logo

US migrant halt may wipe potential job growth: Mike Dolan

Zawya5 hours ago

(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
LONDON - If you're wondering why so many U.S. Federal Reserve officials are remaining hawkish despite slowing growth, consider how the dramatic drop in immigration and the graying of America are impacting the unfolding labor market picture.
Often overlooked by markets focused on the latest news about tariffs, geopolitics and energy markets, curtailing illegal immigration, a signature policy of President Donald Trump, is now starting to move the needle on the U.S. jobs outlook.
The flow of migrant workers into the U.S. has effectively halted over the past year. The pace was already slowing sharply before the election but has ground to a near halt along with the rise in deportations this year. Couple that with the steadily aging population of existing workers, and it looks like a labor crunch could be on the horizon.
Economists at Barclays tracking these trends reckon that 'potential' non-farm private payrolls growth - or the level of extra jobs that can be created without leading to worker shortages - could fall to less than 10,000 per month by the end of next year from more than 100,000 today.
They estimate that potential job growth will fall to about 60,000 within the next six months, slowing potential economic growth to only 1.4-1.6% year-on-year through next year from just over 2% now.
These numbers are pretty stark when considering that average monthly private payrolls growth has been around 172,000 over the past two years.
Meanwhile, Barclays says it expects the effects of population ageing to "intensify very soon", putting even more downward pressure on jobs growth.
The combined impact of the two forces is "about to create significant and persistent headwinds to potential growth in the labor force and economic activity," it said.
The ingredients used to make the forecast are sobering.
FLATLINING PAYROLL POTENTIAL
U.S. immigration surged over the past three years, adding a net 3-4 million to the U.S. population. The roughly 2 million new workers are four times the annual rate of the immediate pre-pandemic years. These were mostly asylum-seeking or 'humanitarian' cases given temporary authorization to live and work in the U.S.
In fact, over the past two years, Barclays estimated that about three quarters of average monthly private jobs gains of almost 180,000 were filled by migrant workers.
But since last summer, net inflows of humanitarian migrants have fallen to nearly zero. And, on top of that, the Barclays tracker estimated current deportations to be running at about 10,000 a month.
On the flipside, U.S. census projections expect the population to decline by about 50,000 in 2026 and 100,000 in 2027. The aging of the population should also cause the labor force to shrink by about 360,000 this year and next, accelerating thereafter.
Tweaking the underlying assumptions leads to different outcomes, of course, but Barclays' central conclusion is that potential payroll growth should essentially flatline in the coming years, weighing on potential GDP growth.
Morgan Stanley also revised down net immigration estimates to a near halt this year and next, although it expects higher payroll 'breakevens' of 70,000 in 2025 and 2026.
FED HEADACHE
For the Fed, an unfolding economic slowdown, compounded by a demand hit from trade war uncertainties, may be arguments for easing policy now.
Trump clearly thinks it should move immediately to slash rates, and his appointees to the Fed board, Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, are both now advocates of easing sooner rather than later.
But if worker shortages are the problem, then that creates a very different problem for the Fed. In that scenario, the Fed's full employment mandate would not be at risk, but wage pressures could aggravate still above-target price inflation.
With tariff hikes already fogging up the inflation horizon, it's therefore not surprising that seven Fed policymakers anticipate keeping the central bank's main borrowing rate steady through the rest of this year at least.
A hit to the labor force then could cause growth to slow, even as the employment rate stays low and inflation pressures simmer.
Fed inertia may be warranted if that transpires.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters
(by Mike Dolan; editing by Stephen Coates)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed kicks off effort to ease bank leverage rules
Fed kicks off effort to ease bank leverage rules

Zawya

time28 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Fed kicks off effort to ease bank leverage rules

The Federal Reserve meets on Wednesday to advance a proposal that would ease leverage rules for banks, which would grant the industry a long-sought win they say will help big firms facilitate Treasury market trading. The central bank's Washington board will consider a plan to revamp the so-called supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), which directs banks to hold capital against assets regardless of their risk level. Originally designed as a backstop to ensure banks hold some capital on even relatively risk-free assets like U.S. Treasury debt, the industry complains it has become a constraint that actually impedes their ability to facilitate trading in U.S. Treasury markets during times of stress. The Fed had previously flagged that the SLR may need some tweaks after it exempted some requirements amid market strains during the COVID-19 pandemic, and now Fed officials plan to advance a more lasting solution. "It would be better if we had a leverage ratio that was a backstop rather than a binding thing, and that's what this proposal is going to do," said Fed Chairman Jerome Powell at a congressional hearing Tuesday. Powell told lawmakers the Fed is expected to advance a proposal that would tweak the formula calculating the "enhanced" SLR (eSLR), which requires the nation's largest banks to hold an extra layer of capital. Specifically, the Fed is expected to mirror an effort regulators pitched in 2018 that failed to advance, which would tie leverage requirements to the overall risk each bank is deemed to pose on the financial system. However, he added the Fed would seek feedback on alternative methods of relief, such as broadly exempting Treasury securities from the requirement altogether. A Fed spokesperson declined to comment ahead of the board meeting. "We believe regulators want to provide banks with more space before riskless assets could make the eSLR a binding constraint," Jaret Seiberg, an analyst with TD Cowen, wrote in a note. The leverage changes are the first of what is expected to be a broad deregulatory agenda from the Fed's new top regulatory official, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman. President Donald Trump, who nominated Bowman for the post, has made trimming regulations a top priority in a bid to boost economic growth. On Monday, she said the leverage rewrite is a first step in overhauling "distorted" capital requirements on banks, which were drastically ratcheted up after the 2008 financial crisis. Other future changes could include weakening an additional surcharge imposed on large global banks and tweaking thresholds under which banks face increasingly strict rules as they grow in size. However, the new plan has its critics, who argue stepping back rules intended to keep banks stable injects unnecessary risk into the system at the behest of the industry. Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said in a letter to regulators on Tuesday she had "grave concerns" about the plan. "If the banking agencies gut this requirement, the big banks will load up on more debt, pay out more money to shareholders and executives, and put the entire economy at risk of another financial crash," she wrote. "There is no valid rationale for your agencies to impose these risks on the American public." (Reporting by Pete Schroeder; Editing by Sam Holmes)

Trump insists Iran nuclear programme set back 'decades'
Trump insists Iran nuclear programme set back 'decades'

Khaleej Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Khaleej Times

Trump insists Iran nuclear programme set back 'decades'

President Donald Trump insisted Wednesday that US strikes led to the "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear capabilities and set the country's atomic programme back "decades", while Israel said it was still early to fully assess the damage. Over a 12-day conflict, Israel pounded Iranian nuclear and military sites while Iran launched waves of missiles at its foe during their deadliest-ever confrontation. The United States joined the fray in support of its ally, hitting two nuclear facilities with massive bunker-buster bombs over the weekend, while a guided missile from a submarine struck a third. But leaked US intelligence cast doubt on the damage caused by American strikes, saying they had set back Tehran's nuclear programme by just a few months. "They're not going to be building bombs for a long time," said Trump, adding that the strikes had set back the programme by "decades" and that the Iran-Israel ceasefire that he declared was going "very well". Earlier, Israel's military said it was "still early" to assess the damage caused to Iran's nuclear programme. "I believe we have delivered a significant hit to the nuclear programme, and I can also say that we have delayed it by several years," said Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin. The head of Israel's military, Eyal Zamir, on Tuesday said Israel and the United States had set back Iran's nuclear programme "by years". But US media on Tuesday cited people familiar with the Defense Intelligence Agency intelligence report as saying the American strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or enriched uranium stockpiles. The strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. Israel had said its bombing campaign, which began on June 13, was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an address to the nation after the ceasefire, announced that "we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project". "And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt," he said. 'Legitimate rights' Iranian lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of suspending cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, according to state TV. "The International Atomic Energy Agency, which refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, put its international credibility up for auction," parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said, according to the broadcaster. The decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA still requires the approval of the Guardian Council, a body empowered to vet legislation. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tuesday his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, but that it would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. In an interview with the Al Araby Al Jadeed news outlet, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities would have "serious and profound repercussions" on the country's future. He said Iran remained committed to the Non-Proliferation Treaty but that it had failed "protect us or our nuclear programme", adding that Iran's approach towards the non-proliferation regime "will undergo changes", without elaborating. Shadow war While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, their 12-day conflict was by far the most destructive confrontation between them. Israeli strikes hit nuclear and military targets -- killing scientists and senior military figures -- as well as residential areas, prompting waves of Iranian missile fire on Israel. The war culminated in US strikes on underground Iranian nuclear sites using bunker-busting bombs -- which Israel lacks -- followed by an Iranian reprisal targeting a US military facility in Qatar, the largest in the Middle East. Trump shrugged off that response as "weak", thanking Tehran for giving advance notice and announcing the contours of the ceasefire just hours later. Some Israelis welcomed the truce. "Finally, we can sleep peacefully. We feel better, less worried, for the kids, for the family. And I hope it stays that way. That's the most important," Yossi Bin, a 45-year-old engineer in Tel Aviv, told AFP. In Iran, people remained uncertain whether the peace would hold. Amir, 28, fled from Tehran to the Caspian Sea coast and told AFP by phone, "I really don't know... about the ceasefire but honestly, I don't think things will return to normal." Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry. Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures and rescuers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store