
Redistricting row: Texas Republicans approve Donald Trump-backed redrawn maps in House; Democrats vow legal fight
The Texas House passed a controversial mid-decade redistricting plan on Wednesday that could hand Republicans five additional seats in the US House of Representatives, triggering a coast-to-coast battle over congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
The new boundaries were approved in an 88-52 party-line vote after weeks of political confrontation, reported news agency Associated Press. The move came following direct pressure from US President Donald Trump, who urged Texas lawmakers to deliver what he described as a 'big beautiful map' to secure the GOP's slim majority in Washington.
The redrawn districts now move to the Republican-controlled state Senate before heading to Governor Greg Abbott, who has signalled he will sign them into law.
Texas Democrats had attempted to derail the measure by leaving the state earlier this month, delaying proceedings for over two weeks. Upon their return, many were assigned round-the-clock police escorts to prevent another walkout.
Several even staged overnight sit-ins at the Capitol in protest, as per the New York Times.
Now they have vowed to contest the new law in court and have expressed concerns that Republicans undertook this political manoeuvre before enacting legislation in response to the deadly floods that affected the state last month.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
US$31 trillion in wealth extracted from Indonesia during Dutch colonial rule: President Prabowo
CNA
Read More
Undo
Republicans made little effort to disguise the motive behind the map. Todd Hunter, the Republican legislator who authored the plan, told colleagues, 'The underlying goal of this plan is straightforward: improve Republican political performance', as quoted by AP.
Democrats condemned the move as undemocratic and racially discriminatory. 'In a democracy, people choose their representatives. This bill flips that on its head and lets politicians in Washington choose their voters,' said Democratic Representative Chris Turner, as cited by AP.
His colleague John H Bucy directly blamed the president, declaring, 'This is Donald Trump's map. It clearly and deliberately manufactures five more Republican seats in Congress.'
The vote has already fuelled retaliation. California's Democratic governor Gavin Newsom vowed to 'fight fire with fire,' saying state lawmakers would introduce a rival plan to create five new Democratic-leaning districts.
As per news agency AFP, the proposal would need voter approval in a November referendum because California usually relies on an independent commission to draw maps.
Former President Barack Obama has endorsed Newsom's effort, calling it a 'smart, measured approach' to counter Texas.
Other battleground states are now under pressure to follow suit. Republicans in Indiana, Missouri, Ohio and Florida are considering similar mid-cycle redraws, while Democrats in New York and Maryland are weighing their options despite stricter state limits.
Civil rights groups are preparing legal challenges in Texas, pointing out that every redistricting cycle since the 1970s has seen courts find the legislature in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
As per AP, critics argue the latest map weakens Black representation in Congress despite claims by Republicans that it increases minority-majority districts.
State Representative Ron Reynolds, a Democrat, warned colleagues about their legacy and said, 'Just like the people who were on the wrong side of history in 1965, history will be looking at the people who made the decisions in this body today.'
Republicans, however, brushed aside accusations of racial bias. Katrina Pierson, a former Trump spokesperson turned lawmaker, told Democrats, 'You call my voters racist, you call my party racist and yet we're expected to follow the rules. There are Black and Hispanic and Asian Republicans in this chamber who were elected just like you.'
With Trump personally lobbying Republican leaders across multiple states, and Democrats mobilising in response, the Texas map marks the opening clash in what could become a decisive national redistricting war ahead of 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
James Dobson cause of death: Influential doctor on Donald Trump's Evangelical Advisory team dies at age of 89
FAQs Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Dr. James Dobson, a politically influential child psychologist who started a radio show counseling Christians on how to be good parents, founded the conservative ministry Focus on the Family and was long a campaigner against abortion and gay rights, died on Thursday. He was 89. His death was confirmed by the Dr. James Dobson Family founded Focus on the Family in 1977, which had more than 1,000 employees at its peak and gave Dobson a platform to weigh in on legislation, advise White House panels and advocate against laws to ban conversion therapy to 'cure' gay left Focus on the Family in 2010 and founded the institute that bears his name and continued with the Family Talk radio show, which is nationally syndicated and is carried by 1,500 radio outlets with more than half a million listeners weekly, according to the instituteHe served on President Donald Trump 's Evangelical Executive Advisory Board.A1. James Dobson was 89-year-old.A2. Dr. James Dobson served on President Donald Trump's Evangelical Executive Advisory Board.


Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US embassy denies $21 million ‘voter turnout' funding to India, counters Trump's claim
The US embassy in New Delhi has flatly denied that America ever gave $21 million for voter turnout activities in India, pushing back against claims made earlier this year by US President Donald Trump. In a formal communication to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the embassy clarified that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) 'did not receive or provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India from Financial Year 2014 to 2024 nor implement any voter turnout-related activities'. The Indian Express had reported that $21 million was sanctioned in 2022 for Bangladesh, not India. $13.4 million of the $21 million to Bangladesh has already been disbursed, ostensibly for 'political and civic engagement' among Bangladesh students in the run-up to the January 2024 elections and projects that put a question mark on the integrity of these elections — seven months before the ouster of Sheikh Hasina. The MEA informed Parliament of the denial in response to a query by Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas. It noted that the US had conducted a global review of its aid programmes in February this year. 'On 2 July 2025, the US Embassy shared data that it said covered USAID funding in India from 2014 to 2024, including details of implementing partners, objectives, and key accomplishments of each activity undertaken. The embassy also maintains that 'USAID/India did not receive or provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India from fiscal years 2014 to 2024, nor has it implemented any voter turnout-related activities in India',' the MEA response said. The embassy's statement comes amid a global shutdown of USAID operations. On 11 August, the embassy informed India's Department of Economic Affairs that all seven partnership agreements between USAID and the Indian government would be closed effective 15 August. It also provided a beneficiary-wise breakdown of USAID allocations for 2022–24. Trump had earlier alleged that USAID funds meant for humanitarian purposes were sent to India: '18 million dollars for helping India with its elections. Why the hell? Why don't we just go to old paper ballots, and let them help us with their elections, right? Voter ID. Wouldn't that be nice? We're giving money to India for elections. They don't need money,' he said on February 23. His claim followed a February 2025 announcement by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), then headed by Elon Musk, which listed the $21 million as part of $723 million in cancelled foreign aid.


New Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
US appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty imposed on Trump
Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause on any punishments taking effect. The panel was sharply divided, issuing 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt New York Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit against Trump and his companies was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any of Trump's lenders felt cheated, they could have sued him themselves, and none did. One judge wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial began that the attorney general had proved Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, who was appointed to the court by Republican Gov. George Pataki, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' ... but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business," Friedman wrote. "The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' In a statement, James focused on the part of the case that went her way, saying the court had 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' 'It should not be lost to history: yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law, and that our case has merit,' James said. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. Claims of politics at play Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. Legal obstacles The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.