
Reduce over-dependence on China for critical minerals
This import reliance is not just a logistical inconvenience; it is a strategic vulnerability. Renewable energy, by its very nature, should represent independence in a way that is free from fossil fuel geopolitics and volatility. But when a country imports nearly 100% of its lithium and other key mineral requirements, the promise of energy sovereignty begins to waver.
Recognising this urgent challenge, the Government of India has launched the National Critical Mineral Mission which mandates PSUs to enter into public private partnerships with private entities such as ourselves and many other innovative companies to make foreign and domestic investments, acquire technology and prepare itself for the large-scale operations that are to come.
The lithium-ion battery supply chain is inherently complex, requiring a seamless integration of mineral exploration, refining, cell chemistry, and manufacturing. It is not enough to mine lithium; one must also refine it with precision, a capability that India currently lacks at commercial scale. We are also vulnerable to a lack of policy support for battery component manufacturers who can apply new technologies they develop or acquire.
This is precisely where our next move becomes critical. As the US-led 14-nation Mineral Security Partnership aligns to democratise and strengthen the critical minerals supply chain, Altmin is stepping up to acquire a sizeable stake in a commercial scale lithium refinery, the only one operational outside China. The move will give Altmin access to refining technology that would otherwise take years to develop. The Government of India and other research and development (R&D) entities are exploring the exploitation of critical minerals. But despite these efforts, India will miss opportunities of the green energy race to the already established Chinese eco-system; unless India adapts existing technology and fast-tracks its own ecosystem reinforced through government policy.
A quick five-point industry ask, if met, will accelerate India's self-reliance in this sector. Standardisation of original equipment manunfacturer (OEM) specifications is the need of the hour. For consistent and scalable manufacturing of cells, the specifications demanded by OEMs must be standardised based on industry requirements. This will eliminate unnecessary variability and help manufacturers plan optimal production lines. Next in line is stabilisation of kilowatt-hour (kWh) pricing. The current spot prices for cell energy (kWh) are influenced by undervalued and cut-rate pricing practises, especially from China. To counteract this, a mechanism to stabilise the kWh pricing is needed, ensuring fair value for domestic manufacturers. I would like to propose a minimum support price for cells so that there is a baseline economic viability that is ensured for manufacturers, independent of international price fluctuations.
The cost of cell production is directly tied to the input components—anode, cathode, electrolyte, and other battery materials. A component-wise minimum support price framework with a fixed minimum profit margin for component manufacturers will encourage growth in these stages of the value chain. To promote Atmanirbhar Bharat, all cell manufacturers availing the minimum support price regime should achieve at least 60% localisation within the next two years. This localisation should be monitored and audited to ensure compliance in both letter and spirit.
These measures will catalyse domestic manufacturing and protect Indian manufacturers from global market distortions, enabling long-term competitiveness and technological sovereignty.
For these efforts to bear fruit at scale, we must adapt existing technologies, foster global collaborations, and build a nurturing domestic ecosystem that can withstand the rigors of future demand. Only then can we secure not just our energy future—but our strategic autonomy.
This article is authored by Anjani Sri Mourya Sunkavalli, founder and MD, Altmin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump tariffs jolt Malaysia, disrupting solar exports, China trade ties
By Alexandra Stevenson and Zunaira Saieed It's become a familiar strategy in Southeast Asia. Companies from China, coveting the American market but blocked by tariffs, do an end run. They pour into a country, opening factories and filling supply chains. They invest billions of dollars and create jobs and business opportunities. The local economy prospers. President Trump wants to stop that trade. On Friday he unveiled a new layer of tariffs — set at a global rate of 40 percent — on all goods that move through a third country before they get to the United States. The tariffs are aimed at stopping transshipment, a practice the administration says has allowed Chinese-made goods to skirt punitive tariffs. The policy landed with a thunderbolt in Southeast Asia, where Chinese investment has helped the economies of poorer neighbors grow more quickly. A crackdown on transshipment will be an economic blow. It also complicates the supply chain in Southeast Asia, which depends heavily on Chinese raw materials and components. From Vietnam to Cambodia to Indonesia, officials and executives are rushing to assess the consequences. The new tariffs raise hard questions for countries that have long used Chinese components to make the final products they ship to the United States. Does the Trump administration, which has yet to detail how it would enforce the new transshipment tariffs, want to tax it all? One country offers a case study others could follow for what to do next: Malaysia. Over the last decade, Malaysia rose to become one of the world's biggest makers of solar panels. Ten companies, most of them Chinese, shoveled $15 billion into factories around the country, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Then, under President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the United States put tariffs on solar equipment coming from Malaysia of as much as 250 percent. Today, just two solar panel makers remain and one of them has ceased much of its production. The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of over 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth. 'We're trying to think about ourselves not just as recipients of investment, but actually creators of technology,' said Liew Chin Tong, the deputy minister of investment, trade and industry. 'We want to think of ourselves not as a production site, but also as a consumer site with a sizable middle class.' Officials in Malaysia, who had been trying to work out a trade deal, had said they were ready to work with the Trump administration to stop companies from passing off Chinese-made goods as their own. But they learned on Friday they would be hit with a base tariff of 19 percent. An additional 40 percent would be added for any goods deemed to have originated in China. Those are set to take effect this week. The country finds itself caught squarely between the United States and China. Malaysia believes that Chinese solar companies can play an important role in its attempts to increase renewable power sources. Its goal over the next five years is for half the country's energy consumption to use clean sources like solar power. Warehouses are stuffed with solar equipment that can no longer be exported to the United States, and the government wants companies to sell it to local solar farms. One challenge for Malaysia is that it still needs China's solar industry on its side. More than 75 percent of the solar panels that Malaysia uses locally are imported from China, where prices are much cheaper because of Beijing's industrial policies that encourage exports. Longer term, Malaysia wants the Chinese companies to restart their mothballed factories to make solar panels for the domestic market. More than any other region, Southeast Asia has felt the brunt of the trade war between the United States and China that began in earnest during Mr. Trump's first presidency. Southeast Asian countries profited as Chinese and global multinationals relocated their factories out of China to avoid Mr. Trump's first-term tariffs. For Malaysia, the aim now is to blunt the collateral damage from the battle between the world's two largest economies. 'I don't like to see us just having to choose between US and China,' said Mr. Liew, adding 'I want to see us strengthening ourselves.' Both superpowers have loomed large in Malaysia. The American tech companies Nvidia, Intel and Texas Instruments built huge facilities to make semiconductors, seeing the country as a good location to hedge against the risks of doing business in China. More than 600 American companies invested in Malaysia last year, said Siobhan Das, chief executive of the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce. Chinese investment, meanwhile, has shaped Malaysia's manufacturing sector, and China has ranked as one of the top investors in the country for the last decade. Malaysia's imports from China have nearly doubled over the past decade, according to Lee Heng Guie, executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Center, a Malaysian think tank. It was also about a decade ago when Chinese solar companies began to invest in factories in Malaysia. The factories made everything for export to the United States and other major markets like Europe. 'We knew we could not compete with the Chinese companies in the long run,' said Lisa Ong, chief executive at Malaysian Solar Resources, a solar company that shut its panel production facilities in 2013. After six years, the company found it was being outperformed on price and production capacity. Today it has switched its focus to building solar farms and importing panels from China. After the Biden administration initiated an investigation into unfair practices by Chinese solar companies in Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand, Chinese companies began to slow some of their operations. The investigation led to steep tariffs on a handful of Chinese solar companies operating in these countries, and prompted most of them to abandon their factories in Malaysia. The only Chinese company still making some solar panels in Malaysia is Longi, an industry giant. When it opened its third Malaysian factory on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur in 2023, it heralded the opening as a 'pivotal moment in Longi's global endeavors.' Its executives boasted of creating 900 jobs and promised to increase the openings to 2,000. Instead of expanding, Longi has shut down several production lines at the facility. Today, much of the space at Longi's plant is unused. On one weekday last month, the parking lot was less than half full. Longi declined to comment for this article. Longi has met with Malaysian officials to discuss how to support more of the local supply chain, according to Justin Sim, the president of the Malaysian Photovoltaic and Sustainable Energy Industry Association. He is pressing the government to rebuild a domestic solar panel industry by harnessing the knowledge of Chinese companies like Longi. 'All the Chinese companies came here when there was not really any capacity or interest in building the local market,' Mr. Sim said. 'And then they all went bust or left because they were hit with tariffs from the US and Europe.' Ms. Ong of Malaysian Solar Resources said she would not rule out her company going back to solar panel manufacturing, especially after the Chinese government announced plans to scale back subsidies to companies. Still, she is hesitant, citing the intense competitiveness of Chinese firms. 'I'm worried and a bit concerned about our future,' she said. 'Many Chinese nationals are migrating to Malaysia and they are a lot more industrious than many of us.'


First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Has Trump Damaged India-US ties Beyond Repair?
Has Trump Damaged India-US ties Beyond Repair? | Vantage with Palki Sharma The trade war is just the beginning. Trump's 25% tariffs, his insults, and his sudden pivot to Pakistan signal something deeper: a breakdown in political trust. What happened to the 'friendship' he once claimed with India? With no pushback from U.S. lawmakers and fading bipartisan support, is the India-U.S. partnership in crisis? Can it be salvaged? Palki Sharma tells you. See More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Goldman Sachs trims India's GDP forecast on Trump's 25% tariffs
Global brokerage Goldman Sachs has marginally lowered India's economic growth forecast as the country prepares to face the impact of US President Donald Trump's proposed 25 per cent tariffs. Trump said that India has tariffs that are "among the highest in the World," and are the most "strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country." He also threatened further penalties for its imports of Russian energy. However, India remains firm on its Russia ties with a broad consensus on avoiding retaliation and resorting to negotiations. Brokerages, however, are hopeful that the final tariff may land lower, 15 to 20 per cent, as both nations continue to negotiate a solution. The latest tariff imposition has led analysts at Goldman Sachs to trim India's real GDP growth forecasts by 0.1 percentage point for calendar year 2025 (CY25) and 0.2 percentage point for CY26, to 6.5 per cent and 6.4 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y), respectively. The rural consumption recovery is sustaining, given strong agricultural activity reflected in higher sowing of summer crops and lower food inflation, which is likely boosting real rural incomes, it said. Amongst urban activity indicators, while the services PMI was strong, air passenger traffic growth has been subdued, it said. "In our view, some of these tariffs are likely to be negotiated lower over time, and further downside risk to the growth trajectory mainly emanates from the uncertainty channel." A rapid and mutually beneficial resolution of the US-India trade negotiations, or a quicker-than-expected rise in core inflation, could alter this view, Goldman Sachs said. Further, with downside risks to growth from the tariff-related uncertainty, along with a generally benign inflation trajectory, Goldman Sachs expects the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to cut the repo rate by another 25 basis points in the fourth quarter (Q4) this year. In the August meet, RBI is likely to remain status quo as per a Business Standard poll, with all analysts expecting a further reduction in the 2025-26 (FY26) inflation forecast.