
Reduce over-dependence on China for critical minerals
As we steer toward a future shaped by renewable energy and electric mobility, lithium-ion batteries have emerged as the backbone of this transformation. From electric vehicles (EVs) to energy storage systems (ESS), the demand for lithium and other critical minerals is surging exponentially. Yet, even as global momentum accelerates, India finds itself at a juncture where we are deeply dependent on foreign sources, especially from China, to meet our mineral needs.
This import reliance is not just a logistical inconvenience; it is a strategic vulnerability. Renewable energy, by its very nature, should represent independence in a way that is free from fossil fuel geopolitics and volatility. But when a country imports nearly 100% of its lithium and other key mineral requirements, the promise of energy sovereignty begins to waver.
Recognising this urgent challenge, the Government of India has launched the National Critical Mineral Mission which mandates PSUs to enter into public private partnerships with private entities such as ourselves and many other innovative companies to make foreign and domestic investments, acquire technology and prepare itself for the large-scale operations that are to come.
The lithium-ion battery supply chain is inherently complex, requiring a seamless integration of mineral exploration, refining, cell chemistry, and manufacturing. It is not enough to mine lithium; one must also refine it with precision, a capability that India currently lacks at commercial scale. We are also vulnerable to a lack of policy support for battery component manufacturers who can apply new technologies they develop or acquire.
This is precisely where our next move becomes critical. As the US-led 14-nation Mineral Security Partnership aligns to democratise and strengthen the critical minerals supply chain, Altmin is stepping up to acquire a sizeable stake in a commercial scale lithium refinery, the only one operational outside China. The move will give Altmin access to refining technology that would otherwise take years to develop. The Government of India and other research and development (R&D) entities are exploring the exploitation of critical minerals. But despite these efforts, India will miss opportunities of the green energy race to the already established Chinese eco-system; unless India adapts existing technology and fast-tracks its own ecosystem reinforced through government policy.
A quick five-point industry ask, if met, will accelerate India's self-reliance in this sector. Standardisation of original equipment manunfacturer (OEM) specifications is the need of the hour. For consistent and scalable manufacturing of cells, the specifications demanded by OEMs must be standardised based on industry requirements. This will eliminate unnecessary variability and help manufacturers plan optimal production lines. Next in line is stabilisation of kilowatt-hour (kWh) pricing. The current spot prices for cell energy (kWh) are influenced by undervalued and cut-rate pricing practises, especially from China. To counteract this, a mechanism to stabilise the kWh pricing is needed, ensuring fair value for domestic manufacturers. I would like to propose a minimum support price for cells so that there is a baseline economic viability that is ensured for manufacturers, independent of international price fluctuations.
The cost of cell production is directly tied to the input components—anode, cathode, electrolyte, and other battery materials. A component-wise minimum support price framework with a fixed minimum profit margin for component manufacturers will encourage growth in these stages of the value chain. To promote Atmanirbhar Bharat, all cell manufacturers availing the minimum support price regime should achieve at least 60% localisation within the next two years. This localisation should be monitored and audited to ensure compliance in both letter and spirit.
These measures will catalyse domestic manufacturing and protect Indian manufacturers from global market distortions, enabling long-term competitiveness and technological sovereignty.
For these efforts to bear fruit at scale, we must adapt existing technologies, foster global collaborations, and build a nurturing domestic ecosystem that can withstand the rigors of future demand. Only then can we secure not just our energy future—but our strategic autonomy.
This article is authored by Anjani Sri Mourya Sunkavalli, founder and MD, Altmin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar rape victim's death: Opposition slams govt's insensitivity, latter asks not to politicise case
Patna: The brutal rape, followed by tragic demise of nine-year-old Dalit girl from Muzaffarpur, has left the local population incensed and outraged, with many demanding capital punishment for the accused. The political landscape, though remains divided over state's apathy and insensitivity towards the teenage victim, the issue has turned into major political row with the ruling party and the Opposition taking potshots at each other. The minor rape victim succumbed to injuries due to systematic apathy and medical negligence. The girl was made to wait for hours at the Patna Medical College Hospital (PMCH) before admission, which her family claimed, led to her death. The girl, after being sexually assaulted, was found in critical condition in a canal on May 26 in Kudhni block of Muzaffarpur district and later brought to Patna for treatment but she died waiting outside the hospital. Nitish Kumar-led NDA government has promised strict action against those found guilty, however, the Opposition, unconvinced with double engine's promises on law and order, has accused it of being 'complicit' in the tragic death of the Dalit girl. "This is a serious incident, and the accused was arrested by the police soon. Legal proceedings have already begun. A chargesheet will be filed soon, and the accused will face the law under a speedy trial," JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar said. "She was everyone's child. It is not right to politicise this issue. The hospital has given an explanation and the events of that night, and all of it is being investigated. The CCTV footage is also being examined. Everything will be investigated according to the law," he added. Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai gave assurances of appropriate punishment to the accused and also took a dig at jungle raj in past regimes. "During the Lalu-Rabri tenure, the culprits and corrupt used to get protected. However, now the NDA government under the leadership of Nitish Kumar ensures culprits face appropriate punishment." However, the Opposition has intensified its attack on the ruling dispensation, accusing the administration of criminal negligence and misgovernance. Bihar Congress in-charge Krishna Allavaru slammed the government, stating, "It is very tragic whenever someone loses their life. This was a young girl who faced great injustice. Though they say good governance exists, however, here there is more misgovernance." "She struggled for 3-4 days but did not receive proper treatment. People had to take to the streets just to get her admitted to the hospital. The Chief Minister, ministers, and the administration failed to take care of the girl. At last, the child gave up. This is not just embarrassing for Bihar but for the entire nation. The incident is very painful. We demand justice for her," he added. On Sunday, widespread protests broke out in Patna and Muzaffarpur. In Patna, party workers led by Bihar Congress president Rajesh Ram gathered at IT crossing and burnt effigies of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Health Minister Mangal Pandey while demanding a judicial probe and the resignation of the Health Minister. "If the girl does not get justice, I will travel across Bihar with her ashes," Rajesh Ram announced during the protest.


India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
China makes shocking move against India, decides to stop supply of…, set to affect India due to….
China has imposed control on rare earth magnets which has created several challenges for Indian automobile companies. Existing stocks are expected to last only until early June, it can create serious problems and disruptions in the vehicle production industry. Indian automobile manufacturers are getting delays in the supply of rare earth magnets. After China's major export regulations there was a delay in shipment for these components. Manufacturers have already warned that if supplies do not go normal then it can impact vehicle production. According to a media report, to address this issue, a delegation from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) and the Automotive Component Manufacturers Association (ACMA) is preparing to travel to China to talk with Chinese officials. The Indian government is also trying to resolve the matter diplomatically. Neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets are important for electric and conventional vehicles. These magnets are used in systems of motors and steering, brakes, wipers, and audio equipment. Even a minor shortage of these magnets affects assembly lines. China's Hold On Earth Magnets 90% of the world's rare earth magnets are produced by China. China asked exporters to take government licenses and detailed end-use certificates from buyers before shipping. Due to these new rules the approval process has slowed down. According to the Economic Times , many consignments for India are stuck at Chinese ports after this rule. However many European companies could get export approvals, but Indian goods are stuck in the country. India imported 460 tons of rare earth magnets from China in the last fiscal year. Now India does not have any other option which can support countries' production lines.


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Without escalating dispute…': GTRI recommends this ‘pragmatic route' for India to deal with Donald Trump's tariffs on steel & aluminium
Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the US, effective from June 4, 2025. (AI image) Donald Trump's fresh set of tariffs on steel and aluminium products should be dealt with as a part of the India-US trade deal framework, says the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). This strategy holds particular significance as India and the United States are presently engaged in comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) discussions. Last week US President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the US, effective from June 4, 2025. GTRI recommends that India should pursue a practical approach by leveraging the current bilateral FTA discussions as a negotiation instrument with the United States. The GTRI analysis indicates that through the FTA framework, India could achieve a favourable resolution by urging the United States to remove or substantially lower the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium products. Also Read | 'Wait and watch…': India, US working to give preferential market access to businesses, says Piyush Goyal on trade deal "This approach would allow India to use its negotiating leverage to gain meaningful market access benefits without escalating the dispute through trade or legal fights at this stage," the release by GTRI said according to an ANI report. Meanwhile, the US dismissed India's WTO petition on May 23, stating that their steel and aluminium tariffs do not constitute safeguard measures under WTO regulations. The American stance maintains that these tariffs are implemented under Section 232 for national security considerations, falling within Article XXI of GATT, rather than the Safeguards Agreement. This position invalidates India's proposed suspension of concessions under the Safeguards Agreement. After the US rejected India's suggested retaliation on both legal and procedural bases, India can still explore alternative courses of action. GTRI noted that one option involves implementing retaliatory tariffs against the US, which would "send a clear message, but it also brings the risk of U.S. countermeasures and possible legal battles". "Other countries like the EU, Canada, and China have done this against the U.S. Section 232 tariffs as a political signal of resistance." Another possibility involves initiating a WTO dispute to challenge the US's use of the national security exception, though this approach presents challenges due to America's historical dismissal of WTO judgements on similar grounds and the currently non-operational Appellate Body. Also Read | Will the Donald Trump administration be forced to give billions of dollars in tariff refunds? Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now