logo
Public broadcasting, RIP?

Public broadcasting, RIP?

Boston Globe14-05-2025
At my public middle school in Arizona, I was taught Intelligent Design, which is a pseudoscientific alternative to evolution more akin to creationism. I was told that humans did not 'come from monkeys,' and that to think so was insulting.
An entrance to the Arizona PBS offices in the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication in Phoenix.
Katie Oyan/Associated Press
PBS was the only educational channel I could watch at home, and while I was mostly interested in the kids' shows, I also tuned in to the National Geographic specials, where I watched experts discuss things like animal biology and evolutionary theory. I realized that PBS was making a better case than my teachers.
Advertisement
At the end of the school year, I moved to a rural ranch in the Pacific Northwest. At 13, I was fully in charge of my own education. I had one American history textbook and access to a shared desktop where I visited Khan Academy — and where I watched PBS.
Without these resources, I would have resorted to scrounging for answers on Google or various social media sites. I had no digital media literacy, and doubt I would have been able to distinguish science and analysis from conspiracy and misinformation.
I had few adults to guide me. My brother was listening to Joe Rogan. I lived with relatives who were climate-change deniers, one of whom was a state representative. They owned every National Geographic going back to the '60s, but told me to disregard most of what was written inside them.
Advertisement
The other reading material was the 'Left Behind' series about the biblical End Times and 'Hank the Cowdog.' Without PBS, I probably wouldn't have found trustworthy, or easily digestible, educational materials at all.
The Trump Administration's latest efforts to cut federal funding for broadcasters like PBS and NPR would have jeopardized my ability to learn on my own, and for free. My story isn't unique. Sixty percent of all PBS viewers are in rural America, and roughly the same portion are low-income. When I was a child with limited resources, PBS was the only reliable education I had, especially as the adults around me failed.
Good riddance, CPB
By
There have been plenty of loud protests about the Trump administration's efforts to cut spending on health care, scientific research, and public schools, and some of these are legitimate. But the outcry over its attempts to
Public broadcasters like NPR and PBS are no longer the kind of necessary public goods President Lyndon Baines Johnson
Moreover, public funding makes up only a fraction of NPR and PBS's budgets. Federal funding makes up
Advertisement
The headquarters for National Public Radio in Washington, D.C.
Charles Dharapak/Associated Press
If they're so essential, people are likely to pay for them through memberships or donations, allowing them to survive on their own.
Trump's executive order directed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and all executive agencies to cease funding NPR and PBS. Congress has already allocated $535 million to CPB for this fiscal year.
These cuts are fundamentally different from the Trump administration's attacks on basic scientific research, which
And why should the government fund highly politicized media, anyway? Johnson promised a public broadcasting that would be 'free, and it will be independent and it will belong to all of our people.' But outlets like NPR belong to liberals. Don't take my word for it — take NPR's. The outlet's former senior editor Uri Berliner
If NPR wants to be a liberal outlet, better do so on its own dime.
So don't let the other misguided Trump cuts mislead you about this one. It's a win on many fronts. Less government spending. Less taxpayer-supported news poorly masked as unbiased public broadcasting. And a step toward restoring trust in the media.
This column first appeared in
, Globe Opinion's free weekly newsletter about local and national politics. If you'd like to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up
.
Advertisement
Rebecca Spiess can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent says US has 'makings of a deal' with China
Bessent says US has 'makings of a deal' with China

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent says US has 'makings of a deal' with China

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that he believed that Washington has the makings of a deal with China and that he was "optimistic" about the path forward. "This week's negotiations in Stockholm have advanced our talks with China, and I believe that we have the makings of a deal that will benefit both of our great nations," Bessent said in a post on X that was subsequently deleted. "I am optimistic about the path forward," he added. A Treasury Department spokesperson said the post was being reposted because the images attached to it had not uploaded correctly. The spokesperson also noted that the language in the post was in line with what Bessent had said in various media interviews this week. In an interview with CNBC on Thursday, Bessent said the United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal with China, but it is "not 100% done." U.S. negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Bessent told CNBC. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Labor secretary hails Trump move to fire BLS chief
Labor secretary hails Trump move to fire BLS chief

The Hill

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Labor secretary hails Trump move to fire BLS chief

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer praised President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) after the Friday release of the July jobs report. In a statement on social media, Chavez-DeRemer hailed Trump's decision to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the agency, which is housed in the Labor Department, released a stunningly bad jobs report earlier Friday. 'I agree wholeheartedly with @POTUS that our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' wrote Chavez-DeRemer, without offering any evidence to support Trump's claim. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' she continued. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' While McEntarfer was appointed by former President Biden to lead BLS, she had previously served for more than 20 years in the federal government in administrations led by both Democrats and Republicans. Former BLS Commissioner William Beech, who was appointed by Trump and served from 2019-2023, strongly condemned the firing of his successor. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' Beech wrote, sharing a statement of concern from other BLS veterans. Trump's move to fire McEntarfer triggered outrage among economists and analysts across the ideological spectrum. 'Erika McEntarfer has devoted her career to public service. She has conducted herself as BLS Commissioner with great integrity. There is no evidence whatsoever that BLS data are politically biased,' wrote Michael R. Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Insitute, on social media. 'By incorrectly asserting that the data are biased, President Trump is undermining the integrity of the information that policymakers, businesses, households, and investors use to make important decisions that affect the welfare of the nation,' he continued. 'It is imperative that decisionmakers understand that government statistics are unbiased and of the highest quality. By casting doubt on that, the President is damaging the United States,' Strain wrote.

Top White House economist: I believe jobs numbers, but agency needs fixes
Top White House economist: I believe jobs numbers, but agency needs fixes

Axios

time11 minutes ago

  • Axios

Top White House economist: I believe jobs numbers, but agency needs fixes

Top White House economist Stephen Miran tells Axios a key economic statistics agency needs "fresh eyes," but he stopped short of repeating President Trump's claim that Friday's jobs data was politically manipulated. Why it matters: President Trump ordered the the firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner on Friday after alleging — without evidence — that disappointing jobs numbers were "rigged." The bureau later confirmed commissioner Erika McEntarfer was terminated, with her deputy William Wiatrowski stepping in as acting commissioner. Catch up quick: The July jobs report, released earlier on Friday, showed just 73,000 jobs added last month. The BLS also announced massive revisions that showed employment was a combined 258,000 lower than previously thought. It was the second-largest two-month downward revision on record, behind only the pandemic. What they're saying: "There's been very little attempt to actually fix this problem and come up with creative solutions to make the data more reliable," says Miran. "It is absolutely time for fresh eyes on this to try and come up with solutions to improve the reliability of the data and get those revision levels down." Miran said the agency should try to incentivize faster responses or delay the data publications by a week or two, if it means smaller revisions down the line. Catch up quick: "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump accused the agency of boosting jobs figures to support his opponent's presidential candidacy. Reality check: The BLS, a nonpolitical agency housed within the Labor Department, has faced plummeting response rates to the surveys that comprise the report. It has scaled back some of its data collection — the Consumer Price Index report, for instance — due in part to proposed budget cuts. "Economic data are always noisy and this has always been a problem that has plagued economic research and economists — it's one that we make the best of," Miran said. Asked if he believes the numbers released by the BLS, Miran said "I think if the BLS tells me that there were 14,000 jobs created [in June], I don't have a competing survey that tells me otherwise." Between the lines: Miran said that revisions were largely a result of statistical artifacts — namely adjustments to account for seasonal quirks. He said that Trump's immigration policies would "inevitably show up in one way or another in the labor market data. I think that some of what we saw is also due to that." "If we're swapping out foreign-born job holders for American-born job holders, I think that's a win," Miran said. What to watch: Mainstream economists say the economy and labor market will likely slow further this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store