Iran confirms consular meetings with cleric detained in Saudi Arabia
Gholamreza Ghasemian, a well-known cleric and religious figure in Iran, was arrested in the kingdom on Monday after a video circulated online showing him criticising the Saudi government, Iran's ISNA news agency reported.
Saudi authorities have not confirmed the arrest.
In the footage, Ghasemian, dressed in white pilgrimage robes, accused Saudi leaders of turning the holy Qibla into 'a place for gambling houses, centres of debauchery, and obscene concerts'.
Alireza Bayat, head of Iran's Hajj organisation, said Iranian officials had held three consular meetings with Ghasemian in coordination with the embassy and consulate in Jeddah, ISNA reported.
Judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir demanded his release on Tuesday, calling his arrest 'unjustified and unlawful' while adding that his remarks reflected his personal views.
'Nevertheless, we are obliged to defend the rights of our citizens.'
Abdolfattah Navvab, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's representative for Hajj and pilgrimage affairs, also called the cleric's comments 'his personal opinion'.
'He is an active figure in holy Quranic circles, and expectations from him are naturally higher. That said, we expect the honourable authorities of the host country... to allow him to complete his pilgrimage and return home.'
On Tuesday night, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X that 'Iran in no uncertain terms condemns any attempt to harm Muslim unity, particularly in the spiritual atmosphere of the Hajj.'
He did not mention the cleric's case.
'We are determined to not allow anyone to sabotage relations with our brotherly neighbours, including the progressive path of Iran and Saudi Arabia,' he said.
Saudi Arabia's defence minister, Prince Khalid bin Salman, met with Khamenei during a visit to Iran last month — the first high-level encounter of its kind since diplomatic ties were severed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time
TEHRAN: A senior Iranian official warned Monday that war with Israel could erupt at any moment, describing the current lull after June's 12-day conflict as only a temporary halt. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref. The fighting in June saw Israel bombard Iranian nuclear and military sites, as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes that killed dozens in Israel. The United States announced a halt in fighting on June 24, two days after it joined the war by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But there was no agreement formalising the ceasefire, only an undeclared pause in hostilities. On Sunday, Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario'. 'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' he said in remarks carried by the Shargh daily. 'A ceasefire means ceasing attacks; that could change at any time,' he added. Since then, Iranian officials have insisted the country is not seeking war but is ready for another confrontation. Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons through its atomic programme, a charge Tehran strongly denies.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Independence - dreams deferred?
The writer is a former Secretary to Government, Home and Tribal Affairs Department and a retired IGP. He can be reached at syed_shah94@ Independence Day on 14th August passed amidst jubilation, military parades, patriotic songs and dazzling illuminations. Seventy-eight years on, we continue to mark this day with great fervour. The very word independence evokes a sense of fresh breathing, of casting off the shackles that once bound us. All nations take pride in their independence, for it is supposed to signify dignity, self-determination and collective ownership of destiny. But have we ever paused to ask ourselves: Why did we seek independence? What does it truly mean in the life of a nation? Before 14 August 1947, we had our mosques, offered our prayers and revered our shrines, many of which were - and still are - in India. Millions of Muslims continue to live there today. Our inheritance, marriages and other personal matters were governed under Muslim personal law. Then why was there such a powerful demand for a separate homeland? The leaders of the Pakistan Movement argued that in a Hindu-majority India, Muslims would be politically marginalised and economically disadvantaged. Their voices would be drowned, their talents stifled. They feared that without political autonomy, Muslims would remain underdogs - destined for poverty, exploitation and denial of fundamental rights. The dream was of emancipation from the yoke of subjugation - of a state where the rights of all citizens would be safeguarded, where justice would prevail, and where every individual could flourish regardless of creed, caste or class. Yet, as we look around today, the picture is starkly different from what was envisioned. Extreme poverty engulfs nearly half of our population. The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics and independent economic surveys repeatedly warn of widening inequality. Millions of children remain out of school; malnutrition and stunted growth plague our future generations; the doctor-to-patient ratio remains critically low; and basic health facilities are beyond the reach of the common man. Fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution - freedom of speech, assembly, movement and association - are often curtailed in practice. Political freedoms have been repeatedly subjected to arbitrary restrictions, and dissent is often treated not as a democratic necessity but as a threat to state security. The constitutional journey, too, has been tumultuous. The 1973 Constitution, envisaged as a consensual social contract, has been subjected to repeated suspensions, abrogations and distortions. Rather than serving as the supreme law binding all institutions to democratic norms, it has too often been bent to serve the expediencies of those in power. The 26th Amendment and other constitutional manoeuvres have often reflected power struggles rather than principled reform. The spirit of constitutionalism - the guarantee that no one is above the law - remains fragile. What is even more troubling is the misuse of laws meant for national security. The Anti-Terrorism Act, enacted in the 1990s to combat genuine threats to public safety, has been weaponised against political leaders and parties. Peaceful protests, sit-ins and rallies - hallmarks of a functioning democracy - are painted with the same brush as acts of terrorism. Such practices not only undermine democracy but also corrode public trust in state institutions. Due process of law, a cornerstone of justice, is often ignored. Political opponents are detained without fair trial; investigations become tools of harassment; and the presumption of innocence - a basic principle of law - is eroded. In several recent instances, prolonged detention without conviction has become the norm, effectively punishing individuals before any court has declared them guilty. This is not merely a political problem - it is a deep constitutional wound. In his haunting poem Subh-e-Azadi, written in the aftermath of Partition, Faiz Ahmad Faiz captured the disillusionment of a people who had gained political freedom but not the promised social and economic justice: "This stained light, this night-bitten dawn This is not the dawn we longed for; This is not the dawn for which we set out Hoping to find, somewhere in the desert of the sky, The final destination of the stars' night." Faiz's lament was not a rejection of freedom itself, but a painful recognition that the journey towards true independence - independence from hunger, fear, exploitation and injustice - was far from over. Sadly, his words still resonate today. True independence is not merely the absence of foreign rule; it is the presence of justice, equality and opportunity. It is a system where the weak can challenge the strong and still win, where the law protects without prejudice, and where the state serves its citizens rather than ruling over them. It is a social contract binding rulers to act as trustees of the people's welfare. Seventy-eight years on, we must ask ourselves: Have we honoured that contract? Have we upheld the ideals for which sacrifices were made, lives were lost and dreams were kindled? Or have we replaced one form of subjugation with another - swapping foreign masters for domestic elites who treat the state as their personal estate? Our economic woes, human rights violations and governance failures are not inevitable. They are the product of choices - choices to prioritise short-term political gains over long-term institutional reform; to silence dissent instead of engaging it; to centralise power rather than distribute it. If we continue to drift away from constitutional governance, allow poverty to deepen and permit the erosion of rights, then the celebrations each August will ring hollow. The parades, the songs and the fireworks will be but a veneer over a deeper national unease. Independence will remain an unfulfilled promise - an anthem sung without meaning, a flag raised without purpose. The dream of Pakistan was never simply about a piece of land; it was about creating a society grounded in dignity, justice and equality. Until we realise that vision, Faiz's "night-bitten dawn" will continue to haunt our mornings.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Govt makes trade breakthrough with Iran
Federal Minister for National Food Security & Research, Rana Tanveer Hussain, led Pakistan's delegation at the High-Level Ministerial Meeting on Food Security and Agricultural Cooperation held in Tehran, achieving a major breakthrough in transforming Pakistan-Iran trade relations in the agriculture sector. According to a statement from the Ministry of National Food Security & Research (MNFSR) released on Monday, the minister was accompanied by the director general of the Department of Plant Protection (DPP) and the joint secretary of MNFSR. The meeting was co-chaired by his Iranian counterpart, Gholamreza Nourozi, and attended by senior representatives of key ministries, research institutions, and trade authorities from both countries. Hussain secured Iran's agreement to source a major portion of its rice imports from Pakistan. Both government procurements and private sector imports will now rely primarily on Pakistani rice, opening a consistent and stable export market for Pakistan. Addressing longstanding challenges faced by fruit exporters, the minister obtained firm assurances for resolving hurdles in mango exports, particularly delays in import permits and foreign exchange allocations. With these measures in place, exports of Pakistani mangoes to Iran are set to rise substantially. The minister also prioritised Pakistan's livestock and meat sector in the discussions. Iran agreed to focus on Pakistan as a principal supplier and to ensure that around 60% of its meat procurements are sourced from Pakistan. Similarly, Iran agreed to import large volumes of maize from Pakistan, with a commitment to resolve technical and procedural issues on priority and within the shortest possible time. Recognising the need for science-driven solutions in agriculture, the statement adds that both sides agreed to enhance cooperation between the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC) and Iranian research institutions. This collaboration will cover key areas of mutual advantage, including crop research, livestock breeding, water management, and innovation for farmers' benefit. The minister further secured consensus on a wide range of facilitation measures aimed at easing agricultural trade. These included faster customs clearance, the establishment of warehouses and cold chain systems, and improvements in border infrastructure to ensure perishable commodities reach markets efficiently and in prime quality. Both countries also reaffirmed their commitment to moving towards a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), providing a long-term framework for expanding bilateral agricultural trade. To ensure that these historic decisions are implemented effectively, a Joint Committee on Agricultural Cooperation was formally established. The committee will meet every six months to review progress, resolve emerging issues, and maintain the momentum of cooperation. Speaking at the conclusion of the meeting, Rana Tanveer Hussain thanked the Government of Iran for its constructive approach and warm hospitality. He highlighted the vision of Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif to strengthen trade ties with neighbouring countries and reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to being a reliable partner in food security and agricultural development. He termed the outcome of the meeting a turning point for both countries, creating new opportunities for farmers, traders, and agribusinesses. He also extended a formal invitation to Minister Nourozi to visit Pakistan to further consolidate this positive momentum, reads the statement. Both sides signed a Joint Communiqué at the end of the meeting, reflecting their shared resolve to implement the decisions taken today and opening a new chapter in Pakistan-Iran cooperation in agriculture and trade.
