Surge in jailed kids as courts refuse bail
More than 230 children were in custody in NSW in June, an increase of 34 per cent since the same month in 2023, the state's crime statistics bureau said.
It's a reversal in a trend of declining numbers of children in detention, but the figure is still lower than it used to be, the bureau's executive director Jackie Fitzgerald told AAP.
"Over the longer term, we have had much higher rates of kids in custody than we have now," she said.
More than 300 children were in custody in June 2015.
The majority of children currently in NSW jails have not been convicted, with only 66 children in custody as a result of a sentencing.
More than 70 per cent of the children in jail are on remand while they go through the court process.
But the increase is not necessarily driven by laws placing additional tests on bail, suggesting magistrates are increasingly inclined to refuse bail.
"There has been a tightening up of access to bail," Ms Fitzgerald said.
"But it seems to be beyond just the offences that were targeted or the particular circumstances that were targeted under the legislative change."
The state government introduced laws limiting access to bail for children aged 14 and over accused of break-and-enter and motor vehicle theft offences while bailed on similar charges.
The government has also clamped down on bail for accused domestic violence offenders.
"We have had a lot of conversation about bail and remand in NSW, both in the adult space and the youth space," Ms Fitzgerald said.
"Whether it's that, or it's something that magistrates are seeing in the court, there has been a move towards more serious bail determinations for young people irrespective of those legislative changes."
The increase is particularly concerning for Indigenous children and conflicts with Closing the Gap targets, Ms Fitzgerald added.
About eight per cent of children in NSW are Indigenous, but that proportion rises to almost 60 per cent for those in jail.
Greens MP Sue Higginson said the money spent locking up children would be better spent on social services and programs that could divert them from the criminal justice system.
"Locking up kids is the most criminogenic thing we can do to them," she said.
"It increases the likelihood of reoffending, entrenches disadvantage and drives higher crime rates."
NSW has the most people in custody in Australia but is also its most populous state.
The Northern Territory has the highest proportion of its population in jail while Victoria has the lowest, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data.
13YARN 13 92 76
Lifeline 13 11 14
Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Spurned doctor seeks legal advice after Crisafulli government U-turn
Would-be chief health officer Dr Krispin Hajkowicz is considering his legal options after the Crisafulli government's U-turn on appointing him as Queensland's chief medico. Hajkowicz is seeking legal advice after his appointment as Dr John Gerrard's permanent successor was abruptly scuttled by the government, despite his selection through a merit-based process run by recruitment agency HardyGroup. It was not the first time Hajkowicz had been selected as CHO – the former Labor government appointed him to the role in 2021, but he decided not to take up the role just days from his official start date, citing personal reasons. A government spokesperson said that decision in 2021 was the reason his appointment in 2025 had been vetoed. 'On October 5, 2021, Dr Hajkowicz was announced as the State's Chief Health Officer. He resigned from the role three weeks later,' the spokesperson said. Loading 'The government is not confident that the stability and longevity Queenslanders expect in this role has yet been met and the recruitment process is ongoing.' But there had been suggestions a Save Victoria Park sign displayed at his house, along with historical Greens corflutes at the address, had also played a role – suggestions the LNP government has denied. On Friday, deputy Labor opposition leader Cameron Dick – a former health minister – said the government was putting politics ahead of public health.
