New by-law aims to loosen building regulations for 'micro housing developers'
Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis
Image: Supplied
The City of Cape Town yesterday passed a major amendment to its Municipal Planning By-law, aimed at unlocking affordable rental housing in informal and lower-income neighbourhoods — a move Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis described as 'a watershed moment.'
The amendment introduces a new land-use right that allows homeowners in 194 designated communities to legally build affordable rental units on their properties. These areas have seen rapid densification over the past decade, particularly through backyarder dwellings and informal structures.
While the Democratic Alliance (DA), which holds a majority in Council, voted in support of the amendment, it faced opposition from several parties, including the EFF, Al Jama-ah, the National Coloured Congress (NCC), GOOD, Cape Exit, the PAC, and the Freedom Front Plus. The ANC abstained.
In his address to Council, Hill-Lewis stressed the scale of the challenge: '1.2 million of our fellow residents live in informal structures in Cape Town,' he said.
'For those of us who did not grow up in townships, or in a backyard, it is hard to imagine what that means. To live with bitter cold and constant damp in winter, and scorching heat and constant threat of fire in summer.'
Hill-Lewis criticised the national government's free housing programme, known as Breaking New Ground, for failing to meet rising demand. 'Budgets are simply too small, the need too vast. Only a lucky few thousand per year, those waiting the very longest, will get a totally free house, while hundreds of thousands remain on the list. It is important that the public understand that.'
While acknowledging that economic growth and job creation remain the only sustainable long-term solution, Hill-Lewis emphasised the need for action now: 'We also can't wait for a faster growing economy. While that is undoubtedly the only sustainable long term solution, we also need a plan now.'
That plan, he said, is the by-law amendment.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'The amendments to the Municipal Planning By-law that we will vote on today will do more than any other programme, in any city, to help many more people make the leap from informal housing to dignified, affordable homes.'
The by-law now enables homeowners in selected communities to build rental units legally and safely, with connections to municipal water, sanitation, and electricity. These developments will also need to meet National Building Regulations.
Hill-Lewis acknowledged that micro-developers in townships have already been meeting housing demand at a scale the State cannot match: 'The fact is that micro-developers in lower-income communities are already getting on with meeting housing demand by building many thousands more units every year than the State could ever possibly hope to deliver.'
He described the City's role not as one of obstruction, but of enablement: 'Now we are playing our proper role – not standing in the way, but enabling this form of housing delivery, driven by people's own enterprise, ingenuity, and investment.'
The by-law also includes support measures, such as: Pre-approved building plans and development charge discounts;
A pipeline of 12,000 affordable housing units on well-located land;
South Africa's first Land Discount Guidelines, allowing for discounted city-owned land to be used for social housing;
Utility discounts for approved social housing projects.
While praising the amendment's potential, Hill-Lewis also raised a broader point about transformation in the housing market: 'For so long, property development has been an industry dominated by wealthy established developers who mainly develop in expensive suburbs… but today we are also blowing open the property development industry for thousands of new entrants – new property developers in the townships and in so many other areas.'
He also committed to streamlining approval processes and clamping down on unlawful construction.
'This amendment also empowers communities, by greatly improving public participation in planning applications, and giving the City real teeth for the first time to stop illegal building work.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
36 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Axed deputy DTIC minister, Whitfield, says he was sidelined by Tau for last 6 months
JOHANNESBURG - Fired deputy minister of trade and industry, Andrew Whitfield, said that he had spent the past six months being sidelined by Minister Parks Tau. Whitfield, who said that he received no reason for his axing by President Cyril Ramaphosa, insisted that he acted in good faith during his time in government. He told 702 that he assumed he was fired because of a trip he took to Washington on behalf of his political party, the Democratic Alliance (DA), in March. Whitfield said that he had never undermined the minister. "I have objected and opposed to a number of issues. I have done that discreetly within the department, in fact through writing to the minister, whether it's on the legal sector codes, the broad-based economic empowerment legal sector codes, whether it's the Transformation Fund or a range of other issues around governance, board appointments, cadre deployments, you name it." Whitfield's political party argued that he was fired for succeeding at his job, which included opposing some appointments, halting what they claim would have been looting from the Transformation Fund and keeping an eye on the national lottery tender. Whitfield said that he still had questions about some of the processes that had unfolded. "And so the minister included me at the end of last year and I was then sidelined for the last six months. So, I have had no line of sight of the process, but certainly have had some questions, which I would like to pose to the minister if given the opportunity, which I have not yet had."
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Inside the political turmoil: What Whitfield's dismissal reveals about ANC dynamics
President Cyril Ramaphosa's public statement that he fired DA Deputy Department of Trade Industry and Competition minister Andrew Whitfield because he had travelled outside the country still leaves many questions unanswereed. The apparent mystery around this decision is what gives it so much power. And the DA is now in a difficult position where it cannot accept this, but cannot easily withdraw from the coalition either. There are many reasons why Whitfield's sacking is so politically potent. Among the most important is that Ramaphosa's explanation, that he 'was removed as a deputy minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the president' does not make sense. For a start, that trip was several months ago. What happened between then and now that took the president so long to act? If it is such a clear sacking offense, then why not act immediately? And if there was some reason for a delay, what was it about yesterday's specific date that then allowed him to act? The president says in his statement that: 'It is not common practice for the President of the Republic of South Africa to provide reasons either for the appointment or the dismissal of Members of the Executive.' Legally, there is no obligation for a president to give reasons for hirings and firings. But that does not make it democratic. Or morally correct. Or even politically wise. The president is not a god, or an absolute ruler or a king. He is accountable to the people. For him to follow the precedents of previous presidents who have also not given reasons, particularly Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki, may not be wise. Both were recalled by the ANC. And while their stories are very different, both had fired someone under strange circumstances that they refused to explain, until the real reasons became obvious later. It is true, as Ramaphosa points to, that Mbeki fired Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge as deputy health minister in 2007, ostensibly because she travelled without permission. It is also true that it followed her being in a dispute with the health minister at the time, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, about the causes of HIV/Aids. 'I'll fix you' Tshabalala-Msimang's comment to Madlala-Routledge, that 'I'll fix you' was surely a bigger factor than her recent travel. In the case of Zuma, he fired Nhlanhla Nene as finance minister one night in 2015, and refused to explain why. You may well remember how that ended. The other, fairly obvious point, is that nothing stopped the Presidency from announcing the reason for Whitfield's sacking yesterday. What changed between the public statement confirming he had been removed and Friday? Why could he make public the reason on Friday, but not on Thursday? Then of course there is Whitfield's public claim that he did ask the Presidency for permission to go on this trip, and was ignored. While that may be through a simple mistake, Whitfield says he followed up every day for nine days. While Ramaphosa may feel he does not have to respond to every request from a deputy minister, it certainly gives the appearance of being incredibly rude to not reply. It may well be politically unwise for the president to stick to this claim, when it appears irrational. It gives the appearance that there is another uncomfortable political fact that he is trying to hide. It must surely be that Ramaphosa fired Whitfield for some reason of which he is ashamed. Or something he'd prefer to keep hidden. This is why this issue is unlikely to disappear quickly. For the moment, the most likely real reason is that there is a faction in the ANC demanding Ramaphosa act against the DA. Or its members. But even that is problematic. Because the message that this may send to many voters is that Ramaphosa is prepared to act against a DA member for internal ANC reasons, but not against ANC ministers who have done much worse things than Whitfield. It does not appear to make sense to act against Whitfield while allowing Nobuhle Nkabinde to remain as higher education minister when it is clear she lied about her 'independent panel' to advise her appointing chairpersons to the Sector Education and Training Authorities. And, as DA leader John Steenhuisen was quick to point out, why fire Whitfield when Ramaphosa has kept David Mahlobo as deputy minister at Water Affairs when there is clear evidence he walked out of the State Security Agency with huge amounts of cash during the State Capture era? Internal ANC politics If this is about internal ANC politics it may also be another demonstration that ANC leaders are more focused on internal factions than on winning votes. This must be one of the big lessons from this. That the ANC is still not focused on winning back the support it has lost. This may well be because many of its decision-makers are much more comfortable dealing with internal dynamics. They are doing what they know, what they have always done — rather than focusing on the hard work of actually governing well enough to win votes. Meanwhile, the DA's leadership has some difficult decisions to make. Steenhuisen's threat that Ramaphosa has '48 hours' to act against ANC ministers may well demonstrate the difficulty of his position. As former strategist Ryan Coetzee and others have pointed out, the DA simply cannot accept having its members fired without any consultation. Even though the president has confirmed the DA will get to replace Whitfield with another of its members, this effectively gives the ANC a vet on DA appointments. This they surely cannot accept. The Freedom Front Plus or the Patriotic Alliance would not accept it either. The problem for Steenhuisen, of course, is what to do now. To leave the coalition is fraught with danger. That said, his constituency might well reward him for it. Some in the ANC might celebrate the DA's departure at first, but might then find that governance becomes virtually impossible. But any decisions made by the ANC or the DA might well be based on longer-term calculations, about whether voters will punish or reward them for pulling out of the coalition. And thus this may not be the last strange and deliberately unexplained event. DM
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Helen Zille accuses Gayton of 'corruption': 'THIS is how he gets votes'
Gayton McKenzie has clapped back at Helen Zille's insinuations that he 'bribes' voters of his political party, the Patriotic Alliance (PA). The former Democratic Alliance (DA) leader reacted to a video of the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture socialising with the public. On her X account, Helen Zille posted a TikTok video of Gayton McKenzie mingling with PA members. In the clip, the minister spoke with an elderly woman in the Mossel Bay area. During their chat, Gayton quietly placed money in the woman's palm. 'Look carefully. This is how Gayton gets votes', Helen posted on X. When one critic pointed out that the PA leader had done something that was acceptable with the coloured community, she responded: 'Extraordinary to suggest that all coloured people employ such methods…….Most people balk at such generalisations. If this is the party people want, good luck with the consequences. State Capture 2.0 loading'. Another claimed that Gayton was simply giving the gogo money to buy something to drink, to which Helen responded: 'Cooldrink is a metaphor widely used for corruption. It fits. When a third asked how the DA differed from the PA, Helen responded: 'Our offer is better governance. Your question makes me conclude that you think corruption is the only way to get a vote.' Clapping back at Helen Zille's insinuation, Gayton McKenzie defended his actions. He posted about the woman and his monetary gift to her: 'This was not even election day. The lady told me that her son was in his dying bed. She asked me for transport money. I gave her some, and tomorrow I'm sending her more.' He added: 'You see why we take all these wards from you, we help people immediately. I helped people immediately where I can'. In another, Gayton took a swipe at Helen Zille's age. He posted: 'I know you and Ouma Francis are in the same age group, but to blatantly accuse her of being capable and accepting of a bribe is wrong. This is a previous pic of her, she is a long-standing member of [the PA]. Clapping back at the DA, he added: 'You couldn't even install toilets in Mosselbaai in 19 years'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
