
Karkardooma court lawyers end hunger strike over shifting 34 digital cheque bounce courts after ‘assurance and request' from Delhi HC
For a week, the lawyers in the court complex situated in Northeast Delhi had been abstaining from work as part of the protest. After the Coordination Committee of All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi held a meeting with Chief Justice Upadhyaya, the trial court lawyers finally decided to call off their strike.
'The Chief Justice took stock of the situation, requested the Members of the Karkardooma Bar to resume the work forthwith and further assured that all issues and concerns relating to functioning of Digital Courts shall be addressed at the earliest by the High Court at the institutional level,' a circular dated July 7 by Delhi High Court Registrar General Arun Bhardwaj reads.
'…the Chief Justice also conveyed to the Coordination Committee that he fully understands the situation and will take all possible steps to ensure that all courts function smoothly,' the circular stated.
Shortly afterwards, the secretary of the Shahdara Bar Association (SBA), advocate Narveer Dabas, issued a notice. 'In view of the written assurance & request of Hon'ble Chief Justice, High Court of Delhi, (Copy Annexed), it has been unanimously resolved by the Executive Committee of Shahdara Bar Association (Regd)., that all members of SBA (Regd.) shall resume their work from 08.07.2025,' it read.
Of the 34 courtrooms whose judges had been shifted, nine are from Dwarka, seven from Tis Hazari, six from Saket, five from Karkardooma Court, four from Rohini, and three from Patiala House Court. While the judges of the respective courtrooms were shifted to Rouse Avenue Court, the court staff (readers, ahlmads and stenographers), who ensure the functioning of the court, continue to operate from their respective districts.
Rooms have been allotted to these judges on the seventh floor of the Rouse Avenue court complex in Central Delhi. The Delhi High Court, which was behind this move, had cited 'optimal utilisation of available infrastructure and resources' and 'inadequate space' to justify the shift of judges of digital cheque bounce courts in a May 30 notification.
'The remaining arrangement, including support staff deployment and recording of evidence from the respective District Court Complexes, shall continue as per the previous directions/practice until adequate and permanent space is made available in the District Courts concerned to which these Digital NI Act Courts ultimately belong,' the high court notification had stated.
The move did not sit well with the Karkardooma Court lawyers and other trial court lawyers, who had flagged confusion in recording evidence, lack of virtual facilities and connectivity issues as their main problems.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Pay 1.2-lakh school fee with interest: Court
New Delhi: A Delhi court recently directed the father of a student at a private school in south Delhi to pay a pending fee of Rs 1.2 lakh with 10% interest. The court of civil judge Yashu Khurana observed that the father of the student did not appear to contest the suit filed by the school, and it remained uncontroverted and unrebutted. The judge was hearing a suit filed by the defendant, Bluebells School International, against Virender Rana for the recovery of the amount of over Rs 1.2 lakh, which was due as school fees for his ward. The school approached the court, stating that it is entirely dependent on the fees paid by the parents to meet its expenses and maintain high standards of education. The school presented evidence before the court, stating that the father did not pay the fees for four years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. The child left the school in 2022 while he was in the Class VII. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Advocate Atul Jain, counsel for the school, submitted that the case of the school stands duly proved by virtue of unchallenged suit and the documents placed on record. In its plea, the school said that Rana, "under the shield of the directorate of education order dated Aug 1, 2018, regarding the fee structure of the school for the year 2017-18 and in the guise of the fact that the issue regarding the same was sub judice before Delhi High Court, long delayed the payment of the dues." The court, noting the school's submission that the delay in payment jeopardised its financial situation, said, "Perusal of the record shows that the present suit was filed on Oct 16, 2024, whereas the cause of action last arose upon the plaintiff on Feb 7, 2024, when the defendant made the last payment against the outstanding amount."


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi HC denies bail to Kapil Wadhawan in Rs 34,615-crore bank fraud case
The Delhi High Court has denied bail to Kapil Wadhawan, former chairman of DHFL, in connection with a Rs 34,615-crore bank loan fraud case. The court cited the seriousness of the allegations, Wadhawan's central role in the conspiracy, the risk of witness tampering, and the magnitude of the funds siphoned off as reasons for the denial. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Delhi High Court Monday rejected a bail petition filed by Kapil Wadhawan , former chairman of the erstwhile Dewan Housing Finance Corp in a Rs 34,615-crore bank loan fraud Ravinder Dudeja said that having regard to the nature and seriousness of the allegations, the gravity of the offence, Wadhwan's 'central role in the conspiracy, the potential adverse impact of his release on the trial and the huge magnitude of the funds siphoned of, this court finds no merit in the present (bail) application.'The court cannot permit the release of a person who is prima facie the mastermind of a deep-rooted financial fraud, especially when the trial is at a nascent stage, the judge said, adding that if released on bail, Wadhwan 'may tamper with the evidence or worse flee from justice. Many of the witnesses in this case are stated to be either ex-employees or associates of DHFL and as such there is a high risk and possibility that the petitioner might try to influence the witnesses.'The judge said that economic offences of such magnitude not only destroy public confidence in the financial system but also eat away the economic foundation of society. 'They require a firm judicial response guided by the rule of law and public interest. The applicant has failed to make out a case for bail. The application is accordingly dismissed,' the order court noted that Wadhawan was 'summoned by ED where he did not appear on pretext of Covid-19, while he was caught with his entire family and entourage during complete lockdown and FIR was registered against him.'Besides, the conduct of Wadhawan during custody has not been beyond reproach, according to the HC. 'The allegations regarding manipulation of valuable assets and transactions carried out during judicial custody are grave and suggest that the applicant continues to exercise significant control and influence,' according to the January 24, the Supreme Court had cancelled the default bail granted to Dheeraj and his brother Kapil Wadhawan on the grounds that the HC and the trial court had 'greatly erred' in granting default bail to to a FIR based on a complaint by Union Bank of India , the Wadhawan brothers and other had allegedly entered into a criminal conspiracy to cheat a consortium of 17 banks. The accused persons induced the consortium to sanction loans aggregating to Rs 42,871.42 crore. It was found that the accused persons "siphoned off and misappropriated" a significant portion of these funds by "falsifying" the books of the DHFL and dishonestly defaulted on repayment of the legitimate dues of the said consortium banks, thereby causing a loss of Rs 34,615 crore to the consortium lenders. So far, this is the largest banking loan fraud in India.


Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
Delhi court asks child's father to clear over Rs 1.21 lakh school dues
New Delhi: A Delhi court has directed a man to pay over Rs 1.21 lakh as outstanding fee for his child to a south Delhi international school. Civil judge Yashu Khurana was hearing a suit filed by the defendant Bluebells School International against the plaintiff Virender Rana for recovery of the amount of over Rs 1.21 lakh, which was due as school fee for his ward. In an order dated July 23, the court said the school alleged that Rana "under the shield of the directorate of education (DoE) order dated August 1, 2018, regarding the the fee structure of the school for the year 2017-18 and in guise of the fact that the issue regarding the same was sub judice before the Delhi High Court, long delayed the payment of the dues". The school submitted due to the delay in the payment, its financial situation was "jeopardised". "Present suit has been filed on October 16, 2024, whereas the cause of action last arose upon the plaintiff on February 7, 2024, when the defendant made the last payment against the outstanding amount," the court said. As Rana did not appear before the court, the order said, the school's submissions remained uncontroverted and unrebutted. The court decreed the suit in the school's favour and directed Rana to pay the outstanding principal amount of over Rs 1.21 lakh along with 10 per cent interest.