logo
Dreams of independence in Europe's far north

Dreams of independence in Europe's far north

New European12-02-2025
'We could be independent within five years,' said Eirikur Lindenskov, the longstanding editor of Sosialurin , the main Faroese print newspaper.
'Five months, more like,' responded my old pal and former Republican politician Magni Arge, over a pint in the capital, Tórshavn.
Faroese politics have gone up in flames since Donald Trump took office: in uncertain times, the seesaw of Faroese public opinion usually tips towards the 'loyalist' view: that is, loyalty to Denmark. Not this time – Trump's threat to Denmark that he would buy Greenland or take it by force has changed everything, and independence seems to be on everybody's lips.
The Faroe Islands and Greenland are the last remnants of Denmark's empire. Sweden and Norway, Shetland, the African and Indian territories, Iceland, the Danish West Indies (now the American Virgin Islands after their sale to the US last century) – all are now gone.
But possession of Greenland earns Denmark a seat at the intergovernmental Arctic Council of eight nations, so it has been reluctant to lose its last two outposts, having defied a narrow Faroese vote for independence in 1946.
With less autonomy, Greenland joined the EU in 1973 on Danish terms that failed to acknowledge its oceanic territorial rights. It promptly left again following a referendum in 1982, after the Arctic island was granted a similar level of autonomy to the Faroes, which had never joined the EU.
Blindsided by Trump, Danish politicians have no easy answer to the charge that Denmark is an outdated colonial power that does not enjoy the full backing of the Greenlandic people.
Arge, who recently completed a thesis on Denmark's disposal of its colonial territories and its compliance (or otherwise) with international law, says Denmark justified its Greenland stance on the basis of Nato solidarity.
'Suddenly, that argument is completely exposed. The Danes are like a boxer who has gone 14 rounds with his opponent but he's still hanging in there… until his promoter comes and punches him on the nose.'
On January 24 the Faroese Parliament agreed to move to the next stage of agreeing a 'three-state solution' so as to neutralise Trump's demands. The idea is that Denmark and its two former colonies would become equal partners in a new 'commonwealth' under the Danish Crown. Each would have separate UN membership and, in all likelihood, Greenland and the Faroes would apply for EU membership, on their own.
During the 25 years I have been going to the Faroes I have witnessed extraordinary change. Once a sleepy, socially conservative backwater, fiercely divided between Danish loyalists and those who yearned for full independence, now even the right wing loyalist party has recognised, in private at least, the reality of an impending reset. Independence is not a left-right split: the current coalition is led by the Copenhagen-leaning social democrats, allied with centre left Republicans and the centre right pro-independence Progress party.
With the social democratic Danish government now ready to flesh out the three-state idea, pro-independence Faroese see an opportunity to slip through an open door to independence, alongside Greenland.
The modern Faroes boast a growing population – out of kilter with the reality in most remote European island communities – GDP per capita is higher than Denmark's, it has a booming fishery within its 200-mile limits, a world-renowned farmed salmon industry, successful IT and creative industries, and is undergoing a tourism boom.
Younger Faroese living in Denmark are coming home in ever greater numbers because of better opportunities – and because they see a recognisably more liberal society. A growing migrant population is the only way to meet workforce shortfalls in construction and service industries.
Atli Gregersen is the founder of Hiddenfjord, the all-Faroese salmon producer, and an elder statesman of the islands' business community. He is blunt: 'The salmon industry needs to be much closer to the EU, and if we are not part of Denmark, it's obvious we would be part of the EU. It's also obvious now that the Danes can't protect us. I like the Danes, but I don't ever like 'to be a Dane'.'
And at Guðrun and Guðrun – the Tórshavn-based knitwear partnership that went global when Sophie Gråbøl wore her traditional Faroese sweater in Danish TV's drama The Killing – Guðrun Røgvadóttir says: 'Some changes can come really suddenly. We have been working for independence for 70 years, and then Trump says 'I want Greenland', so there's no question that the relationship with Denmark will change.'
And her partner, Guðrun Ludvig, adds with a smile: 'I am never, ever going to live in Denmark again!'
Stan Abbott is a journalist and author of travel narratives
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Donald Trump's visit was a good thing for Police Scotland
Why Donald Trump's visit was a good thing for Police Scotland

Scotsman

time21 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Why Donald Trump's visit was a good thing for Police Scotland

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Well, well, despite all the scare stories, Donald Trump's four-day visit went exactly as planned. Contrary to the dire predictions of some, our policing system was not brought to its knees by a long weekend's work. If our community policing model could just survive the year of extractions caused by the 84/85 Miners Strike, it could surely withstand the extra demands of four days. It was, however, a tricky operation, with more than two venues and a lot of outside exposure for a president who has recently survived two assassination attempts, and appears to be 'catnip' for extremists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But now that Air Force One is well away and the pointless placards put away 'til next time, we can safely reflect on the fact that the presidential visit has actually benefited our police service. Let me explain. READ MORE: Deer put down after being hit by police car in Aberdeenshire ahead of Trump visit Police Scotland officers guard the Trump Turnberry golf course ahead of Donald Trump's arrival in Scotland (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images Ensuring match fitness Police Scotland, whether in its recent national incarceration or its old constituent forces, had a well-deserved reputation for the professional handling of major events. Next to London, Edinburgh had more major and royal events than any other city in the UK. The west of Scotland was also highly experienced. The continuous exposure to the ritual hate fest which is 'Old Firm' football ensures that police in and around Glasgow always knew how to control hostile crowds. But experience has a shelf-life and the preparedness of police forces to deal with complex and major events depends on 'match fitness'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The last truly major event in Scotland was the initial phase of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth in 2022, and, while it was logistically tricky, there was very little real threat. You have to go back to the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow the previous year to find a major event that tested all aspects of police planning and operations. But that was four years ago, and things change quickly at the top of policing. Almost all the senior officers involved in COP26 have now moved on and been replaced by officers, who though able have not actually been in the hot seat. For you can plan all you like, run exercises all day long, but there is no substitute for the real thing. Regardless of contingencies, things go wrong as soon as real people become involved. Small mistakes can turn into big problems, and before you know it you are reacting to incidents rather than driving the operation. Trump's habit of going 'off script' In the case of President Trump's visit, there were good points and bad. It was not a state visit with high-risk public processions in crowded streets. On the other hand, golf links, while remote, are vast open spaces and difficult to protect. Transport routes were also tricky, with lots of minor roads to be protected from disruption. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And the US Secret Service would have been on edge, with the recent assassination attempts and their president's habit of impromptu 'off-script' behaviour adding to the tension. But in the end, it all came good, as I was sure it would. The plan worked, and all the little things that went wrong were sorted quickly and without fuss. So congratulations to the event 'Gold Commander', Assistant Chief Emma Bond, and all her team. Another big job well done, lessons learned and valuable experience banked.

Talking politics has bartenders on edge in Trump's Washington DC
Talking politics has bartenders on edge in Trump's Washington DC

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Talking politics has bartenders on edge in Trump's Washington DC

Deke Dunne relocated to Washington DC from Wyoming in 2008 to pursue a career in politics. Though a progressive himself, he worked as a legislative aide for Republican senator Mike Enzi and spent many nights at local watering holes, guzzling $10 pitchers and eating wings with fellow broke staffers from both sides of the aisle. Long before he began moonlighting as a bartender, he learned that talking politics in DC bars was always a recipe for disaster. 'When I used to work in politics, I would spend a lot of time in bars near Capitol Hill,' said Dunne, 'so I was exposed to more political professionals. In those spaces, you often find yourself witnessing knockdown, drag-out arguments about politics.' Today, Dunne is one of DC's most influential mixologists, having abandoned politics almost a decade ago for a hospitality career. Serving drinks in a city that is more ideologically divided than ever, Dunne says he exercises more diplomacy behind the bar now than he ever did working in politics. There has always been an unspoken rule among Washington DC bartenders, according to Dunne, that political conversations across the bar should be avoided at all costs. It is generally understood that maintaining neutrality is critical to ensuring that guests of all political persuasions feel welcome. But the partisan rancor in Washington during the early stages of Donald Trump's presidential encore has created palpable tension in hospitality spaces, placing undue strain on staff to manage the vibes. 'It's always been an accepted truth in DC that every four to eight years, you get a whole new swath of people in from a different political ideology and if you want to have a strong, viable business, you don't talk politics,' said Dunne. 'Trump broke that rule.' According to local bar professionals in the nation's capital, the 'tending' part of bartending has never been more challenging. 'Politics in DC is not only something that a lot of people care about, but it's also a lot of people's livelihoods,' said Zac Hoffman, a bar industry veteran who until recently managed the restaurant inside the National Democratic Club near the Capitol. 'When you're talking about work, you're talking about politics. That's just the reality of where we live. It's a company town.' At Allegory, where Dunne oversees the beverage program, the bar has always taken a progressive approach, which occasionally provokes more conservative-minded guests who stay in the Eaton, the boutique hotel and cultural hub in downtown where the bar opened seven years ago. Its aesthetic and cocktail menu reimagines Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland, but featuring a young Ruby Bridges, the iconic civil rights activist who faced a jeering mob when she desegregated a Little Rock elementary school. 'Our very presence as a mission-based bar has sparked many conversations surrounding our concept, but also gender-neutral bathrooms, provocative art and advocacy,' he said. 'We've had people that are clearly uncomfortable with our concept leave and then post a negative review but frame it about something else.' The resurgent, and often strident, brand of conservatism that dominates the political sphere in Washington today has many of the city's more progressive bar owners on edge. At The Green Zone, a Middle Eastern cocktail bar in Adams Morgan on the city's north side, politics have always been integral to the bar's identity since it opened in 2018. Bar owner Chris Hassaan Francke, whose mother is Iraqi, has earned a reputation for being outspoken about political conflicts, especially those in the Middle East. But since Trump's return to office, he admits to having toned down some of the rhetoric. 'We changed the name of one of our most infamous cocktails [which contained an incendiary reference to the current president],' said Francke. 'It kills me that I can't always say everything I want to say, but ultimately the safety and wellbeing of my staff [are] more important than that.' While the city may be under Republican rule at the moment, DC itself is still overwhelmingly liberal (Kamala Harris won over 90% of the vote in the 2024 election), which means that a majority of its hospitality workers are liberal, too. 'I know some bartenders who will say the opposite of what they believe around customers they don't agree with politically,' said Hoffman. 'There are plenty of socialists who make great tips talking shit about liberals with Republicans.' It isn't only the more progressive venues around town that have become targets. After recent articles in the New York Times and Washington Post championed upscale Capitol Hill bistro Butterworth's as a haven for Maga sympathizers, backlash ensued. According to chef and co-owner Bart Hutchins – who, like Dunne, also left a career in politics to work in hospitality – being perceived as pro-Trump has attracted crowds to his fledgling restaurant, which opened last fall. But it's also created some unwanted operational challenges. For one, a serial provocateur with an air-horn routinely disrupts his weekly dinner service by sounding it through the front entrance, often multiple times a week. Despite Butterworth's reputation for being a sanctuary for high-profile Trump supporters such as Steve Bannon, not every political conversation at the bar is peaceful. 'I've broken up at least three political arguments since we opened,' said Hutchins. 'It always starts with somebody who's really, really insistent that everyone agrees with them, someone who's watching way too much cable news who's really determined to have their Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow moment.' Another unfortunate byproduct of being known as a right-leaning restaurant in a left-leaning town, Hutchins says, has been difficulty hiring and retaining staff. 'There have been times where it's been really hard to hire people,' he said. 'Early on, we had some servers self-select out and say: 'I don't want to serve these people.' But a lot of those people have moved on.' Over time, the staff has found ways to put their political convictions aside for the good of the restaurant. 'Our No 1 rule that's written on a door in the back is: 'Everybody's a VIP,' said Hutchins. 'We're not interested in using politics as a measuring device for whether or not someone deserves great service.' For DC bars, proximity to Capitol Hill has historically increased the likelihood that the conversations inside them will revolve around politics. And while some bars on the Hill may welcome these spirited conversations, many older, legacy bars prefer that patrons leave their partisanship at the door. Tune Inn, a well-loved dive bar that originally opened a few blocks from the Capitol in 1947, outwardly discourages political conversations of any kind. 'You can always tell the newbies because they want to come in and immediately start talking about politics,' said Stephanie Hulbert, who has worked as a bartender, server and now general manager at the bar for more than 17 years. 'They get shut down very quickly.' To keep the peace and maintain nonpartisan decorum inside the bar, she and her staff regularly intervene and admonish guests to keep their politics to themselves. These interventions occur at least two or three times every week, according to Hulbert, which is why the TVs inside the bar are deliberately set to sports channels rather than news outlets. 'I'll argue about sports all day long with you,' she said. 'But I won't argue about politics.' Despite the heightened anxiety in Washington, Dunne is optimistic that healthy dialogues in more progressive bars including Allegory can effect positive change. In January, Trump's inauguration drew conservative revelers to the Eaton, where inclusivity and multiculturalism is essential to its brand and mission. That led to some uncomfortable conversations with Republican patrons about the bar's progressive ethos. 'I don't know how effective the conversations were, but they were constructive,' he said. 'We found middle ground about the fact that what Ruby [Bridges] went through was tragic. It's common ground you don't find very often around here anymore.'

To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd
To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd

Simon Jenkins' article (He may talk rubbish but Trump has an eye for beauty, and that is a breath of fresh air, 1 August) was for the most part milquetoast Trump apologia, studded with the usual non-criticisms to give an impression of impartiality (yes, Trump does sometimes 'talk rubbish') and lauding one particular droplet in his firehose stream of insanity as some sort of visionary pronouncement (I would argue one of his more significant early actions was to economically attack my country, deride its sovereignty and muse on annexing us, but yes, restoring federal buildings is nice, too.) Where the article veered into insulting territory, however, was in comparing Trump to Teddy Roosevelt, claiming that both men 'seemed to care about America's natural environment, its forests and deserts, and a role for Washington in their custodianship'. To call this comparison absurd would be an understatement. Teddy Roosevelt was a committed conservationist who created the United States Forest Service; Trump called climate change a Chinese hoax. Roosevelt greatly expanded the national parks system; Trump opened up national parks in Alaska for oil drilling. Roosevelt created 51 wild bird reserves; Trump neutered the Migratory Bird Treaty Act at the behest of the fossil fuel industry. Roosevelt used executive orders to protect 600,000sq km of forest from logging and other exploitation; Trump used executive orders to try to bring back coal. Should I go on?Justin JoschkoOttawa, Ontario, Canada Imposing classical revival styles in federal architecture is the tool of dictators. To insinuate that Trump has any taste at all fails. His own ostentatious display of wealth by dipping everything that he surrounds himself with in cheesy gold paint is proof. The American Institute of Architects is on record against this mandate as being retrograde, and calls out this failure to promote forward-reaching design and creative Simmons Santa Fe, New Mexico, US Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. As I have driven across Kansas, Oklahoma and crossing into California from Arizona on Interstate 10, I smile when I see those turbines turning and think, ah, green energy, less pollution and saving the planet. They, to me, are beautiful, much better than coal belching pollutants into the AckersLeawood, Kansas, US How disingenuous to suggest that President Trump has any care for the aesthetic beauty of our environment, without noting his zeal for plundering the earth's resources to their limit for personal and private profit. Don't we all remember 'Drill, baby, drill'? His antipathy to wind turbines, regardless of where they are sited, owes more to his loathing for renewable energy solutions than it does to his concerns about aesthetic HutchesonCastle Carrock, Cumbria If Donald Trump has an eye for beauty, why did he destroy the sand dunes near Aberdeen in order to install his golf course? Cliff SaxtonLauzun, France

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store