CNN Panelists Go to War Over Trump's Meeting With Putin: ‘Don't Put Words in My Mouth!'
The bedlam began on NewsNight With Abby Phillip when conservative analyst Scott Jennings—who said he was prepared to give Trump some 'latitude' to talk to Putin—was challenged by commentator Tara Setmayer over his claim that Trump has 'solved, like, seven conflicts this year.'
'What reality do you live in?' Jennings said, heckling Setmayer—the co-founder of the Seneca Project and former Republican who has vocally criticized Trump—as she tried to make her point. As Setmayer said that Trump appears to have 'an affinity for Vladimir Putin,' Jennings cut in with: 'Lying!'
His response irked Setmayer, who fired back: 'No, you're not going to get away with calling me a liar.'
'I know that's like the line you like to throw out, but I'm not lying, nobody's lying about anything. You can ask the countries who were involved in this whether Donald Trump actually solved those conflicts or whether it was pomp and circumstance.'
She also said Trump had been a 'useful idiot for Russia for years,' prompting right-wing talk show host Ben Ferguson to cut in with: 'Is Biden a useful idiot?'
Trying to restore order, host Abby Phillip asked Ferguson about Trump's approach to negotiations with Putin over the Ukraine war, which Trump had said he could end in 24 hours when he returned to office.
'[Trump] wants to be a peacemaker. He wants the Nobel Peace Prize, that whole thing,' Phillip said. 'And this has been elusive largely because Vladimir Putin is not that interested in the deal. He's not. So is Trump going into this a little bit naive, thinking that Putin is actually ready to deal when what he really wants is complete victory?'
'This is the part that I think is really just sad, is that there's people sitting at this table who clearly want this to be a failure,' Ferguson said.
'Where are those people?' asked Setmayer, to which Ferguson responded: 'I think you're one of them.'
Setmayer reacted furiously to the accusation, telling the guest: 'What? Don't you put words in my mouth. I never said that. We want him to negotiate from a position of strength, not bringing a war criminal onto U.S. soil, and-'
Ferguson tried to cut her off and get back on track, but instead found his confrontational tone thrown back in his face. 'Oh, I'm not allowed to interrupt you, but you can interrupt me and overtalk?' Setmayer asked. Phillip then intervened to end the exchange because of all the 'bickering.'
Trump has had limited success in his self-appointed role as a 'peacemaker' throughout his second term.
Trump and his supporters have cited his role in diplomatic efforts between Thailand and Cambodia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, and Egypt and Ethiopia. The president's claim that he helped negotiate an end to the India-Pakistan conflict has been dismissed by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and his attempts to impose ceasefires in Ukraine and Gaza have fallen apart almost immediately.
The president will meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine, despite the presence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the negotiating table still being uncertain.
Speaking to reporters about the meeting on Monday, Trump said: 'We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine,' claiming the two countries would engage in 'some swapping, changes in land.'
Russia currently occupies large areas of Ukraine, including much of its eastern territories and the Crimea peninsula. Putin has kept up his attacks on Ukraine as the summit with Trump approaches.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
The Reason Economists Are Worried About Trump's Labor Statistics Choices
How many commissioners of the Bureau of Labor Statistics can you name? For the vast majority of people (and even most economists) the answer would be zero. And for good reason. While several highly accomplished and effective people have served in that role over the years, it is fundamentally about making sure the plumbing of our data infrastructure is working. Most of us just accept that the data is the best possible estimate of the economy — just as we do not think much about where our water comes from, we simply drink it — and instead argue about much harder and less objective questions, like whether inflation is transitory or job growth is trending toward recession. Unfortunately, that could change if the Senate confirms President Trump's pick, E.J. Antoni, to be the next B.L.S. commissioner. When Mr. Trump abruptly fired the B.L.S. commissioner after negative jobs number revisions earlier this month, he wrote on social media that he would find someone 'much more competent and qualified' for the post. He is proposing replacing Erika McEntarfer, a highly respected economist with decades of experience working at the U.S. Census Bureau and elsewhere, with a partisan favored for the job by Steve Bannon. Mr. Antoni's posts that have shown apparent misunderstandings of import prices and the baby boom retirement have gotten the most attention and criticism, along with his statement before the nomination that the monthly jobs report should be suspended. But even more egregious, as Alan Cole, an economist the right-leaning Tax Foundation, has pointed out, is that in October 2024 Mr. Antoni took the time to publish a report that purported to find that 'the American economy has actually been in recession since 2022.' This claim was based on a concept of 'adjusted real' disposable income, which was down about 2 percent from 2019 to 2024 — in contrast to the official data, which showed real disposable income up 12 percent over this period. The problem was his measure effectively double-counted housing inflation, making the inflation rate artificially higher and growth artificially lower. Mr. Antoni's selection has done something I have rarely seen, which is to unite a number of economists and policy wonks from across the political spectrum. The American Enterprise Institute's Stan Veuger told The Washington Post that 'he is utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets.' Similar sentiments were echoed by people affiliated with conservative and libertarian think tanks, in a Wall Street Journal editorial and a National Review article. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Appeals court allows Trump administration to cut billions in foreign aid
Washington — A divided panel of appeals court judges ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can suspend or terminate billions of dollars of congressionally appropriated funding for foreign aid. Two of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that grant recipients challenging the freeze did not meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction that restored the flow of money. In January, on the first day of his second term in the White House, President Trump issued an executive order directing the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development to freeze spending on foreign aid. After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. The appeal court's majority partially vacated Ali's order. Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Gregory Katsas concluded that the plaintiffs did not have a valid legal basis for the court to hear their claims. The ruling was not on the merits of whether the government unconstitutionally infringed on Congress' spending powers. "The parties also dispute the scope of the district court's remedy but we need not resolve it ... because the grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event," Henderson wrote. Judge Florence Pan, who dissented, said the Supreme Court has held "in no uncertain terms" that the president does not have the authority to disobey laws for policy reasons. "Yet that is what the majority enables today," Pan wrote. "The majority opinion thus misconstrues the separation-of-powers claim brought by the grantees, misapplies precedent, and allows Executive Branch officials to evade judicial review of constitutionally impermissible actions." The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Mr. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals. Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden.
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
Mexico says 26 capos extradited to US were requested by Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico sent 26 alleged cartel figures to face justice in the United States because the Trump administration requested them and Mexico did not want them to continue running their illicit businesses from Mexican prisons, officials said Wednesday. The mass transfer was not, however, part of wider negotiations as Mexico seeks to avoid higher tariffs threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump, they said. 'These transfers are not only a strategic measure to ensure public safety, but also reflect a firm determination to prevent these criminals from continuing to operate from within prisons and to break up their networks of influence,' Mexican Security Minister Omar García Harfuch said in a news conference on Wednesday. The 26 prisoners handed over to American authorities on Tuesday included figures aligned with the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel among others. They were wanted by American authorities for their roles in drug trafficking and other crimes. It comes months after 29 other cartel leaders were sent to the U.S. in February. In the exchange, the U.S. Justice Department promised it would not seek the death penalty against any of the 55 people included in the two transfers, which experts say may help avoid any violent outburst by the cartels in response. Authorities said the operation involved nearly a thousand law enforcement officers, 90 vehicles and a dozen military aircraft. Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said earlier Wednesday that the transfers were 'sovereign decisions,' but the move comes as the Mexican leader faces mounting pressure by the Trump administration to crack down on cartels and fentanyl production. García Harfuch also confirmed Wednesday that a U.S. government drone — non-military — was flying over central Mexico, but at the request of Mexican authorities as part of an ongoing investigation. So far, Sheinbaum has tried to show the Trump administration a greater willingness to pursue the cartels than her predecessor — a change that has been acknowledged by U.S. officials — and continued to slow migration to the U.S. border, in an effort to avoid the worst of Trump's tariff threats. Two weeks ago, the two leaders spoke and agreed to give their teams another 90 days to negotiate to avoid threatened 30% tariffs on imports from Mexico. 'Little by little, Mexico is following through with this demand by the Americans to deliver drug capos,' said Mexican security analyst David Saucedo. 'It's buying (the Mexican government) time.' Saucedo said the Mexican government has been able to avoid a burst of violence by cartels – a reaction often seen when capos are captured – in part, because Ovidio Guzmán, a son of infamous capo Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, showed it's possible to negotiate with U.S. prosecutors. Ovidio Guzmán pleaded guilty last month to drug trafficking and other charges and hopes for a lighter sentence in exchange for his cooperation. But Saucedo warned that if such mass prisoner transfers continue, the Latin American country is bound to see another outburst of violence in the future.
