Budget 2025: Who's Worse Off Under New KiwiSaver Changes?
Article – RNZ
The increase in contribution rates should make most savers better off – but it won't benefit everyone.
, Money Correspondent
An increase in contribution rates for KiwiSaver should make most savers better off – but it won't benefit everyone.
As part of the Budget, the Government announced it was increasing the default KiwiSaver contribution rate to 4 percent from employees and 4 percent from employers.
Over a saver's lifetime, including a first home withdrawal, it estimated this could make a high earner 28 percent better off at retirement and a low income or part-time worker 21 percent better off.
But some people won't be better off at all.
Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson said about 20 percent of KiwiSaver members would be worse off due to the Budget changes, The changes also included a reduction in the member tax credit to $260.72 (from $521.43 previously) when someone contributed at least $1042, and the removal of the credit entirely for people earning over $180,000.
Total remuneration
People who are paid on a 'total remuneration' basis will not benefit when contribution rates increase.
'Total remuneration' refers to the practice of employers offering a salary package, from which an employee can choose to make KiwiSaver contributions, rather than setting aside a separate contribution on top of an employee's salary.
Some KiwiSaver providers, such as Kōura founder Rupert Carlyon, have expressed concern that more employers might shift to the total remuneration model, to avoid the higher rates.
Wrightson said it would be important that did not happen. She has been calling for it to be banned for some time.
Earlier Retirement Commission research showed just under half of employers used total remuneration for some employees.
'It goes completely against the sprit of KiwiSaver whereby retirement savings are meant to be contributed by the employer, the employee and the Government contribution,' Wrightson said.
'That's the model. People will get no benefit from the changes on a total remuneration contract. This system needs to be changed so that total remuneration is abolished.
'It's the old story – money in your hand versus money salted away. It becomes very tempting, so total remuneration was not permitted in the original KiwiSaver settings, it was changed a few years ago and I think it should change back.'
Lower-income workers
Wrightson said lower-income workers were more affected by the drop in the member tax credit because it was responsible for a greater portion of their retirement savings.
She said, for people earning less than $30,000 a year, the member tax credit was expected to add up to 15 percent or 20 percent of their total balance at 65.
With the reduction, it would be 6 percent to 11 percent.
Wrightson said there was a divide forming between people who could afford to make KiwiSaver contributions at all and those who could not.
Self-employed
Self-employed people do not have access to an employer contribution in many cases and many providers say it is common for them to opt to contribute only the $1042 required to get the member tax credit.
In 2024, about 200,000 only received the government contribution, including 125,000 self-employed people, Wrightson said.
She said the commission would conduct some more investigation into the impact of the changes on self-employed people and gig workers.
'We're doing some work with Hnry to look at some of their data… We need to find out who's doing what, who's not doing what, where the gaps are and what the response by Government could be.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
14 minutes ago
- Scoop
Speed Change Gets Go Ahead For PAK'nSAVE
Press Release – Hamilton City Council Hamilton City Council approved the change at its meeting on 30 April 2025, however further approval from NZTA was required to meet new Government rules around speed changes. A speed reduction to a section of Wairere Drive in Te Rapa has been given the tick of approval by NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) to enable a new supermarket to be built in the area. The speed on Wairere Drive, between Arthur Porter Drive and Pukete Road, will reduce from 80km/h to 60km/h to meet the traffic conditions in a resource consent for a new PAK'nSAVE supermarket. Hamilton City Council approved the change at its meeting on 30 April 2025, however further approval from NZTA was required to meet new Government rules around speed changes. Deputy Mayor Angela O'Leary celebrates the speed limit reduction approval. 'The majority of submitters told us they wanted the speed limit reduced on this section of Wairere Drive, and a main reason was for the economic and community benefits a PAK'nSAVE would bring.' Consultation with the community generated 1107 submissions with 64% of submitters supporting the proposal to lower the speed limit. 'The PAK'nSAVE supports the growth we're seeing in the north of Hamilton and will create jobs, and better access to essential goods and services for those communities.' Foodstuffs North Island Head of Property, Nick Hanson, is looking forward to delivering a much-needed community amenity for Hamilton North. 'The new PAK'nSAVE will support the growing local population with great value groceries and a modern, safe shopping experience.' As part of the resource consent for the PAK'nSAVE, an independent commissioner determined traffic lights are required to be installed at the Wairere Drive and Karewa Place intersection to allow a right turn into (but not out of) Karewa Place from Wairere Drive. The installation of the traffic lights will be undertaken by Foodstuffs at their cost. The speed limit reduction is a safety requirement to manage speeds at the intersection and will be completed in conjunction with the installation of the traffic lights.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
30 With Guyon Espiner: Netflix ‘Doesn't Need Us' Or Our ‘Silly' Levy
Global streaming giant Netflix 'doesn't need us' and a proposal to force them in to funding local shows is 'silly,' says TV production pioneer Dame Julie Christie. Dame Julie, a founding force in reality TV and an internationally successful format producer, is the latest guest on RNZ's multimedia talk show 30 with Guyon Espiner. She is critical of proposals suggested by industry groups and the government that would compel global streamers to invest more in local productions or face bans. More focus needs go on funding ideas and formats that will garner international success, she says. People should not 'stand around and whine, or do silly things like threatening Netflix – 'If you don't make more local productions, we'll turn you off in this country.' You can imagine the public reaction to that.' Christie, whose production company Touchdown helped define and export iconic shows like Treasure Island and Game of Two Halves, said New Zealand needs to be more realistic about its size and global influence. 'Netflix doesn't need us,' she says, dismissing suggestions that a levy on streaming giants would fix the problem. 'And who's going to decide what's made with that revenue? Netflix. I just don't think it will work.' Instead, the country should focus on producing globally appealing content in genres where New Zealand can compete – particularly in unscripted formats and documentaries. 'True crime is the biggest genre in the world … and we're not making it, because you usually can't get it publicly funded,' she says. 'As a result, we're not making what the world wants.' NZ On Air has become too narrowly focused on funding projects that meet too specific cultural criteria, often at the expense of international interest. 'The number one thing you have to have to get funded by New Zealand on Air is to reflect our cultural identity. Now, what is our cultural identity now?' Highlighting her experience producing a docu-series about Auckland's Football Club, Forever FC, Christie says: 'If you go to Auckland FC, it's very different [to NZ On Air criteria]. It's 20 immigrant families within one team. I think that we have to really open up about what we think our culture is.' New Zealand's small population, while a challenge, could be turned into a strength if the industry embraced creating distinctively local stories and tailoring them for international sale. 'We're belly-gazing, basically,' she says. 'We don't think, 'If I adjust this show by 20%, I might be able to sell it to Australia or a smaller American channel.'' NZ On Air needs to adapt to the new global content environment and stop treating cultural identity and commercial potential as mutually exclusive. 'There should be a massive tick if you've got international viability in anything,' she says. Scrambling for cash Christie welcomes the increase in screen production rebates announced in the Budget, but says we should be aiming higher. 'It's working in bringing film production into New Zealand. That provides jobs. The problem is, it's working for wages,' she says. 'It is less than half the cost to make shows here than most places in the world. 'We should be taking huge advantage of that, while creating our own IP … creating things we own.' New Zealand used to have a stronger international outlook, but the industry has become bogged down in local funding battles, Christie says. 'We were leading the world in creating formats in the early 2000s. Now we just don't do it because we're all scrambling to get that little bit of New Zealand On Air money.' * Watch the full interview with Dame Julie Christie on 30 With Guyon Espiner.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
