Labour MP warns proscribing Palestine Action would be ‘kneejerk reaction'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has unveiled plans to proscribe the organisation, which armed forces minister Luke Pollard described as 'not a protest group'.
Counter-terror police are investigating the break-in last Friday, when activists damaged two RAF Voyager aircraft using paint.
Palestine Action claimed responsibility for the incident, and the organisation posted footage from the Oxfordshire base on its X account, claiming that the planes help to 'collect intelligence, refuel fighter jets and transport weapons to commit genocide in Gaza'.
Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside Kim Johnson told the Commons that she was 'concerned by the Government's kneejerk reaction to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation'.
She told MPs: 'This country has a long history of protests, as I mentioned in this chamber last week, some on British military sites, and none have been branded as terrorists.'
Ms Johnson added that authorities could pursue those responsible for 'criminal damage, but not as a terrorist', and asked: 'Can the minister set out what steps his department will take to ensure peaceful protest activity is not wrongly categorised as a national security threat?'
Mr Pollard replied: 'The proscription of Palestine Action has been something that has been considered over a long period of time by my colleagues in the Home Office.
'It is a decision that they have taken after considering the facts, those in the public domain and those perhaps held privately, and we are certain that this is the right course of action to keep our country safe in these difficult times.'
Liz Saville Roberts, Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader, said: 'Direct action at military bases is nothing new. We remember with respect the women who marched from Wales to Greenham Common, and the thousands of women who joined them.
'They didn't just march, they pulled down fences. They criminally damaged infrastructure.
'So, does the minister recognise the risk implicit in proscribing protest groups calling out war as terrorist organisations?'
Ms Saville Roberts was referring to a demonstration between 1981 and 2000, when anti-nuclear weapons protesters set up the Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp.
Mr Pollard replied: 'They're not a protest group. They are people that have undertaken severe criminal damage to military assets. They're people who are increasingly using violence as part of their modus operandi.
'The decision that the Home Secretary has taken has not been taken lightly and reflects the seriousness of the intent of that organisation.
'I welcome free speech, I welcome debate and challenge, but vandalising RAF jets is not free speech – that is criminal damage, that is interventions on a military base, that is – as I say in my statement – not only epically stupid but also a threat to our national security and the Home Secretary was right to proscribe them.'
In his statement, Mr Pollard had earlier told MPs that personnel at Brize Norton 'work tirelessly to support our armed forces deployed across the world to deliver military assistance to Ukraine, and they have been formally recognised for their contribution in flying humanitarian aid into Gaza, so this action does nothing to further the path to peace'.
Sir Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP for New Forest East, warned that 'it would do the country and the Government no favours if they were to lose in court a challenge to the process of proscription, because whereas the secret sabotage of planes would certainly have been an act of terrorism leading to proscription, the fact is, this was a performative act which they announced they had done'.
MPs will have a 'full debate' in Parliament as part of the proscription process, Mr Pollard pledged in response, as he said the bid to proscribe Palestine Action was put together after 'considerable thought'.
MPs also heard that the 'fence is not formidable' at Brize Norton, after Liberal Democrat MP for Witney Charlie Maynard told the Commons that 'security at the base has been really underinvested for a long time'.
Mr Maynard said he had walked around the base's perimeter in his constituency 'quite a few times'.
Mr Pollard said the Government's response had already 'helped identify a number of immediate steps' to bolster security at the site.
The minister added: 'He is right that much of our armed forces estate and our armed forces have been hollowed out and underfunded for far too long.
'It's precisely for that reason that I welcome the increase in defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027.
'Our armed forces are brilliant but it's time they had first-class facilities.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Israel and Iran agree ceasefire after attack on US air base
The news came after Iran attacked American forces at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base on Monday evening. No casualties were reported, and the US was made aware of the attack in advance. Just hours later, US president Donald Trump announced a ceasefire agreement had been reached on his social media platform Truth Social – although it took some time for both Iran and Israel to confirm. READ MORE: Ellie Gomersall: Banning a protest group as authoritarian as it gets At around 11pm UK time, Trump posted: "CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!" Around an hour later, a senior Iranian official told the Reuters news agency that it had agreed to the ceasefire, which was proposed by the US and mediated by Qatar. Shortly before 6am UK-time, Iranian state television said the ceasefire had officially begun – but there was no word from Israel on whether it accepted the deal until just over an hour later. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said in a statement that it has agreed to the proposal, adding that Israel would respond "forcefully" to any violations from Iran. The statement added that Israel had agreed to the deal after "achieving the objectives" of its attacks, claiming that the "immediate existential threat" of Iran's nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles had been removed. READ MORE: I was at the protest for Palestine Action – here's what happened The UK Government has welcomed the news. Speaking on the Tuesday morning media round, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden told BBC Breakfast that it was "good news, if the ceasefire holds". He said: 'I welcome the Israeli statement. It's obviously a fragile situation in the Middle East. 'A number of people have been killed overnight in missile strikes, but I think the whole world will hope that the ceasefire will hold and that Iran will come forward with a credible plan that shows that it will not pursue the development of a nuclear weapon.' At the time of writing, there has been no official statement from either Foreign Secretary David Lammy or Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is heading to the Netherlands on Tuesday for a two-day Nato summit.
Glasgow Times
28 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
More than 100 MPs threaten to halt welfare reforms in PM's biggest rebellion
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1. The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Commons majority could be under threat by rebel Labour MPs opposed to his Government's welfare reform plans (Jordan Pettitt/PA) But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'. There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said. They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee. The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said. She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.' Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading. Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC). Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. Amid the growing threat of rebellion, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned on Tuesday morning it would be a 'very serious thing' for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the Bill at its first major outing in the Commons. He added: 'You're right to point out that this phrase reasoned amendment isn't just a small tweak. It would stop the legislative process if it succeeded.' Mr McFadden insisted the growing costs of welfare were unsustainable, as a 'city the size of Leicester' was being added to the population on benefits each year. Pat McFadden said the increasing welfare bill was unsustainable (James Manning/PA) 'I don't think as the party of labour, the party of work, we can sit back and be relaxed about so many people going on to long-term sickness and disability benefits,' he added. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known. The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'. She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it. Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. 'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
More than 100 MPs threaten to halt welfare reforms in PM's biggest rebellion
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1. The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'. But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'. There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said. They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee. The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said. She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.' Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading. Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC). Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. Amid the growing threat of rebellion, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned on Tuesday morning it would be a 'very serious thing' for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the Bill at its first major outing in the Commons. He added: 'You're right to point out that this phrase reasoned amendment isn't just a small tweak. It would stop the legislative process if it succeeded.' Mr McFadden insisted the growing costs of welfare were unsustainable, as a 'city the size of Leicester' was being added to the population on benefits each year. 'I don't think as the party of labour, the party of work, we can sit back and be relaxed about so many people going on to long-term sickness and disability benefits,' he added. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known. The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'. She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it. Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. 'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
