logo
Canada and Australia have decided to become citadels of wokeism

Canada and Australia have decided to become citadels of wokeism

The Print05-05-2025

Canadians have always been comfortable with this ultra-left liberal position. Now, they have been able to comfortably combine it with a dash of hyper-nationalism, thanks to Trump's needling of their leaders and their policies. Geographically distant observers like this writer see nothing so frightening about Trump's amusing positions. In fact, they seem both logical and obvious. But then when hyper-patriotic and hyper-matriotic media anchors dominate, there is no space for down-to-earth logic or benign amusement. Net-net, the rightward shift of the US has been met with a reaffirmation of Canada's impractical, utopian Left ideology.
Canadians affirmed that they are a left-of-centre people. Despite the disastrous and inequitable carbon tax, the emasculation of civil rights during Covid and a fanatical pursuit of climate hysteria in a resource-rich land, Canadians were willing to tolerate—and even welcome back—the Left, albeit under a new leader. Mark Carney is not from the traditional Left. He has probably never visited a factory or a farm, let alone worked in one. Elite boardrooms and transnational executive suites are his natural habitat. He represents the New Left with its neo-Malthusian weltanschauung .
The most common words in election analysis are: trend, sweep, upset, and so on. Let us consider three elections in largely English-speaking countries: Canada, Australia, and Britain. The first two were parliamentary elections, while the third consisted of several local elections and an important by-election. The rightward shift in US politics is believed by most observers to have influenced all these elections.
Australia's paradox
Australia is quite similar. The Labor government has spent its years apologising for the racism—real, exaggerated, and sometimes imagined—of their country's founders. It has waffled on anti-Semitism in the streets of Sydney and while keeping it under the radar, its partiality for China cannot be missed. It has allowed and even encouraged universities and state-controlled media to become citadels of wokeism. Australia, too, is on a neo-Malthusian crusade engineered by the Holy Climate Inquisition. Yet, the otherwise sensible, cricket-loving Australians have chosen to reaffirm their faith in the Left.
In Australia, there was some hope that the rightward shift in US politics would bring about positive change. Unfortunately, the Left has succeeded in promoting itself as anti-Trump—or at least as the side not pro-Trump—and this seems to have gone down well with voters. One can only pity today's voters and their children as their once prosperous and free country continues down a path toward genteel poverty and cancel-culture totalitarianism. One hates to see these developments in purely imperialist or racial terms. But sometimes one must abandon political correctness. In a few years, Australia might become the first white Anglo-Saxon country to willingly serve as a subservient outpost of the Han empire.
Britain bucks the trend
British elections, on the other hand, have been markedly positive. This writer had given up on Britain when the colourless, odourless, tasteless Keir Starmer came to power. It got worse when it became clear that Starmer was a closet, or perhaps even open, Islamist, as he resisted calls for a proper inquiry into the grooming-raping scandal across large parts of Britain. Starmer is also wrecking what remains of Britain's industrial competitiveness by listening to his in-house climate ayatollahs.
And then came Nigel Farage and the Reform Party. One could write a new Ode to the West Wind, as Reform has echoed the right sentiments from across the Atlantic. Reform has highlighted the destructive potential of uncontrolled immigration and the systematic discrimination by police, prosecutors, and courts (all gone woke with a vengeance) targeting native white Britons. Clearly, Reform has benefited from being pro-Trump. That is the demonstrable difference between the voters of Canada and Australia and those in Britain's middle and working classes.
The British need to be congratulated. Unfortunately and unhappily for them, they must spend a few more years sipping from the poisoned chalice of Starmerian Labour. But there is light at the end of the tunnel. The upward trajectory of Reform may yet lead them out of woke and neo-Malthusian traps. I am not sure Farage will read this column. Perhaps some UK-based readers of ThePrint can forward this article to his office and ask that the paragraph below be shared with him.
Dear Mr Farage: in De Quincey's essay on Taking the News of Victory on a Stagecoach, he portrays a period when Britain and its Iberian allies were fighting Napoleonic France. Even small British successes were celebrated as big victories. Coachmen driving through Britain would shout 'Salamanca Forever; Badajoz Forever'. Today, Mr Farage, you are entitled to shout, 'Runcorn Forever; Helsby Forever; Lincolnshire Forever'. This writer and many others in lands distant from yours wish you all the best in your fight to stay the right course (right in more ways than one) and preserve your nation's identity and heritage. Those of us engaged in the struggle to preserve our authentic identities are with you. To end: Elections forever! By-elections forever!
Jaithirth 'Jerry' Rao is a retired entrepreneur who lives in Lonavala. He has published three books: 'Notes from an Indian Conservative', 'The Indian Conservative', and 'Economist Gandhi'. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump proceeds with maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests
Trump proceeds with maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests

Business Standard

time8 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump proceeds with maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests

Trump called up the California National Guard over Gov. Newsom's objections-the first time in 60 years a president has done so-and is sending active-duty troops to support them AP Washington Donald Trump made no secret of his willingness to exert a maximalist approach to enforcing immigration laws and keeping order as he campaigned to return to the White House. The fulfillment of that pledge is now on full display in Los Angeles. The president has put hundreds of National Guard troops on the streets to quell protests over his administration's immigration raids, a deployment that state and city officials say has only inflamed tensions. Trump called up the California National Guard over the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom the first time in 60 years a president has done so and is deploying active-duty troops to support the guard. By overriding Newsom, Trump is already going beyond what he did to respond to Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when he warned he could send troops to contain demonstrations that turned violent if governors in the states did not act to do so themselves. Trump said in September of that year that he "can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor" and that "we have to go by the laws." But now, the past and current president is moving swiftly, with little internal restraint to test the bounds of his executive authority in order to deliver on his promise of mass deportations. What remains to be seen is whether Americans will stand by him once it's operationalised nationwide, as Trump looks to secure billions from Congress to dramatically expand the country's detention and deportation operations. For now, Trump is betting that they will. "If we didn't do the job, that place would be burning down," Trump told reporters Monday, speaking about California. "I feel we had no choice. ... I don't want to see what happened so many times in this country." A crisis of Trump's own making The protests began to unfold on Friday as federal authorities arrested immigrants in several locations throughout the sprawling city, including in the fashion district of Los Angeles and at a Home Depot. The anger over the administration's actions quickly spread, with protests in Chicago and Boston as demonstrations in the southern California city also continued on Monday. But Trump and other administration officials remained unbowed, capitalising on the images of burning cars, graffiti and Mexican flags which, while not dominant, started to become the defining images of the unrest to bolster their law-and-order cause. Leaders in the country's most populous state were similarly defiant. California officials moved on Monday to sue the Trump administration, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops "trampled" on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorised by Trump. The state's senior Democratic senator, Alex Padilla, said in an interview that "this is absolutely a crisis of Trump's own making." "There are a lot of people who are passionate about speaking up for fundamental rights and respecting due process, but the deployment of National Guard only serves to escalate tensions and the situation," Padilla told The Associated Press. "It's exactly what Donald Trump wanted to do." Padilla slammed the deployment as "counterproductive" and said the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department was not advised ahead of the federalisation of the National Guard. His office has also pushed the Pentagon for a justification on the deployment, and "as far as we're told, the Department of Defense isn't sure what the mission is here," Padilla added. Candidate Trump previewed immigration strategy during campaign Much of this was predictable. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump pledged to conduct the largest domestic deportation operation in American history to expel millions of immigrants in the country without legal status. He often praised President Dwight D Eisenhower's military-style immigration raids, and the candidate and his advisers suggested they would have broad power to deploy troops domestically to enact Trump's far-reaching immigration and public safety goals. Trump's speedy deployment in California of troops against those whom the president has alluded to as "insurrectionists" on social media is a sharp contrast to his decision to issue no order or formal request for National Guard troops during the insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, despite his repeated and false assertions that he had made such an offer. Trump is now surrounded by officials who have no interest in constraining his power. In 2020, Trump's then-Pentagon chief publicly rebuked Trump's threat to send in troops using the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that empowers the president to use the military within the US and against American citizens. Current Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth signalled support on his personal X account for deploying troops to California, writing, "The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE," referring to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. The Defence Department said on Monday it is deploying about 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to support National Guard troops already on the ground to respond to the protests. White House responds to an incompetent' governor Protesters over the weekend blocked off a major freeway and burned self-driving cars as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades in clashes that encompassed several downtown blocks in Los Angeles and led to several dozen arrests. Much of the city saw no violence. But the protests prompted Trump to issue the directive Saturday mobilising the California National Guard over Newsom's objections. The president and his top immigration aides accused the governor of mismanaging the protests, with border czar Tom Homan asserting in a Fox News interview on Monday that Newsom stoked anti-ICE sentiments and waited two days to declare unlawful assembly in the city. Trump told Newsom in a phone call on Friday evening to get the situation in Los Angeles under control, a White House official said. It was only when the administration felt Newsom was not restoring order in the city and after Trump watched the situation escalate for 24 hours and White House officials saw imagery of federal law enforcement officers with lacerations and other injuries that the president moved to deploy the Guard, according to the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations. "He's an incompetent governor," Trump said on Monday. "Look at the job he's doing in California. He's destroying one of our great states." Local law enforcement officials said Los Angeles police responded as quickly as they could once the protests erupted, and Newsom repeatedly asserted that state and city authorities had the situation under control. "Los Angeles is no stranger to demonstrations and protests and rallies and marches," Padilla said. "Local law enforcement knows how to handle this and has a rapport with the community and community leaders to be able to allow for that." The aggressive moves prompted blowback from some of Trump's erstwhile allies. Ileana Garcia, a Florida state senator who in 2016 founded the group Latinas for Trump and was hired to direct Latino outreach, called the recent escalation "unacceptable and inhumane." "I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens, but what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal," said Garcia, referring to Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff and key architect of Trump's immigration crackdown. The tactics could be just a preview to what more could come from the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. GOP lawmakers are working to pass a massive tax-and-border package that includes billions to hire thousands of new officers for Border Patrol and for ICE. The goal, under the Trump-backed plan, is to remove 1 million immigrants without status annually and house 100,000 people in immigration detention centres.

Kaleshwaram a viable project: Harish
Kaleshwaram a viable project: Harish

Hans India

time12 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Kaleshwaram a viable project: Harish

Hyderabad: Bharat Rashtra Samithi senior leader and former irrigation minister T Harish Rao explained the Justice Ghose Commission of inquiry, which is probing the alleged irregularities in the execution of the Kaleshwaram project, the economic viability of the biggest lift irrigation scheme in the state. The senior BRS leader and then irrigation minister deposed before the Commission on Monday and submitted documentary evidence on how the Kaleshwaram project was designed to generate revenues along the water flow areas, which could be used to repay loans taken from various financial institutions for the construction of the project. Harish Rao briefed Justice Ghose that the then BRS government had borrowed loans to construct the project, which included barrages and reservoirs, by letting financial institutions know about the revenue stream through supply of abundant water to industries for commercial needs. He elaborated the need for such revenue generation to repay the loans to avoid putting the burden on the state government. However, the Covid-19 pandemic created trouble in implementing the plans relating to revenue generation. The BRS leader said that the project was built to also meet the growing irrigation needs as well as drinking water purpose for Hyderabad city. When the Commission posed a volley of questions on the project design, water release in the barrages and maintenance of the structures, Harish Rao sought to put the record straight by presenting government orders as well as Central Water Commission and Technical Committee reports. Since the Maharashtra government was opposed to Tummidihetti, he said that the BRS government finalized Medigadda barrage in tune with the recommendations made by Technical Committee and retired engineers' reports. Harish Rao also narrated the purpose of the constitution of the Cabinet Sub Committee with T Nageswara Rao, E Rajendar and him, stating it which was confined to the study of increasing irrigation facility in the state and that the committee had no role in the Kaleshwaram project. Filling the barrages with water was purely a technical issue and the engineers were responsible for it. The BRS leader said that engineers developed the plan for the entire project based on the technical reports. Relevant WAPCOS reports and CWC letters were placed on record. Speaking to newsmen after 40 minutes of open court questioning by the Commission, Harish pointed out that Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy recently laid the foundation for the Gandamalla Project, which will receive water from the Mallanna Sagar -- a key reservoir of the Kaleshwaram project. Even the proposed Musi River beautification and Hyderabad drinking water supply projects were dependent on water from the Mallanna Sagar. Coco Cola unit is proof Harish Rao told the Commission that Coca Cola Company had set up a soft drink manufacturing unit in Siddipet by utilizing water released from the Kaleshwaram project and it was a testimony to the economic viability of the lift irrigation project. Revenue generated from vending Kaleshwaram water to the industries could be a big source of revenue. The previous government had come up with a plan to promote industries all along the water flowing areas in the Kaleshwaram.

From red flags to American flags: Trump keeps Tesla, Musk keeps quiet; 'big, beautiful' feud over?
From red flags to American flags: Trump keeps Tesla, Musk keeps quiet; 'big, beautiful' feud over?

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

From red flags to American flags: Trump keeps Tesla, Musk keeps quiet; 'big, beautiful' feud over?

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (R) Just days after calling for US President Donald Trump 's impeachment, Elon Musk is now softening his stance, offering indirect praise and patriotic emojis for the administration, in a dramatic shift after what had been dubbed the 'big, beautiful breakup' between the two giants. The rapid shift in tone comes after a public and messy split between the tech mogul and the US president. Last week, Musk's social media posts took direct aim at Trump, accusing him, without evidence, of appearing in documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and demanding his removal from office. But by the weekend, many of those posts had vanished. As clashes between demonstrators and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers escalated in LA, Musk threw his weight behind the administration's firm stance on immigration enforcement. He reposted Vice President JD Vance's message that the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence,' adding a string of American flags. Musk has long voiced support for closed borders and stricter immigration controls, positions closely aligned with Trump's own policies. Tech billionaire also amplified a post from Trump on Truth Social demanding apologies from California governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass over the chaos in the city. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'They should apologize to the people of Los Angeles,' Trump wrote, as images of burning cars and violent confrontations flooded social media. In a gesture that signals a possible thaw in tensions, President Trump announced Monday that he would not sell the Tesla he purchased from Elon Musk—despite their recent public fallout. The car, acquired during friendlier times as a symbolic move to promote American-made electric vehicles, was reportedly intended for White House use rather than personal driving. Following the clash between the two, there had been speculation that Trump might sell or give away the vehicle. However, the President clarified he had no plans to part with it. 'I could move it around,' Trump said, 'but I won't sell the car.' He also confirmed he had no intention of cutting ties with Musk's Starlink satellite service, further suggesting that a complete break between the two may not be in the cards. In another surprising turn, Musk re-followed White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, one of the architects of the administration's immigration policy -- after unfollowing him during last week's feud. The move stirred speculation, especially given that Miller's wife, Katie Miller, recently left her White House post to work with Musk full-time. The Millers had been regulars at Musk's social gatherings, and their proximity to both camps has made them the subject of White House gossip amid the falling out. Katie Miller declined to comment. Musk also moved to quash viral rumours that had fanned the flames of the feud. When his AI chatbot Grok seemingly confirmed a fake post showing Musk telling Miller 'Just like I took your wife,' Musk replied, 'No, it's fake ffs I never posted this.' Despite the apparent thaw, Musk has not fully abandoned criticism. Over the weekend, he took more subtle jabs at the president's sweeping domestic policy proposal, nicknamed the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill'—which recently passed the House and is now under Senate review. Wall Street, however, seems to be welcoming the détente. Tesla's stock rebounded 4.6% on Monday, though it remains below levels seen before last week's dramatic fallout. 'While we do not expect Trump and Musk to be back to their Mar-a-Lago connected at the hip days, it would not be a surprise to see Trump and Musk slowly mend the fences (with the help of intermediaries behind closed doors) over the coming months,' wrote WedBush analyst Dan Ives. 'At the end of the day Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons including a green light on a federal framework for autonomous [vehicles]. ' On Monday afternoon, Trump himself struck a more conciliatory tone when asked about Musk. 'We had a good relationship, I wish him well, very well,' the president told reporters at the White House. But when asked if he would answer Musk's call, Trump paused: 'I haven't really thought about it actually. I would imagine he wants to speak to me, I would think so.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store