How Trump's Military Parade Compares to Others around The Globe
Black Hawk helicopters fly over Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall in Arlington, Virginia, during a celebration Wednesday of the Army's 250th anniversary.
President Donald Trump is set to realize on Saturday, as he turns 79, one of his long-standing ambitions: to host a major military parade in Washington.
While the idea might be novel for many Americans, military parades are common spectacles in many parts of the world. Trump was so taken by France's Bastille Day ceremonies in 2017 that he vowed to match or top them. 'It was one of the greatest parades I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters of the French festivities.
Under authoritarian regimes and strong democracies, as part of centuries-old traditions or to celebrate new victories, uniformed soldiers, horses, tanks and even missiles roll down thoroughfares in displays of might bound up in power projection and national identity.
'Americans aren't used to seeing these kinds of parades,' said David Kieran, historian of war and society in contemporary U.S. culture at Columbus State University in Georgia.
Ceremonial military reviews and parades celebrated wartime victories when the United States was a young republic through World War I, but the U.S. doesn't have a modern tradition of public military parades.
Since the end of World War II, the United States has put on only one major military parade: the National Victory Celebration in Washington after the 1991 Gulf War, under President George H.W. Bush. Troops marched and tanks rolled down Constitution Avenue.
Celebrations for the war lasted longer than the war itself, said David Fitzgerald, historian of the U.S. military at University College Cork in Ireland.
The homecoming of Vietnam War veterans was generally subdued, amid roiling debates, political fights and social unrest over the draft and the war. The first Gulf War, and the military parade in the capital, 'was the chance to say: America's back and the American military's back,' Fitzgerald said.
Around the world, parades tell national stories, he said.
'Any effort in memorialization is an effort to say this is who we are, this is what we believe, this what we value, these are the stories that matter to us … and help us understand how we're going to engage with the rest of the world,' Kieran said.
Here are some notable military parades around the world:
France
France holds an annual military parade to celebrate Bastille Day, which commemorates the storming by revolutionaries in 1789 of the Bastille, an old fortress turned state prison that came to symbolize monarchical tyranny.
A tradition since 1880 and major focal point in the historical memory of the French revolutionary era, it's the oldest and largest military parade in Europe – with about 6,500 people marching, 200 horses, 219 vehicles and almost 100 planes and helicopters. The tradition began after the country's wars with Prussia, and served as a 'reassertion of French military might,' Fitzgerald said.
The tradition serves a ceremonial purpose – but has also served diplomatic aims. In 2023, an Indian army contingent marched down the Champs-Élysées in the parade, before a crowd that included that year's guest of honor, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The year prior, the parade served as a salute to Ukraine, five months after Russia invaded the country.
In 2017, Trump told a reporter he thought the parade was a 'tremendous thing for France and for the spirit of France.'
Russia
Russia has commemorated Victory Day to celebrate the Soviet Union's victory over the Nazis in the Second World War.
Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin initially downplayed the holiday, in the immediate wake of the massive Soviet death toll, but it grew into a major celebration and commemoration. For Russian President Vladimir Putin, it has served to project confidence with foreign leaders in attendance, even as supporters of Ukraine seek to isolate Russia.
In last month's Victory Day parade, Moscow showcased Iskander ballistic missiles, rocket launchers and heavy flamethrower systems used in Ukraine. Nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missiles rolled through Red Square.
Britain
For more than 260 years, Britain has held a ceremony, including a parade, called Trooping the Colour, to celebrate the birthday of the monarch. In King Charles II's first parade, 1,400 soldiers, 200 horses and 300 musicians took part.
This year's parade is to take place the same day as Trump's – which happens to fall on his birthday.
Trooping the Colour and similar displays of pageantry play a major role in the royal family's image. They 'realized that to survive, they needed to tie in with a lot of pomp and circumstance and to make themselves sort of visible to the public in that way,' Fitzgerald said.
North Korea
North Korea puts on heavily publicized military parades marking various events and holidays – including the founding of the military, the republic and the Workers' Party of Korea. Sometimes, intercontinental ballistic missiles roll through Pyongyang. One parade in 2023 showcased at least 11 Hwasong-17 ICBMs.
'Our military powers have developed and evolved to an extent that no one else can dream of or amount to,' North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said at a parade in 2020, speaking from a new grand marble podium.
India
India holds its annual military parade on Republic Day, which celebrates the adoption of the Indian constitution. Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to attend in 2015.
China
Every decade, to mark the anniversary of Mao Zedong's proclamation establishing the People's Republic of China, the People's Liberation Army and Chinese Communist Party put on a parade with 100,000 performers including thousands of soldiers.
In 2009, the parade included not just troop and equipment formations but also a 'pageant' of grand floats surrounded by about 2,000 marchers, with themes such as 'Struggling and Initiating,' 'Scientific Development,' and 'Brilliant Achievement.'
Iran
Iran hosts a military parade on 'Sacred Defense Week,' marking the day Iraq started an eight-year war against Iran.
'This occasion offers a chance to reflect on the heroic sacrifices made by the brave individuals of our homeland, reminding everyone, particularly the youth, that the notion of global arrogance's invincibility took shape shortly after the Islamic Revolution's success,' the Iranian Armed Forces said ahead of last year's ceremonies.
United States
Historically, the U.S. staged military parades 'at the end of conflicts where there's been a decisive victory,' Kieran said.
The Korean War, Vietnam War and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ended on terms that left Americans without a clear victory and raised questions among segments of the public about the role the U.S. military in the world.
'They weren't really events that lent themselves to the kind of celebratory environment that a parade creates,' Kieran said.
The 1991 welcome-home celebration parade after Operation Desert Storm included 8,800 people marching with Patriot missiles systems and Abrams tanks. Part of the $12 million festivities was a seven-block-long display of weaponry that helped defeat Iraq.
Saturday's parade on Trump's birthday is a celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army.
'The military remains a deeply respected institution in American life,' Kieran said. But 'recognition of the service member' is often 'separated from the wars that those service members fight in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Social Media Battle Between Thailand and Cambodia
Civil wars, insurgencies, religious and ideological movements, and social and political tensions exist in all 11 nations of Southeast Asia and among the many communities they contain. However, since the end of the Cold War, the region has largely avoided one particular type of conflict: interstate war. It is unsurprising then, that when airstrikes and artillery barrages erupted along the disputed border between Thailand and Cambodia in late July, it made global headlines. The scale and intensity of the fighting was markedly different from that of the skirmishes that took place during the last border dispute from 2008-2011. While many factors have been observed as the roots of the war, what has been less explored and analyzed is the pre-existing tensions that exist between each state's ordinary citizens, especially following the border skirmish in May, who have rallied to their respective governments as the dispute has intensified, particularly on social media. From TikTok to X, Thai and Cambodian netizens have been waging a different kind of war, one based on insults, nationalistic hyperbole, and historical and cultural nostalgia. This has created echo chambers where an imagined sense of one's perceived innocence and superiority over the other justifies hatred and war. At a time of fragile peace, this sort of collective mentality remains a constant threat to the safety and security of thousands on both sides of the border. A History of Territorial Disputes The recent conflict between Thailand and Cambodia is a manifestation of the complicated relationship between the two countries. In 2008, a dispute over Preah Vihear temple, an 11th Century Angkorian temple situated on the border between the two countries, resulted in a standoff between Thailand and Cambodia that escalated into military conflict. A French colonial map of the area placed the temple on the Cambodian side of the border, but Thailand believed that this deviated from the terms of border treaties signed between French Indochina and the Kingdom of Siam in 1904 and 1907, and claimed it had never officially accepted the map. Although the International Court of Justice ruled in Cambodia's favor in 1962, giving it ownership over Preah Vihear, disputes over this and other surrounding parcels of land. The most recent incidents erupted from a minor skirmish at the border, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier on May 28; both countries blame the other for initiating the clash. Tensions escalated further on July 23, when Thai soldiers triggered a landmine, injuring five, following a similar incident a week earlier. Accusations once again flared, and Thailand recalled its ambassador from Phnom Penh. Early the next morning, fighting broke out at Ta Moan Thom, another temple along the border, which was followed by four more days of large-scale exchanges of firepower and air strikes, which ultimately killed at least 43 people, including civilians, and displaced more than 300,000. On July 28, both countries agreed to 'an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.' However, about eight hours after the newly implemented ceasefire, 20 Cambodian soldiers were detained by Thai forces for crossing the border, only two of which have since been returned. Nationalism and Social Media Before the Five-Day War Social media has long acted as a battleground in the everyday lives of Thais and Cambodians, nationalist sentiments bashing one another being a common sight. A quick search on any social media platform showcases many examples of defamation and nationalist pride that have garnered much attention and hatred even before tensions poured into a war. Well before the war, Cambodian netizens had accused Thailand of the cultural theft of music, ancient temples, and food, as well as rewriting or faking history to erase 'Khmer glory' from the Thai education system. This has led some to refer to it as 'Copyland.' Comments from various social media platforms have labelled Thailand as a 'bully,' claiming that Cambodians living in Thailand are treated without respect, abused without protection in the workforce, and that their children are denied rights. Alongside the bashing of Thailand, a recent upsurge of a TikTok trend of users dressed in Cambodian uniforms dancing to the song 'Weapons,' by Cambodian Artists La Cima Cartel, All3rgy, and Hasha had obvious undertones of nationalism that propelled many Cambodians to rally around their government following the initial clash in May. Conversely, hostile discourse by Thais is not uncommon. 'Scambodia,' 'CampuChina,' 'Xi Jinping's playground,' and 'mini China,' are all derogatory nicknames that Thai social media users have given to Cambodia in the comment sections of various social media sites before the events of July 24. This phenomenon has created a foundation of mistrust on platforms that are less visible to outsiders yet extremely influential in an age of digital technology, creating the conditions for an explosion of online animosity after the conflict broke out. Continuing Tensions #Save Thailand, #ThailandOpenedFire, 'Angkor Wat will belong to Thailand,' 'Cambodia Attacking Hospital.' These are just a few of the many recent comments under a TikTok video of two Western travel-vloggers who shared their experiences having visited Cambodia weeks before the war began. There is no doubt that the preexisting adversity between the two states before the outbreak of the conflict blew into a massive social media battleground still active a week after the ceasefire. Many themes that dominated the social media tug-of-war before 24 July — moral superiority, cultural history, good governance, respectable royalty — became sharper and more pronounced afterwards. Recent social media posts include comparisons of royal family members, a favorite target of Cambodian users being Thailand's Prince Dipangkorn Rasmijoti who has been frequently contrasted against Cambodia's Princess Norodom Jenna, usually subjected to shameful emojis and captions. Thai netizens are no better, posting edits of their air force's military gains during the clashes or the country's supposed help toward Cambodian refugees in 1979. Even against the backdrop of a nominal ceasefire, the generalization and abuse of issues as trivial and mundane as the two prime ministers' English accents during the ceasefire agreement have become weapons disrupting an atmosphere of stability on the internet. AI tools have been used extensively to serve up the same propaganda and slander, for instance, to reimagine a false, glorified conclusion to the conflict. In addition to amplifying the existing social media animosity, the outbreak of war has also led both sides to accuse each other of firing the first shot. This has been followed by a flood of tit-for-tat requests for justice and accountability, veiled in self-righteousness. On X, Cambodian op-eds from their national newspapers and captioned images still condemning the Thai military for 'a calculated act of intimidation against a peaceful neighbour' have been posted as recently as August 4, while pro-Thai posts have similarly pictured Cambodia as a false victim of a war it started. Nationalist social media posts continue to be uploaded ambitiously. Videos of both sides accusing each other of breaking the ceasefire have also surfaced well into the first week of August. The constant animosity on social media between politicians from both countries, including big names such as Thaksin Shinawatra and Hun Sen, only increased tensions, rallying nationalistic crowds, rallying nationalistic crowds, both to agree and add insults, under every post. A Mentality of Conflict Persists While social media banter and its influence on nationalistic and jingoistic rhetoric is not new, its effects have created a collective opposition to lasting peace between Thailand and Cambodia. As part of a reply on a TikTok video posted a few days ago — 'just protect and fight back' — connotes, the desire for conflict has not been quelled. While there have been calls for peace and stability in the region, such optimism is usually overshadowed by unresolved grievances and a confused need for netizens to fulfill their own definitions of justice, created in an echo chamber of like-minded people. Social media users on both sides continue to justify the violence as a necessary reaction to aggression from each other, rather than calling for the two nations to transcend their dispute in the interests of reconciliation and cooperation. On the ground, as the ceasefire remains fragile, both militaries are on high alert, and distrust between the two governments runs deep. 'It can erupt at any time,' one Thai politician commented, on the possibility of renewed conflict. Online, the social media war shows no signs of slowing down. It is important to recognize that one of the contributors to a lack of widespread opposition to the war from both sides has been the fact that social media had already laid the groundwork of distrust and antagonism. If cool-headed leaders on both sides are unable to rise above the online noise, the continuing tug-of-war on social media may pull the two nations into yet another series of border clashes.
The Mainichi
7 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Senegal president hopes for Japanese support for Africa's digital growth
DAKAR (Kyodo) -- The president of Senegal has expressed hope for Japanese support for boosting technological and digital development in Africa to help grow the continent's economy. In a recent interview ahead of the ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development in Japan, Diomaye Faye said that he believes taking advantage of Japan's edge in the field will lead to providing "transformative solutions for African economies." The remarks by Faye, who became the youngest president in Senegal's history in April last year at the age of 44, come ahead of the start of the TICAD conference on Wednesday in Yokohama near Tokyo. Faye is hoping to tap into the region's large young population for the development of human resources. This year's TICAD conference will tackle issues such as empowerment of youth and women. Faye described the gathering as a "great opportunity to strengthen and diversify cooperation between Africa and Japan." While stressing the importance of TICAD as a forum for multilateral cooperation, he said he is concerned that "multilateralism is taking a significant step backward," in an apparent reference to U.S. President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy. Faye called on Japan, Africa and partners around the world "to strengthen this multilateralism" and make it "fairer." Faye won last year's presidential election as an opposition candidate, marking the third democratic regime change in the country after 2000 and 2012. In recent years, West Africa has experienced military coups, prompting the French military to withdraw from the area. Although Senegal has never experienced a coup since its independence from France in 1960, it has requested French troops to leave, ending their permanent deployment in July.
The Mainichi
10 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Residents accused of 'spying' for US military killed on Okinawa island even after WWII's end
KUMEJIMA, Okinawa -- Even after the radio broadcast of then Emperor Hirohito (posthumously known as Emperor Showa) announcing the end of World War II in Japan in the summer of 1945, tragedies continued on Kume Island, about 100 kilometers west of Okinawa's main island. On Aug. 18, 1945, three days after the nationwide broadcast, a man was killed along with his wife and child after he called for residents to surrender. On Aug. 20, a family of seven headed by a Korean man were brutally murdered. Five of them were children including an infant. The assailants were a Japanese military unit led by Tadashi Kayama. In Okinawa, where a ground battle between Japanese and U.S. forces took place, organizational combat had come to an end in late June following the suicide of a Japanese military commander. The Kayama unit, however, did not surrender to the U.S. military, and around 30 soldiers hid themselves on Mount Uegusuku. After U.S. troops landed on Kume Island on June 26, the Kayama unit killed residents one after the other who had connections with the U.S. military. A man who brought a document believed to be a surrender notice to the unit at the request of U.S. forces was executed by the unit leader. A total of nine locals -- including at least one resident who was temporarily captured by the U.S. military and their family members -- were labeled as "spies" and killed. "The Japanese military was even scarier," one resident recounted, while another said, "If you talked to Americans, it became such a big deal. They (the Japanese military) would instantly accuse you of spying," according to testimonies recorded in the town history of Kumejima. The Kayama unit, which locals feared as "mountain troops," surrendered on Sept. 7. By that time, the lives of 20 local residents had been claimed.
