logo
How India can navigate Trump's tariff storm in a choppy world

How India can navigate Trump's tariff storm in a choppy world

First Post08-08-2025
Trump's tariffs and the penalty he is likely to put on India for purchasing Russian oil have undeniably introduced a new layer of complexity to the Indo-American relationship read more
Good diplomacy aims for win-win situations where all parties involved in a negotiation or agreement benefit, fostering cooperation and long-term stability. A win-win approach can de-escalate tensions and build trust between nations. This contrasts with a zero-sum approach where one party's gain necessitates another's loss. Win-win outcomes in diplomacy are achieved through negotiation, compromise, and a focus on mutual gains.
India and the US have deepened their partnership across multiple sectors, driven by shared interests, democratic values, and strong people-to-people ties. Key areas of collaboration include defence, technology and innovation, space, semiconductors, biotechnology, cybersecurity, advanced telecommunications, clean energy, trade and economy, energy, education and culture.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, India's relations with the US, which were progressing from strength to strength, are now facing serious challenges. Some experts are even saying that President Donald Trump has sent Indo-American ties to the drawing board.
Indeed, a comprehensive US-India trade deal has hit several roadblocks and is currently facing uncertainty. The US has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on a broad range of Indian goods, effective August 7, 2025. This comes despite previous indications of good progress in trade talks and amidst a deadline for a possible agreement. In addition, President Trump has signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports. He has said that these additional tariffs are because India is purchasing Russian oil. That will raise the total tariff on Indian imports to the United States to 50 per cent which is among the highest tariff rates imposed by the US. India has 21 days to respond to the additional tariffs before they go into effect.
A major point of contention is the US' demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy sectors. India has consistently resisted, citing concerns about the livelihoods of millions of small farmers and potential disruption from subsidised US products. India is also pushing for the removal of the recently imposed tariffs and further reductions on other products, such as steel and
aluminium, to gain a competitive advantage over other countries.
The situation is deteriorating further as the US has expressed concerns about India's continued purchases of Russian oil and military equipment, linking these actions to the current trade impasse. President Trump has accused India of profiting from the Ukraine war by selling Russian oil in the open market and said that the US will be 'substantially' increasing the tariffs imposed on Indian imports in response. The Time magazine (August 5) has said that 'President Trump seems unafraid to burn India, a long-time friend of the
US, over its Russian oil purchases'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India, however, maintains that its relationship with Russia stands on its own merits and that its energy purchases are vital for its economy. India has said that such targeting by the US was 'unjustified and unreasonable' in light of continued and substantial Western trade with Moscow. In a statement issued on August 4, India's Ministry of External Affairs said, 'Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel machinery and transport equipment. Where the US is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, and fertilisers as well as chemicals. The statement concluded by saying that like any other major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.
The Indian government has also decried the executive order on additional tariffs. India has said, 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, the important question is whether the position taken by India will diffuse tensions with the US or escalate them even further. Going by past trends, Trump is unlikely to be swayed by the undeniable logic contained in India's statement, as it runs counter to his own stand. Being a businessman, Trump brings a transactional approach to diplomacy. His style of functioning is
such that he feels happy only when the other party is seen to be making concessions. The concessions must sound big even if they are not quite so, for Trump likes to feel that he has won the contest.
An article entitled 'India Defies Trump on Russian Oil Despite Tariff Threats' in The Wall Street Journal (August 5) states that 'India is digging in its heels and resisting pressure from the US to curb purchases of Russian oil, despite threats by President Trump to retaliate by imposing higher tariffs on India'. Based on this assessment, it appears that the statement by the Ministry of External
Affairs could escalate tensions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US tariffs could potentially damage India's economy in several ways. They will increase the cost of Indian products for American consumers, making them less competitive compared to goods from other countries not subject to these tariffs or to lower tariffs. The tariffs could put Indian exports at a disadvantage in the US market compared to competitors like Vietnam and Bangladesh.
Sectors heavily reliant on exports to the US, such as gemstones and jewellery, textiles and apparel, pharmaceuticals, and potentially auto components, are likely to experience the most significant negative impacts. India supplies a significant portion of US pharmaceutical needs. Tariffs could lead to decreased demand, potentially impacting earnings for Indian pharmaceutical companies
which derive a substantial portion of their revenue from the US market. A decline in export orders could lead to production cuts and job losses, particularly in labour-intensive sectors and smaller businesses in India.
The American tariffs on India, which was hiked to 50 per cent, citing Delhi's continued buying of the Russian oil, could also potentially reduce the country's GDP growth by a significant amount. Further penalties imposed by the US could weaken capital inflows and investment in India. Thus, Trump's tariffs could be considered a near-term headwind for the Indian equity market
and could contribute to volatility.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In short, a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement remains elusive. India-US tensions are escalating and are likely to continue doing so in the immediate future. US tariffs could hurt India's economy by making its exports less competitive, potentially impacting key industries and potentially slowing down its overall economic growth, while also straining the diplomatic relationship
between the two countries.
The tariffs and the likely penalties linked to India's purchase of Russian oil have already caused diplomatic friction. They will also damage the long-standing, carefully nurtured relationship between India and the US. India views the imposition of tariffs and penalties related to Russian oil purchases as an attempt at coercion and interference in its foreign policy. While India has
initially ruled out immediate retaliation, it has expressed its intention to safeguard its national interests and economic security, possibly through future measures. There are reports that India could consider imposing reciprocal taxes on US imports to compensate for the anticipated $33 billion loss in exports due to the tariffs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
There are also geopolitical factors at play which India cannot ignore. Trump has moved closer to Pakistan, with which he has historically had a complex and sometimes tense relationship. It cannot be forgotten that in January 2019, Trump had said that the US had given Pakistan 33 billion US dollars in aid, and in return, Pakistan had given only lies and deceit. He is now speaking about
Pakistan in a completely different tone. Trump's approach also raises concerns about the potential elevation of Pakistan as preferred regional partner for the US, further destabilising the dynamics in South Asia.
It's widely acknowledged that high-level diplomatic intervention can sometimes achieve remarkable results in international relations. One wonders whether the need of the hour is for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to step in and stem the rot. After all, the strategic India-America bilateral relationship built over decades is now also at risk.
PM Modi has repeatedly said that solutions to problems can only be found through dialogue and diplomacy. He has emphasised that the world needs leaders who can find solutions to global complexities and needs while prioritising their nation's interests on the global stage. He has received numerous international awards, including the Legion of Merit on December 21,
2020, from President Trump himself! The award recognised PM Modi's leadership and vision for India's global emergence, his contributions to advancing the India-United States strategic partnership, and his role in promoting global peace and prosperity. All the accolades received by him are seen as a recognition of his global leadership and standing on the world stage.
However, without some concessions, Trump is unlikely to soften his position.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What sort of concessions can PM Modi offer?
India has often used TRQs (tariff rate quotas) which involve a two-tiered system. A specified quantity of a particular agricultural product can be imported at a lower or even zero duty. Imports exceeding this quota face a higher tariff rate. India currently has TRQs for commodities like corn, sunflower oil, rapeseed oil and milk powder. While India has reportedly offered TRQs to
the US, the extent of these concessions is limited.
According to a report prepared by the US Department of Agriculture, top agricultural prospects for US exporters include cotton, dairy products, ethanol, fresh fruit, forest products, processed food and beverages, pulses, and tree
nuts. According to this report,India has tremendous potential to be a large consumer of many of the high-quality and diverse agricultural products that the United States has to offer.
The US is seeking to significantly expand its agricultural exports to India, with a particular focus on commodities like cotton, corn and soybeans. India has concerns about allowing imports of certain products like corn and soybeans due to potential impacts on domestic farmers. However, it must be pointed out that the domestic demand for both these items is rising.
India is a significant consumer of corn, particularly for animal feed, human consumption, and increasingly for ethanol production. While it's also a notable producer, recent trends show a growing domestic demand that is reshaping the country's corn market. Corn consumption in India is rising, driven by factors like the adoption of corn-based snacks and dishes, increased use in
animal feed, and the growing biofuel industry.
The Indian government's decision to promote ethanol production from corn has significantly increased demand, leading to a surge in imports. Corn is a crucial component of animal feed, especially for poultry and dairy, and the expansion of the livestock sector also contributes to the rising demand for corn. While India is a major corn producer, the increased domestic demand,
coupled with the ethanol push, is leading to a shift in focus towards more imports for meeting domestic needs.
Likewise, India is a significant importer of soybeans and soybean oil. While India is no doubt a major producer, its domestic production is not sufficient to meet the growing demand for edible oils and animal feed. In fact, India is a big importer of soybean oil, with imports often exceeding domestic production. India relies on imports to meet a significant portion of its soybean oil needs,
with a large percentage coming from countries like Argentina and Brazil.
While China remains the largest export destination for US soybeans, India is seen as a growing market, especially for soybean oil. The war in Ukraine has led India to seek alternative sources for vegetable oils, potentially boosting soybean oil imports from countries like the US. India had restricted imports of Genetically Modified soybeans but had also temporarily relaxed these
restrictions in 2021 and 2022 to address shortages and rising prices.
To whatever extent is feasible, India could offer the US some more TRQs on specific American agricultural products like corn, soybeans and nuts while maintaining higher tariffs for quantities exceeding the quota. This could help to
provide some concessions to the US in sectors where it is demanding greater market access while still protecting domestic industries.
Dairy product imports remain a sensitive sector in India, where cultural and dietary preferences influence food choices, and some restrictions exist on imports, particularly concerning animal by-products in feed. India's dairy imports are relatively small, with a focus on specific products like butter oil, skimmed milk powder, and ingredients like lactose and whey protein, primarily
for industrial use. India does not currently offer TRQs for dairy imports and has halted such mechanisms since 2014. India also requires dairy imports to be certified as originating from animals not fed with feed containing ruminant or porcine byproducts, such as blood meal or meat and bone meal. Dairy products which do not meet this requirement cannot enter the Indian market.
In conclusion, Trump's tariffs and the penalty he is likely to put on India for purchasing Russian oil have undeniably introduced a new layer of complexity to the US-India relationship with significant geopolitical implications for India's foreign policy choices, economic trajectory, and regional standing. The tensions with the US are assuming dangerous proportions and the situation
cannot be brushed off lightly.
The writer is a retired Indian diplomat and had previously served as Ambassador in Kuwait and Morocco and as Consul General in New York. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump cancels August vacation in New Jersey to work on Russia-Ukraine
Trump cancels August vacation in New Jersey to work on Russia-Ukraine

Business Standard

time3 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump cancels August vacation in New Jersey to work on Russia-Ukraine

White House Press Secretary Leavitt said Trump skipped his usual vacation, considering working from Bedminster for a few weeks but ultimately deciding not to AP Washington The White House on Tuesday said President Donald Trump called off his traditional summer vacation in northern New Jersey due to the ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, confirmed the president's decision. This is normally the time when the president goes on vacation, but not this president, Leavitt said, adding that there were discussions about him working from Bedminster for a couple of weeks but he decided against it. Bedminster is the location of his club in northern New Jersey, where Trump often goes for weekends. He also spent some stretches of time in August there for vacation during his first term. The comments from Leavitt came when the White House took a portion of the day's press pool out to the renovated Rose Garden as the president tested out the area's new speakers. Earlier, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Dan Scavino posted footage showing off new speakers installed as part of Trump's makeover of the White House's Rose Garden. One of Trump's favourite songs, Lee Greenwood's God Bless the USA, blares in the video, over a shot showing patio-style tables shielded by yellow umbrellas. The shot later focuses in on an American flag overhead. Leavitt subsequently brought reporters to the Rose Garden and said Trump was controlling the playlist as crews tested the speakers for what will be the best event in the history of the White House. She said the next party there will be hopefully soon. Other songs being played included Whiter Shade of Pale by Procol Harum. The music was loud enough to be heard in other parts of the White House. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Putin calls Zelensky the West's illegitimate puppet. Can he talk peace with him?
Putin calls Zelensky the West's illegitimate puppet. Can he talk peace with him?

Mint

time3 minutes ago

  • Mint

Putin calls Zelensky the West's illegitimate puppet. Can he talk peace with him?

The first and only time Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, left, was in Paris in 2019. If Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees to meet his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, as urged by President Trump, he will come face-to-face with a man he has spent 3½ years excoriating as an illegitimate leader and puppet. Negotiating directly with Zelensky would run sharply counter to the narrative Putin has carefully constructed and sold to Russians in an effort to justify his 2022 invasion of Ukraine: that the war is part of a broader conflict with the West in which Zelensky and his country are mere pawns. Trump's call for a meeting puts Putin in a bind. If he declines, he risks angering the U.S. president, who has already threatened him with more sanctions. But sitting down with Zelensky could damage him politically with the Russian elite and the broader public. Trump said Tuesday that he was working to bring the two leaders together as the next phase in his efforts to forge a lasting peace in Ukraine, but he nodded to the challenge at hand. 'They haven't been exactly best friends," he said in an interview with Fox News, adding that Putin and Zelensky will have to iron out details of a possible meeting if they agree to one. The question of Putin's willingness to meet his Ukrainian counterpart has taken center stage following a Trump-Putin summit in Alaska and discussions Monday at the White House between Trump, Zelensky and European leaders. On Tuesday, Russian officials gave little indication they were working toward such a meeting. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said plans for any contacts between officials should be laid out 'with the utmost care." Other Russian officials ridiculed Zelensky as an unserious politician. Agreement from Putin to meet Zelensky won't likely come quickly—or easily. He has dismissed the Ukrainian leader repeatedly as a servant of the West, and has insisted that various complex issues be solved before the two leaders sit down. He has also questioned Zelensky's legitimacy after he extended his mandate beyond the usual five-year term, citing the problems with holding an election during a war. Putin has questioned his authority to sign any peace agreement. Ukrainian servicemen installing antidrone nets in the eastern Donetsk region words 'For Russia' on a wall in Mariupol, which Russian forces captured from Ukraine in 2022. Putin has said a meeting between the two leaders should come at the end of a peace process—and more as a formality to sign the necessary documents. 'I'm ready to meet, but if it's some kind of final stage, so we don't sit there endlessly dividing things up, but bring this to an end," he said in June. 'But we will need the signature of the legitimate authorities." The issues also go far beyond Zelensky. Putin sees the war as part of a broader Russian push to relitigate grievances the country has felt since the end of the Cold War, analysts say. Putin's engagement with the Trump administration is part of an effort to secure an agreement that goes far beyond territorial concessions in Ukraine and concerns the very makeup of Europe's security architecture. 'For Putin, this is a much wider confrontation with the West. And Ukraine is a battlefield between Russia and the West," said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. 'In Putin's eyes, Zelensky is not a player," she added. 'The fact Ukrainians are fighting at all is because of Western support." Most important, a meeting with Zelensky could end the delicate dance Putin has performed around Trump's peace efforts. To avoid more punishing sanctions, the Kremlin leader has professed his desire for peace while escalating offensives have won Russian troops important gains in the country's east. A summit with Zelensky could bring an unwelcome moment of truth. 'A meeting could indicate that he's really willing to negotiate the end of this war, and I don't think he's ready," said Samuel Charap, veteran Russia watcher and senior political analyst at Rand Corporation. The first and only time Putin met Zelensky was in 2019 at a very different moment in Russian-Ukrainian relations. At the time, Putin appeared to have high hopes for a relationship with his newly elected counterpart who had made peace with Russia a main campaign priority. The meeting between Putin and Zelensky was hailed as a step toward peace after Russia had seized Crimea and backed separatists in eastern Ukraine with soldiers and money. But far from being the start of a working relationship, disagreements erupted over the details of a peace deal, including disengagement across the front line. Ties quickly deteriorated thereafter and the two haven't met since. Since the start of the war, Zelensky has believed that he could make headway in his relationship with Putin if he could sit down face-to-face with the Kremlin leader, but he has also drawn the ire of Moscow by issuing a vaguely worded decree that calls talks with the Kremlin leader impossible. To satisfy Trump and Zelensky's own desire to meet, Putin has said he isn't opposed to talking face-to-face, but that various conditions would need to be met, including signals from Kyiv that it is ready to make serious concessions. Zelensky, for his part, has shown openness to meet without preconditions, most recently abandoning an earlier demand for a cease-fire to facilitate talks. 'If Ukraine begins setting various preconditions for a meeting—including justified ones regarding a cease-fire—then the Russians will present 100 of their own," he said after his meeting with Trump and European leaders in Washington on Monday. 'I think we should meet without conditions and explore what further progress there can be on this path to ending the war." Zelensky has successfully used the Kremlin leader's resistance against him. In May, Trump had expressed his desire for Putin to come to Turkey where he could meet face-to-face with Zelensky. When Putin passed up the chance, Zelensky flew into Turkey and bemoaned how the Kremlin was 'too afraid" to meet. This time, however, the political stakes are higher, adding pressure on the Kremlin leader. With rising demands from Trump and European leaders, Moscow has hinted it will double down on its refusal and continue to paint Zelensky as a dilettante that Putin shouldn't stoop to meet. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova went on the offensive on Tuesday to level accusations against the Ukrainian leader to justify Putin's own refusal to meet. Ultimately, analysts say, Putin is likely to pour cold water on the idea of a meeting without actually refusing one outright—a strategy he has previously deployed in response to calls for a cease-fire. Agreement over maximalist peace terms that Russia handed to Ukraine in Istanbul, according to Stanovaya, is likely to serve as Moscow's precondition for a meeting. Those terms include Ukraine's disarmament, political neutrality, and abandonment of its aspiration to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 'What Putin will say now is 'let's do it,' but first we need to talk about common documents we can finalize in such a meeting," she said. 'And we'll find ourselves in the same situation as before the Alaska summit." Write to Thomas Grove at and Matthew Luxmoore at

Trump administration to screen immigrants for ‘anti-American' views
Trump administration to screen immigrants for ‘anti-American' views

Mint

time3 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump administration to screen immigrants for ‘anti-American' views

The Trump administration plans to scrutinize social media for 'anti-American ideologies" when deciding to grant visa or green-card applications. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the primary agency in charge of legal immigration, said Tuesday that its officers should give significant weight to evidence that an immigrant 'has any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations" when reviewing residency, work and visa applications. When it comes to what registers as anti-American ideology, the updated guidance points to a provision of immigration law dating back to the Cold War that prohibits immigrants from becoming U.S. citizens if they are members of communist or anarchist organizations. It doesn't specify the range of speech the administration would categorize as anti-American. The Department of Homeland Security didn't respond to a request for clarification. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said Tuesday. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, a national immigrant advocacy group, said relying on broad phrases to determine eligibility to live and work in the U.S. could be problematic. 'The term anti-American is ill-defined and malleable," he said. 'What one person may consider anti-American another person might consider pro-American." The latest directive builds on the agency's April announcement that it would screen immigrants' social media for evidence of antisemitism. As part of that shift, many immigrants, including those applying for tourist or student visas to the U.S., must now submit their social-media handles and make their profiles public for officers to review. It is another step in the Trump administration's goal of not only reducing overall immigration levels, but also in shaping the types of immigrants permitted to come to the country. The administration has also used allegations of anti-American and antisemitic activity against students who have participated in pro-Palestine protests. The administration also tightened citizenship standards last week in a separate policy memorandum that said applicants will need to prove 'good moral character." That includes contributing to the community, having a good education, holding down a job and paying taxes on time, according to Homeland Security. Write to Jack Morphet at Victoria Albert at and Michelle Hackman at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store