.' Back in 2024 Patrick opened up about the tricky times the couple had faced balancing their careers. Prior to her job at This Morning, Cat was the host of So You Think You Can Dance over in the US. Speaking about a period during Christmas 2023, Patrick told The Times: 'There was a moment after Christmas that was tricky. 'She had to fly to Atlanta for seven weeks. There was a wee bit of a juggle there. But I think with all these things, as long as you have a routine, it doesn't take as much fizz out of you as some people think.' They moved back to North London in 2020, prior to Cat securing her job at This Morning amid fears of gun violence following an incident in which Patrick had to hide from a gunman in a Los Angeles mall (pictured at the Emmy Awards in 2015) Discussing how things have changed since her move to This Morning he added: 'Because Cat's doing her stuff in the morning, she would normally be back just after lunchtime. And we've got the start of the week and the weekends together, so it's not "Hi/bye".' The former couple are estimated to be worth approximately £11million with Cat believed to be on around £600,000 per year to host This Morning. Patrick, on the other hand, was given a three-year, £216,000 contract to host 30 episodes of the Late Late Show, after he took over from Ryan Tubridy. Meanwhile last year Cat stunned ITV viewers when she made a shock bedroom confession on This Morning. She and her co-host Ben Shephard were discussing whether separate rooms are the key to a happy marriage alongside Linda Lusardi and married couple Emma and Kevin - who choose to sleep in separate bedrooms. Speaking about her own bedroom arrangements, Cat revealed her sleeping situation with Patrick. She explained: 'It's one of those things that because of our schedule here [This Morning], from Monday to Thursday I sleep in the guest bedroom and the rest of the time I'm back. 'Because otherwise I get up at 5am and I want to fall asleep earlier.' Before marrying Patrick, This Morning presenter Cat was married to businessman Mark Whelan for five years. They divorced in 2006. Northern Irish comedian and presenter Patrick was in a high-profile relationship with Amanda Bryam for five years, separating in 2003.


The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
How Molly-Mae Hague's viral parenting outburst has sparked deep tension with Fury family in-laws as bitter row brews
MULTI-millionaire Molly-Mae Hague built an empire off the back of her real-life relatability on social media - but her unfiltered honesty appears to have backfired following a recent breakdown. We can reveal those close to her partner Tommy Fury claim the 26-year-old's candid views on motherhood have ruffled feathers within his famous boxing family. 10 Just months after the couple got back together following Love Island Tommy's booze battle, tension is said to be brewing over Molly-Mae's public struggles with parenting their daughter Bambi. The two-year-old's temper tantrum this week led reality star Molly to film herself breaking down in tears in despair. The 26-year-old cried 'I'm sorry, I'm so embarrassed' as she opened up about the "huge problems" she faces as a mum of one. But the heartfelt moment seems to have bothered her Irish Traveller in-laws who are more used to the no-nonsense attitude of Paris Fury - the wife of Tommy's boxing legend brother Tyson - who has seven children. A source told The Sun: "Within the Travelling community, having a big family with lots of children is the norm. "Tommy's relatives have been hopeful that he and Molly will have more children after getting back on track. "They care about her so much and are concerned, but also worried about how publicly she's venting about motherhood. "The family are used to Paris's attitude of being able to work, run the house and bring up her seven kids with Tyson without complaint. "Molly voicing how difficult she's finding it is surprising. They've been reaching out to support her through this tough time. "Of course it's natural for Molly to share the good, the bad and the ugly with her fans - no matter what anyone says. "She is determined to open up fully to her followers, whatever the backlash, and encourage the family to see it from her perspective." Molly-Mae has previously said she is 'selfish' and is 'not cut out' to deal with the stresses of parenting. It's in stark contrast to Tommy's sister-in-law Paris who was praised for her resilience in the family's Netflix documentary, At Home with the Furys. Molly‑Mae herself has described the 35-year-old as "wonder woman", having formed a close bond as Fury WAGs. Sadly, Paris was left heartbroken in May 2024 when she miscarried her eighth child while six months pregnant, days before Tyson's highly-anticipated fight with Oleksandr Usyk. She had previously revealed plans to have 10 children with her heavyweight champion husband, admitting: "There are times when it's stressful, but I enjoy it. I like that kind of chaotic life." Meanwhile Molly's breakdown over her daughter's "terrible twos" followed furious backlash online about being "out of touch". The businesswoman was accused of 'moaning" after telling fans she's not done one "fun thing" this summer despite jetting off to Dubai, Disneyland Paris and Budapest. Addressing the upset as she sobbed about motherhood, Molly admitted: 'I'm trying so so hard to stay positive and have a really nice day but I feel like I need to keep my camera running all day so you can see… every single thing is a huge problem. 'I can't even get like socks and shoes on'. She added: 'I don't care who tells me I am out of touch with reality or all this stuff that's going on on TikTok at the minute, I don't care I'm not going to not talk about it.' She sobbed: 'We're at a little local farm near us and Zoe and Bambi have gone in, just to leave me to calm down for a minute.' Despite her comments seemingly causing upset, Molly has no intention of censoring herself when it comes to what she posts online. Loving fans have flooded her with messages of support to assure her she's not alone in how she's feeling. One said: "You are amazing. Truly. Please don't ever feel like a failure. You're doing your absolute best, and it shows. You're not alone — so many of us are just trying to survive each day. And that's enough. You're enough." Another added: "You are an amazing mum. All children go through these moments. Plus we have more sensitive days where everything can feel 100 times worse. You are not alone!! You are amazing." Someone else wrote: "Hey Molly, you're doing a great job. Everyone's personality is different and every mum handles their child in different ways. "Some mums wake up enjoying every minute, including the screaming and shouting and some despise it." Molly faced immense pressure to open up about her brief split from Tommy last year after he turned to alcohol to cope while injured from boxing. 10 The Sun revealed the pair rekindled at a New Year's Eve party at Manchester United footballer Luke Shaw's home before Molly spoke out about their troubles weeks later in her Prime Video documentary, Molly-Mae: Behind It All. Our source added: "Molly is always unapologetically herself. "She's got a thick skin and can deal with what people throw at her. It's more important to Molly that she's authentic about how she's dealing with being a mum. "She's been through a lot in the past year and is just focused on her family. "Molly loves Bambi more than anything and who knows what the future will hold about having more kids." The Sun has reached out to Molly and Tommy's reps.