AI terms skyrocket in company earnings calls
Why it matters: Anything that affects American jobs is likely to become a wedge issue, but communications can help.
The big picture: To say workers are skeptical of AI is putting it mildly.
More than half of Americans are worried about the future impact of AI use in the workplace, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey, and 32% think it will lead to fewer job opportunities.
A recent Gallup survey found that 3 in 4 Americans view AI negatively, and an Ipsos poll concludes that 44% of global workers have concerns about AI's effect on their job security.
Between the lines: This broad misunderstanding and skepticism about AI increases the potential for messaging land mines, especially as new AI-related terms quickly become part of the corporate language.
State of play: The mention of terms like "agentic AI," "AI workforce," "digital labor" and "AI agents" during earnings calls increased 779% in the past year, according to AlphaSense data.
What they're saying: "It's a confusing landscape and we are introducing new vocabulary, which is common in tech comms, but oftentimes requires more background and context," says Mission North co-CEO Tyler Perry.
Now is not the time to communicate with shorthand, says Outcast CEO Becky Porter.
"If a company is having to navigate a reduction in workforce because they are remodeling the way that their company needs to work, they're oftentimes saying, 'We're going to reduce our workforce by X percent, and it's being replaced by AI.' And I think that's leaving a lot of room for misinterpretation," Porter said.
"AI and automation offer incredible opportunities for efficiency but often are perceived by human employees as job replacers, rather than job enhancers. And so I think as communicators, there is a real opportunity to balance the reality with the excitement around AI and its potential."
Reality check: While AI will disrupt the workforce, it is not expected to completely replace humans. Instead, it will augment the work most are already doing.
This is what communicators from all industries will have to explain to investors, lawmakers and especially employees.
"I think that the internal communications is just as important as the external communication, because otherwise, employees may become disinterested in being a part of what their company is doing and where they're headed," Porter said.
The intrigue: While a majority of Americans are still suspicious of AI tools, more established tech companies have a leg up with consumers, according to a new Brand Expectations survey by Mission North.
When it comes to the AI race, Google, Amazon and Microsoft are the most trusted, while Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic are among the least trust, per the survey.
Zoom in: "The narrative was that AI will replace jobs, but it should be about how it will improve life," says Perry. "And to do that, communicators must keep humans at the center of AI storytelling."
What to watch: Corporations previously used jargon-y acronyms (ESG, DEI) when describing sustainability pledges or commitments to inclusion.
These terms were misunderstood by the masses and quickly redefined by the opposition.
AI-related terminology could be next, if not communicated in a consistent and clear way to all audiences.
The bottom line: All communicators — not just those at OpenAI, Google and Microsoft — must figure out the best way to message AI's effect on the workforce.
More at Axios:
Nearly all Americans use AI, though most dislike it, poll shows
Salesforce chief predicts today's CEOs will be the last with all-human workforces
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump's tax law will mostly benefit the rich, while leaving poorer Americans with less, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump 's tax and spending law will result in less income for the poorest Americans while sending money to the richest, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Monday. The CBO estimates that the 10% of poorest Americans will lose roughly $1,200 a year as they experience restrictions on government programs like Medicaid and food assistance, while the richest 10% of Americans will see their income increase by $13,600 from tax cuts. Overall, American households will see more income from the tax cuts in the legislation, including middle income households, but the largest benefit will go to the top 10% of earners. The CBO's report comes as lawmakers are away from Washington, many taking their messages about the bill to voters. Republicans muscled the legislation — deemed 'the big, beautiful bill' by Trump — through Congress in July. Democrats all vehemently opposed the legislation, warning that its tax cuts and spending priorities would come at the expense of vital government aid programs and a ballooning national debt. 'This really is a big, beautiful bill for billionaires, but for the poor and the working class in this country, you are actually poorer,' said Rep. Brendan Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in an MSNBC interview on Monday. Changes to eligibility for government food assistance under the law will impact millions of Americans, the CBO found. Roughly 2.4 million people won't be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program under new work requirements for many recipients. Low-income Americans could also see their income reduced through further restrictions on food aid and other types of assistance included in the law. Already, more than 10 million Americans are expected to be without health insurance by 2034 due to changes to Medicaid under the law. Following release of the report, Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said he took issue with CBO's methodology, repeating criticism he has made in the past. 'CBO has a troubled track record of getting its estimates incorrect and, like Democrats, is biased in favor of more federal spending and higher taxes,' Smith said on social media. 'Don't buy it.' Republicans have been eager to sell the upsides of the legislation — arguing that the tax cuts will spur economic growth — while they are on a monthlong summer break from Washington. But those who have held townhalls in their home districts have often been greeted by an earful from voters and activists. 'Tax the rich,' the crowd in Lincoln, Neb. chanted last week as Republican Rep. Michael Flood attempted to defend the bill. Still, Trump has been undeterred.
Business Upturn
2 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Optimove Reports Reveal 80%+ of US Consumers Have Anxiety Over Tariffs Across 2025 Shopping Seasons
New York, Aug. 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Optimove Insights, the research and analysis arm of Optimove, today released new findings showing that American consumers are increasingly concerned about the impact of tariffs on their spending power. Data from Optimove Insights' surveys of 1,066 US consumers aged 18–65 with household incomes over $75,000 on summer, back-to-school, and pre-holiday shopping periods revealed a consistent theme: more than 81.4% of shoppers are worried about tariffs, and 80.5% are concerned about inflation. Optimove, the creator of Positionless Marketing, frees marketing teams from the limitations of fixed roles, giving every marketer the power to execute any marketing task instantly and independently. Its platform is used by leading global B2C brands. 'These findings are a wake-up call for marketers,' said Pini Yakuel, CEO of Optimove. 'Now more than ever, consumers feel economic pressures. Marketers need agility and empathy to respond in real time. Brands must acknowledge financial anxiety through supportive, empathetic messaging.' Survey results also revealed that while consumers are anxious, many remain willing to spend if presented with value and trust-driven engagement. Irrelevant messaging leads to fatigue and missed opportunities. Yakuel added, 'Brands that cannot listen to consumers' needs and wants and respond in real time will appear tone-deaf. Positionless Marketing helps eliminate these inefficiencies by enabling smarter, more personalized engagement at scale.' About Optimove Optimove, the creator of Positionless Marketing, frees marketing teams from the limitations of fixed roles, giving every marketer the power to execute any marketing task instantly and independently. Positionless Marketing has been proven to improve campaign efficiency by 88%, allowing marketing teams to create more personalized engagement with existing customers. Optimove is recognized as the Visionary Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for Multichannel Marketing Hubs. Being a visionary leader is a hallmark of Optimove. It was the first CRM Marketing Platform to natively embed AI with the ability to predict customer migrations between lifecycle stages in 2012. Today, its comprehensive AI-powered suite is at the leading edge of empowering marketers to optimize workflows from Insight to Creation and through Orchestration. Optimove provides industry-specific and use-case solutions for leading consumer brands globally. For more information, go to About Optimove Insights
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Republicans, Democrats alike exhort Trump: Keep security pact with Australia and UK alive
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. lawmakers from both parties are urging the Trump administration to maintain a three-way security partnership designed to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines — a plea that comes as the Pentagon reviews the agreement and considers the questions it has raised about the American industrial infrastructure's shipbuilding capabilities. Two weeks ago, the Defense Department announced it would review AUKUS, the 4-year-old pact signed by the Biden administration with Australia and the United Kingdom. The announcement means the Republican administration is looking closely at a partnership that many believe is critical to the U.S. strategy to push back China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. The review is expected to be completed in the fall. 'AUKUS is essential to strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific and advancing the undersea capabilities that will be central to ensuring peace and stability," Republican Rep. John Moolenaar of Michigan and Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois wrote in a July 22 letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Moolenaar chairs the House panel on China and Krishnamoorthi is its top Democrat. The review comes as the Trump administration works to rebalance its global security concerns while struggling with a hollowed-out industrial base that has hamstrung U.S. capabilities to build enough warships. The review is being led by Elbridge Colby, the No. 3 Pentagon official, who has expressed skepticism about the partnership. 'If we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great. But if we can't, that becomes a very difficult problem," Colby said during his confirmation hearing in March. 'This is getting back to restoring our defense industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies." US cannot build enough ships As part of the $269 billion AUKUS partnership, the United States will sell three to five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, with the first delivery scheduled as soon as 2032. The U.S. and the U.K. would help Australia design and build another three to five attack submarines to form an eight-boat force for Australia. A March report by the Congressional Research Service warned that the lack of U.S. shipbuilding capacities, including workforce shortage and insufficient supply chains, is jeopardizing the much-celebrated partnership. If the U.S. should sell the vessels to Australia, the U.S. Navy would have a shortage of attack submarines for two decades, the report said. The Navy has been ordering two boats per year in the last decade, but U.S. shipyards have been only producing 1.2 Virginia-class subs a year since 2022, the report said. 'The delivery pace is not where it needs to be" to make good on the first pillar of AUKUS, Admiral Daryl Caudle, nominee for the Chief of Naval Operations, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. Australia has invested $1 billion in the U.S. submarine industrial base, with another $1 billion to be paid before the end of this year. It has agreed to contribute a total of $3 billion to uplift the U.S. submarine base, and it has sent both industry personnel to train at U.S. shipyards and naval personnel for submarine training in the United States. "Australia was clear that we would make a proportionate contribution to the United States industrial base,' an Australian defense spokesperson said in July. 'Australia's contribution is about accelerating U.S. production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia's future Virginia-class submarines.' The three nations have also jointly tested communication capabilities with underwater autonomous systems, Australia's defense ministry said on July 23. Per the partnership, the countries will co-develop other advanced technologies, from undersea to hypersonic capabilities. At the recent Aspen Security Forum, Kevin Rudd, the Australian ambassador to the United States, said his country is committed to increasing defense spending to support its first nuclear-powered sub program, which would also provide 'massively expensive full maintenance repair facilities" for the U.S. Indo-Pacific fleet based in Western Australia. Rudd expressed confidence that the two governments 'will work our way through this stuff.' AUKUS called 'crucial to American deterrence' Bruce Jones, senior fellow with the Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy and Technology, told The Associated Press that the partnership, by positioning subs in Western Australia, is helping arm the undersea space that is 'really crucial to American deterrence and defense options in the Western Pacific.' 'The right answer is not to be content with the current pace of submarine building. It's to increase the pace," Jones said. Jennifer Parker, who has served more than 20 years with the Royal Australian Navy and founded Barrier Strategic Advisory, said it should not be a zero-sum game. 'You might sell one submarine to Australia, so you have one less submarine on paper. But in terms of the access, you have the theater of choice from operating from Australia, from being able to maintain your submarines from Australia," Parker said. 'This is not a deal that just benefits Australia." Defense policy is one of the few areas where Republican lawmakers have pushed back against the Trump administration, but their resolve is being tested with the Pentagon's review of AUKUS. So far, they have joined their Democratic colleagues in voicing support for the partnership. They said the U.S. submarine industry is rebounding with congressional appropriations totaling $10 billion since 2018 to ensure the U.S. will have enough ships to allow for sales to Australia. "There is a little bit of mystification about the analysis done at the Pentagon,' Kaine said, adding that 'maybe (what) the analysis will say is: We believe this is a good thing.'
