Watchdog calls for more transparency with telehealth
The Consumer Council on Tuesday said telehealth service providers should enhance transparency to boost patients' trust in virtual consultations.
This came as the watchdog found that a majority of the 19 service providers it reviewed did not clearly state the refund arrangements for patients deemed unsuitable for virtual consultations.
Many of them also did not have a common standard on illnesses suitable for telehealth services.
The council's chairman, Clement Chan, said clear information such as the fees charged is crucial to consumers.
"The clarity of information on the telehealth website provided by different providers is of importance to the consumers when they make decisions on choosing which doctors they should go for," he said.
"Then they would be able to make informed decisions if the information about pricing and specialty of the doctor is more clear."
He went on to say that most of the related complaints the council received between 2022 and June this year were caused by the non-delivery of services and refund arrangements.
By surveying users and private medical practitioners offering telehealth services, the watchdog found that both parties were concerned about privacy.
For instance, they were worried that consultations conducted on platforms such as WhatsApp could be tracked.
In this regard, the council suggested traders and communication platforms set up a whitelist.
Chan noted while telehealth services are currently at an initial stage in Hong Kong, usage is expected to rise, particularly due to the ageing population.
"Also with the advancement of technology, I think people will be inclined to use more on the telehealth in order to save time for travelling, for taking time out to go to consult a doctor," he said.
The chairman added that the government should educate the public on how to use virtual consultations and always verify the identity of service providers to avoid getting scammed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
15 hours ago
- RTHK
Watchdog calls for more transparency with telehealth
Watchdog calls for more transparency with telehealth The Consumer Council on Tuesday said telehealth service providers should enhance transparency to boost patients' trust in virtual consultations. This came as the watchdog found that a majority of the 19 service providers it reviewed did not clearly state the refund arrangements for patients deemed unsuitable for virtual consultations. Many of them also did not have a common standard on illnesses suitable for telehealth services. The council's chairman, Clement Chan, said clear information such as the fees charged is crucial to consumers. "The clarity of information on the telehealth website provided by different providers is of importance to the consumers when they make decisions on choosing which doctors they should go for," he said. "Then they would be able to make informed decisions if the information about pricing and specialty of the doctor is more clear." He went on to say that most of the related complaints the council received between 2022 and June this year were caused by the non-delivery of services and refund arrangements. By surveying users and private medical practitioners offering telehealth services, the watchdog found that both parties were concerned about privacy. For instance, they were worried that consultations conducted on platforms such as WhatsApp could be tracked. In this regard, the council suggested traders and communication platforms set up a whitelist. Chan noted while telehealth services are currently at an initial stage in Hong Kong, usage is expected to rise, particularly due to the ageing population. "Also with the advancement of technology, I think people will be inclined to use more on the telehealth in order to save time for travelling, for taking time out to go to consult a doctor," he said. The chairman added that the government should educate the public on how to use virtual consultations and always verify the identity of service providers to avoid getting scammed.
RTHK
6 days ago
- RTHK
Half of shoes for younger students carry health risks
Half of shoes for younger students carry health risks The Consumer Council says tests found 13 out of 28 pairs of different shoe models for primary school children contained harmful substances. Photo: RTHK The Consumer Council on Thursday warned of health risks arising from shoes for primary school students after finding harmful substances in nearly half of samples that it tested. It urged manufacturers to improve the designs and materials used to make the shoes to protect children's health. Kenneth Chan, the vice chairman of the watchdog's committee on sustainability, public affairs and education, said the council purchased 28 pairs of different student shoe models from retail outlets at prices ranging from HK$198 to HK$599. Chemical tests showed that 13 pairs of shoes contained harmful substances, including chromium VI, which can cause lung cancer, and reproductive toxicant plasticisers. 'Using leather containing chromium VI could cause rashes, ulcers and allergic reactions resulting in contact dermatitis,' Chan said. 'Two models were detected with 4.5mg/kg and 5.0mg/kg of chromium VI in their lining, both exceeding the EU limit. "Although children generally wear socks with shoes, the risk of contact with chromium VI in shoes cannot be completely ruled out.' The plasticisers, which affect human hormone levels, were detected in four samples, with the concentration in one sample exceeding the European Union limit by nearly 86 times. 'Generally, plasticisers are not readily absorbed by human skin, but with wounds or eczema the risk of absorption increases,' he said. 'Parents should also teach their children to wash hands after putting on or taking off their shoes to avoid indirect ingestion of plasticisers through contact with the mouth or food.' Chan said two shoe models also showed cracks after 35,000 or 50,000 flexes in durability tests. Children should try on shoes in person and avoid wearing those that are bigger by one size, he added.
RTHK
15-07-2025
- RTHK
Be cautious when buying children's raincoats: watchdog
Be cautious when buying children's raincoats: watchdog The Consumer Council tested 14 raincoats and ponchos labelled as suitable for children aged 3 to 7. Photo: RTHK The Consumer Council on Tuesday urged parents to be more vigilant when purchasing children's raincoats, after some were found to contain harmful chemicals exceeding international safety standards. The watchdog put out the advisory following tests on 14 raincoats and ponchos labelled as suitable for children between 110cm and 130cm tall, or aged 3 to 7. It found that two models contained phthalates – chemicals used to make plastics more flexible and durable – that exceeded European standards, with the worst case surpassing the limit by 11 times. The two brands involved are and One. The watchdog said the risk of absorbing phthalates is normally low but warned that the use of sunscreen, wounds on the skin and having eczema could increase such a risk. It said absorbing the hazardous chemical may disrupt children's endocrine system and even affect their reproductive health. The product was also found to contain lead levels exceeding US regulatory limits. Additionally, the council found that raincoats from three brands – Kocotree, Smart Angel, and One – had cords and drawstrings that failed to meet European safety standards, posing a higher risk of strangulation. 'We suggest manufacturers to review their product materials and change to materials that do not have such hazardous chemicals,' Angel Cheung, the council's director of research and survey, said. 'For physical safety, we suggest manufacturers review their design of raincoats and ponchos to avoid having long drawstrings and cords to safeguard children safety and health.' In response to the report, submitted its own test results to the council, saying they did not find any abnormalities in their products but had suspended sales.
