logo
Wind turbine owners are getting money for nothing

Wind turbine owners are getting money for nothing

Telegraph04-03-2025
We could have rebuilt a couple of hospitals. Or bought 45 new Challenger tanks. Or restored the winter fuel allowance to 800,000 of the neediest pensioners.
Even allowing for inflation, there are still lots of things you could do with £250m. Instead, as The Telegraph revealed on Monday, over the first two months of this year we spent it on paying wind farms to switch off their turbines.
That is crazy.
We are spending vast sums of money we don't have on a power system that has become completely dysfunctional and which has landed us with electricity that is cripplingly expensive. We need to start fixing that before the country is bankrupted and our industry wiped out.
In principle, generating electricity from wind should be a perfect solution, especially for a country such as the UK where, if we are being honest, it can be a little blustery at times. It doesn't involve any carbon emissions, it will never run out and it can be generated domestically.
Boris Johnson used to talk about turning the UK into the ' Saudi Arabia of wind ' and while there may have been some characteristic hyperbole in that promise, there was nothing wrong with the ambition. The technology could have been ideal for the UK.
The trouble is, it is not working out as planned. Bottlenecks in the network of cables that move electricity around the country mean that at crucial times wind farms have to be switched off to prevent the grid from becoming overloaded.
So far this year, operators have been paid up to on average just under £180,000 an hour to switch off their turbines because there is nowhere for the power to go. The so-called constraint payments have already cost an extraordinary £252m in the first two months of 2025, up from £158m over the same period last year, an increase of 60pc.
In effect, Britain is paying more and more for these farms to do nothing. Even worse, while the wind farms sit idle, other generators, very often a gas plant, have to cover shortfalls in the network where power is needed.
Last Friday afternoon, £79,507 was spent on switching off wind turbines while £1.2m was spent buying energy elsewhere, according to the Wasted Wind website, which analyses Elexon market data.
The British energy market appears to have stepped through the looking glass, into a weird dysfunctional world where we pay green wind farms to sit idle and then pay even more for fossil fuels to provide a back-up. Even the most twisted satirist would find that hard to make up. It is surreal.
Sure, you can argue that this is just a teething problem and that as we complete the transition from fossil fuels to green energy, it will sort itself out. Perhaps it will, although most of us would take a lot of persuading to believe that anything Ed Miliband, the Energy Minister, is in charge of will ever 'sort itself out'.
The trouble is, there is not much sign of it. The constraint payments are soaring, when in reality they should be coming down. If they are just a bug, they have not been ironed out yet. Instead, the costs keep rising.
In reality, Britain does not have the luxury of this kind of self-indulgence any more. We have created a system that delivers some of the most expensive electricity in the world for both domestic and industrial users. Only last week, Ofgem announced the third consecutive rise in the energy price cap, with an increase of £111 for the average bill kicking in from April.
We have the highest industrial electricity prices in the world, running at almost double the level of competitors such as France and Spain. This has triggered the closure of chemical plants, such as Ineos's Grangemouth refinery, and imposed impossible costs on many others.
Of course, 'constraint payments' to wind farms are far from the only reason for that. But let's put this politely. They certainly aren't helping. And they are emblematic of how the UK has, under successive governments, created one of the most dysfunctional energy systems in the world.
Indeed, as an analysis by Peel Hunt made clear this week, declining electricity production is one of the main explanations for why the UK has fallen so far behind the United States since the financial crash of 2008. If we had not got that so badly wrong, we would not be struggling with zero growth.
It is madness.
Everyone agrees – well, almost everyone – that cutting carbon emissions is important and that the UK should switch to renewable energy (although given that we only account for 1pc of global emissions, it is questionable whether we really need to be a global leader in that).
But that does not mean we need to abandon basic common sense, or forget the rules of economics.
Wind power may well be an important part of the mix, though we should remain agnostic on that until we have more hard evidence. But if it is, we need to make sure we build it in the right way.
We should put the pylons in place to distribute the power and build the storage systems to save it when necessary before building the wind farms – and not the other way around.
And we should subject every project to a cold, sober cost-benefit analysis and stop brushing aside inconvenient truths – to borrow a phrase loved by the climate change gang – with some waffle about a ' green industrial revolution '.
Instead, every time the weather turns blustery, we are spending hundreds of thousands of pounds to switch the wind turbines off.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Jimmy Lai? 'Prisoner of conscience' who has endured 1,600 days behind bars
Who is Jimmy Lai? 'Prisoner of conscience' who has endured 1,600 days behind bars

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Who is Jimmy Lai? 'Prisoner of conscience' who has endured 1,600 days behind bars

Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai has been in a high-security prison for more than 1,600 days. The 77-year-old was arrested over his role in pro-democracy protests in 2019 and has since been charged with various offences, including collusion with foreign forces, as well as sedition under colonial-era laws. His trial for alleged national security offences has faced lengthy delays, but is due to restart in Hong Kong on Thursday. Here is everything you need to know about the "world's most famous prisoner of conscience" and his trial, as it draws ever closer to a long-awaited conclusion. Who is Jimmy Lai? Lai was born in mainland China but fled to Hong Kong at the age of 12, after stowing away on a fishing boat. Here, he began working as a child labourer in a garment factory. He went on to build a fortune with the fashion empire Giordano and, after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, when thousands of people protested for political reforms in Beijing, he became a democracy advocate and turned his hand to newspapers. Ahead of the 1997 handover of Hong Kong from the UK to China, he started the Chinese-language newspaper Apple Daily in an attempt to maintain freedom of speech. The paper was staunchly pro-democratic and did not shy away from criticising authorities in Beijing. Around the same time, in 1994, he became a full British citizen. He has never held a Chinese or Hong Kong passport, but is seen as a Chinese citizen by Hong Kong authorities. Why is he in jail? It was his pro-democratic beliefs that led to Lai becoming a key figure in the 2019 protests in Hong Kong, spurred by Beijing's tightening squeeze on wide-ranging freedoms. Lai's Apple Daily newspaper backed the protesters, criticising the government reforms. Lai and his sons were arrested in August 2020 after police raided the offices of the Apple Daily publisher, Next Digital. He was granted bail, but this was overturned in December of the same year, when Lai was charged with fraud. He was charged under the very national security laws, put in place in 2020, that he had protested. The charges include collusion with foreign forces, as well as conspiracy to print and distribute seditious publications. Lai has been in solitary confinement for most of his imprisonment. During this time, he has lost a significant amount of weight and his son, Sebastien Lai, has consistently raised concerns for his father's declining health. His legal team has claimed he has been denied independent medical care for diabetes, is only allowed out of his cell for 50 minutes a day and, as a devout Catholic, has been denied the Eucharist. However, this week the South China Morning Post has reported a Hong Kong government spokesman saying that Lai had received appropriate treatment and welfare in prison. What has happened during his trial so far? After years of delay, Lai's national security trial started in December 2023. Prosecutors allege that Lai conspired with senior executives at Apple Daily to publish 161 seditious articles intended to incite hatred toward the central or Hong Kong governments. They labelled him a "radical political figure" and accused him of asking the US and other foreign countries to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and mainland China. The charges he faces under the territory's national security law could see him handed a life sentence. But Lai has always denied the charges against him. Nearly a year after the trial started, in November 2024, Lai took to the stand to testify. During his 52 days on the stand he faced questions about his editorial control over Apple Daily, links to activists in Hong Kong, the UK and US - and about alleged meetings with US politicians. Closing arguments in the trial were due to start on 28 July, but were delayed until 14 August. The next hearing is due to last around eight days. How is the British government involved? As he is a British citizen, the UK government expressed concern when Lai was first charged under the national security law in 2020. Subsequent British governments, including the current Labour one, have said Lai's imprisonment is a breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration - the 1984 agreement which set out the conditions of the transfer of Hong Kong from the UK to China. Three months after winning the general election, Sir Keir Starmer said securing Lai's release was a "priority" for his government and said his government would "continue" to raise the case with China. Most recently, during a January trip to China, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she raised the question over Lai's imprisonment with every minister she met. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said he has also pressed Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Lai's detention during previous visits. In March, Lai's son, Sebastien, delivered a letter to 10 Downing Street asking for a meeting with Sir Keir to get his father released immediately. He said he was worried his father might die in prison and the case is a "litmus test" for the government to see if it will stand up to China for a British citizen who is in jail "for peaceful campaigning and journalism".

Boris Johnson named as potential witness in Nuked Blood Scandal crimes against troops
Boris Johnson named as potential witness in Nuked Blood Scandal crimes against troops

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Boris Johnson named as potential witness in Nuked Blood Scandal crimes against troops

In office, Boris Johnson was told of allegations about crimes by the British state in withholding information about blood testing of nuclear troops. Now he has been identified as a potential witness in a criminal investigation Boris Johnson has been named as a potential witness to a criminal cover-up at the heart of the British state. ‌ The former PM's name appears, alongside others, in evidence handed to Thames Valley Police, which is considering whether to launch a full investigation. Detectives have been urged to question him about a secret programme of human radiation experiments on servicemen, the results of which have been withheld from their personnel files. ‌ The Nuked Blood Scandal - involving blood tests taken from troops before, during and after service at Cold War nuclear weapons trials - has led to a formal allegation of misconduct in public office centred on the Ministry of Defence. ‌ If convicted, such a charge is likely to lead to a sentence of 3 or 4 years' in jail for any public official who has acted unlawfully in post, with harm caused to others as a result. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: "Veterans and their families have been serving a life sentence of their own. Chronic illness, cancers, birth defects, bereavement, miscarriage, trauma, suicide - much of it avoidable, and all of it more treatable, had they been told what really happened. "Instead they had decades of denial from successive governments. Boris was the first PM to sit down and look us in the eye, and now we ask him to do the right thing once again. and help the veterans get the justice they have for so long been denied." Mr Johnson was first informed of the scandal by the Mirror during a showdown in his Parliamentary office in June 2022, when he was asked to authorise a nuclear test medal. We showed him a 1958 memo between atomic scientists discussing the "gross irregularity" in the blood tests of a squadron leader who had been ordered to fly through mushroom clouds. We told the PM - in front of witnesses who included ministers, Downing Street officials, and backbench MPs - that the officer's medical records were being unlawfully withheld, and that was potentially a criminal offence. ‌ "Yes it is," he agreed, before studying the memo and asking the Mirror where the records had been hidden. It is not known what action he took as a result of the information he had been given. His representatives have been asked for comment. Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham, who is also named as a potential witness, confirmed he would speak to the police if asked. He said: "Just as with infected blood, I believe senior politicians have been witnesses to a live and ongoing cover-up affecting our nuclear test veterans. If the police decide to investigate, it is incumbent upon all of us to co-operate fully and tell officers what we know. Politicians must have the courage to step forward and end Whitehall's culture of cover-up." Victims Commissioner demands police investigate allegations of Nuked Blood cover-up ‌ Other names on the list of potential witnesses include lawyers who provided sworn testimony, submissions to judges and written evidence handed in to court, stating that blood testing of troops did not take place, no documentation about it existed, and all relevant records had been disclosed. Thousands of pages of orders, discussion and results have since been uncovered, and a huge database is due to be declassified. Keir Starmer, who was first informed of missing medical records while Leader of the Opposition, is also on the list, along with Defence Secretary John Healey and Veterans Minister Al Carns. Downing Street, the MoD, and Government Legal Department all declined to answer the question of whether they would co-operate with any investigation. ‌ A government spokesman said: "These claims are false and there is no evidence to back this up. The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look seriously into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority. This comprehensive work is underway and will enable us to better understand what information the department holds in relation to the medical testing of service personnel who took part in the UK nuclear weapons tests." Former Conservative ministers, and staff at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, have also been identified to police as people who may be able to shed light on who knew about the blood testing, and what was done about it in government. Campaigners say all the people they have named were told, or should have known, there was evidence of criminal behaviour within the MoD, and taken steps to report it to police. A ministerial review of the records has so far checked more than a million pages of documents, including orders for blood testing, but the government has refused to tell Parliament what has been found.

US and Russia fire off veiled nuclear threats ahead of Alaska showdown talks between Trump and Putin
US and Russia fire off veiled nuclear threats ahead of Alaska showdown talks between Trump and Putin

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

US and Russia fire off veiled nuclear threats ahead of Alaska showdown talks between Trump and Putin

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RUSSIA and America swapped veiled nuclear threats yesterday ahead of showdown talks between their two presidents over the war in Ukraine. At a British air base used by US nuclear bombers Vice ­President JD Vance warned that peace was only possible if the 'bad guys' were afraid of America. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Russia and the US have exchanged veiled nuclear threats, pictured Mr Zelensky is met in Berlin by Germany's Chancellor Merz Credit: AFP 5 The diplomatic war games came as President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russia's President Putin in Alaska tomorrow Credit: Getty 5 Mr Trump warned there would be 'very severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to a ceasefire Credit: AP Meanwhile it was announced that joint exercises to be held by Russian and Belarusian troops will include nuclear weapons drills. The diplomatic war games came as President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russia's President Vladimir Putin in Alaska tomorrow. Mr Trump yesterday warned there would be 'very severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to a ceasefire. He spoke out after a video call with European leaders including Ukraine's President ­Volodymyr Zelensky and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Europe's political chiefs also vowed to hit tyrant Putin with more sanctions if talks fail. Mr Vance, in Britain on holiday, yesterday addressed US airmen at RAF Fairford, Gloucestershire. The base is routinely used as a staging post by US nuclear bombers. He said: 'It is impossible to bring peace anywhere unless the bad guys are worried that we have got a hell of a fine air force and a hell of a fine military to back up the peace to begin with. 'You make it possible for us to accomplish the President's goals through negotiation. 'You make it possible for us to go into a room and say, 'yes, we want peace, yes we want to work together, yes we want to bring an end to this terrible conflict but we have also got some great airmen'. Trump & Putin's 1-on-1 meeting is a 'listening exercise', WH says as 'Vlad wants Ukraine to withdraw for ceasefire' 'The fact that people are afraid of you is why we are able to do what we do as an administration.' A British defence source said last night: 'It's the big stick theory. It is deterrence — don't f*** with me because I will f*** you more. 'If we can't get that message over then we fail.' Peace isn't possible unless the bad guys fear you've got hell of a military JD Vance Mr Vance's warnings came as Belarus announced it will hold joint nuclear drills with Russia. Defence minister Viktor Khrenin said its troops would train for the deployment of nuclear weapons. Kremlin said the drills were 'predominantly strategic deterrence' abut added: 'We should be ready for everything.' President Trump has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough, saying his meeting with Putin was to get the lie of the land. He also touted the possibility of a second meeting to include Mr Zelensky, who has been frozen out of the peace talks. 5 Prime Minister Keir Starmer on a video conference Credit: EPA Mr Zelensky, who was in Berlin for the video conference yesterday, warned that Putin was bluffing over peace after Russian military advances in eastern Ukraine. Mr Zelensky insisted America, Ukraine and allies all want 'peace in Ukraine, peace in Europe'. Putin doesn't want peace — he wants to occupy our country Zelensky But he declared: 'Putin is bluffing, he is trying to push forward along the whole front. 'Putin doesn't want peace — he wants to occupy our country.' And he repeated calls for more economic pressure on Moscow, saying: 'In reality, the sanctions are very effective, and they're hurting the Russian military economy.' But Moscow's foreign ministry warned 'any attempts on our property will result in a painful response'. Europe's 'coalition of the willing' has demanded a ceasefire, stronger sanctions and 'robust and credible security guarantees' that Ukraine will not lose any territory. Russia wants a land swap to end the three-year conflict. In a statement PM Sir Keir later insisted the UK's support for Ukraine is 'unwavering'. He has previously vowed to send British peacekeeping troops to Ukraine. His spokesman said Europe's leaders thanked President Trump for his 'efforts in bringing Putin to the table in pursuit of a ceasefire to end to the ongoing bloodshed'. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Europe and America must 'increase the pressure' on Russia if peace talks fail. Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte said 'the ball is now in Putin's court'. But Mr Trump's former National Security Advisor John Bolton reckoned inviting Putin to the US was 'a great victory' for the tyrant. He said: 'He's a rogue leader of a pariah state and he's going to be welcomed into the United States.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store