
Mineral desire: Moscow has enough to satisfy India
Once a frozen frontier, the Arctic is rapidly transforming into a geopolitical and geoeconomic focal point. Melting ice is exposing vast reserves of critical minerals, hydrocarbons, and strategic shipping routes. As the West advances through NATO's northern reach, a sanctioned Russia is turning to trusted partners to unlock its Arctic potential.
For India, this shift offers a rare strategic opportunity. With rising energy needs, critical mineral ambitions, and a desire for multipolar engagement, India can enter the Arctic not as a competitor, but as a partner to Russia, guardian of over half the Arctic coastline and its richest untapped resources.
India's pursuit of energy security and cleaner fuels finds a strategic match in Russia's Arctic LNG (liquefied natural gas) ambitions. While Yamal LNG has proven operationally successful, the Arctic LNG-2 project, long hindered by Western sanctions, now stands at a potential turning point. The renewed thaw in US-Russia relations following Donald Trump's second term, as noted by Oxford Energy, has opened possibilities for easing restrictions on key Arctic energy assets.
For India, this shifting landscape offers a timely opportunity to deepen its role in Russia's polar pivot, by investing in Arctic LNG infrastructure, securing long-term gas supplies, and positioning itself as a critical partner in shaping the emerging Arctic order.
The Yamal LNG facility, operating at 20% above capacity since 2023, has firmly anchored Russia's Arctic presence, producing over 100 million tonnes of LNG since 2017. For India, this has translated into energy security gains, with GAIL securing long-term contracts for 2.85 MTPA through Gazprom Marketing & Trading Singapore. Despite EU restrictions on transshipment, deliveries continue uninterrupted, aligning with India's strategy of diversifying supply sources to hedge against global volatility and fuel its gas-based economy.
Yet the real test lies in Arctic LNG-2. Once 59% complete in 2021, the project stalled under heavy Western sanctions. By 2025, only limited operations resumed. India has maintained official distance, but quiet negotiations persist as Russia courts Indian buyers with steep discounts and DES (Delivered Ex-Ship) terms, mirroring its crude oil outreach. The recent easing of US-Russia tensions after Trump's re-election offers a potential breakthrough: if secondary sanctions are lifted, Indian firms may finally step in, unlocking a significant Arctic energy axis.
India's Arctic engagement also aligns with its 'Act Far East' policy and 2022 Arctic policy. ONGC Videsh's $8.4 billion legacy in Sakhalin and Vankorneft provides operational experience and political capital that could be redeployed in the Arctic, though harsher environments and geopolitical stakes differ sharply.
As Russia aims to capture 20% of global LNG exports by 2030, India's energy calculus must adapt. For New Delhi, the Arctic offers more than LNG, it's a new corridor linking Russian resources with India's infrastructure and strategic aspirations.
As Russia pivots to the Arctic amid Western sanctions, India finds strategic opportunity in emerging polar logistics. The Northern Sea Route (NSR), offering a 40% shorter passage than the Suez Canal and cutting transit time by 16 days, is becoming central to Indo-Russian Arctic cooperation. In 2023, NSR cargo traffic hit a record 36.254 million tonnes, with Moscow targeting 200 million tonnes by 2030. India's growing stake is evident, by early 2023, it accounted for 35% of cargo at Russia's Murmansk port, largely driven by rising coal imports.
Complementing this is the Chennai–Vladivostok Maritime Corridor (EMC), launched in late 2024, which directly links India's eastern seaboard to Russia's Arctic gateway. Trade along the EMC has surged as coal shipments rose 87% and crude oil by 48% in FY 2024–25. This corridor not only facilitates India's access to Russia's vast Arctic and Far East resources but also strengthens its maritime footprint. India is positioning its ports and shipyards as vital nodes in Arctic logistics, proposing joint production of $750 million worth of Russian icebreakers. Together, the NSR and EMC mark India's emergence as a serious player in Arctic connectivity, where geoeconomics and strategy now converge.
Russia's Arctic frontier, stretching across the Kola Peninsula, Norilsk, and Yakutia, is a treasure trove of critical minerals vital for India's green and digital ambitions. The Kolmozerskoye deposit holds nearly 19% of Russia's lithium reserves, Lovozerskoye is the country's largest rare-earth element (REE) source, and Norilsk supplies over 40% of global palladium. Backed by state giants like Rosatom and Nornickel, Russia is fast-tracking development. Nornickel plans to triple cobalt output to 3,000 tonnes annually by 2025, while Rosatom's Polar Lithium JV prepares to exploit Kolmozerskoye's lithium for global markets.
For India, dependent on imports for 100% of its lithium, cobalt, and nickel, access to these resources is a strategic imperative. With China dominating 60–90% of global critical mineral supply chains, Russia offers India a rare diversification opportunity. Ambassador Denis Alipov has highlighted mutual interests in Arctic mineral cooperation. India's $15 billion investment in oil and gas projects in Russia, and the Chennai–Vladivostok Maritime Corridor, operational since 2024, lay the groundwork for secure logistics and collaborative mining ventures.
Russia's Arctic holds an estimated 658 million tonnes of rare metals, including 29 million tonnes of REEs, crucial for India's EVs, renewables, and defence technologies. India is also eyeing technology transfer for processing projects like Tomtor, the world's third-largest REE deposit. A proposed Centre of Excellence on Critical Minerals could partner with Russian institutes such as Gipronickel Institute to advance extraction methods.
Though Western sanctions complicate financing, India's 2030 target of $100 billion in bilateral trade provides a framework for structured deals. For India, Arctic minerals are not just economic assets, they are pillars of strategic autonomy. By anchoring itself in Russia's resource-rich, sanction-insulated Arctic, India can strengthen its supply chains, hasten its green transition, and reduce dependence on China, all while asserting influence in a rapidly evolving polar landscape.
India's Arctic engagement extends beyond economics, grounded in scientific inquiry and climate diplomacy. Since gaining Observer status in the Arctic Council in 2013, India has actively contributed to initiatives like the Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative and the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Working Group. Its most prominent scientific asset is the Himadri Research Station in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, operational since 2008 and managed by the National Centre for Polar and Ocean Research (NCPOR).
Himadri supports year-round studies on glaciology, ocean-atmosphere interactions, and the Arctic's impact on the Indian monsoon, with over 200 Indian scientists participating in research missions.
India's capabilities offer scope for deeper collaboration with Russia, especially through space-based technologies. The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), using its Cartosat and RISAT satellites, can aid in Arctic mapping, environmental monitoring, and tracking activity along the NSR.
India and Russia's longstanding space partnership, dating back to their first agreement in 1962, offers untapped potential for Arctic collaboration in energy, shipping, and strategic monitoring. While current Arctic-specific projects remain limited, future joint space applications could enhance maritime domain awareness and infrastructure development in the polar region.
India's Arctic push is a strategic leap, linking energy security, mineral access, and scientific strength with Russia's resource-rich north. As the Arctic reshapes global power corridors, India is no longer a bystander but a rising stakeholder. With logistics in place and a $100 billion trade vision, the polar frontier offers India more than resources, it offers resilience. In the ice of the Arctic, India finds new ground for strategic autonomy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine has lost nearly all US-supplied Abrams tanks
The Russian military has reportedly destroyed the majority of US-supplied M1 Abrams tanks delivered to Ukraine, with only five of them remaining operational, RIA Novosti has reported, citing its own analysis. In January 2023, then-US President Joe Biden announced the transfer of 31 M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine, with the delivery completed in September that year. Since then, Moscow has consistently targeted the vehicles and has shared numerous videos purporting to show the destruction or capture of the US tanks. In May 2024, one of the vehicles was displayed at the Army-2024 military expo in Moscow, along with other Western-supplied hardware. According to RIA's estimates, the Russian military has destroyed a total of 26 Abrams tanks since February 2024, leaving Ukraine's forces with just five out of 31 of the tanks. The first Abrams was reportedly knocked out on February 26 by the Russian 'Center' military group near Avdeevka. RIA's latest estimates follow a report from the New York Times in March, which cited Ukrainian officials confirming that 19 of the 31 Abrams tanks had already been destroyed or damaged. The newspaper added that the remaining vehicles have been withdrawn from frontline service due to their vulnerability to Russian drone and artillery attacks. Oryx, a Dutch analyst group which tracks visually confirmed equipment losses, has also claimed that as of late 2024, Ukraine had lost at least 22 Abrams tanks. Last week, Russia's Defense Ministry reported that two Ukrainian Abrams tanks had been seized during an operation in Ukraine's Sumy Region. The Defense Ministry released a video showing Russian troops recovering the vehicles, which appeared to be intact. The tanks were reportedly towed to the rear by the 22nd Motor Rifle Regiment after reconnaissance teams secured the area. After Biden's initial announcement of Abrams deliveries to Ukraine, US media outlets hailed the tanks as a 'game changer' for Kiev, particularly ahead of its failed counteroffensive in 2023. However, by September of that year, Ukraine's top military spy, Kirill Budanov, admitted that the tanks were unlikely to survive on the battlefield for long. Former US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan later also acknowledged that the Abrams was 'not useful' for Ukraine. Moscow has criticized the Western weapons deliveries to Kiev, saying they only prolong hostilities and lead to more bloodshed without affecting the outcome.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Israel has transferred Patriot missile systems to Ukraine
Israel has quietly transferred US-made Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine, Israeli Ambassador to Kiev Mikhail Brodsky has revealed. The country had previously insisted it was only providing humanitarian assistance. 'The Patriot systems we once received from the United States are now in Ukraine,' Brodsky said in an interview with Ukrainian journalist Marichka Dovbenko published on Sunday. 'These were Israeli systems deployed in the early 1990s. We agreed to transfer them. Unfortunately, this hasn't been widely discussed. But when people say that Israel hasn't helped militarily – that's simply not true.' When asked about reports that Israel has been sending military equipment to Ukraine via third countries, Brodsky described it as 'a sensitive issue' that should not be discussed publicly. West Jerusalem has previously claimed it was only delivering humanitarian aid to Ukraine, reportedly out of concern over provoking Russia, which maintains a naval facility and an airbase in neighboring Syria. Israel has emphasized that it seeks to maintain good relations with both Ukraine and Russia. Axios reported in January that the US transferred around 90 Patriot missiles from Israel to Poland for delivery to Ukraine. The New York Times later said Kiev would receive a full Patriot system previously stationed in Israel. According to The Times of Israel, eight systems were retired from service in 2024. Russia's envoy to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, warned last year that any Israeli decision to transfer Patriots to Ukraine would carry 'political consequences.' Moscow has repeatedly argued that foreign arms shipments only escalate the conflict and will not prevent Russia from achieving its objectives. The Kremlin has listed the halt of Western arms deliveries as a precondition for any ceasefire.


Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
The West prevented Ukraine from reaching peace in 2022
The Ukraine conflict, now dragging on for more than three years, could have ended within a week if Kiev hadn't listened to its Western backers, Russia's top negotiator and presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky has said. Speaking to RT's Rick Sanchez on his show Sanchez Effect, Medinsky argued Ukraine had a chance to secure a deal on more favorable terms had it not walked away from negotiations in 2022. 'I'm going to tell you something, Rick, that I've probably never said publicly. If Ukraine had wanted it, had been ready, and had been making its own decisions, we could have signed a peace treaty during the first meeting on February 28, 2022. And the terms would have been less harsh than what we're offering today,' he said. Medinsky stated that Ukrainian officials initially accepted Russia's terms but reversed course after consulting with the US and UK. According to him, Ukrainian negotiators told the Russian side: 'Our foreign partners don't support the agreement and will not guarantee aid or security if we sign it.''So we'll fight until either you defeat us or we defeat you,' the Ukrainian delegation reportedly said, according to Medinsky. David Arakhamia, who led the Ukrainian negotiating team during the 2022 Istanbul talks, later confirmed that then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson had urged Kiev not to sign a deal with Russia. However, he denied that Johnson's opinion had influenced Ukraine's decision-making. Johnson has also denied pressuring Kiev. The Ukrainian side became even 'less independent' when direct talks resumed in Istanbul last month, Medinsky said, arguing that Kiev's European allies were pushing it to act against its own interests. Russia has demanded that Ukraine recognize its new borders, abandon plans to join NATO, and guarantee the rights of the Russian-speaking minority. President Vladimir Putin has said that Ukraine and the West must address 'the root causes' of the conflict before any ceasefire can be reached.