No age limit on law, says Met Police chief as 83-year-old arrested at protest
The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm.
Reverend Sue Parfitt, 83, who was sat in a camp chair with placards at her feet, appeared to have been taken away by officers.
A woman seen lying on the ground in handcuffs was lifted by officers and put in a police van.
Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley was asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg whether it was a good use of police time after the priest was pictured being taken away from the demonstration.
He said: 'The law doesn't have an age limit, whether you're 18 or 80.
'If you're supporting proscribed organisations, then the law is going to be enforced.
'Officers, you could see, did it with great care and tried to preserve that person's dignity, but they're breaking a serious law.
'Palestine Action have over the last 18 months, I have to be careful what I say, because there's cases coming to trial, but some really serious criminal offences that they're accused of. There are millions of pounds worth of damage on multiple occasions. There are assaults, there are weapons used.
'It is not about protest. This is about an organisation committing serious criminality and obviously the Home Secretary was persuaded by the papers on her desk to proscribe them, that law has come into force, and if people want to defy that law, then we have to enforce it.'
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight.
The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
A group had earlier said it was set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries.
In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction, but we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.'
The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at RAF Brize Norton.
They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
28 minutes ago
- Metro
Bob Vylan singer supports Kneecap in first appearance since Glastonbury investig
Bob Vylan singer Bobby Vylan was snapped supporting Kneecap at Finsbury Park festival on Saturday afternoon, just a week on from his Glastonbury performance. Earlier this month, Worthy Farm's West Holt stage saw the punk duo – comprising of frontman Bobby Vylan and drummer Bobbie Vylan – get into some hot water. During their set, they led crowds at the festival into a frenzy with chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'death to the IDF',' which was broadcast on the BBC. The band is now being investigated by the police, with Glastonbury and the BBC calling out their performance. Making his first public appearance since the Glastonbury performance, Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, appeared in North London to support Kneecap. The Irish band have been famously pro-Palestine and their Glastonbury performance was not televised by the BBC, instead choosing to show Vylan's performance to audiences at home. Vylan was seen making his way through the crowds and looking on from the side of the stage as the Irish rap trio performed in the afternoon. Kneecap also performed at Glastonbury and has been critiqued for their comments about their bandmate Mo Chara's ongoing investigation. A member of the group told audiences to 'start a riot,' in reference to charges of terrorism levelled at Liam Óg (stage name Mo Chara) for allegedly displaying the flag of the proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah at a gig last year – charges which he has denied. Bandmate Naoise Ó Cairealláin said at the festival: 'It's not the first time there has been a miscarriage of justice for an Irish person in the British justice system. 'So, if anyone is available on 20th August at Westminster, we will go to support Mo Chara, we will start a riot outside the courts.' He then clarified a few moments later: 'I want to make a disclaimer. When we go support Mo Chara at the court case, I don't want anybody to start a riot. No riots, just love and support and more orderly support and support for Palestine.' Both Kneecap and Bob Vylan's Glastonbury sets are being investigated by police. In a statement posted online, Avon and Somerset police said it had decided 'further enquiries are required, and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken', with a senior detective appointed to lead the investigation. 'This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage. The investigation will be evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes,' it continued. 'We have received a large amount of contact in relation to these events from people across the world and recognise the strength of public feeling. There is absolutely no place in society for hate. Neighbourhood policing teams are speaking with people in their local communities and key stakeholders to make sure anyone who needs us knows that we are here for them.' The statement concluded with police writing: 'We hope the work we have carried out, and are continuing to carry out, reassures the public how seriously we are treating Saturday's events. We politely ask the public to refrain from continuing to report this matter to us because an investigation is already taking place.' While on stage at Finsbury Park on Saturday, July 5, Mo Chara aka Naoise O Caireallain, DJ Provai aka JJ Ó Dochartaigh and Moglai Bap aka Liam Og O Hannaidh spoke about their support for Palestine, with Mo Chara wearing a keffiyeh over his shoulders throughout the gig. More Trending The band stood in front of a screen that said, 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.' They also made their feelings about the British government and Keir Starmer clear after Starmer said that Kneecap performing at Glastonbury wouldn't be 'appropriate'. Kneecap shared a screenshot from his interview during their Finsbury Park gig writing: 'You know what's 'not appropriate' Keir?! Arming a f***ing genocide… [sic]'. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Glastonbury headliner's whopping fee revealed after controversial performance MORE: 'Donkeys are a lifeline in Gaza – it's vital we look after them' MORE: Fontaines D.C. fan told to 'put Palestinian t-shirt in the bin' at London gig
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Army barred from showing kit at Armed Forces Day, sparks anger
A Labour council has sparked fury after banning Army vehicles from its Armed Forces Day 'celebration' - over fears the military kit could enrage Pro-Palestine activists. York's council leader said the move to bar the local reserve unit from bringing its open-top Jackal was due to 'residents' concerns' - and 'reflects our city's diverse views'. But the decision outraged part-time soldiers from the Queen's Own Yeomanry, who reportedly withdrew entirely from the event in protest. It comes amid claims the decision was taken to avoid inflaming pro-Palestine demonstrators, with a whistle-blower telling military blog Fill Your Boots the council was worried about 'triggering a protest'. Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon was appalled at the claims and accused the council of 'capitulating' to activists like Palestine Action - which over the weekend was banned and branded a proscribed terror group. The former commander of the military's Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Regiment told MailOnline: 'It's absolutely bonkers if a Labour council is seemingly supporting a proscribed terrorist group over the army.' 'The military is there to protect the civilian community, but it seems at the moment whether you're an activist against climate change or anything else they get the rub of the green rather than the people doing the hard yards. 'It's a hugely disappointing and the people who serve us - the council and MPs - need to man up a bit and stand for those on the right side of the law rather than capitulating to the likes of Palestine Action, that's a proscribed terror group.' Speaking ahead of the event, Councillor Claire Douglas (pictured) - leader of York City Council - said the day was 'a show of unity, pride and community spirit'. And Martin Rowley, the city's lord mayor and an army veteran, said it was about thanking and celebrating 'all who serve or have served'. But in a post on Facebook, seen by MailOnline, Mr Rowley conceded: 'We could and should have handled this situation differently.' Local Tories hit out at the fiasco, with Councillor Chris Steward, leader of the York Conservative group, telling York Press : 'Military equipment is not a big part of Armed Forces Day by volume, but it is a crucial part. What use is any military without equipment? We totally condemn this decision of the Labour councillors. It shows how far the Labour Party has fallen from a proud, patriotic party which recognised the courageous and vital job our military do, to one more concerned how their actions may offend their increasingly extreme supporters who seem to want to protest against our long held values.' The council declined to comment on whether the decision to block the Jackal vehicle from attending was taken due to fear it could lead to protests. However, in a statement, Cllr Douglas said: 'With our military partners, we carefully considered residents' concerns and decided that the day will go ahead as planned, with the only change being no military equipment on show. This decision in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day and our deep respect and commitment to those who serve and have served.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
We must take to the streets and raise our voices for the world
More than 70 medics killed in 50 days. Entire health systems levelled. Children maimed, entire families erased and infrastructure bombed into dust, the illegal detention of medics and individuals, the torturing of these Palestinians and murder at the hands of the IDF when collecting food, the land grab in the West Bank! These are not unfortunate by-products of war – they are part of a deliberate and systematic campaign to destroy a people's ability to survive. And our government stands idly by, shielding Israel diplomatically and supplying weapons – including F-35 components – used to carry out this destruction. The UK High Court has now refused, in a legally weak decision, to halt arms exports, effectively greenlighting continued sales while Palestinians are slaughtered. And while brave UN officials speak out, Labour and Tory front benches compete in cowardice, too spineless to condemn crimes against humanity when they fear political fallout. Even the right to speak about Palestine is under attack. The proscription of Palestinian movements, the labelling of all resistance as terrorism, the censorship and threats faced by those who speak out – all form part of a growing war on free expression and dissent in the UK. The 100+ BBC journalists who have criticised the BBC for its spineless reporting on the Gaza Genocide speaks volumes The Arab world offers handwringing and silence. The US under Trump, and formerly Biden, has aided and encouraged Israel's brutality. But the Scottish people must speak with moral clarity. We say this clearly: You do not govern in our name. Scotland did not vote for the arming of an apartheid state. Scotland did not consent to being complicit in genocide. We demand an end to all arms exports to Israel, an end to diplomatic protection, and a public reckoning for those who have allowed this mass killing to continue unchallenged and that includes UK politicians! If Westminster will not act, then Scotland must. We must raise our voices, take to the streets and tell the world – we are not with them. Not now. Not ever. Enough. Not in our name. Peter Macari Aberdeen I AM glad that Stan Grodynski took the time to read and even re-read my recent long letter on the subject of the many policy promises made by and sadly broken by our SNP Scottish Government. In the minds of the public, these broken promises are often more relevant than the constant further promises of improvement, after 18 years in government, and the almost endless list of 'free' stuff which dominate the SNP's PR output these days. Stan has even invented a new political language – 'seemingly misleading, from reference to factual sources' is a phrase I have certainly never heard before. I do, however, agree with Stan that with Alex Salmond's passing, Scotland lost a powerful voice that his successors, both in the SNP and Alba parties, as well as in the wider independence movement, have struggled to emulate. I was initially attracted to Stan's suggestion that the SNP should separate the roles of first minister from 'someone else to step up and take the lead in campaigning for independence'. However, that says quite a lot about the ability of the current first minister and his apparent failure to lead the party as well as the Parliament. A reasonable person might expect the SNP's deputy leader to then lead the independence campaign but I suspect that more than 90% of the Scottish electorate, and even a fair number of SNP members, have no idea who that person actually is. I have to admire Stan's considerable efforts to defend both the SNP and the Scottish Government – especially as he is not even a member of the party. His volume of correspondence in this letters page as well as that of several other well-known newspapers is to his credit. It is a shame that the SNP and its considerable army of politicians, well-paid special advisers and spin doctors fail to do the same. The SNP have until May 2026 (appropriately, nine months) to conceive, gestate and produce a strategy which they can then ask the electorate to vote on. That strategy must include a viable route to independence. If the manifesto for 2026 to 2031 is restricted to a list of past achievements, vague promises of vast pots of independence jam tomorrow and better management of devolution, many potential SNP supporters will be asking: just what is the point – and who can blame them. PS. The SNP's current deputy leader is Keith Brown MSP. He has been in that post since June 8, 2018 – seven long years! John Baird Largs THE recent deliberations asked of the Supreme Court by the SNP were narrowly focused on the jurisdictional extent of the Scotland Act so far as relates to the power of the Scottish Government to hold a referendum. More to the point is that question so far as relates to the Treaty of Union. The Treaty of Union predates the Scotland Act. Scotland's jurisdiction outwith the ambit of the Scotland Act was not touched on and therefore remains. That would include the powers to hold a referendum. Calum I Duncan via email
